Fix build of 4.14 kernel in dunfell OE#4
Merged
gratian merged 1 commit intoni:nilrt/master/4.14from Aug 19, 2020
Merged
Conversation
commit f73b3cc upstream. If the build user has the CFLAGS variable set in their environment, objtool blindly appends to it, which can cause unexpected behavior. Clobber CFLAGS to ensure consistent objtool compilation behavior. Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/83a276df209962e6058fcb6c615eef9d401c21bc.1567121311.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CC: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Author
|
@ni/rtos |
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Nov 4, 2020
Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the
following lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30
kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0
alloc_inode+0x81/0x90
iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0
kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210
sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
path_mount+0x70f/0xa80
do_mount+0x75/0x90
__x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80
sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0
kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0
kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60
vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
fc_mount+0xe/0x40
vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90
btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60
vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
path_mount+0x70f/0xa80
do_mount+0x75/0x90
__x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs]
check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs]
btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs]
run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs]
writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs]
__extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs]
extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x40/0xe0
__writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610
writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500
wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0
wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0
wb_workfn+0x81/0x340
process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0
worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
kthread+0x137/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs]
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs]
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs]
evict+0xd6/0x1c0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0
shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0
balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750
kswapd+0x206/0x4d0
kthread+0x137/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(kernfs_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/76:
#0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0
#2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x77/0x97
check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
? save_trace+0x50/0x470
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20
? save_trace+0x50/0x470
__lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs]
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs]
evict+0xd6/0x1c0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0
shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0
balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750
kswapd+0x206/0x4d0
? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750
kthread+0x137/0x150
? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start
adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency
on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before
we start doing anything with sysfs.
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Nov 4, 2020
Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 ni#6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee ni#7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b ni#8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 ni#9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 ni#10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 ni#11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Nov 4, 2020
When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item
for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the
tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat
(with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs]
btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by btrfs/24552:
#0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0
#1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs]
#2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs]
#3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs]
#4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x77/0x97
check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the
qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue
processing roots.
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Nov 17, 2020
The two commits below add up to a cpuset might_sleep() splat for RT: 8447a0f cpuset: convert callback_mutex to a spinlock 344736f cpuset: simplify cpuset_node_allowed API BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:995 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 11718, name: cset CPU: 135 PID: 11718 Comm: cset Tainted: G E 4.10.0-rt1-rt #4 Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND, BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014 Call Trace: ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81 ? ___might_sleep+0xf4/0x170 ? rt_spin_lock+0x1c/0x50 ? __cpuset_node_allowed+0x66/0xc0 ? ___slab_alloc+0x390/0x570 <disables IRQs> ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? copy_page_range+0x6cf/0xb00 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? __slab_alloc.isra.74+0x5a/0x81 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b5/0x1f0 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? copy_process.part.35+0x1670/0x1ee0 ? _do_fork+0xdd/0x3f0 ? _do_fork+0xdd/0x3f0 ? do_syscall_64+0x61/0x170 ? entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 The later ensured that a NUMA box WILL take callback_lock in atomic context by removing the allocator and reclaim path __GFP_HARDWALL usage which prevented such contexts from taking callback_mutex. One option would be to reinstate __GFP_HARDWALL protections for RT, however, as the 8447a0f changelog states: The callback_mutex is only used to synchronize reads/updates of cpusets' flags and cpu/node masks. These operations should always proceed fast so there's no reason why we can't use a spinlock instead of the mutex. Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
When requeueing all requests on the device request queue to the blocklayer we might get to an ERP (error recovery) request that is a copy of an original CQR. Those requests do not have blocklayer request information or a pointer to the dasd_queue set. When trying to access those data it will lead to a null pointer dereference in dasd_requeue_all_requests(). Fix by checking if the request is an ERP request that can simply be ignored. The blocklayer request will be requeued by the original CQR that is on the device queue right behind the ERP request. Fixes: 9487cfd ("s390/dasd: fix handling of internal requests") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.16 Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
This fix is for a failure that occurred in the DWARF unwind perf test.
Stack unwinders may probe memory when looking for frames.
Memory sanitizer will poison and track uninitialized memory on the
stack, and on the heap if the value is copied to the heap.
This can lead to false memory sanitizer failures for the use of an
uninitialized value.
Avoid this problem by removing the poison on the copied stack.
The full msan failure with track origins looks like:
==2168==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x559ceb10755b in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106acf in __libdwfl_frame_reg_set elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:77:22
#1 0x559ceb106acf in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:627:13
#2 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#3 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#9 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#10 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#11 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#12 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#13 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#14 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#15 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#16 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#21 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#22 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#23 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#24 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106a54 in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:613:9
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceaff8800 in memory_read tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:156:10
#1 0x559ceb10f053 in expr_eval elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:501:13
#2 0x559ceb1060cc in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:603:18
#3 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#4 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#9 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#10 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#11 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#12 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#13 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#14 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#15 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#16 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#17 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#19 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#21 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#22 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#23 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#24 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#25 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559cea9027d9 in __msan_memcpy llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1558:3
#1 0x559cea9d2185 in sample_ustack tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:41:2
#2 0x559cea9d202c in test__arch_unwind_sample tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:72:9
#3 0x559ceabc9cbd in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:106:6
#4 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#5 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#6 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#7 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#8 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#9 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#10 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#11 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#12 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#13 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#14 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#15 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#16 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#17 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'bf' in the stack frame of function 'perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events'
#0 0x559ceafc5f60 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c:445
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 in handle_cfi
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@google.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201113182053.754625-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
adapter->tx_scrq and adapter->rx_scrq could be NULL if the previous reset did not complete after freeing sub crqs. Check for NULL before dereferencing them. Snippet of call trace: ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Releasing sub-CRQ ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Releasing CRQ ... ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Got Control IP offload Response ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Re-setting tx_scrq[0] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000000 Faulting instruction address: 0xc008000003dea7cc Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_counter nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables xsk_diag tcp_diag udp_diag raw_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag tun bridge stp llc rfkill sunrpc pseries_rng xts vmx_crypto uio_pdrv_genirq uio binfmt_misc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvscsi ibmvnic ibmveth scsi_transport_srp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 80 PID: 1856 Comm: kworker/80:2 Tainted: G W 5.8.0+ #4 Workqueue: events __ibmvnic_reset [ibmvnic] NIP: c008000003dea7cc LR: c008000003dea7bc CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c0000007ef7db860 TRAP: 0380 Tainted: G W (5.8.0+) MSR: 800000000280b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28002422 XER: 0000000d CFAR: c000000000bd9520 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c008000003dea7bc c0000007ef7dbaf0 c008000003df7400 c0000007fa26ec00 GPR04: c0000007fcd0d008 c0000007fcd96350 0000000000000027 c0000007fcd0d010 GPR08: 0000000000000023 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR12: 0000000000002000 c00000001ec18e00 c0000000001982f8 c0000007bad6e840 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 fffffffffffffef7 GPR24: 0000000000000402 c0000007fa26f3a8 0000000000000003 c00000016f8ec048 GPR28: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000007fa26ec00 NIP [c008000003dea7cc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x15c/0x258 [ibmvnic] LR [c008000003dea7bc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x14c/0x258 [ibmvnic] Call Trace: [c0000007ef7dbaf0] [c008000003dea7bc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x14c/0x258 [ibmvnic] (unreliable) [c0000007ef7dbb80] [c008000003de8860] __ibmvnic_reset+0x408/0x970 [ibmvnic] [c0000007ef7dbc50] [c00000000018b7cc] process_one_work+0x2cc/0x800 [c0000007ef7dbd20] [c00000000018bd78] worker_thread+0x78/0x520 [c0000007ef7dbdb0] [c0000000001984c4] kthread+0x1d4/0x1e0 [c0000007ef7dbe20] [c00000000000cea8] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 Fixes: 57a4943 ("ibmvnic: Reset sub-crqs during driver reset") Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master KVM/arm64 fixes for v5.10, take #4 - Fix alignment of the new HYP sections - Fix GICR_TYPER access from userspace
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 ni#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 ni#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 ni#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 ni#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 ni#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 ni#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 ni#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 ni#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit ca10845 ] While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2020
