nati_x86_64_defconfig: enable full real-time preemption by gratian · Pull Request #2 · ni/linux

gratian · 2020-07-21T18:58:10Z

The configuration option for enabling full real-time preemption got
renamed from CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT by commit
a50a3f4 ("sched/rt, Kconfig: Introduce CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT") which
merged it upstream.

Commit 32df499 ("nati_x86_64_defconfig: update to 5.6.14-rt7")
missed this rename when the defconfig got upgraded from 4.14 to 5.6.
As a result the resulting configuration defaults to CONFIG_PREEMPT
"Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)".

Re-enable full real-time preemption.

Fixes: 32df499 ("nati_x86_64_defconfig: update to 5.6.14-rt7")
Signed-off-by: Gratian Crisan gratian.crisan@ni.com

The configuration option for enabling full real-time preemption got renamed from CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT by commit a50a3f4 ("sched/rt, Kconfig: Introduce CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT") which merged it upstream. Commit 32df499 ("nati_x86_64_defconfig: update to 5.6.14-rt7") missed this rename when the defconfig got upgraded from 4.14 to 5.6. As a result the resulting configuration defaults to CONFIG_PREEMPT "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)". Re-enable full real-time preemption. Fixes: 32df499 ("nati_x86_64_defconfig: update to 5.6.14-rt7") Signed-off-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>

bstreiff · 2020-07-21T19:02:50Z

Aha, oops. I did see that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL went away but apparently mistakenly subbed in only CONFIG_PREEMPT.

Acked-by: Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@ni.com>

With SO_RCVLOWAT, under memory pressure, it is possible to enter a state where: 1. We have not received enough bytes to satisfy SO_RCVLOWAT. 2. We have not entered buffer pressure (see tcp_rmem_pressure()). 3. But, we do not have enough buffer space to accept more packets. In this case, we advertise 0 rwnd (due to #3) but the application does not drain the receive queue (no wakeup because of #1 and #2) so the flow stalls. Modify the heuristic for SO_RCVLOWAT so that, if we are advertising rwnd<=rcv_mss, force a wakeup to prevent a stall. Without this patch, setting tcp_rmem to 6143 and disabling TCP autotune causes a stalled flow. With this patch, no stall occurs. This is with RPC-style traffic with large messages. Fixes: 03f45c8 ("tcp: avoid extra wakeups for SO_RCVLOWAT users") Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023184709.217614-1-arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 ni#6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee ni#7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b ni#8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 ni#9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 ni#10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 ni#11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat (with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs/24552: #0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0 #1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs] #2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs] #3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs] #4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue processing roots. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem patches on btrfs/104: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ ni#102 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520 process_one_work+0x238/0x540 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903: #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ ni#102 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read lock on the tree_root nodes. To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Various fixes This patch set contains various fixes for mlxsw. Patch #1 ensures that only link modes that are supported by both the device and the driver are advertised. When a link mode that is not supported by the driver is negotiated by the device, it will be presented as an unknown speed by ethtool, causing the bond driver to wrongly assume that the link is down. Patch #2 fixes a trivial memory leak upon module removal. Patch #3 fixes a use-after-free that syzkaller was able to trigger once on a slow emulator after a few months of fuzzing. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201024133733.2107509-1-idosch@idosch.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Split the IRQ-off section while accessing the PCP list from zone->lock while freeing pages. Introcude isolate_pcp_pages() which separates the pages from the PCP list onto a temporary list and then free the temporary list via free_pcppages_bulk(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

…text The following trace is triggered when running ltp oom test cases: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 17188, name: oom03 Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8112ba70>] mem_cgroup_reclaim+0x90/0xe0 CPU: 2 PID: 17188 Comm: oom03 Not tainted 3.10.10-rt3 #2 Hardware name: Intel Corporation Calpella platform/MATXM-CORE-411-B, BIOS 4.6.3 08/18/2010 ffff88007684d730 ffff880070df9b58 ffffffff8169918d ffff880070df9b70 ffffffff8106db31 ffff88007688b4a0 ffff880070df9b88 ffffffff8169d9c0 ffff88007688b4a0 ffff880070df9bc8 ffffffff81059da1 0000000170df9bb0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8169918d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8106db31>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0x170 [<ffffffff8169d9c0>] rt_spin_lock+0x20/0x50 [<ffffffff81059da1>] queue_work_on+0x61/0x100 [<ffffffff8112b361>] drain_all_stock+0xe1/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8112ba70>] mem_cgroup_reclaim+0x90/0xe0 [<ffffffff8112beda>] __mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x41a/0xc40 [<ffffffff810f1c91>] ? release_pages+0x1b1/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8106f200>] ? sched_exec+0x40/0xb0 [<ffffffff8112cc87>] mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x37/0x70 [<ffffffff8112e2c6>] mem_cgroup_newpage_charge+0x26/0x30 [<ffffffff8110af68>] handle_pte_fault+0x618/0x840 [<ffffffff8103ecf6>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x16/0x70 [<ffffffff81070f94>] ? migrate_enable+0xd4/0x200 [<ffffffff8110cde5>] handle_mm_fault+0x145/0x1e0 [<ffffffff810301e1>] __do_page_fault+0x1a1/0x4c0 [<ffffffff8169c9eb>] ? preempt_schedule_irq+0x4b/0x70 [<ffffffff8169e3b7>] ? retint_kernel+0x37/0x40 [<ffffffff8103053e>] do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff8169e4c2>] page_fault+0x22/0x30 So, to prevent schedule_work_on from being called in preempt disabled context, replace the pair of get/put_cpu() to get/put_cpu_light(). Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

rcutorture was generating some nesting scenarios that are not reasonable. Constrain the state selection to avoid them. Example #1: 1. preempt_disable() 2. local_bh_disable() 3. preempt_enable() 4. local_bh_enable() On PREEMPT_RT, BH disabling takes a local lock only when called in non-atomic context. Thus, atomic context must be retained until after BH is re-enabled. Likewise, if BH is initially disabled in non-atomic context, it cannot be re-enabled in atomic context. Example #2: 1. rcu_read_lock() 2. local_irq_disable() 3. rcu_read_unlock() 4. local_irq_enable() If the thread is preempted between steps 1 and 2, rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked will be set, but it won't be acted on in step 3 because IRQs are disabled. Thus, reporting of the quiescent state will be delayed beyond the local_irq_enable(). For now, these scenarios will continue to be tested on non-PREEMPT_RT kernels, until debug checks are added to ensure that they are not happening elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for v5.10, take #2 - Fix compilation error when PMD and PUD are folded - Fix regresssion of the RAZ behaviour of ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1

While doing memory hot-unplug operation on a PowerPC VM running 1024 CPUs with 11TB of ram, I hit the following panic: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000007 Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000456048 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#2] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS= 2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp CPU: 160 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G D 5.9.0 #1 NIP: c000000000456048 LR: c000000000455fd4 CTR: c00000000047b350 REGS: c00006028d1b77a0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G D (5.9.0) MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24004228 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c00000000000f1b0 DAR: 0000000000000007 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c000000000455fd4 c00006028d1b7a30 c000000001bec800 0000000000000000 GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000 00000000000374ef c00007c53df99320 GPR08: 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000 GPR12: 0000000000004400 c00000001e8e4400 0000000000000000 0000000000000f6a GPR16: 0000000000000000 c000000001c25930 c000000001d62528 00000000000000c1 GPR20: c000000001d62538 c00006be469e9000 0000000fffffffe0 c0000000003c0ff8 GPR24: 0000000000000018 0000000000000000 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000 GPR28: c00007c513755700 c000000001c236a4 c00007bc4001f800 0000000000000001 NIP [c000000000456048] __kmalloc_node+0x108/0x790 LR [c000000000455fd4] __kmalloc_node+0x94/0x790 Call Trace: kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110 mem_cgroup_css_online+0x10c/0x270 online_css+0x48/0xd0 cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2c4/0x470 cgroup_mkdir+0x408/0x5f0 kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0x100 vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x250 do_mkdirat+0x154/0x1c0 system_call_exception+0xf8/0x200 system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c Instruction dump: e93e0000 e90d0030 39290008 7cc9402a e94d0030 e93e0000 7ce95214 7f89502a 2fbc0000 419e0018 41920230 e9270010 <89290007> 7f994800 419e0220 7ee6bb78 This pointing to the following code: mm/slub.c:2851 if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) { c000000000456038: 00 00 bc 2f cmpdi cr7,r28,0 c00000000045603c: 18 00 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456054 <__kmalloc_node+0x114> node_match(): mm/slub.c:2491 if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && page_to_nid(page) != node) c000000000456040: 30 02 92 41 beq cr4,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330> page_to_nid(): include/linux/mm.h:1294 c000000000456044: 10 00 27 e9 ld r9,16(r7) c000000000456048: 07 00 29 89 lbz r9,7(r9) <<<< r9 = NULL node_match(): mm/slub.c:2491 c00000000045604c: 00 48 99 7f cmpw cr7,r25,r9 c000000000456050: 20 02 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330> The panic occurred in slab_alloc_node() when checking for the page's node: object = c->freelist; page = c->page; if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) { object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c); stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH); The issue is that object is not NULL while page is NULL which is odd but may happen if the cache flush happened after loading object but before loading page. Thus checking for the page pointer is required too. The cache flush is done through an inter processor interrupt when a piece of memory is off-lined. That interrupt is triggered when a memory hot-unplug operation is initiated and offline_pages() is calling the slub's MEM_GOING_OFFLINE callback slab_mem_going_offline_callback() which is calling flush_cpu_slab(). If that interrupt is caught between the reading of c->freelist and the reading of c->page, this could lead to such a situation. That situation is expected and the later call to this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() will detect the change to c->freelist and redo the whole operation. In commit 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in node_match()") check on the page pointer has been removed assuming that page is always valid when it is called. It happens that this is not true in that particular case, so check for page before calling node_match() here. Fixes: 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in node_match()") Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027190406.33283-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This fix is for a failure that occurred in the DWARF unwind perf test. Stack unwinders may probe memory when looking for frames. Memory sanitizer will poison and track uninitialized memory on the stack, and on the heap if the value is copied to the heap. This can lead to false memory sanitizer failures for the use of an uninitialized value. Avoid this problem by removing the poison on the copied stack. The full msan failure with track origins looks like: ==2168==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x559ceb10755b in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 #1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceb106acf in __libdwfl_frame_reg_set elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:77:22 #1 0x559ceb106acf in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:627:13 #2 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #3 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #9 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #10 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #11 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #12 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #13 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #14 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #15 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #16 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #18 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #20 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #21 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #22 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #23 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #24 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceb106a54 in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:613:9 #1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceaff8800 in memory_read tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:156:10 #1 0x559ceb10f053 in expr_eval elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:501:13 #2 0x559ceb1060cc in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:603:18 #3 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #4 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #9 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #10 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #11 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #12 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #13 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #14 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #15 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #16 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #17 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #18 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #19 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #20 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #21 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #22 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #23 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #24 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #25 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559cea9027d9 in __msan_memcpy llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1558:3 #1 0x559cea9d2185 in sample_ustack tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:41:2 #2 0x559cea9d202c in test__arch_unwind_sample tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:72:9 #3 0x559ceabc9cbd in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:106:6 #4 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #5 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #6 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #7 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #8 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #9 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #10 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #11 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #12 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #13 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #14 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #15 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #16 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #17 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'bf' in the stack frame of function 'perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events' #0 0x559ceafc5f60 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c:445 SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 in handle_cfi Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@google.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201113182053.754625-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Couple of fixes Patch #1 fixes firmware flashing when CONFIG_MLXSW_CORE=y and CONFIG_MLXFW=m. Patch #2 prevents EMAD transactions from needlessly failing when the system is under heavy load by using exponential backoff. Please consider patch #2 for stable. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117173352.288491-1-idosch@idosch.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

When running test case btrfs/017 from fstests, lockdep reported the following splat: [ 1297.067385] ====================================================== [ 1297.067708] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1297.068022] 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 Not tainted [ 1297.068322] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1297.068629] btrfs/189080 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1297.068929] ffff9f2725731690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.069274] but task is already holding lock: [ 1297.069868] ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.070219] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 1297.071131] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 1297.071721] -> #1 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 1297.072375] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.072710] __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xb30 [ 1297.073061] btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x59/0x6a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.073421] create_subvol+0x194/0x990 [btrfs] [ 1297.073780] btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.074133] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.074498] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x58/0x80 [btrfs] [ 1297.074872] btrfs_ioctl+0x1a90/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.075245] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.075617] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.075993] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.076380] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 1297.077166] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 [ 1297.077572] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110 [ 1297.077984] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.078411] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs] [ 1297.078853] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.079323] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.079789] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.080232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.080680] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.081139] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1297.082536] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1297.083510] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1297.084005] ---- ---- [ 1297.084500] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); [ 1297.084994] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 1297.085485] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); [ 1297.085974] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 1297.086454] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1297.087880] 3 locks held by btrfs/189080: [ 1297.088324] #0: ffff9f2725731470 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0xa73/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.088799] #1: ffff9f2702b60cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.089284] #2: ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.089771] stack backtrace: [ 1297.090662] CPU: 5 PID: 189080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [ 1297.091132] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1297.092123] Call Trace: [ 1297.092629] dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5 [ 1297.093115] check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 [ 1297.093596] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 [ 1297.094076] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 1297.094553] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.095029] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110 [ 1297.095510] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.095993] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.096476] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs] [ 1297.096962] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.097451] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.097941] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.098429] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.098904] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x20c/0x430 [ 1297.099382] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 1297.099854] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.100328] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.100801] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12/0x180 [ 1297.101272] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.101739] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.102207] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.102673] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.103148] RIP: 0033:0x7f773ff65d87 This is because during the quota enable ioctl we lock first the mutex qgroup_ioctl_lock and then start a transaction, and starting a transaction acquires a fs freeze semaphore (at the VFS level). However, every other code path, except for the quota disable ioctl path, we do the opposite: we start a transaction and then lock the mutex. So fix this by making the quota enable and disable paths to start the transaction without having the mutex locked, and then, after starting the transaction, lock the mutex and check if some other task already enabled or disabled the quotas, bailing with success if that was the case. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