commit 6f117cb upstream. When requeueing all requests on the device request queue to the blocklayer we might get to an ERP (error recovery) request that is a copy of an original CQR. Those requests do not have blocklayer request information or a pointer to the dasd_queue set. When trying to access those data it will lead to a null pointer dereference in dasd_requeue_all_requests(). Fix by checking if the request is an ERP request that can simply be ignored. The blocklayer request will be requeued by the original CQR that is on the device queue right behind the ERP request. Fixes: 9487cfd ("s390/dasd: fix handling of internal requests") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.16 Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit d715ff8 ] The purpose of srv_mutex is to protect srv_list as in put_srv, so no need to hold it when allocate memory for srv since it could be time consuming. Otherwise if one machine has limited memory, rsrv_close_work could be blocked for a longer time due to the mutex is held by get_or_create_srv since it can't get memory in time. INFO: task kworker/1:1:27478 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G O 4.14.171-1-storage #4.14.171-1.3~deb9 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kworker/1:1 D 0 27478 2 0x80000000 Workqueue: rtrs_server_wq rtrs_srv_close_work [rtrs_server] Call Trace: ? __schedule+0x38c/0x7e0 schedule+0x32/0x80 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10 __mutex_lock.isra.2+0x25e/0x4d0 ? put_srv+0x44/0x100 [rtrs_server] put_srv+0x44/0x100 [rtrs_server] rtrs_srv_close_work+0x16c/0x280 [rtrs_server] process_one_work+0x1c5/0x3c0 worker_thread+0x47/0x3e0 kthread+0xfc/0x130 ? trace_event_raw_event_workqueue_execute_start+0xa0/0xa0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Let's move all the logics from __find_srv_and_get and __alloc_srv to get_or_create_srv, and remove the two functions. Then it should be safe for multiple processes to access the same srv since it is protected with srv_mutex. And since we don't want to allocate chunks with srv_mutex held, let's check the srv->refcount after get srv because the chunks could not be allocated yet. Fixes: 9cb8374 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023074353.21946-6-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit 4a9d81c ] If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration process will fall into an endless loop. kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137] PID: 17137 TASK: ffff8818d93c0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "nfsd" [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76] RIP: ffffffffc00e817c RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff881dc0c38298 RBX: ffffffff81b03580 RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50 RDX: ffff881e3fce8500 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81b03580 RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0 R8: 0000000000000020 R9: ffff8818d3aefd40 R10: ffff88017fc03800 R11: ffff8818e83933c0 R12: ffff8818d3aefd40 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8818e8391068 R15: ffff8818fa6e4000 CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace] #1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd] #2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd] #3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd] #4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd] #5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc] #6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc] #7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd] #8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607 The troublemake elem: crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298 struct lock_manager { list = { next = 0xffff881dc0c38298, prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298 }, block_opens = false } Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2021
commit 00c3348 upstream. Mismatch in probe platform_set_drvdata set's and method's that call dev_get_platdata will result in "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference", let's use according method for getting driver data after platform_set_drvdata. 8<--- cut here --- Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = (ptrval) [00000000] *pgd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.9.10-00003-g723e101e0037-dirty #4 Hardware name: Technologic Systems TS-72xx SBC PC is at ep93xx_rtc_read_time+0xc/0x2c LR is at __rtc_read_time+0x4c/0x8c [...] [<c02b01c8>] (ep93xx_rtc_read_time) from [<c02ac38c>] (__rtc_read_time+0x4c/0x8c) [<c02ac38c>] (__rtc_read_time) from [<c02ac3f8>] (rtc_read_time+0x2c/0x4c) [<c02ac3f8>] (rtc_read_time) from [<c02acc54>] (__rtc_read_alarm+0x28/0x358) [<c02acc54>] (__rtc_read_alarm) from [<c02abd80>] (__rtc_register_device+0x124/0x2ec) [<c02abd80>] (__rtc_register_device) from [<c02b028c>] (ep93xx_rtc_probe+0xa4/0xac) [<c02b028c>] (ep93xx_rtc_probe) from [<c026424c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x24/0x5c) [<c026424c>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c0262918>] (really_probe+0x218/0x374) [<c0262918>] (really_probe) from [<c0262da0>] (device_driver_attach+0x44/0x60) [<c0262da0>] (device_driver_attach) from [<c0262e70>] (__driver_attach+0xb4/0xc0) [<c0262e70>] (__driver_attach) from [<c0260d44>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xac) [<c0260d44>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c026223c>] (driver_attach+0x18/0x24) [<c026223c>] (driver_attach) from [<c0261dd8>] (bus_add_driver+0x150/0x1b4) [<c0261dd8>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c026342c>] (driver_register+0xb0/0xf4) [<c026342c>] (driver_register) from [<c0264210>] (__platform_driver_register+0x30/0x48) [<c0264210>] (__platform_driver_register) from [<c04cb9ac>] (ep93xx_rtc_driver_init+0x10/0x1c) [<c04cb9ac>] (ep93xx_rtc_driver_init) from [<c000973c>] (do_one_initcall+0x7c/0x1c0) [<c000973c>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c04b9ecc>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x168/0x1ac) [<c04b9ecc>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c03b2228>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xf4) [<c03b2228>] (kernel_init) from [<c00082c0>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34) Exception stack(0xc441dfb0 to 0xc441dff8) dfa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 dfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 dfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Code: e12fff1e e92d4010 e590303c e1a02001 (e5933000) ---[ end trace c914d6030eaa95c8 ]--- Fixes: b809d19 ("rtc: ep93xx: stop setting platform_data") Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201095507.10317-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit d9e4498 ] Like other tunneling interfaces, the bareudp doesn't need TXLOCK. So, It is good to set the NETIF_F_LLTX flag to improve performance and to avoid lockdep's false-positive warning. Test commands: ip netns add A ip netns add B ip link add veth0 netns A type veth peer name veth1 netns B ip netns exec A ip link set veth0 up ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev veth0 ip netns exec B ip link set veth1 up ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev veth1 for i in {2..1} do let A=$i-1 ip netns exec A ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \ dstport $i ethertype ip ip netns exec A ip link set bareudp$i up ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.$i.1/24 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec A ip r a 10.0.$i.2 encap ip src 10.0.$A.1 \ dst 10.0.$A.2 via 10.0.$i.2 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec B ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \ dstport $i ethertype ip ip netns exec B ip link set bareudp$i up ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.$i.2/24 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec B ip r a 10.0.$i.1 encap ip src 10.0.$A.2 \ dst 10.0.$A.1 via 10.0.$i.1 dev bareudp$i done ip netns exec A ping 10.0.2.2 Splat looks like: [ 96.992803][ T822] ============================================ [ 96.993954][ T822] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 96.995102][ T822] 5.10.0+ #819 Not tainted [ 96.995927][ T822] -------------------------------------------- [ 96.997091][ T822] ping/822 is trying to acquire lock: [ 96.998083][ T822] ffff88810f753898 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 96.999813][ T822] [ 96.999813][ T822] but task is already holding lock: [ 97.001192][ T822] ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.002908][ T822] [ 97.002908][ T822] other info that might help us debug this: [ 97.004401][ T822] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 97.004401][ T822] [ 97.005784][ T822] CPU0 [ 97.006407][ T822] ---- [ 97.007010][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2); [ 97.007779][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2); [ 97.008550][ T822] [ 97.008550][ T822] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 97.008550][ T822] [ 97.010057][ T822] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 97.010057][ T822] [ 97.011594][ T822] 7 locks held by ping/822: [ 97.012426][ T822] #0: ffff888109a144f0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0x12f7/0x2b00 [ 97.014191][ T822] #1: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020 [ 97.016045][ T822] #2: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960 [ 97.017897][ T822] #3: ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.019684][ T822] #4: ffffffffbce2f600 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bareudp_xmit+0x31b/0x3690 [bareudp] [ 97.021573][ T822] #5: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020 [ 97.023424][ T822] #6: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960 [ 97.025259][ T822] [ 97.025259][ T822] stack backtrace: [ 97.026349][ T822] CPU: 3 PID: 822 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0+ #819 [ 97.027609][ T822] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 97.029407][ T822] Call Trace: [ 97.030015][ T822] dump_stack+0x99/0xcb [ 97.030783][ T822] __lock_acquire.cold.77+0x149/0x3a9 [ 97.031773][ T822] ? stack_trace_save+0x81/0xa0 [ 97.032661][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910 [ 97.033673][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910 [ 97.034679][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 [ 97.035697][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 97.036690][ T822] lock_acquire+0x1b2/0x730 [ 97.037515][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.038466][ T822] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50 [ 97.039277][ T822] ? netif_skb_features+0x296/0x9c0 [ 97.040226][ T822] ? validate_xmit_skb+0x29/0xb10 [ 97.041151][ T822] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [ 97.041977][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.042927][ T822] __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.043852][ T822] ? netdev_core_pick_tx+0x290/0x290 [ 97.044824][ T822] ? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120 [ 97.045712][ T822] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0 [ 97.046824][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 [ 97.047771][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.048710][ T822] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x41/0x120 [ 97.049626][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.050556][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 [ 97.051509][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.052443][ T822] ? check_chain_key+0x244/0x5f0 [ 97.053352][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x56/0xa0 [ 97.054317][ T822] ? ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020 [ 97.055263][ T822] ? pneigh_lookup+0x410/0x410 [ 97.056135][ T822] ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020 [ ... ] Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Fixes: 571912c ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228152136.24215-1-ap420073@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2021
commit 3a21777 upstream. We had kernel panic, it is caused by unload module and last close confirmation. call trace: [1196029.743127] free_sess+0x15/0x50 [rtrs_client] [1196029.743128] rtrs_clt_close+0x4c/0x70 [rtrs_client] [1196029.743129] ? rnbd_clt_unmap_device+0x1b0/0x1b0 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743130] close_rtrs+0x25/0x50 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743131] rnbd_client_exit+0x93/0xb99 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743132] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x190/0x260 And in the crashdump confirmation kworker is also running. PID: 6943 TASK: ffff9e2ac8098000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "kworker/4:2" #0 [ffffb206cf337c30] __schedule at ffffffff9f93f891 #1 [ffffb206cf337cc8] schedule at ffffffff9f93fe98 #2 [ffffb206cf337cd0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9f943938 #3 [ffffb206cf337d50] wait_for_completion at ffffffff9f9410a7 #4 [ffffb206cf337da0] __flush_work at ffffffff9f08ce0e #5 [ffffb206cf337e20] rtrs_clt_close_conns at ffffffffc0d5f668 [rtrs_client] #6 [ffffb206cf337e48] rtrs_clt_close at ffffffffc0d5f801 [rtrs_client] #7 [ffffb206cf337e68] close_rtrs at ffffffffc0d26255 [rnbd_client] #8 [ffffb206cf337e78] free_sess at ffffffffc0d262ad [rnbd_client] #9 [ffffb206cf337e88] rnbd_clt_put_dev at ffffffffc0d266a7 [rnbd_client] The problem is both code path try to close same session, which lead to panic. To fix it, just skip the sess if the refcount already drop to 0. Fixes: f7a7a5c ("block/rnbd: client: main functionality") Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
commit caab13b upstream. Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init, we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs: " AT91: Could not find identification node" Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list. Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+ Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201211135846.1334322-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
…st[] commit 6808965 upstream. of_match_node() calls __of_match_node() which loops though the entries of matches array. It stops when condition: (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) is false. Thus, add a null entry at the end of at91_soc_allowed_list[] array. Fixes: caab13b ("drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+ Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
[ Upstream commit c1c3ba1 ] If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during skl_tplg_complete: [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000078 [ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 26.566897] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 26.572642] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 26.575479] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 26.580158] CPU: 2 PID: 2082 Comm: udevd Tainted: G C 5.4.81 #4 [ 26.588232] Hardware name: HP Soraka/Soraka, BIOS Google_Soraka.10431.106.0 12/03/2019 [ 26.597082] RIP: 0010:skl_tplg_complete+0x70/0x144 [snd_soc_skl] Fixes: 2d744ec ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Automatic DMIC format configuration according to information from NHL") Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@semihalf.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121171644.131059-1-ribalda@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