commit fccc000 upstream. Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce with btrfs/187. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. We don't want to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where it matters. So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation in order to avoid the lockdep splat. Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 ni#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 ni#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 ni#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 ni#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 ni#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 ni#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 ni#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 ni#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…during probe [ Upstream commit 4ce35a3 ] When booting j721e the following bug is printed: [ 1.154821] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99 [ 1.154827] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1 [ 1.154832] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12: [ 1.154836] #0: ffff000840030728 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8 [ 1.154852] #1: ffff80001214fdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8 [ 1.154860] #2: ffff00084060b170 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x138 [ 1.154872] irq event stamp: 63096 [ 1.154881] hardirqs last enabled at (63095): [<ffff800010b74318>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0x78 [ 1.154887] hardirqs last disabled at (63096): [<ffff800010b740d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x28/0x80 [ 1.154893] softirqs last enabled at (62254): [<ffff800010080c88>] _stext+0x488/0x564 [ 1.154899] softirqs last disabled at (62247): [<ffff8000100fdb3c>] irq_exit+0x114/0x140 [ 1.154906] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6-next-20200318-00094-g45e4089b0bd3 ni#221 [ 1.154911] Hardware name: Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC (DT) [ 1.154917] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 1.154923] Call trace: [ 1.154928] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 1.154933] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 1.154940] dump_stack+0xe0/0x148 [ 1.154946] ___might_sleep+0x150/0x1f0 [ 1.154952] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80 [ 1.154957] wait_for_completion_timeout+0x40/0x140 [ 1.154964] ti_sci_set_device_state+0xa0/0x158 [ 1.154969] ti_sci_cmd_get_device_exclusive+0x14/0x20 [ 1.154977] ti_sci_dev_start+0x34/0x50 [ 1.154984] genpd_runtime_resume+0x78/0x1f8 [ 1.154991] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x140 [ 1.154996] rpm_callback+0x20/0x80 [ 1.155001] rpm_resume+0x568/0x758 [ 1.155007] __pm_runtime_resume+0x44/0xb0 [ 1.155013] omap8250_probe+0x2b4/0x508 [ 1.155019] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0 [ 1.155023] really_probe+0xd4/0x318 [ 1.155028] driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8 [ 1.155033] __device_attach_driver+0x80/0xb8 [ 1.155039] bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xc0 [ 1.155044] __device_attach+0xdc/0x138 [ 1.155049] device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 [ 1.155053] bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0 [ 1.155058] deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0 [ 1.155063] process_one_work+0x280/0x6e8 [ 1.155068] worker_thread+0x48/0x430 [ 1.155073] kthread+0x108/0x138 [ 1.155079] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 To fix the bug we need to first call pm_runtime_enable() prior to any pm_runtime calls. Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320125200.6772-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ca10845 ] While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

This patch introduce a new globs attribute to define the subclass of the glock lockref spinlock. This avoid the following lockdep warning, which occurs when we lock an inode lock while an iopen lock is held: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.10.0-rc3+ #4990 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/0:1/12 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9067d45672d8 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 but task is already holding lock: ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12: #0: ffff9067c1bfdd38 ((wq_completion)delete_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540 #1: ffffac594006be70 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_delete)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540 #2: ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #4990 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Workqueue: delete_workqueue delete_work_func Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 __lock_acquire.cold+0x19e/0x2e3 lock_acquire+0x150/0x410 ? lockref_get+0x9/0x20 _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40 ? lockref_get+0x9/0x20 lockref_get+0x9/0x20 delete_work_func+0x188/0x260 process_one_work+0x237/0x540 worker_thread+0x4d/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x540/0x540 kthread+0x127/0x140 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>

While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog 3 locks held by memhog/946: #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty #316 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc. Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context). Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option for better maintenance. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range") Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117202916.GA3856507@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Prarit reported that depending on the affinity setting the ' irq $N: Affinity broken due to vector space exhaustion.' message is showing up in dmesg, but the vector space on the CPUs in the affinity mask is definitely not exhausted. Shung-Hsi provided traces and analysis which pinpoints the problem: The ordering of trying to assign an interrupt vector in assign_irq_vector_any_locked() is simply wrong if the interrupt data has a valid node assigned. It does: 1) Try the intersection of affinity mask and node mask 2) Try the node mask 3) Try the full affinity mask 4) Try the full online mask Obviously #2 and #3 are in the wrong order as the requested affinity mask has to take precedence. In the observed cases #1 failed because the affinity mask did not contain CPUs from node 0. That made it allocate a vector from node 0, thereby breaking affinity and emitting the misleading message. Revert the order of #2 and #3 so the full affinity mask without the node intersection is tried before actually affinity is broken. If no node is assigned then only the full affinity mask and if that fails the full online mask is tried. Fixes: d6ffc6a ("x86/vector: Respect affinity mask in irq descriptor") Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ft4djtyp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de