[ Upstream commit 7f9942c ] Building with the clang integrated assembler produces a couple of errors for the s3c24xx fiq support: arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:52:2: error: instruction 'subne' can not set flags, but 's' suffix specified subnes pc, lr, #4 @@ return, still have work to do arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:64:1: error: invalid symbol redefinition s3c24xx_spi_fiq_txrx: There are apparently two problems: one with extraneous or duplicate labels, and one with old-style opcode mnemonics. Stefan Agner has previously fixed other problems like this, but missed this particular file. Fixes: bec0806 ("spi_s3c24xx: add FIQ pseudo-DMA support") Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204162416.3030114-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
[ Upstream commit c5c97ca ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210214091638.519643-1-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2021
commit 4d14c5c upstream Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits: * ae5e070 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction") * 6f23277 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle") Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime: PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex: PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state. Fixes: c53e965 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2021
commit ac0bbf5 upstream. The digital input subdevice supports Comedi asynchronous commands that read interrupt status information. This uses 16-bit Comedi samples (of which only the bottom 8 bits contain status information). However, the interrupt handler is calling `comedi_buf_write_samples()` with the address of a 32-bit variable `unsigned int status`. On a bigendian machine, this will copy 2 bytes from the wrong end of the variable. Fix it by changing the type of the variable to `unsigned short`. Fixes: a8c66b6 ("staging: comedi: addi_apci_1500: rewrite the subdevice support functions") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.0+ Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210223143055.257402-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jpautler
pushed a commit
to jpautler/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2021
commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ni#1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ni#2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 ni#3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 ni#4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 ni#5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 ni#6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 ni#7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 ni#8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 ni#9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 ni#10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 ni#11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 ni#14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 ni#15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 ni#16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 ni#17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ni#18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame ni#2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jpautler
pushed a commit
to jpautler/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ] We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ni#4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> ni#1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jpautler
pushed a commit
to jpautler/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ni#5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> ni#1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jpautler
pushed a commit
to jpautler/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit f0caea8 ] Olga reports seeing the following Oops when doing O_DIRECT writes to a pNFS flexfiles server: Oops: 0000 [ni#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 234186 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4+ ni#4 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 Workqueue: nfsiod rpc_async_release [sunrpc] RIP: 0010:nfs_mark_request_commit+0x12/0x30 [nfs] Code: ff ff be 03 00 00 00 e8 ac 34 83 eb e9 29 ff ff ff e8 22 bc d7 eb 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 f6 74 16 48 8b 42 10 48 8b 40 18 <48> 8b 40 18 48 85 c0 74 05 e9 70 fc 15 ec 48 89 d6 e9 68 ed ff ff RSP: 0018:ffffa82f0159fe00 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8f3393141880 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffffa82f0159fe08 RSI: ffff8f3381252500 RDI: ffff8f3393141880 RBP: ffff8f33ac317c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f3487724cb0 R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffff8f3485bccee0 R14: ffff8f33ac317c10 R15: ffff8f33ac317cd8 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f34fbc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000122120006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: nfs_direct_write_completion+0x13b/0x250 [nfs] rpc_free_task+0x39/0x60 [sunrpc] rpc_async_release+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc] process_one_work+0x1ce/0x370 worker_thread+0x30/0x380 ? process_one_work+0x370/0x370 kthread+0x11a/0x140 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> Fixes: 9c455a8 ("NFS/pNFS: Clean up pNFS commit operations") Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jpautler
pushed a commit
to jpautler/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 54659ca ] when turning off a connection, lockdep complains with the following warning (a modprobe has been done but the same happens with a disconnection from NetworkManager, it's enough to trigger a cfg80211_disconnect call): [ 682.855867] ====================================================== [ 682.855877] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 682.855887] 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 Tainted: G C OE [ 682.855898] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 682.855906] modprobe/1770 is trying to acquire lock: [ 682.855916] ffffb6d000332b00 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856073] but task is already holding lock: [ 682.856081] ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856207] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 682.856215] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 682.856223] -> ni#1 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.856247] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.856265] rtw_get_stainfo+0x9a/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856389] rtw_xmit_classifier+0x27/0x130 [r8723bs] [ 682.856515] rtw_xmitframe_enqueue+0xa/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 682.856642] rtl8723bs_hal_xmit+0x3b/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856752] rtw_xmit+0x4ef/0x890 [r8723bs] [ 682.856879] _rtw_xmit_entry+0xba/0x350 [r8723bs] [ 682.856981] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xee/0x320 [ 682.856999] sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x330 [ 682.857014] __dev_queue_xmit+0xba5/0xf00 [ 682.857030] packet_sendmsg+0x981/0x1b80 [ 682.857047] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 [ 682.857060] __sys_sendto+0xf1/0x160 [ 682.857073] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 682.857087] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.857102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.857117] -> #0 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.857142] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.857158] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.857172] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.857185] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.857308] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.857415] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.857522] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.857759] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.857961] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.858163] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.858180] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.858195] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.858209] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.858225] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.858240] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.858255] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.858360] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.858463] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.858532] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.858550] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.858564] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.858579] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.858685] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.858699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.858715] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.858729] other info that might help us debug this: [ 682.858737] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 682.858744] CPU0 CPU1 [ 682.858751] ---- ---- [ 682.858758] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858772] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858786] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858799] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858812] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 682.858820] 5 locks held by modprobe/1770: [ 682.858831] #0: ffff8d870697d980 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x1a/0x1d0 [ 682.858869] ni#1: ffffffffbdbbf1c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: unregister_netdev+0xe/0x20 [ 682.858906] ni#2: ffff8d87054ee5e8 (&rdev->wiphy.mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x9e/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.859131] ni#3: ffff8d870f2bc8f0 (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_leave+0x20/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.859354] ni#4: ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.859482] stack backtrace: [ 682.859491] CPU: 1 PID: 1770 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G C OE 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 [ 682.859507] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW 08/20/2015 [ 682.859517] Call Trace: [ 682.859531] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 682.859551] check_noncircular+0xdb/0xf0 [ 682.859579] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.859606] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.859623] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859752] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x70 [ 682.859769] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x4a/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859898] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.859914] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860039] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860171] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.860286] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.860397] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.860629] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.860836] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.861048] ? __lock_acquire+0x4dc/0x1b50 [ 682.861070] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861089] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861104] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861120] ? packet_notifier+0x173/0x300 [ 682.861141] ? lock_release+0xb3/0x250 [ 682.861160] ? packet_notifier+0x192/0x300 [ 682.861184] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.861205] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.861224] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.861245] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.861264] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861284] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.861306] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.861325] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.861434] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.861542] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.861615] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.861637] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.861656] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.861674] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.861782] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.861801] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xf3/0x170 [ 682.861817] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 [ 682.861836] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.861855] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.861873] RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbe85400b [ 682.861890] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 6d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 682.861906] RSP: 002b:00007ffe7a82f538 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 682.861923] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a64693bd20 RCX: 00007f6dbe85400b [ 682.861935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861946] RBP: 000055a64693bd20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.861957] R10: 00007f6dbe8c7ac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861967] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a64693bd88 R15: 00007ffe7a831848 This happens because when we enqueue a frame for transmission we do it under xmit_priv lock, then calling rtw_get_stainfo (needed for enqueuing) takes sta_hash_lock and this leads to the following lock dependency: xmit_priv->lock -> sta_hash_lock Turning off a connection will bring to call rtw_free_assoc_resources which will set up the inverse dependency: sta_hash_lock -> xmit_priv_lock This could lead to a deadlock as lockdep complains. Fix it by removing the xmit_priv->lock around rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call inside rtl8723bs_hal_xmit and put it in a smaller critical section inside rtw_xmit_classifier, the only place where xmit_priv data are actually accessed. Replace spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(pxmitpriv->lock) in other tx paths leading to rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call with spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(psta->sleep_q.lock) - it's not clear why accessing a sleep_q was protected by a spinlock on xmitpriv->lock. This way is avoided the same faulty lock nesting order. Extra changes in v2 by Hans de Goede: -Lift the taking of the struct __queue.lock spinlock out of rtw_free_xmitframe_queue() into the callers this allows also protecting a bunch of related state in rtw_free_stainfo(): -Protect psta->sleepq_len on rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&psta->sleep_q); -Protect