[ Upstream commit 429fa96 ] The size of tx_valid_cpus was calculated under the assumption that the numa nodes identifiers are continuous, which is not the case in all archs as this could lead to the following panic when trying to access an invalid tx_valid_cpus index, avoid the following panic by using nr_node_ids instead of num_online_nodes() to allocate the tx_valid_cpus size. Kernel attempted to read user page (8) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0) BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000008 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0080000081b4a90 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV Modules linked in: siw(+) rfkill rpcrdma ib_isert iscsi_target_mod ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm sunrpc ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm i40iw ib_uverbs ib_core i40e ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas ipmi_powernv ibmpowernv at24 ofpart ipmi_devintf regmap_i2c ipmi_msghandler powernv_flash uio_pdrv_genirq uio mtd opal_prd zram ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod t10_pi ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm_ttm_helper ttm drm vmx_crypto aacraid drm_panel_orientation_quirks dm_mod CPU: 40 PID: 3279 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W X --------- --- 5.11.0-0.rc4.129.eln108.ppc64le #2 NIP: c0080000081b4a90 LR: c0080000081b4a2c CTR: c0000000007ce1c0 REGS: c000000027fa77b0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G W X --------- --- (5.11.0-0.rc4.129.eln108.ppc64le) MSR: 9000000002009033 <SF,HV,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 44224882 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000007ce200 DAR: 0000000000000008 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c0080000081b4a2c c000000027fa7a50 c0080000081c3900 0000000000000040 GPR04: c000000002023080 c000000012e1c300 000020072ad70000 0000000000000001 GPR08: c000000001726068 0000000000000008 0000000000000008 c0080000081b5758 GPR12: c0000000007ce1c0 c0000007fffc3000 00000001590b1e40 0000000000000000 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 000000011ad68fc8 00007fffcc09c5c8 GPR20: 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 00000001590b2850 00000001590b1d30 GPR24: 0000000000043d68 000000011ad67a80 000000011ad67a80 0000000000100000 GPR28: c000000012e1c300 c0000000020271c8 0000000000000001 c0080000081bf608 NIP [c0080000081b4a90] siw_init_cpulist+0x194/0x214 [siw] LR [c0080000081b4a2c] siw_init_cpulist+0x130/0x214 [siw] Call Trace: [c000000027fa7a50] [c0080000081b4a2c] siw_init_cpulist+0x130/0x214 [siw] (unreliable) [c000000027fa7a90] [c0080000081b4e68] siw_init_module+0x40/0x2a0 [siw] [c000000027fa7b30] [c0000000000124f4] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x2e0 [c000000027fa7c00] [c000000000267ffc] do_init_module+0x7c/0x350 [c000000027fa7c90] [c00000000026a180] __do_sys_init_module+0x210/0x250 [c000000027fa7db0] [c0000000000387e4] system_call_exception+0x134/0x230 [c000000027fa7e10] [c00000000000d660] system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c Instruction dump: 40810044 3d420000 e8bf0000 e88a82d0 3d420000 e90a82c8 792a1f24 7cc4302a 7d2642aa 79291f24 7d25482a 7d295214 <7d4048a8> 7d4a3b78 7d4049ad 40c2fff4 Fixes: bdcf26b ("rdma/siw: network and RDMA core interface") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210201112922.141085-1-kamalheib1@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com> Tested-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit c5c97ca ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210214091638.519643-1-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 4d14c5c upstream Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits: * ae5e070 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction") * 6f23277 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle") Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime: PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex: PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state. Fixes: c53e965 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…t context commit 5ae5fbd upstream. Running "perf mem record" in powerpc platforms with selinux enabled resulted in soft lockup's. Below call-trace was seen in the logs: CPU: 58 PID: 3751 Comm: sssd_nss Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #2 NIP: c000000000dff3d4 LR: c000000000dff3d0 CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c000007fffab7d60 TRAP: 0100 Not tainted (5.11.0-rc7+) ... NIP _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x94/0x120 LR _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0x120 Call Trace: 0xc00000000fd47260 (unreliable) skb_queue_tail+0x3c/0x90 audit_log_end+0x6c/0x180 common_lsm_audit+0xb0/0xe0 slow_avc_audit+0xa4/0x110 avc_has_perm+0x1c4/0x260 selinux_perf_event_open+0x74/0xd0 security_perf_event_open+0x68/0xc0 record_and_restart+0x6e8/0x7f0 perf_event_interrupt+0x22c/0x560 performance_monitor_exception0x4c/0x60 performance_monitor_common_virt+0x1c8/0x1d0 interrupt: f00 at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x120 NIP: c000000000dff378 LR: c000000000b5fbbc CTR: c0000000007d47f0 REGS: c00000000fd47860 TRAP: 0f00 Not tainted (5.11.0-rc7+) ... NIP _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x120 LR skb_queue_tail+0x3c/0x90 interrupt: f00 0x38 (unreliable) 0xc00000000aae6200 audit_log_end+0x6c/0x180 audit_log_exit+0x344/0xf80 __audit_syscall_exit+0x2c0/0x320 do_syscall_trace_leave+0x148/0x200 syscall_exit_prepare+0x324/0x390 system_call_common+0xfc/0x27c The above trace shows that while the CPU was handling a performance monitor exception, there was a call to security_perf_event_open() function. In powerpc core-book3s, this function is called from perf_allow_kernel() check during recording of data address in the sample via perf_get_data_addr(). Commit da97e18 ("perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks") introduced security enhancements to perf. As part of this commit, the new security hook for perf_event_open() was added in all places where perf paranoid check was previously used. In powerpc core-book3s code, originally had paranoid checks in perf_get_data_addr() and power_pmu_bhrb_read(). So perf_paranoid_kernel() checks were replaced with perf_allow_kernel() in these PMU helper functions as well. The intention of paranoid checks in core-book3s was to verify privilege access before capturing some of the sample data. Along with paranoid checks, perf_allow_kernel() also does a security_perf_event_open(). Since these functions are accessed while recording a sample, we end up calling selinux_perf_event_open() in PMI context. Some of the security functions use spinlock like sidtab_sid2str_put(). If a perf interrupt hits under a spin lock and if we end up in calling selinux hook functions in PMI handler, this could cause a dead lock. Since the purpose of this security hook is to control access to perf_event_open(), it is not right to call this in interrupt context. The paranoid checks in powerpc core-book3s were done at interrupt time which is also not correct. Reference commits: Commit cd1231d ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak via perf_get_data_addr()") Commit bb19af8 ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak to userspace via BHRB buffer") We only allow creation of events that have already passed the privilege checks in perf_event_open(). So these paranoid checks are not needed at event time. As a fix, patch uses 'event->attr.exclude_kernel' check to prevent exposing kernel address for userspace only sampling. Fixes: cd1231d ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak via perf_get_data_addr()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+ Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614247839-1428-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit a7889c6 upstream. afs_listxattr() lists all the available special afs xattrs (i.e. those in the "afs.*" space), no matter what type of server we're dealing with. But OpenAFS servers, for example, cannot deal with some of the extra-capable attributes that AuriStor (YFS) servers provide. Unfortunately, the presence of the afs.yfs.* attributes causes errors[1] for anything that tries to read them if the server is of the wrong type. Fix the problem by removing afs_listxattr() so that none of the special xattrs are listed (AFS doesn't support xattrs). It does mean, however, that getfattr won't list them, though they can still be accessed with getxattr() and setxattr(). This can be tested with something like: getfattr -d -m ".*" /afs/example.com/path/to/file With this change, none of the afs.* attributes should be visible. Changes: ver #2: - Hide all of the afs.* xattrs, not just the ACL ones. Fixes: ae46578 ("afs: Get YFS ACLs and information through xattrs") Reported-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003502.html [1] Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003567.html # v1 Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003573.html # v2 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit c7de87f upstream. [ This problem is in mainline, but only rt has the chops to be able to detect it. ] Lockdep reports a circular lock dependency between serv->sv_lock and softirq_ctl.lock on system shutdown, when using a kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, and a nfs mount exists. This is due to the definition of spin_lock_bh on rt: local_bh_disable(); rt_spin_lock(lock); which forces a softirq_ctl.lock -> serv->sv_lock dependency. This is not a problem as long as _every_ lock of serv->sv_lock is a: spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); but there is one of the form: spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock); This is what is causing the circular dependency splat. The spin_lock() grabs the lock without first grabbing softirq_ctl.lock via local_bh_disable. If later on in the critical region, someone does a local_bh_disable, we get a serv->sv_lock -> softirq_ctrl.lock dependency established. Deadlock. Fix is to make serv->sv_lock be locked with spin_lock_bh everywhere, no exceptions. [ OK ] Stopped target NFS client services. Stopping Logout off all iSCSI sessions on shutdown... Stopping NFS server and services... [ 109.442380] [ 109.442385] ====================================================== [ 109.442386] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 109.442387] 5.10.16-rt30 #1 Not tainted [ 109.442389] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 109.442390] nfsd/1032 is trying to acquire lock: [ 109.442392] ffff994237617f60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442405] [ 109.442405] but task is already holding lock: [ 109.442406] ffff994245cb00b0 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: svc_close_list+0x1f/0x90 [ 109.442415] [ 109.442415] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 109.442415] [ 109.442416] [ 109.442416] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 109.442417] [ 109.442417] -> #1 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 109.442421] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442428] svc_add_new_perm_xprt+0x42/0xa0 [ 109.442430] svc_addsock+0x135/0x220 [ 109.442434] write_ports+0x4b3/0x620 [ 109.442438] nfsctl_transaction_write+0x45/0x80 [ 109.442440] vfs_write+0xff/0x420 [ 109.442444] ksys_write+0x4f/0xc0 [ 109.442446] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ 109.442450] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 109.442454] [ 109.442454] -> #0 ((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: [ 109.442457] __lock_acquire+0x1264/0x20b0 [ 109.442463] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x400 [ 109.442466] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442469] __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442471] svc_xprt_do_enqueue+0xc0/0x4d0 [ 109.442474] svc_close_list+0x60/0x90 [ 109.442476] svc_close_net+0x49/0x1a0 [ 109.442478] svc_shutdown_net+0x12/0x40 [ 109.442480] nfsd_destroy+0xc5/0x180 [ 109.442482] nfsd+0x1bc/0x270 [ 109.442483] kthread+0x194/0x1b0 [ 109.442487] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 109.442492] [ 109.442492] other info that might help us debug this: [ 109.442492] [ 109.442493] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 109.442493] [ 109.442493] CPU0 CPU1 [ 109.442494] ---- ---- [ 109.442495] lock(&serv->sv_lock); [ 109.442496] lock((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock); [ 109.442498] lock(&serv->sv_lock); [ 109.442499] lock((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock); [ 109.442501] [ 109.442501] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 109.442501] [ 109.442501] 3 locks held by nfsd/1032: [ 109.442503] #0: ffffffff93b49258 (nfsd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nfsd+0x19a/0x270 [ 109.442508] #1: ffff994245cb00b0 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: svc_close_list+0x1f/0x90 [ 109.442512] #2: ffffffff93a81b20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0x5/0xc0 [ 109.442518] [ 109.442518] stack backtrace: [ 109.442519] CPU: 0 PID: 1032 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 5.10.16-rt30 #1 [ 109.442522] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF/X9DRL-3F/iF, BIOS 3.2 09/22/2015 [ 109.442524] Call Trace: [ 109.442527] dump_stack+0x77/0x97 [ 109.442533] check_noncircular+0xdc/0xf0 [ 109.442546] __lock_acquire+0x1264/0x20b0 [ 109.442553] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x400 [ 109.442564] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442570] __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442573] svc_xprt_do_enqueue+0xc0/0x4d0 [ 109.442577] svc_close_list+0x60/0x90 [ 109.442581] svc_close_net+0x49/0x1a0 [ 109.442585] svc_shutdown_net+0x12/0x40 [ 109.442588] nfsd_destroy+0xc5/0x180 [ 109.442590] nfsd+0x1bc/0x270 [ 109.442595] kthread+0x194/0x1b0 [ 109.442600] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 109.518225] nfsd: last server has exited, flushing export cache [ OK ] Stopped NFSv4 ID-name mapping service. [ OK ] Stopped GSSAPI Proxy Daemon. [ OK ] Stopped NFS Mount Daemon. [ OK ] Stopped NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking.. Fixes: 719f8bc ("svcrpc: fix xpt_list traversal locking on shutdown") Signed-off-by: Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 4deb550 ] label err_eni_release is reachable when eni_start() fail. In eni_start() it calls dev->phy->start() in the last step, if start() fail we don't need to call phy->stop(), if start() is never called, we neither need to call phy->stop(), otherwise null-ptr-deref will happen. In order to fix this issue, don't call phy->stop() in label err_eni_release [ 4.875714] ================================================================== [ 4.876091] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.876433] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task modprobe/95 [ 4.876778] [ 4.876862] CPU: 0 PID: 95 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7-00090-gdcc0b49040c7 #2 [ 4.877290] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-48-gd94 [ 4.877876] Call Trace: [ 4.878009] dump_stack+0x7d/0xa3 [ 4.878191] kasan_report.cold+0x10c/0x10e [ 4.878410] ? __slab_free+0x2f0/0x340 [ 4.878612] ? suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.878832] suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.879043] eni_do_release+0x3b/0x70 [eni] [ 4.879269] eni_init_one.cold+0x1152/0x1747 [eni] [ 4.879528] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7b/0xd0 [ 4.879768] ? eni_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [eni] [ 4.879990] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 [ 4.880226] ? eni_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [eni] [ 4.880448] local_pci_probe+0x6f/0xb0 [ 4.880650] pci_device_probe+0x171/0x240 [ 4.880864] ? pci_device_remove+0xe0/0xe0 [ 4.881086] ? kernfs_create_link+0xb6/0x110 [ 4.881315] ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0x76/0xe0 [ 4.881594] really_probe+0x161/0x420 [ 4.881791] driver_probe_device+0x6d/0xd0 [ 4.882010] device_driver_attach+0x82/0x90 [ 4.882233] ? device_driver_attach+0x90/0x90 [ 4.882465] __driver_attach+0x60/0x100 [ 4.882671] ? device_driver_attach+0x90/0x90 [ 4.882903] bus_for_each_dev+0xe1/0x140 [ 4.883114] ? subsys_dev_iter_exit+0x10/0x10 [ 4.883346] ? klist_node_init+0x61/0x80 [ 4.883557] bus_add_driver+0x254/0x2a0 [ 4.883764] driver_register+0xd3/0x150 [ 4.883971] ? 0xffffffffc0038000 [ 4.884149] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x250 [ 4.884355] ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_finish+0x150/0x150 [ 4.884674] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.884875] ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x84/0xa0 [ 4.885150] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.885352] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.885557] do_init_module+0xf8/0x350 [ 4.885760] load_module+0x3fe6/0x4340 [ 4.885960] ? vm_unmap_ram+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 4.886166] ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x84/0xa0 [ 4.886441] ? module_frob_arch_sections+0x20/0x20 [ 4.886697] ? __do_sys_finit_module+0x108/0x170 [ 4.886941] __do_sys_finit_module+0x108/0x170 [ 4.887178] ? __ia32_sys_init_module+0x40/0x40 [ 4.887419] ? file_open_root+0x200/0x200 [ 4.887634] ? do_sys_open+0x85/0xe0 [ 4.887826] ? filp_open+0x50/0x50 [ 4.888009] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x4d/0x60 [ 4.888287] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x2f/0x130 [ 4.888547] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ 4.888739] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 4.889010] RIP: 0033:0x7ff62fcf1cf7 [ 4.889202] Code: 48 89 57 30 48 8b 04 24 48 89 47 38 e9 1d a0 02 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f71 [ 4.890172] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6644ade8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.890570] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000f2ca70 RCX: 00007ff62fcf1cf7 [ 4.890944] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000f2b9e0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 4.891318] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 4.891691] R10: 00007ff62fd55300 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000f2b9e0 [ 4.892064] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000f2bdd0 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 4.892439] ================================================================== Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 90bd070 upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 #2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 #3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] #4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 #5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 #6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 #7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 #2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 #3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 #4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d #5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] #7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [wen.gang.wang@oracle.com: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210402171344.1605-1-wen.gang.wang@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331203654.3911-1-wen.gang.wang@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit b5332a9 ] We are not changing anything in the TCP connection state so we should not take a write_lock but rather a read lock. This caused a deadlock when running nvmet-tcp and nvme-tcp on the same system, where state_change callbacks on the host and on the controller side have causal relationship and made lockdep report on this with blktests: ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.12.0-rc3 #1 Tainted: G I -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-R} usage. nvme/1324 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: ffff888363151000 (clock-AF_INET){++-?