struct tx_servq.tx_pending and tx_servq.qcnt when calling rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&tx_servq.sta_pending) -This also allows moving the spin_lock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock); to below the sleep_q free-ing code, avoiding another ABBA locking issue CC: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Co-developed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-on: Lenovo Ideapad MiiX 300-10IBY Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit f0caea8 ] Olga reports seeing the following Oops when doing O_DIRECT writes to a pNFS flexfiles server: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 234186 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4+ #4 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 Workqueue: nfsiod rpc_async_release [sunrpc] RIP: 0010:nfs_mark_request_commit+0x12/0x30 [nfs] Code: ff ff be 03 00 00 00 e8 ac 34 83 eb e9 29 ff ff ff e8 22 bc d7 eb 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 f6 74 16 48 8b 42 10 48 8b 40 18 <48> 8b 40 18 48 85 c0 74 05 e9 70 fc 15 ec 48 89 d6 e9 68 ed ff ff RSP: 0018:ffffa82f0159fe00 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8f3393141880 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffffa82f0159fe08 RSI: ffff8f3381252500 RDI: ffff8f3393141880 RBP: ffff8f33ac317c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f3487724cb0 R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffff8f3485bccee0 R14: ffff8f33ac317c10 R15: ffff8f33ac317cd8 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f34fbc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000122120006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: nfs_direct_write_completion+0x13b/0x250 [nfs] rpc_free_task+0x39/0x60 [sunrpc] rpc_async_release+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc] process_one_work+0x1ce/0x370 worker_thread+0x30/0x380 ? process_one_work+0x370/0x370 kthread+0x11a/0x140 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> Fixes: 9c455a8 ("NFS/pNFS: Clean up pNFS commit operations") Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 5ec0a6f ] Host crashes when pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for VFs with virtual buses. The virtual buses added to SR-IOV have bus->self set to NULL and host crashes due to this. PID: 4481 TASK: ffff89c6941b0000 CPU: 53 COMMAND: "bash" ... #3 [ffff9a9481713808] oops_end at ffffffffb9025cd6 #4 [ffff9a9481713828] page_fault_oops at ffffffffb906e417 #5 [ffff9a9481713888] exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9a0ad14 ni#6 [ffff9a94817138b0] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9c00ace [exception RIP: pcie_capability_read_dword+28] RIP: ffffffffb952fd5c RSP: ffff9a9481713960 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff89c6b1096000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff9a9481713990 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000080 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: ffff89c64341a2f8 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89c648bab000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff89c648bab0c8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 ni#7 [ffff9a9481713988] pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root at ffffffffb95359a6 ni#8 [ffff9a94817139c0] bnxt_qplib_determine_atomics at ffffffffc08c1a33 [bnxt_re] ni#9 [ffff9a94817139d0] bnxt_re_dev_init at ffffffffc08ba2d1 [bnxt_re] Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, the AtomicOp Requester Enable bit in Device Control 2 is reserved for VFs. The PF value applies to all associated VFs. Return -EINVAL if pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for a VF. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1631354585-16597-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com Fixes: 35f5ace ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Enable global atomic ops if platform supports") Fixes: 430a236 ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()") Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2021
commit 2aa3660 upstream. It is generally unsafe to call put_device() with dpm_list_mtx held, because the given device's release routine may carry out an action depending on that lock which then may deadlock, so modify the system-wide suspend and resume of devices to always drop dpm_list_mtx before calling put_device() (and adjust white space somewhat while at it). For instance, this prevents the following splat from showing up in the kernel log after a system resume in certain configurations: [ 3290.969514] ====================================================== [ 3290.969517] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3290.969519] 5.15.0+ #2420 Tainted: G S [ 3290.969523] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3290.969525] systemd-sleep/4553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3290.969529] ffff888117ab1138 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.969554] but task is already holding lock: [ 3290.969556] ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.969571] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3290.969573] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3290.969575] -> #3 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969583] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969591] device_pm_add+0x2e/0xe0 [ 3290.969597] device_add+0x4d5/0x8f0 [ 3290.969605] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0xb0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969689] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.71+0x124/0x750 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969747] hci_event_packet+0xd6c/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969798] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969842] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969851] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969859] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969865] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.969872] -> #2 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969881] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969887] hci_event_packet+0xba/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969935] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969978] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969985] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969993] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969999] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970004] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970013] process_one_work+0x27d/0x650 [ 3290.970020] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.970028] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.970033] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970038] -> #0 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970047] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970054] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970059] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970066] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970073] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970081] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970130] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970195] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970201] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970211] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970215] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970220] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970229] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970236] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970243] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970251] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970257] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970263] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970269] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970276] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970284] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3290.970285] Chain exists of: (wq_completion)hci0#2 --> &hdev->lock --> dpm_list_mtx [ 3290.970297] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3290.970299] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3290.970300] ---- ---- [ 3290.970302] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970306] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 3290.970310] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970314] lock((wq_completion)hci0#2); [ 3290.970319] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3290.970321] 7 locks held by systemd-sleep/4553: [ 3290.970325] #0: ffff888103bcd448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970341] #1: ffff888115a14488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x103/0x1b0 [ 3290.970355] #2: ffff888100f719e0 (kn->active#233){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1b0 [ 3290.970369] #3: ffffffff82661048 (autosleep_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: state_store+0x12/0x90 [ 3290.970384] #4: ffffffff82658ac8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x9f/0x310 [ 3290.970399] #5: ffffffff827f2a48 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x4c/0x80 [ 3290.970416] ni#6: ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.970428] stack backtrace: [ 3290.970431] CPU: 3 PID: 4553 Comm: systemd-sleep Tainted: G S 5.15.0+ #2420 [ 3290.970438] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9380/0RYJWW, BIOS 1.5.0 06/03/2019 [ 3290.970441] Call Trace: [ 3290.970446] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 [ 3290.970454] check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 [ 3290.970468] ? __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970474] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970487] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970493] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970503] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x3b/0x60 [ 3290.970510] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x58/0x240 [ 3290.970519] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970526] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970544] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970552] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970561] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970572] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970624] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970687] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970695] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970705] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970710] ? dpm_resume_early+0x251/0x3b0 [ 3290.970718] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970723] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970737] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970746] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970755] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970764] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970777] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970785] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970794] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970811] RIP: 0033:0x7f41b1328164 [ 3290.970819] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 4a d2 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [ 3290.970824] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6ae21b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 3290.970831] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f41b1328164 [ 3290.970836] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 000055965e651070 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970839] RBP: 000055965e651070 R08: 000055965e64f390 R09: 00007f41b1e3d1c0 [ 3290.970843] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970846] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055965e64f2b0 R15: 0000000000000004 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Dec 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 54659ca ] when turning off a connection, lockdep complains with the following warning (a modprobe has been done but the same happens with a disconnection from NetworkManager, it's enough to trigger a cfg80211_disconnect call): [ 682.855867] ====================================================== [ 682.855877] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 682.855887] 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 Tainted: G C OE [ 682.855898] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 682.855906] modprobe/1770 is trying to acquire lock: [ 682.855916] ffffb6d000332b00 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856073] but task is already holding lock: [ 682.856081] ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856207] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 682.856215] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 682.856223] -> #1 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.856247] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.856265] rtw_get_stainfo+0x9a/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856389] rtw_xmit_classifier+0x27/0x130 [r8723bs] [ 682.856515] rtw_xmitframe_enqueue+0xa/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 682.856642] rtl8723bs_hal_xmit+0x3b/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856752] rtw_xmit+0x4ef/0x890 [r8723bs] [ 682.856879] _rtw_xmit_entry+0xba/0x350 [r8723bs] [ 682.856981] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xee/0x320 [ 682.856999] sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x330 [ 682.857014] __dev_queue_xmit+0xba5/0xf00 [ 682.857030] packet_sendmsg+0x981/0x1b80 [ 682.857047] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 [ 682.857060] __sys_sendto+0xf1/0x160 [ 682.857073] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 682.857087] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.857102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.857117] -> #0 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.857142] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.857158] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.857172] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.857185] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.857308] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.857415] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.857522] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.857759] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.857961] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.858163] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.858180] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.858195] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.858209] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.858225] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.858240] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.858255] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.858360] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.858463] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.858532] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.858550] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.858564] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.858579] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.858685] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.858699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.858715] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.858729] other info that might help us debug this: [ 682.858737] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 682.858744] CPU0 CPU1 [ 682.858751] ---- ---- [ 682.858758] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858772] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858786] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858799] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858812] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 682.858820] 5 locks held by modprobe/1770: [ 682.858831] #0: ffff8d870697d980 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x1a/0x1d0 [ 682.858869] #1: ffffffffbdbbf1c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: unregister_netdev+0xe/0x20 [ 682.858906] #2: ffff8d87054ee5e8 (&rdev->wiphy.mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x9e/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.859131] #3: ffff8d870f2bc8f0 (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_leave+0x20/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.859354] #4: ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.859482] stack backtrace: [ 682.859491] CPU: 1 PID: 1770 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G C OE 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 [ 682.859507] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW 08/20/2015 [ 682.859517] Call Trace: [ 682.859531] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 682.859551] check_noncircular+0xdb/0xf0 [ 682.859579] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.859606] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.859623] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859752] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x70 [ 682.859769] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x4a/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859898] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.859914] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860039] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860171] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.860286] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.860397] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.860629] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.860836] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.861048] ? __lock_acquire+0x4dc/0x1b50 [ 682.861070] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861089] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861104] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861120] ? packet_notifier+0x173/0x300 [ 682.861141] ? lock_release+0xb3/0x250 [ 682.861160] ? packet_notifier+0x192/0x300 [ 682.861184] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.861205] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.861224] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.861245] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.861264] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861284] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.861306] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.861325] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.861434] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.861542] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.861615] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.861637] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.861656] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.861674] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.861782] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.861801] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xf3/0x170 [ 682.861817] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 [ 682.861836] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.861855] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.861873] RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbe85400b [ 682.861890] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 6d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 682.861906] RSP: 002b:00007ffe7a82f538 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 682.861923] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a64693bd20 RCX: 00007f6dbe85400b [ 682.861935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861946] RBP: 000055a64693bd20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.861957] R10: 00007f6dbe8c7ac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861967] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a64693bd88 R15: 00007ffe7a831848 This happens because when we enqueue a frame for transmission we do it under xmit_priv lock, then calling rtw_get_stainfo (needed for enqueuing) takes sta_hash_lock and this leads to the following lock dependency: xmit_priv->lock -> sta_hash_lock Turning off a connection will bring to call rtw_free_assoc_resources which will set up the inverse dependency: sta_hash_lock -> xmit_priv_lock This could lead to a deadlock as lockdep complains. Fix it by removing the xmit_priv->lock around rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call inside rtl8723bs_hal_xmit and put it in a smaller critical section inside rtw_xmit_classifier, the only place where xmit_priv data are actually accessed. Replace spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(pxmitpriv->lock) in other tx paths leading to rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call with spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(psta->sleep_q.lock) - it's not clear why accessing a sleep_q was protected by a spinlock on xmitpriv->lock. This way is avoided the same faulty lock nesting order. Extra changes in v2 by Hans de Goede: -Lift the taking of the struct __queue.lock spinlock out of rtw_free_xmitframe_queue() into the callers this allows also protecting a bunch of related state in rtw_free_stainfo(): -Protect psta->sleepq_len on rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&psta->sleep_q); -Protect struct tx_servq.tx_pending and tx_servq.qcnt when calling rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&tx_servq.sta_pending) -This also allows moving the spin_lock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock); to below the sleep_q free-ing code, avoiding another ABBA locking issue CC: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Co-developed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-on: Lenovo Ideapad MiiX 300-10IBY Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
commit f35838a upstream. Line 1169 (#3) allocates a memory chunk for victim_name by kmalloc(), but when the function returns in line 1184 (#4) victim_name allocated by line 1169 (#3) is not freed, which will lead to a memory leak. There is a similar snippet of code in this function as allocating a memory chunk for victim_name in line 1104 (#1) as well as releasing the memory in line 1116 (#2). We should kfree() victim_name when the return value of backref_in_log() is less than zero and before the function returns in line 1184 (#4). 1057 static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 1058 struct btrfs_root *root, 1059 struct btrfs_path *path, 1060 struct btrfs_root *log_root, 1061 struct btrfs_inode *dir, 1062 struct btrfs_inode *inode, 1063 u64 inode_objectid, u64 parent_objectid, 1064 u64 ref_index, char *name, int namelen, 1065 int *search_done) 1066 { 1104 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #1: kmalloc (victim_name-1) 1105 if (!victim_name) 1106 return -ENOMEM; 1112 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1113 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1114 victim_name_len); 1115 if (ret < 0) { 1116 kfree(victim_name); // #2: kfree (victim_name-1) 1117 return ret; 1118 } else if (!ret) { 1169 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #3: kmalloc (victim_name-2) 1170 if (!victim_name) 1171 return -ENOMEM; 1180 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1181 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1182 victim_name_len); 1183 if (ret < 0) { 1184 return ret; // #4: missing kfree (victim_name-2) 1185 } else if (!ret) { 1241 return 0; 1242 } Fixes: d3316c8 ("btrfs: Properly handle backref_in_log retval") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
commit f35838a upstream. Line 1169 (#3) allocates a memory chunk for victim_name by kmalloc(), but when the function returns in line 1184 (#4) victim_name allocated by line 1169 (#3) is not freed, which will lead to a memory leak. There is a similar snippet of code in this function as allocating a memory chunk for victim_name in line 1104 (#1) as well as releasing the memory in line 1116 (#2). We should kfree() victim_name when the return value of backref_in_log() is less than zero and before the function returns in line 1184 (#4). 1057 static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 1058 struct btrfs_root *root, 1059 struct btrfs_path *path, 1060 struct btrfs_root *log_root, 1061 struct btrfs_inode *dir, 1062 struct btrfs_inode *inode, 1063 u64 inode_objectid, u64 parent_objectid, 1064 u64 ref_index, char *name, int namelen, 1065 int *search_done) 1066 { 1104 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #1: kmalloc (victim_name-1) 1105 if (!victim_name) 1106 return -ENOMEM; 1112 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1113 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1114 victim_name_len); 1115 if (ret < 0) { 1116 kfree(victim_name); // #2: kfree (victim_name-1) 1117 return ret; 1118 } else if (!ret) { 1169 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #3: kmalloc (victim_name-2) 1170 if (!victim_name) 1171 return -ENOMEM; 1180 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1181 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1182 victim_name_len); 1183 if (ret < 0) { 1184 return ret; // #4: missing kfree (victim_name-2) 1185 } else if (!ret) { 1241 return 0; 1242 } Fixes: d3316c8 ("btrfs: Properly handle backref_in_log retval") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
commit 0c8e32f upstream. The fixed commit attempts to close inject.output even if it was never opened e.g. $ perf record uname Linux [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (7 samples) ] $ perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb --quiet perf Reading symbols from perf... (gdb) r inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Starting program: /home/ahunter/bin/perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007eff8afeef5b in _IO_new_fclose (fp=0x0) at iofclose.c:48 48 iofclose.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 0x00007eff8afeef5b in _IO_new_fclose (fp=0x0) at iofclose.c:48 #1 0x0000557fc7b74f92 in perf_data__close (data=data@entry=0x7ffcdafa6578) at util/data.c:376 #2 0x0000557fc7a6b807 in cmd_inject (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at builtin-inject.c:1085 #3 0x0000557fc7ac4783 in run_builtin (p=0x557fc8074878 <commands+600>, argc=4, argv=0x7ffcdafb6a60) at perf.c:313 #4 0x0000557fc7a25d5c in handle_internal_command (argv=<optimized out>, argc=<optimized out>) at perf.c:365 #5 run_argv (argcp=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at perf.c:409 #6 main (argc=4, argv=0x7ffcdafb6a60) at perf.c:539 (gdb) Fixes: 02e6246 ("perf inject: Close inject.output on exit") Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213084829.114772-2-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
commit c271a55 upstream. The fixed commit attempts to get the output file descriptor even if the file was never opened e.g. $ perf record uname Linux [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (7 samples) ] $ perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb --quiet perf Reading symbols from perf... (gdb) r inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Starting program: /home/ahunter/bin/perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __GI___fileno (fp=0x0) at fileno.c:35 35 fileno.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 __GI___fileno (fp=0x0) at fileno.c:35 #1 0x00005621e48dd987 in perf_data__fd (data=0x7fff4c68bd08) at util/data.h:72 #2 perf_data__fd (data=0x7fff4c68bd08) at util/data.h:69 #3 cmd_inject (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fff4c69c1f0) at builtin-inject.c:1017 #4 0x00005621e4936783 in run_builtin (p=0x5621e4ee6878 <commands+600>, argc=4, argv=0x7fff4c69c1f0) at perf.c:313 #5 0x00005621e4897d5c in handle_internal_command (argv=<optimized out>, argc=<optimized out>) at perf.c:365 #6 run_argv (argcp=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at perf.c:409 #7 main (argc=4, argv=0x7fff4c69c1f0) at perf.c:539 (gdb) Fixes: 0ae0389 ("perf tools: Pass a fd to perf_file_header__read_pipe()") Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213084829.114772-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
commit 232796d upstream. When enabling quotas, we attempt to commit a transaction while holding the mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. This can result on a deadlock with other quota operations such as: - qgroup creation and deletion, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_CREATE; - adding and removing qgroup relations, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_ASSIGN. This is because these operations join a transaction and after that they attempt to lock the mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. Acquiring that mutex after joining or starting a transaction is a pattern followed everywhere in qgroups, so the quota enablement operation is the one at fault here, and should not commit a transaction while holding that mutex. Fix this by making the transaction commit while not holding the mutex. We are safe from two concurrent tasks trying to enable quotas because we are serialized by the rw semaphore fs_info->subvol_sem at btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl(), which is the only call site for enabling quotas. When this deadlock happens, it produces a trace like the following: INFO: task syz-executor:25604 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:24800 pid:25604 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x994/0x2e90 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2201 btrfs_quota_enable+0x95c/0x1790 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1120 btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4229 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x637e/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5010 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f86920b2c4d RSP: 002b:00007f868f61ac58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f86921d90a0 RCX: 00007f86920b2c4d RDX: 0000000020005e40 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: 00007f869212bd80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f86921d90a0 R13: 00007fff6d233e4f R14: 00007fff6d233ff0 R15: 00007f868f61adc0 INFO: task syz-executor:25628 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:29080 pid:25628 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_remove_qgroup+0xb7/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1548 btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_create fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4333 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x683c/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5014 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZQF19bQ1C6=yetF3BvL10OSORpFUcWXTP6HErshDB4dQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 340f1aa ("btrfs: qgroups: Move transaction management inside btrfs_quota_enable/disable") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19 Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2022