}-{2:2}, at: nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 _raw_write_lock_bh+0x39/0x80 nvmet_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x170 [nvmet_tcp] tcp_fin+0x2a8/0x780 tcp_data_queue+0xf94/0x1f20 tcp_rcv_established+0x6ba/0x1f00 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x502/0x760 tcp_v4_rcv+0x257e/0x3430 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x69/0x6a0 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x1e2/0x2f0 ip_local_deliver+0x1a2/0x420 ip_rcv+0x4fb/0x6b0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x162/0x1b0 process_backlog+0x1ff/0x770 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa9/0x5c0 net_rx_action+0x7b3/0xb30 __do_softirq+0x1f0/0x940 do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xd8/0x100 ip_finish_output2+0x6b7/0x18a0 __ip_queue_xmit+0x706/0x1aa0 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2068/0x2e20 tcp_write_xmit+0xc9e/0x2bb0 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x92/0x310 inet_shutdown+0x158/0x300 __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core] nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460 new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610 vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae irq event stamp: 10687 hardirqs last enabled at (10687): [<ffffffff9ec376bd>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at (10686): [<ffffffff9ec374d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x90 softirqs last enabled at (10684): [<ffffffff9f000608>] __do_softirq+0x608/0x940 softirqs last disabled at (10649): [<ffffffff9cdedd31>] do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(clock-AF_INET); <Interrupt> lock(clock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by nvme/1324: #0: ffff8884a01fe470 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 #1: ffff8886e435c090 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x216/0x460 #2: ffff888104d90c38 (kn->active#255){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove_self+0x22d/0x330 #3: ffff8884634538d0 (&queue->queue_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x52/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] #4: ffff888363150d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_shutdown+0x59/0x300 stack backtrace: CPU: 26 PID: 1324 Comm: nvme Tainted: G I 5.12.0-rc3 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06NR82, BIOS 2.10.0 11/12/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x93/0xc2 mark_lock_irq.cold+0x2c/0xb3 ? verify_lock_unused+0x390/0x390 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x160/0x160 ? lock_downgrade+0x100/0x100 ? save_trace+0x88/0x5e0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40 mark_lock+0x530/0x1470 ? mark_lock_irq+0x1d10/0x1d10 ? enqueue_timer+0x660/0x660 mark_usage+0x215/0x2a0 __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0 ? tcp_schedule_loss_probe.part.0+0x38c/0x520 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40 ? tcp_mtu_probe+0x1ae0/0x1ae0 ? kmalloc_reserve+0xa0/0xa0 ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170 _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170 inet_shutdown+0x189/0x300 __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core] nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460 new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110 vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 ? __ia32_sys_read+0xa0/0xa0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x198/0x340 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fixes: 872d26a ("nvmet-tcp: add NVMe over TCP target driver") Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 1748696 ] Commit eab2404 ("Bluetooth: Add BT_PHY socket option") added a dependency between socket lock and hci_dev->lock that could lead to deadlock. It turns out that hci_conn_get_phy() is not in any way relying on hdev being immutable during the runtime of this function, neither does it even look at any of the members of hdev, and as such there is no need to hold that lock. This fixes the lockdep splat below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.12.0-rc1-00026-g73d464503354 #10 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ bluetoothd/1118 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8f078383c078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: ffff8f07e831d920 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: l2cap_sock_getsockopt+0x8b/0x610 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x72/0xa0 l2cap_sock_ready_cb+0x18/0x70 [bluetooth] l2cap_config_rsp+0x27a/0x520 [bluetooth] l2cap_sig_channel+0x658/0x1330 [bluetooth] l2cap_recv_frame+0x1ba/0x310 [bluetooth] hci_rx_work+0x1cc/0x640 [bluetooth] process_one_work+0x244/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3c/0x380 kthread+0x13e/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #2 (&chan->lock#2/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xa10 l2cap_chan_connect+0x33a/0x940 [bluetooth] l2cap_sock_connect+0x141/0x2a0 [bluetooth] __sys_connect+0x9b/0xc0 __x64_sys_connect+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #1 (&conn->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xa10 l2cap_chan_connect+0x322/0x940 [bluetooth] l2cap_sock_connect+0x141/0x2a0 [bluetooth] __sys_connect+0x9b/0xc0 __x64_sys_connect+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x147a/0x1a50 lock_acquire+0x277/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xa10 hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] l2cap_sock_getsockopt+0x5a9/0x610 [bluetooth] __sys_getsockopt+0xcc/0x200 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> &chan->lock#2/1 --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); lock(&chan->lock#2/1); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by bluetoothd/1118: #0: ffff8f07e831d920 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: l2cap_sock_getsockopt+0x8b/0x610 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 1118 Comm: bluetoothd Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-00026-g73d464503354 #10 Hardware name: LENOVO 20K5S22R00/20K5S22R00, BIOS R0IET38W (1.16 ) 05/31/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7f/0xa1 check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 ? __lock_acquire+0x147a/0x1a50 __lock_acquire+0x147a/0x1a50 lock_acquire+0x277/0x3d0 ? hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] ? __lock_acquire+0x2e1/0x1a50 ? lock_is_held_type+0xb4/0x120 ? hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xa10 ? hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] ? lock_acquire+0x277/0x3d0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 ? hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] hci_conn_get_phy+0x1c/0x150 [bluetooth] l2cap_sock_getsockopt+0x5a9/0x610 [bluetooth] __sys_getsockopt+0xcc/0x200 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fb73df33eee Code: 48 8b 0d 85 0f 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 37 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 52 0f 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fffcfbbbf08 EFLAGS: 00000203 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000037 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000019 RCX: 00007fb73df33eee RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: 0000000000000112 RDI: 0000000000000018 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fffcfbbbf44 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007fffcfbbbf3c R11: 0000000000000203 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000556fcefc70d0 Fixes: eab2404 ("Bluetooth: Add BT_PHY socket option") Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit bbd6f0a ] In bnxt_rx_pkt(), the RX buffers are expected to complete in order. If the RX consumer index indicates an out of order buffer completion, it means we are hitting a hardware bug and the driver will abort all remaining RX packets and reset the RX ring. The RX consumer index that we pass to bnxt_discard_rx() is not correct. We should be passing the current index (tmp_raw_cons) instead of the old index (raw_cons). This bug can cause us to be at the wrong index when trying to abort the next RX packet. It can crash like this: #0 [ffff9bbcdf5c39a8] machine_kexec at ffffffff9b05e007 #1 [ffff9bbcdf5c3a00] __crash_kexec at ffffffff9b111232 #2 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ad0] panic at ffffffff9b07d61e #3 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b50] oops_end at ffffffff9b030978 #4 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b78] no_context at ffffffff9b06aaf0 #5 [ffff9bbcdf5c3bd8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06ae2e #6 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c28] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06af24 #7 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c38] __do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06b67e #8 [ffff9bbcdf5c3cb0] do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06bb12 #9 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ce0] page_fault at ffffffff9bc015c5 [exception RIP: bnxt_rx_pkt+237] RIP: ffffffffc0259cdd RSP: ffff9bbcdf5c3d98 RFLAGS: 00010213 RAX: 000000005dd8097f RBX: ffff9ba4cb11b7e0 RCX: ffffa923cf6e9000 RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 0000000000000627 RDI: 0000000000001000 RBP: ffff9bbcdf5c3e60 R8: 0000000000420003 R9: 000000000000020d R10: ffffa923cf6ec138 R11: ffff9bbcdf5c3e83 R12: ffff9ba4d6f928c0 R13: ffff9ba4cac28080 R14: ffff9ba4cb11b7f0 R15: ffff9ba4d5a30000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 Fixes: a1b0e4e ("bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.") Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5bbf219 ] An out of bounds write happens when setting the default power state. KASAN sees this as: [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in radeon_atombios_parse_power_table_1_3+0x1837/0x1998 [radeon] Write of size 4 at addr ffff88810178d858 by task systemd-udevd/157 CPU: 0 PID: 157 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.12.0-E620 #50 Hardware name: eMachines eMachines E620 /Nile , BIOS V1.03 09/30/2008 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa5/0xe6 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x239 kasan_report+0x170/0x1a8 radeon_atombios_parse_power_table_1_3+0x1837/0x1998 [radeon] radeon_atombios_get_power_modes+0x144/0x1888 [radeon] radeon_pm_init+0x1019/0x1904 [radeon] rs690_init+0x76e/0x84a [radeon] radeon_device_init+0x1c1a/0x21e5 [radeon] radeon_driver_load_kms+0xf5/0x30b [radeon] drm_dev_register+0x255/0x4a0 [drm] radeon_pci_probe+0x246/0x2f6 [radeon] pci_device_probe+0x1aa/0x294 really_probe+0x30e/0x850 driver_probe_device+0xe6/0x135 device_driver_attach+0xc1/0xf8 __driver_attach+0x13f/0x146 bus_for_each_dev+0xfa/0x146 bus_add_driver+0x2b3/0x447 driver_register+0x242/0x2c1 do_one_initcall+0x149/0x2fd do_init_module+0x1ae/0x573 load_module+0x4dee/0x5cca __do_sys_finit_module+0xf1/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Without KASAN, this will manifest later when the kernel attempts to allocate memory that was stomped, since it collides with the inline slab freelist pointer: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 781 Comm: openrc-run.sh Tainted: G W 5.10.12-gentoo-E620 #2 Hardware name: eMachines eMachines E620 /Nile , BIOS V1.03 09/30/2008 RIP: 0010:kfree+0x115/0x230 Code: 89 c5 e8 75 ea ff ff 48 8b 00 0f ba e0 09 72 63 e8 1f f4 ff ff 41 89 c4 48 8b 45 00 0f ba e0 10 72 0a 48 8b 45 08 a8 01 75 02 <0f> 0b 44 89 e1 48 c7 c2 00 f0 ff ff be 06 00 00 00 48 d3 e2 48 c7 RSP: 0018:ffffb42f40267e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffd61280ee8d88 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 000000008010000d RDX: 4000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffba1360b0 RDI: ffffd61280ee8d80 RBP: ffffd61280ee8d80 R08: ffffffffb91bebdf R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8fe2c1047ac8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000100 FS: 00007fe80eff6b68(0000) GS:ffff8fe339c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe80eec7bc0 CR3: 0000000038012000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: __free_fdtable+0x16/0x1f put_files_struct+0x81/0x9b do_exit+0x433/0x94d do_group_exit+0xa6/0xa6 __x64_sys_exit_group+0xf/0xf do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fe80ef64bea Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7fe80ef64bc0. RSP: 002b:00007ffdb1c47528 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fe80ef64bea RDX: 00007fe80ef64f60 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007fe80ee2c620 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fe80eff41e0 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007fe80edf9cd0 Modules linked in: radeon(+) ath5k(+) snd_hda_codec_realtek ... Use a valid power_state index when initializing the "flags" and "misc" and "misc2" fields. Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211537 Reported-by: Erhard F. <erhard_f@mailbox.org> Fixes: a48b9b4 ("drm/radeon/kms/pm: add asic specific callbacks for getting power state (v2)") Fixes: 79daedc ("drm/radeon/kms: minor pm cleanups") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit cf7b39a ] We get a bug: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iov_iter_revert+0x11c/0x404 lib/iov_iter.c:1139 Read of size 8 at addr ffff0000d3fb11f8 by task CPU: 0 PID: 12582 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.10.0-00843-g352c8610ccd2 #2 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2d0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:132 show_stack+0x28/0x34 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:196 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x110/0x164 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description+0x78/0x5c8 mm/kasan/report.c:385 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:545 [inline] kasan_report+0x148/0x1e4 mm/kasan/report.c:562 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] __asan_load8+0xb4/0xbc mm/kasan/generic.c:252 iov_iter_revert+0x11c/0x404 lib/iov_iter.c:1139 io_read fs/io_uring.c:3421 [inline] io_issue_sqe+0x2344/0x2d64 fs/io_uring.c:5943 __io_queue_sqe+0x19c/0x520 fs/io_uring.c:6260 io_queue_sqe+0x2a4/0x590 fs/io_uring.c:6326 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6395 [inline] io_submit_sqes+0x4c0/0xa04 fs/io_uring.c:6624 __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9013 [inline] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:8960 [inline] __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x190/0x708 fs/io_uring.c:8960 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:36 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48 [inline] el0_svc_common arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:158 [inline] do_el0_svc+0x120/0x290 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:227 el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:367 el0_sync_handler+0x98/0x170 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:383 el0_sync+0x140/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:670 Allocated by task 12570: stack_trace_save+0x80/0xb8 kernel/stacktrace.c:121 kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:48 [inline] kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0xdc/0x120 mm/kasan/common.c:461 kasan_kmalloc+0xc/0x14 mm/kasan/common.c:475 __kmalloc+0x23c/0x334 mm/slub.c:3970 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:557 [inline] __io_alloc_async_data+0x68/0x9c fs/io_uring.c:3210 io_setup_async_rw fs/io_uring.c:3229 [inline] io_read fs/io_uring.c:3436 [inline] io_issue_sqe+0x2954/0x2d64 fs/io_uring.c:5943 __io_queue_sqe+0x19c/0x520 fs/io_uring.c:6260 io_queue_sqe+0x2a4/0x590 fs/io_uring.c:6326 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6395 [inline] io_submit_sqes+0x4c0/0xa04 fs/io_uring.c:6624 __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9013 [inline] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:8960 [inline] __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x190/0x708 fs/io_uring.c:8960 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:36 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48 [inline] el0_svc_common arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:158 [inline] do_el0_svc+0x120/0x290 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:227 el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:367 el0_sync_handler+0x98/0x170 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:383 el0_sync+0x140/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:670 Freed by task 12570: stack_trace_save+0x80/0xb8 kernel/stacktrace.c:121 kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:48 [inline] kasan_set_track+0x38/0x6c mm/kasan/common.c:56 kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:355 __kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:422 kasan_slab_free+0x10/0x1c mm/kasan/common.c:431 slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1544 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook mm/slub.c:1577 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:3142 [inline] kfree+0x104/0x38c mm/slub.c:4124 io_dismantle_req fs/io_uring.c:1855 [inline] __io_free_req+0x70/0x254 fs/io_uring.c:1867 io_put_req_find_next fs/io_uring.c:2173 [inline] __io_queue_sqe+0x1fc/0x520 fs/io_uring.c:6279 __io_req_task_submit+0x154/0x21c fs/io_uring.c:2051 io_req_task_submit+0x2c/0x44 fs/io_uring.c:2063 task_work_run+0xdc/0x128 kernel/task_work.c:151 get_signal+0x6f8/0x980 kernel/signal.c:2562 do_signal+0x108/0x3a4 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:658 do_notify_resume+0xbc/0x25c arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:722 work_pending+0xc/0x180 blkdev_read_iter can truncate iov_iter's count since the count + pos may exceed the size of the blkdev. This will confuse io_read that we have consume the iovec. And once we do the iov_iter_revert in io_read, we will trigger the slab-out-of-bounds. Fix it by reexpand the count with size has been truncated. blkdev_write_iter can trigger the problem too. Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Acked-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silencec@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401071807.3328235-1-yangerkun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…xtent [ Upstream commit 6416954 ] When cloning an inline extent there are a few cases, such as when we have an implicit hole at file offset 0, where we start a transaction while holding a read lock on a leaf. Starting the transaction results in a call to sb_start_intwrite(), which results in doing a read lock on a percpu semaphore. Lockdep doesn't like this and complains about it: [46.580704] ====================================================== [46.580752] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [46.580799] 5.13.0-rc1 #28 Not tainted [46.580832] ------------------------------------------------------ [46.580877] cloner/3835 is trying to acquire lock: [46.580918] c00000001301d638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.581167] [46.581167] but task is already holding lock: [46.581217] c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581293] [46.581293] which lock already depends on the new lock. [46.581293] [46.581351] [46.581351] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [46.581410] [46.581410] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [46.581464] down_read_nested+0x68/0x200 [46.581536] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581577] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x88/0x200 [46.581623] btrfs_search_slot+0x298/0xb70 [46.581665] btrfs_set_inode_index+0xfc/0x260 [46.581708] btrfs_new_inode+0x26c/0x950 [46.581749] btrfs_create+0xf4/0x2b0 [46.581782] lookup_open.isra.57+0x55c/0x6a0 [46.581855] path_openat+0x418/0xd20 [46.581888] do_filp_open+0x9c/0x130 [46.581920] do_sys_openat2+0x2ec/0x430 [46.581961] do_sys_open+0x90/0xc0 [46.581993] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582037] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582078] [46.582078] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [46.582135] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.582176] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.582263] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.582308] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.582353] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.582388] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.582434] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.582481] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.582558] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.582605] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.582651] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.582697] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.582733] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582777] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582822] [46.582822] other info that might help us debug this: [46.582822] [46.582888] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [46.582888] [46.582942] CPU0 CPU1 [46.582984] ---- ---- [46.583028] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583062] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583119] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583174] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583212] [46.583212] *** DEADLOCK *** [46.583212] [46.583266] 6 locks held by cloner/3835: [46.583299] #0: c00000001301d448 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.583382] #1: c00000000f6d3768 