commit 8b59b0a upstream. arm32 uses software to simulate the instruction replaced by kprobe. some instructions may be simulated by constructing assembly functions. therefore, before executing instruction simulation, it is necessary to construct assembly function execution environment in C language through binding registers. after kasan is enabled, the register binding relationship will be destroyed, resulting in instruction simulation errors and causing kernel panic. the kprobe emulate instruction function is distributed in three files: actions-common.c actions-arm.c actions-thumb.c, so disable KASAN when compiling these files. for example, use kprobe insert on cap_capable+20 after kasan enabled, the cap_capable assembly code is as follows: <cap_capable>: e92d47f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr} e1a05000 mov r5, r0 e280006c add r0, r0, #108 ; 0x6c e1a04001 mov r4, r1 e1a06002 mov r6, r2 e59fa090 ldr sl, [pc, #144] ; ebfc7bf8 bl c03aa4b4 <__asan_load4> e595706c ldr r7, [r5, #108] ; 0x6c e2859014 add r9, r5, #20 ...... The emulate_ldr assembly code after enabling kasan is as follows: c06f1384 <emulate_ldr>: e92d47f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr} e282803c add r8, r2, #60 ; 0x3c e1a05000 mov r5, r0 e7e37855 ubfx r7, r5, #16, #4 e1a00008 mov r0, r8 e1a09001 mov r9, r1 e1a04002 mov r4, r2 ebf35462 bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e357000f cmp r7, #15 e7e36655 ubfx r6, r5, #12, #4 e205a00f and sl, r5, #15 0a000001 beq c06f13bc <emulate_ldr+0x38> e0840107 add r0, r4, r7, lsl #2 ebf3545c bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e084010a add r0, r4, sl, lsl #2 ebf3545a bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e2890010 add r0, r9, #16 ebf35458 bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e5990010 ldr r0, [r9, #16] e12fff30 blx r0 e356000f cm r6, #15 1a000014 bne c06f1430 <emulate_ldr+0xac> e1a06000 mov r6, r0 e2840040 add r0, r4, #64 ; 0x40 ...... when running in emulate_ldr to simulate the ldr instruction, panic occurred, and the log is as follows: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000090 pgd = ecb46400 [00000090] *pgd=2e0fa003, *pmd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 206 [#1] SMP ARM PC is at cap_capable+0x14/0xb0 LR is at emulate_ldr+0x50/0xc0 psr: 600d0293 sp : ecd63af8 ip : 00000004 fp : c0a7c30c r10: 00000000 r9 : c30897f4 r8 : ecd63cd4 r7 : 0000000f r6 : 0000000a r5 : e59fa090 r4 : ecd63c98 r3 : c06ae294 r2 : 00000000 r1 : b7611300 r0 : bf4ec008 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user Control: 32c5387d Table: 2d546400 DAC: 55555555 Process bash (pid: 1643, stack limit = 0xecd60190) (cap_capable) from (kprobe_handler+0x218/0x340) (kprobe_handler) from (kprobe_trap_handler+0x24/0x48) (kprobe_trap_handler) from (do_undefinstr+0x13c/0x364) (do_undefinstr) from (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x30) (__und_svc_finish) from (cap_capable+0x18/0xb0) (cap_capable) from (cap_vm_enough_memory+0x38/0x48) (cap_vm_enough_memory) from (security_vm_enough_memory_mm+0x48/0x6c) (security_vm_enough_memory_mm) from (copy_process.constprop.5+0x16b4/0x25c8) (copy_process.constprop.5) from (_do_fork+0xe8/0x55c) (_do_fork) from (SyS_clone+0x1c/0x24) (SyS_clone) from (__sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10) Code: 0050a0e1 6c0080e2 0140a0e1 0260a0e1 (f801f0e7) Fixes: 35aa1df ("ARM kprobes: instruction single-stepping support") Fixes: 4210157 ("ARM: 9017/2: Enable KASan for ARM") Signed-off-by: huangshaobo <huangshaobo6@huawei.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2022
commit 232796d upstream. When enabling quotas, we attempt to commit a transaction while holding the mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. This can result on a deadlock with other quota operations such as: - qgroup creation and deletion, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_CREATE; - adding and removing qgroup relations, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_ASSIGN. This is because these operations join a transaction and after that they attempt to lock the mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. Acquiring that mutex after joining or starting a transaction is a pattern followed everywhere in qgroups, so the quota enablement operation is the one at fault here, and should not commit a transaction while holding that mutex. Fix this by making the transaction commit while not holding the mutex. We are safe from two concurrent tasks trying to enable quotas because we are serialized by the rw semaphore fs_info->subvol_sem at btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl(), which is the only call site for enabling quotas. When this deadlock happens, it produces a trace like the following: INFO: task syz-executor:25604 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:24800 pid:25604 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x994/0x2e90 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2201 btrfs_quota_enable+0x95c/0x1790 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1120 btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4229 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x637e/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5010 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f86920b2c4d RSP: 002b:00007f868f61ac58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f86921d90a0 RCX: 00007f86920b2c4d RDX: 0000000020005e40 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: 00007f869212bd80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f86921d90a0 R13: 00007fff6d233e4f R14: 00007fff6d233ff0 R15: 00007f868f61adc0 INFO: task syz-executor:25628 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:29080 pid:25628 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_remove_qgroup+0xb7/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1548 btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_create fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4333 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x683c/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5014 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZQF19bQ1C6=yetF3BvL10OSORpFUcWXTP6HErshDB4dQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 340f1aa ("btrfs: qgroups: Move transaction management inside btrfs_quota_enable/disable") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19 Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2022
commit b7d6f44 upstream. Rolf Eike Beer reported the following bug: [1274934.746891] Bad Address (null pointer deref?): Code=15 (Data TLB miss fault) at addr 0000004140000018 [1274934.746891] CPU: 3 PID: 5549 Comm: cmake Not tainted 5.15.4-gentoo-parisc64 #4 [1274934.746891] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI [1274934.746891] PSW: 00001000000001001111111000001110 Not tainted [1274934.746891] r00-03 000000ff0804fe0e 0000000040bc9bc0 00000000406760e4 0000004140000000 [1274934.746891] r04-07 0000000040b693c0 0000004140000000 000000004a2b08b0 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r08-11 0000000041f98810 0000000000000000 000000004a0a7000 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r12-15 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040c0cbc0 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040bddbc0 [1274934.746891] r16-19 0000000040bde3c0 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040bde3c0 0000000000000007 [1274934.746891] r20-23 0000000000000006 000000004a368950 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r24-27 0000000000001fff 000000000800000e 000000004a1710f0 0000000040b693c0 [1274934.746891] r28-31 0000000000000001 0000000041f988b0 0000000041f98840 000000004a171118 [1274934.746891] sr00-03 00000000066e5800 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000066e5800 [1274934.746891] sr04-07 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] IASQ: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 IAOQ: 00000000406760e8 00000000406760ec [1274934.746891] IIR: 48780030 ISR: 0000000000000000 IOR: 0000004140000018 [1274934.746891] CPU: 3 CR30: 00000040e3a9c000 CR31: ffffffffffffffff [1274934.746891] ORIG_R28: 0000000040acdd58 [1274934.746891] IAOQ[0]: sba_unmap_sg+0xb0/0x118 [1274934.746891] IAOQ[1]: sba_unmap_sg+0xb4/0x118 [1274934.746891] RP(r2): sba_unmap_sg+0xac/0x118 [1274934.746891] Backtrace: [1274934.746891] [<00000000402740cc>] dma_unmap_sg_attrs+0x6c/0x70 [1274934.746891] [<000000004074d6bc>] scsi_dma_unmap+0x54/0x60 [1274934.746891] [<00000000407a3488>] mptscsih_io_done+0x150/0xd70 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040798600>] mpt_interrupt+0x168/0xa68 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040255a48>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xc8/0x278 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040255c34>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0xd8 [1274934.746891] [<000000004025ecb4>] handle_percpu_irq+0xb4/0xf0 [1274934.746891] [<00000000402548e0>] generic_handle_irq+0x50/0x70 [1274934.746891] [<000000004019a254>] call_on_stack+0x18/0x24 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] Kernel panic - not syncing: Bad Address (null pointer deref?) The bug is caused by overrunning the sglist and incorrectly testing sg_dma_len(sglist) before nents. Normally this doesn't cause a crash, but in this case sglist crossed a page boundary. This occurs in the following code: while (sg_dma_len(sglist) && nents--) { The fix is simply to test nents first and move the decrement of nents into the loop. Reported-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Mar 15, 2022
commit b7d6f44 upstream. Rolf Eike Beer reported the following bug: [1274934.746891] Bad Address (null pointer deref?): Code=15 (Data TLB miss fault) at addr 0000004140000018 [1274934.746891] CPU: 3 PID: 5549 Comm: cmake Not tainted 5.15.4-gentoo-parisc64 #4 [1274934.746891] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI [1274934.746891] PSW: 00001000000001001111111000001110 Not tainted [1274934.746891] r00-03 000000ff0804fe0e 0000000040bc9bc0 00000000406760e4 0000004140000000 [1274934.746891] r04-07 0000000040b693c0 0000004140000000 000000004a2b08b0 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r08-11 0000000041f98810 0000000000000000 000000004a0a7000 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r12-15 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040c0cbc0 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040bddbc0 [1274934.746891] r16-19 0000000040bde3c0 0000000040bddbc0 0000000040bde3c0 0000000000000007 [1274934.746891] r20-23 0000000000000006 000000004a368950 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [1274934.746891] r24-27 0000000000001fff 000000000800000e 000000004a1710f0 0000000040b693c0 [1274934.746891] r28-31 0000000000000001 0000000041f988b0 0000000041f98840 000000004a171118 [1274934.746891] sr00-03 00000000066e5800 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000066e5800 [1274934.746891] sr04-07 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] IASQ: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 IAOQ: 00000000406760e8 00000000406760ec [1274934.746891] IIR: 48780030 ISR: 0000000000000000 IOR: 0000004140000018 [1274934.746891] CPU: 3 CR30: 00000040e3a9c000 CR31: ffffffffffffffff [1274934.746891] ORIG_R28: 0000000040acdd58 [1274934.746891] IAOQ[0]: sba_unmap_sg+0xb0/0x118 [1274934.746891] IAOQ[1]: sba_unmap_sg+0xb4/0x118 [1274934.746891] RP(r2): sba_unmap_sg+0xac/0x118 [1274934.746891] Backtrace: [1274934.746891] [<00000000402740cc>] dma_unmap_sg_attrs+0x6c/0x70 [1274934.746891] [<000000004074d6bc>] scsi_dma_unmap+0x54/0x60 [1274934.746891] [<00000000407a3488>] mptscsih_io_done+0x150/0xd70 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040798600>] mpt_interrupt+0x168/0xa68 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040255a48>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xc8/0x278 [1274934.746891] [<0000000040255c34>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0xd8 [1274934.746891] [<000000004025ecb4>] handle_percpu_irq+0xb4/0xf0 [1274934.746891] [<00000000402548e0>] generic_handle_irq+0x50/0x70 [1274934.746891] [<000000004019a254>] call_on_stack+0x18/0x24 [1274934.746891] [1274934.746891] Kernel panic - not syncing: Bad Address (null pointer deref?) The bug is caused by overrunning the sglist and incorrectly testing sg_dma_len(sglist) before nents. Normally this doesn't cause a crash, but in this case sglist crossed a page boundary. This occurs in the following code: while (sg_dma_len(sglist) && nents--) { The fix is simply to test nents first and move the decrement of nents into the loop. Reported-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Mar 15, 2022
[ Upstream commit 3d6cc98 ] When cifs_get_root() fails during cifs_smb3_do_mount() we call deactivate_locked_super() which eventually will call delayed_free() which will free the context. In this situation we should not proceed to enter the out: section in cifs_smb3_do_mount() and free the same resources a second time. [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888364f4d110 by task swapper/1/0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G OE 5.17.0-rc3+ #4 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.0 12/17/2019 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Call Trace: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] <IRQ> [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x78 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x24/0x150 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] kasan_report.cold+0x7d/0x117 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __asan_load8+0x86/0xa0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_core+0x547/0xca0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? call_rcu+0x3c0/0x3c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __do_softirq+0x1d4/0x67b [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __irq_exit_rcu+0x100/0x150 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x30 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] sysvec_hyperv_stimer0+0x9d/0xc0 ... [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] Freed by task 58179: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x50 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_set_free_info+0x24/0x40 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] ____kasan_slab_free+0x137/0x170 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x20 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xb3/0x1d0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kfree+0xcd/0x520 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x149/0xbe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] smb3_get_tree+0x1a0/0x2e0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] vfs_get_tree+0x52/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] path_mount+0x635/0x10c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __x64_sys_mount+0x1bf/0x210 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] Last potentially related work creation: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x50 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0xb6/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc+0xb/0x10 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] call_rcu+0x76/0x3c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_umount+0xce/0xe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_kill_sb+0xc8/0xe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] deactivate_locked_super+0x5d/0xd0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0xab9/0xbe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] smb3_get_tree+0x1a0/0x2e0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] vfs_get_tree+0x52/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] path_mount+0x635/0x10c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __x64_sys_mount+0x1bf/0x210 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reported-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Apr 5, 2022
[ Upstream commit 3d6cc98 ] When cifs_get_root() fails during cifs_smb3_do_mount() we call deactivate_locked_super() which eventually will call delayed_free() which will free the context. In this situation we should not proceed to enter the out: section in cifs_smb3_do_mount() and free the same resources a second time. [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888364f4d110 by task swapper/1/0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G OE 5.17.0-rc3+ #4 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.0 12/17/2019 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] Call Trace: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] <IRQ> [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x78 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x24/0x150 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] kasan_report.cold+0x7d/0x117 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __asan_load8+0x86/0xa0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x32/0x60 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_core+0x547/0xca0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? call_rcu+0x3c0/0x3c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __do_softirq+0x1d4/0x67b [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] __irq_exit_rcu+0x100/0x150 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x30 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:06 2022] sysvec_hyperv_stimer0+0x9d/0xc0 ... [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] Freed by task 58179: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x50 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_set_free_info+0x24/0x40 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] ____kasan_slab_free+0x137/0x170 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x20 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xb3/0x1d0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kfree+0xcd/0x520 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x149/0xbe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] smb3_get_tree+0x1a0/0x2e0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] vfs_get_tree+0x52/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] path_mount+0x635/0x10c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __x64_sys_mount+0x1bf/0x210 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] Last potentially related work creation: [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x50 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0xb6/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc+0xb/0x10 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] call_rcu+0x76/0x3c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_umount+0xce/0xe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_kill_sb+0xc8/0xe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] deactivate_locked_super+0x5d/0xd0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0xab9/0xbe0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] smb3_get_tree+0x1a0/0x2e0 [cifs] [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] vfs_get_tree+0x52/0x140 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] path_mount+0x635/0x10c0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] __x64_sys_mount+0x1bf/0x210 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 [Thu Feb 10 12:59:07 2022] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reported-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
Apr 5, 2022
[ Upstream commit 4cb9a99 ] I saw the below splatting after the host suspended and resumed. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2943 at kvm/arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:5531 kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm] CPU: 0 PID: 2943 Comm: step_after_susp Tainted: G W IOE 5.17.0-rc3+ #4 RIP: 0010:kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> syscore_resume+0x90/0x340 suspend_devices_and_enter+0xaee/0xe90 pm_suspend.cold+0x36b/0x3c2 state_store+0x82/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b6/0x260 new_sync_write+0x258/0x370 vfs_write+0x33f/0x510 ksys_write+0xc9/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae lockdep_is_held() can return -1 when lockdep is disabled which triggers this warning. Let's use lockdep_assert_not_held() which can detect incorrect calls while holding a lock and it also avoids false negatives when lockdep is disabled. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Message-Id: <1644920142-81249-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
[ Upstream commit fe2640b ] In remove_phb_dynamic() we use &phb->io_resource, after we've called device_unregister(&host_bridge->dev). But the unregister may have freed phb, because pcibios_free_controller_deferred() is the release function for the host_bridge. If there are no outstanding references when we call device_unregister() then phb will be freed out from under us. This has gone mainly unnoticed, but with slub_debug and page_poison enabled it can lead to a crash: PID: 7574 TASK: c0000000d492cb80 CPU: 13 COMMAND: "drmgr" #0 [c0000000e4f075a0] crash_kexec at c00000000027d7dc #1 [c0000000e4f075d0] oops_end at c000000000029608 #2 [c0000000e4f07650] __bad_page_fault at c0000000000904b4 #3 [c0000000e4f076c0] do_bad_slb_fault at c00000000009a5a8 #4 [c0000000e4f076f0] data_access_slb_common_virt at c000000000008b30 Data SLB Access [380] exception frame: R0: c000000000167250 R1: c0000000e4f07a00 R2: c000000002a46100 R3: c000000002b39ce8 R4: 00000000000000c0 R5: 00000000000000a9 R6: 3894674d000000c0 R7: 0000000000000000 R8: 00000000000000ff R9: 0000000000000100 R10: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R11: 0000000000008000 R12: c00000000023da80 R13: c0000009ffd38b00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000000011c87f0f0 R16: 0000000000000006 R17: 0000000000000003 R18: 0000000000000002 R19: 0000000000000004 R20: 0000000000000005 R21: 000000011c87ede8 R22: 000000011c87c5a8 R23: 000000011c87d3a0 R24: 0000000000000000 R25: 0000000000000001 R26: c0000000e4f07cc8 R27: c00000004d1cc400 R28: c0080000031d00e8 R29: c00000004d23d800 R30: c00000004d1d2400 R31: c00000004d1d2540 NIP: c000000000167258 MSR: 8000000000009033 OR3: c000000000e9f474 CTR: 0000000000000000 LR: c000000000167250 XER: 0000000020040003 CCR: 0000000024088420 MQ: 0000000000000000 DAR: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6ba3 DSISR: c0000000e4f07920 Syscall Result: fffffffffffffff2 [NIP : release_resource+56] [LR : release_resource+48] #5 [c0000000e4f07a00] release_resource at c000000000167258 (unreliable) #6 [c0000000e4f07a30] remove_phb_dynamic at c000000000105648 #7 [c0000000e4f07ab0] dlpar_remove_slot at c0080000031a09e8 [rpadlpar_io] #8 [c0000000e4f07b50] remove_slot_store at c0080000031a0b9c [rpadlpar_io] #9 [c0000000e4f07be0] kobj_attr_store at c000000000817d8c #10 [c0000000e4f07c00] sysfs_kf_write at c00000000063e504 #11 [c0000000e4f07c20] kernfs_fop_write_iter at c00000000063d868 #12 [c0000000e4f07c70] new_sync_write at c00000000054339c #13 [c0000000e4f07d10] vfs_write at c000000000546624 #14 [c0000000e4f07d60] ksys_write at c0000000005469f4 #15 [c0000000e4f07db0] system_call_exception at c000000000030840 #16 [c0000000e4f07e10] system_call_vectored_common at c00000000000c168 To avoid it, we can take a reference to the host_bridge->dev until we're done using phb. Then when we drop the reference the phb will be freed. Fixes: 2dd9c11 ("powerpc/pseries: use pci_host_bridge.release_fn() to kfree(phb)") Reported-by: David Dai <zdai@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220318034219.1188008-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
[ Upstream commit 841aee4 ] Put NVMe/TCP sockets in their own class to avoid some lockdep warnings. Sockets created by nvme-tcp are not exposed to user-space, and will not trigger certain code paths that the general socket API exposes. Lockdep complains about a circular dependency between the socket and filesystem locks, because setsockopt can trigger a page fault with a socket lock held, but nvme-tcp sends requests on the socket while file system locks are held. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.0-rc3 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ fio/1496 is trying to acquire lock: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendpage+0x23/0x80 but task is already holding lock: (&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. other info that might help us debug this: chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_INET --> sb_internal --> &xfs_dir_ilock_class/5 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5); lock(sb_internal); lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by fio/1496: #0: (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x9fc/0xa20 #1: (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x296/0xa20 #2: (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: xfs_trans_alloc_icreate+0x41/0xd0 [xfs] #3: (&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs] #4: (hctx->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: hctx_lock+0x51/0xd0 #5: (&queue->send_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_queue_rq+0x33e/0x380 [nvme_tcp] This annotation lets lockdep analyze nvme-tcp controlled sockets independently of what the user-space sockets API does. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/CAHj4cs9MDYLJ+q+2_GXUK9HxFizv2pxUryUR0toX974M040z7g@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
commit a80ced6 upstream. As guest_irq is coming from KVM_IRQFD API call, it may trigger crash in svm_update_pi_irte() due to out-of-bounds: crash> bt PID: 22218 TASK: ffff951a6ad74980 CPU: 73 COMMAND: "vcpu8" #0 [ffffb1ba6707fa40] machine_kexec at ffffffff8565b397 #1 [ffffb1ba6707fa90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff85788a6d #2 [ffffb1ba6707fb58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8578995d #3 [ffffb1ba6707fb70] oops_end at ffffffff85623c0d #4 [ffffb1ba6707fb90] no_context at ffffffff856692c9 #5 [ffffb1ba6707fbf8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff85f95b51 #6 [ffffb1ba6707fc50] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff86000ace [exception RIP: svm_update_pi_irte+227] RIP: ffffffffc0761b53 RSP: ffffb1ba6707fd08 RFLAGS: 00010086 RAX: ffffb1ba6707fd78 RBX: ffffb1ba66d91000 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 00003c803f63f1c0 RSI: 000000000000019a RDI: ffffb1ba66db2ab8 RBP: 000000000000019a R8: 0000000000000040 R9: ffff94ca41b82200 R10: ffffffffffffffcf R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffffffffffcf R15: 000000000000005f ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffffb1ba6707fdb8] kvm_irq_routing_update at ffffffffc09f19a1 [kvm] #8 [ffffb1ba6707fde0] kvm_set_irq_routing at ffffffffc09f2133 [kvm] #9 [ffffb1ba6707fe18] kvm_vm_ioctl at ffffffffc09ef544 [kvm] RIP: 00007f143c36488b RSP: 00007f143a4e04b8 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f05780041d0 RCX: 00007f143c36488b RDX: 00007f05780041d0 RSI: 000000004008ae6a RDI: 0000000000000020 RBP: 00000000000004e8 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: 00007f05780041e0 R10: 00007f0578004560 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000004e0 R13: 000000000000001a R14: 00007f1424001c60 R15: 00007f0578003bc0 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 CS: 0033 SS: 002b Vmx have been fix this in commit 3a8b067 (KVM: VMX: Do not BUG() on out-of-bounds guest IRQ), so we can just copy source from that to fix this. Co-developed-by: Yi Liu <liu.yi24@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <liu.yi24@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Message-Id: <20220309113025.44469-1-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
[ Upstream commit 447c799 ] Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10 GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation locks. [ +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted [ +0.000004] -------------------------------------------- [ +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock: [ +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000203] but task is already holding lock: [ +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000017] other info that might help us debug this: [ +0.000002] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ +0.000003] CPU0 [ +0.000002] ---- [ +0.000002] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000004] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000003] *** DEADLOCK *** [ +0.000002] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822: [ +0.000003] #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000232] #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000241] #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000236] #3: ffffb2b35606fd28 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000235] #4: ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000015] #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at: drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm] [ +0.000038] #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000195] stack backtrace: [ +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 [ +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02 08/29/2018 [ +0.000003] Call Trace: [ +0.000003] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 [ +0.000010] __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90 [ +0.000009] lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0 [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060 [ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000005] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000185] ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm] [ +0.000010] amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu] [ +0.000229] ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu] [ +0.000190] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000234] kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000218] kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000006] ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0 [ +0.000007] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0 [ +0.000007] do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70 [ +0.000004] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317 [ +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX: 00007fbff90a7317 [ +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fbcc402d880 [ +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c0184b18 [ +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15: 00007fbcc402d820 Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
[ Upstream commit 059a47f ] After rx/tx ring buffer size is changed, kernel panic occurs when it acts XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT. When tx/rx ring buffer size is changed(ethtool -G), sfc driver reallocates and reinitializes rx and tx queues and their buffer (tx_queue->buffer). But it misses reinitializing xdp queues(efx->xdp_tx_queues). So, while it is acting XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT, it uses the uninitialized tx_queue->buffer. A new function efx_set_xdp_channels() is separated from efx_set_channels() to handle only xdp queues. Splat looks like: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000002a #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#4] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc] CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G D 5.17.0+ #55 e8beeee8289528f11357029357cf Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80 RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e45c60 EFLAGS: 00010297 RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea506895c0 RCX: ffffffffc0330870 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001139b10ce RDI: ffff92ea506895c0 RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001139b110d R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff92ea414c0088 R12: 0000000000000040 R13: 0000000000000018 R14: 00000001139b10ce R15: ffff92ea506895c0 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff92f121ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80 CR2: 000000000000002a CR3: 00000003e6810004 CR4: 00000000007706e0 RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e85c60 EFLAGS: 00010297 PKRU: 55555554 RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea50689700 RCX: ffffffffc0330870 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001145a90ce RDI: ffff92ea50689700 RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001145a910d R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff92ea414c0088 R12: 0000000000000040 R13: 0000000000000018 R14: 00000001145a90ce R15: ffff92ea50689700 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff92f121e80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000002a CR3: 00000003e6810005 CR4: 00000000007706e0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> efx_xdp_tx_buffers+0x12b/0x3d0 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] __efx_rx_packet+0x5c3/0x930 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] efx_rx_packet+0x28c/0x2e0 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] efx_ef10_ev_process+0x5f8/0xf40 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x95/0x550 efx_poll+0xc4/0x360 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] Fixes: 3990a8f ("sfc: allocate channels for XDP tx queues") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
[ Upstream commit 8b2c181 ] There is possible circular locking dependency detected on event_mutex (see below logs). This is due to set fail safe mode is done at dp_panel_read_sink_caps() within event_mutex scope. To break this possible circular locking, this patch move setting fail safe mode out of event_mutex scope. [ 23.958078] ====================================================== [ 23.964430] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 23.970777] 5.17.0-rc2-lockdep-00088-g05241de1f69e #148 Not tainted [ 23.977219] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 23.983570] DrmThread/1574 is trying to acquire lock: [ 23.988763] ffffff808423aab0 (&dp->event_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_dp_displ ay_enable+0x58/0x164 [ 23.997895] [ 23.997895] but task is already holding lock: [ 24.003895] ffffff808420b280 (&kms->commit_lock[i]/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_c rtcs+0x80/0x8c [ 24.012495] [ 24.012495] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 24.012495] [ 24.020886] [ 24.020886] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 24.028570] [ 24.028570] -> #5 (&kms->commit_lock[i]/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 24.035472] __mutex_lock+0xc8/0x384 [ 24.039695] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x74 [ 24.044272] lock_crtcs+0x80/0x8c [ 24.048222] msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x1e8/0x3d0 [ 24.053413] commit_tail+0x7c/0xfc [ 24.057452] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x15c [ 24.062826] drm_atomic_commit+0x60/0x74 [ 24.067403] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x6b0/0x908 [ 24.072508] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe8/0x168 [ 24.077086] drm_ioctl+0x320/0x370 [ 24.081123] drm_compat_ioctl+0x40/0xdc [ 24.085602] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0xe0/0x150 [ 24.090895] invoke_syscall+0x80/0x114 [ 24.095294] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xc4/0xf8 [ 24.100668] do_el0_svc_compat+0x2c/0x54 [ 24.105242] el0_svc_compat+0x4c/0xe4 [ 24.109548] el0t_32_sync_handler+0xc4/0xf4 [ 24.114381] el0t_32_sync+0x178 [ 24.118688] [ 24.118688] -> #4 (&kms->commit_lock[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 24.125408] __mutex_lock+0xc8/0x384 [ 24.129628] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x74 [ 24.134204] lock_crtcs+0x80/0x8c [ 24.138155] msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x1e8/0x3d0 [ 24.143345] commit_tail+0x7c/0xfc [ 24.147382] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x15c [ 24.152755] drm_atomic_commit+0x60/0x74 [ 24.157323] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x68/0x90 [ 24.162869] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x394/0x648 [ 24.167535] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe8/0x168 [ 24.172102] drm_ioctl+0x320/0x370 [ 24.176135] drm_compat_ioctl+0x40/0xdc [ 24.180621] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0xe0/0x150 [ 24.185904] invoke_syscall+0x80/0x114 [ 24.190302] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xc4/0xf8 [ 24.195673] do_el0_svc_compat+0x2c/0x54 [ 24.200241] el0_svc_compat+0x4c/0xe4 [ 24.204544] el0t_32_sync_handler+0xc4/0xf4 [ 24.209378] el0t_32_sync+0x174/0x178 [ 24.213680] -> #3 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 24.220308] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.20+0xe8/0x878 [ 24.225951] ww_mutex_lock+0x60/0xd0 [ 24.230166] modeset_lock+0x190/0x19c [ 24.234467] drm_modeset_lock+0x34/0x54 [ 24.238953] drmm_mode_config_init+0x550/0x764 [ 24.244065] msm_drm_bind+0x170/0x59c [ 24.248374] try_to_bring_up_master+0x244/0x294 [ 24.253572] __component_add+0xf4/0x14c [ 24.258057] component_add+0x2c/0x38 [ 24.262273] dsi_dev_attach+0x2c/0x38 [ 24.266575] dsi_host_attach+0xc4/0x120 [ 24.271060] mipi_dsi_attach+0x34/0x48 [ 24.275456] devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x28/0x68 [ 24.280298] ti_sn_bridge_probe+0x2b4/0x2dc [ 24.285137] auxiliary_bus_probe+0x78/0x90 [ 24.289893] really_probe+0x1e4/0x3d8 [ 24.294194] __driver_probe_device+0x14c/0x164 [ 24.299298] driver_probe_device+0x54/0xf8 [ 24.304043] __device_attach_driver+0xb4/0x118 [ 24.309145] bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd4 [ 24.313628] __device_attach+0xcc/0x158 [ 24.318112] device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30 [ 24.322954] bus_probe_device+0x38/0x9c [ 24.327439] deferred_probe_work_func+0xd4/0xf0 [ 24.332628] process_one_work+0x2f0/0x498 [ 24.337289] process_scheduled_works+0x44/0x48 [ 24.342391] worker_thread+0x1e4/0x26c [ 24.346788] kthread+0xe4/0xf4 [ 24.350470] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 24.354683] [ 24.354683] [ 24.354683] -> #2 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 24.361489] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xe4/0x138 [ 24.366777] drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x44/0x114 [ 24.372327] check_connector_changed+0xbc/0x198 [ 24.377517] drm_helper_hpd_irq_event+0xcc/0x11c [ 24.382804] dsi_hpd_worker+0x24/0x30 [ 24.387104] process_one_work+0x2f0/0x498 [ 24.391762] worker_thread+0x1d0/0x26c [ 24.396158] kthread+0xe4/0xf4 [ 24.399840] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 24.404053] [ 24.404053] -> #1 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 24.411032] __mutex_lock+0xc8/0x384 [ 24.415247] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x74 [ 24.419819] dp_panel_read_sink_caps+0x23c/0x26c [ 24.425108] dp_display_process_hpd_high+0x34/0xd4 [ 24.430570] dp_display_usbpd_configure_cb+0x30/0x3c [ 24.436205] hpd_event_thread+0x2ac/0x550 [ 24.440864] kthread+0xe4/0xf4 [ 24.444544] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 24.448757] [ 24.448757] -> #0 (&dp->event_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 24.455116] __lock_acquire+0xe2c/0x10d8 [ 24.459690] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x2d0 [ 24.463988] __mutex_lock+0xc8/0x384 [ 24.468201] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x74 [ 24.472773] msm_dp_display_enable+0x58/0x164 [ 24.477789] dp_bridge_enable+0x24/0x30 [ 24.482273] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_enable+0x78/0x9c [ 24.488006] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x1bc/0x244 [ 24.494801] msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x248/0x3d0 [ 24.499992] commit_tail+0x7c/0xfc [ 24.504031] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x15c [ 24.509404] drm_atomic_commit+0x60/0x74 [ 24.513976] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x6b0/0x908 [ 24.519079] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe8/0x168 [ 24.523650] drm_ioctl+0x320/0x370 [ 24.527689] drm_compat_ioctl+0x40/0xdc [ 24.532175] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0xe0/0x150 [ 24.537463] invoke_syscall+0x80/0x114 [ 24.541861] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xc4/0xf8 [ 24.547235] do_el0_svc_compat+0x2c/0x54 [ 24.551806] el0_svc_compat+0x4c/0xe4 [ 24.556106] el0t_32_sync_handler+0xc4/0xf4 [ 24.560948] el0t_32_sync+0x174/0x178 Changes in v2: -- add circular lockiing trace Fixes: d4aca42 ("drm/msm/dp: always add fail-safe mode into connector mode list") Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/481396/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1649451894-554-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
May 19, 2022
[ Upstream commit 841aee4 ] Put NVMe/TCP sockets in their own class to avoid some lockdep warnings. Sockets created by nvme-tcp are not exposed to user-space, and will not trigger certain code paths that the general socket API exposes. Lockdep complains about a circular dependency between the socket and filesystem locks, because setsockopt can trigger a page fault with a socket lock held, but nvme-tcp sends requests on the socket while file system locks are held. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.0-rc3 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ fio/1496 is trying to acquire lock: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendpage+0x23/0x80 but task is already holding lock: (&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. other info that might help us debug this: chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_INET --> sb_internal --> &xfs_dir_ilock_class/5 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5); lock(sb_internal); lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by fio/1496: #0: (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x9fc/0xa20 #1: (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x296/0xa20 #2: (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: xfs_trans_alloc_icreate+0x41/0xd0 [xfs] #3: (&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs] #4: (hctx->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: hctx_lock+0x51/0xd0 #5: (&queue->send_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_queue_rq+0x33e/0x380 [nvme_tcp] This annotation lets lockdep analyze nvme-tcp controlled sockets independently of what the user-space sockets API does. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/CAHj4cs9MDYLJ+q+2_GXUK9HxFizv2pxUryUR0toX974M040z7g@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gratian
referenced
this pull request
in gratian/linux
May 19, 2022
commit a80ced6 upstream. As guest_irq is coming from KVM_IRQFD API call, it may trigger crash in svm_update_pi_irte() due to out-of-bounds: crash> bt PID: 22218 TASK: ffff951a6ad74980 CPU: 73 COMMAND: "vcpu8" #0 [ffffb1ba6707fa40] machine_kexec at ffffffff8565b397 #1 [ffffb1ba6707fa90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff85788a6d #2 [ffffb1ba6707fb58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8578995d #3 [ffffb1ba6707fb70] oops_end at ffffffff85623c0d #4 [ffffb1ba6707fb90] no_context at ffffffff856692c9 #5 [ffffb1ba6707fbf8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff85f95b51 ni#6 [ffffb1ba6707fc50] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff86000ace [exception RIP: svm_update_pi_irte+227] RIP: ffffffffc0761b53 RSP: ffffb1ba6707fd08 RFLAGS: 00010086 RAX: ffffb1ba6707fd78 RBX: ffffb1ba66d91000 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 00003c803f63f1c0 RSI: 000000000000019a RDI: ffffb1ba66db2ab8 RBP: 000000000000019a R8: 0000000000000040 R9: ffff94ca41b82200 R10: ffffffffffffffcf R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffffffffffcf R15: 000000000000005f ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 ni#7 [ffffb1ba6707fdb8] kvm_irq_routing_update at ffffffffc09f19a1 [kvm] ni#8 [ffffb1ba6707fde0] kvm_set_irq_routing at ffffffffc09f2133 [kvm] ni#9 [ffffb1ba6707fe18] kvm_vm_ioctl at ffffffffc09ef544 [kvm] RIP: 00007f143c36488b RSP: 00007f143a4e04b8 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f05780041d0 RCX: 00007f143c36488b RDX: 00007f05780041d0 RSI: 000000004008ae6a RDI: 0000000000000020 RBP: 00000000000004e8 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: 00007f05780041e0 R10: 00007f0578004560 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000004e0 R13: 000000000000001a R14: 00007f1424001c60 R15: 00007f0578003bc0 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 CS: 0033 SS: 002b Vmx have been fix this in commit 3a8b067 (KVM: VMX: Do not BUG() on out-of-bounds guest IRQ), so we can just copy source from that to fix this. Co-developed-by: Yi Liu <liu.yi24@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <liu.yi24@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Message-Id: <20220309113025.44469-1-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
dunfell OE sets a gcc parameter for CFLAGS which is inherited by this Makefile. If host's gcc is old and doesn't support the parameter, build fails.
Cherry-picked this commit from upstream 4.14 linux-stable-rt that fixes it.