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x58/0xc0 [46.583477] #2: c00000000f6d72a8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x9c/0xc0 [46.583574] #3: c00000000f6d7138 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xd0/0x590 [46.583657] #4: c00000000f6d35f8 (&ei->i_mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xe0/0x590 [46.583743] #5: c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.583828] [46.583828] stack backtrace: [46.583872] CPU: 1 PID: 3835 Comm: cloner Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1 #28 [46.583931] Call Trace: [46.583955] [c0000000167c7200] [c000000000c1ee78] dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) [46.584052] [c0000000167c7240] [c000000000274058] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x3a8/0x400 [46.584123] [c0000000167c72e0] [c0000000002741f4] check_noncircular+0x144/0x190 [46.584191] [c0000000167c73b0] [c000000000278fc0] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.584259] [c0000000167c74f0] [c00000000027aa94] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.584317] [c0000000167c75e0] [c000000000a0d6cc] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.584388] [c0000000167c7690] [c000000000af47a4] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.584457] [c0000000167c77c0] [c000000000af525c] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.584514] [c0000000167c7990] [c000000000af5698] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.584583] [c0000000167c7a00] [c000000000af5b58] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.584652] [c0000000167c7ae0] [c0000000005d81dc] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.584722] [c0000000167c7b40] [c0000000005d84f0] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.584793] [c0000000167c7bb0] [c00000000058bf80] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.584861] [c0000000167c7c10] [c00000000058c894] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.584922] [c0000000167c7d10] [c00000000058db4c] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.584978] [c0000000167c7d60] [c0000000000364a4] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.585046] [c0000000167c7e10] [c00000000000d45c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.585114] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585160] NIP: 00007ffff7e22990 LR: 00000001000010ec CTR: 0000000000000000 [46.585224] REGS: c0000000167c7e80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc1) [46.585280] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000244 XER: 00000000 [46.585374] IRQMASK: 0 [46.585374] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffffffdec0 00007ffff7f17100 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR04: 000000008020940d 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR08: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007ffff7ffa940 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR20: 0000000000000000 000000009123683e 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR28: 0000000100030260 0000000100030280 0000000000000003 000000000000005f [46.585919] NIP [00007ffff7e22990] 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585964] LR [00000001000010ec] 0x1000010ec [46.586010] --- interrupt: c00 This should be a false positive, as both locks are acquired in read mode. Nevertheless, we don't need to hold a leaf locked when we start the transaction, so just release the leaf (path) before starting it. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210513214404.xks77p566fglzgum@riteshh-domain/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 9c2876d ] When amdgpu_ib_ring_tests failed, the reset logic called amdgpu_device_ip_suspend twice, then deadlock occurred. Deadlock log: [ 805.655192] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: ib ring test failed (-110). [ 806.290952] [drm] free PSP TMR buffer [ 806.319406] ============================================ [ 806.320315] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 806.321225] 5.11.0-custom #1 Tainted: G W OEL [ 806.322135] -------------------------------------------- [ 806.323043] cat/2593 is trying to acquire lock: [ 806.323825] ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.325668] but task is already holding lock: [ 806.326664] ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.328430] other info that might help us debug this: [ 806.329539] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 806.330549] CPU0 [ 806.330983] ---- [ 806.331416] lock(&adev->dm.dc_lock); [ 806.332086] lock(&adev->dm.dc_lock); [ 806.332738] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 806.333747] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 806.334899] 3 locks held by cat/2593: [ 806.335537] #0: ffff888100d3f1b8 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: simple_attr_read+0x4e/0x110 [ 806.337009] #1: ffff888136b1fd78 (&adev->reset_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_lock_adev+0x42/0x94 [amdgpu] [ 806.339018] #2: ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.340869] stack backtrace: [ 806.341621] CPU: 6 PID: 2593 Comm: cat Tainted: G W OEL 5.11.0-custom #1 [ 806.342921] Hardware name: AMD Celadon-CZN/Celadon-CZN, BIOS WLD0C23N_Weekly_20_12_2 12/23/2020 [ 806.344413] Call Trace: [ 806.344849] dump_stack+0x93/0xbd [ 806.345435] __lock_acquire.cold+0x18a/0x2cf [ 806.346179] lock_acquire+0xca/0x390 [ 806.346807] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.347813] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x930 [ 806.348454] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.349434] ? amdgpu_device_indirect_rreg+0x58/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 806.350581] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x50 [ 806.351437] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.352437] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4f/0x80 [ 806.353252] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4f/0x80 [ 806.354064] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 806.354747] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 806.355457] dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.356427] ? soc15_common_set_clockgating_state+0x17d/0x19 [amdgpu] [ 806.357736] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x78/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 806.360394] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x21/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 806.362926] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xb3/0x270 [amdgpu] [ 806.365560] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x679/0x8eb [amdgpu] Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <Lang.Yu@amd.com> Acked-by: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 9453d45 ] Function skb_ext_add() doesn't initialize created skb extension with any value and leaves it up to the user. However, since extension of type TC_SKB_EXT originally contained only single value tc_skb_ext->chain its users used to just assign the chain value without setting whole extension memory to zero first. This assumption changed when TC_SKB_EXT extension was extended with additional fields but not all users were updated to initialize the new fields which leads to use of uninitialized memory afterwards. UBSAN log: [ 778.299821] UBSAN: invalid-load in net/openvswitch/flow.c:899:28 [ 778.301495] load of value 107 is not a valid value for type '_Bool' [ 778.303215] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7+ #2 [ 778.304933] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 778.307901] Call Trace: [ 778.308680] <IRQ> [ 778.309358] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [ 778.310307] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 [ 778.311167] __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value.cold+0x43/0x48 [ 778.312454] ? memset+0x20/0x40 [ 778.313230] ovs_flow_key_extract.cold+0xf/0x14 [openvswitch] [ 778.314532] ovs_vport_receive+0x19e/0x2e0 [openvswitch] [ 778.315749] ? ovs_vport_find_upcall_portid+0x330/0x330 [openvswitch] [ 778.317188] ? create_prof_cpu_mask+0x20/0x20 [ 778.318220] ? arch_stack_walk+0x82/0xf0 [ 778.319153] ? secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb [ 778.320399] ? stack_trace_save+0x91/0xc0 [ 778.321362] ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x160/0x160 [ 778.322517] ? lock_release+0x52e/0x760 [ 778.323444] netdev_frame_hook+0x323/0x610 [openvswitch] [ 778.324668] ? ovs_netdev_get_vport+0xe0/0xe0 [openvswitch] [ 778.325950] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x771/0x2db0 [ 778.327067] ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6f0 [ 778.328021] ? lock_acquire+0x565/0x720 [ 778.328940] ? generic_xdp_tx+0x4f0/0x4f0 [ 778.329902] ? inet_gro_receive+0x2a7/0x10a0 [ 778.330914] ? lock_downgrade+0x6f0/0x6f0 [ 778.331867] ? udp4_gro_receive+0x4c4/0x13e0 [ 778.332876] ? lock_release+0x52e/0x760 [ 778.333808] ? dev_gro_receive+0xcc8/0x2380 [ 778.334810] ? lock_downgrade+0x6f0/0x6f0 [ 778.335769] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x295/0x820 [ 778.336955] ? process_backlog+0x780/0x780 [ 778.337941] ? mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister+0x20/0x20 [mlx5_core] [ 778.339613] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0xa7/0xc0 [ 778.341033] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x14/0x20 [ 778.342072] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x5f5/0xcb0 [ 778.343288] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x7a/0x90 [ 778.344234] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x9e0/0x9e0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.345676] ? mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame_mpwqe+0x14d0/0x14d0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.347140] ? __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x820/0x820 [ 778.348351] ? mlx5e_post_rx_mpwqes+0xa6/0x25d0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.349688] ? napi_gro_flush+0x26c/0x3c0 [ 778.350641] napi_complete_done+0x188/0x6b0 [ 778.351627] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x373/0x1b80 [mlx5_core] [ 778.352853] __napi_poll+0x9f/0x510 [ 778.353704] ? mlx5_flow_namespace_set_mode+0x260/0x260 [mlx5_core] [ 778.355158] net_rx_action+0x34c/0xa40 [ 778.356060] ? napi_threaded_poll+0x3d0/0x3d0 [ 778.357083] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x190 [ 778.358041] ? __common_interrupt+0x8e/0x1a0 [ 778.359045] __do_softirq+0x1ce/0x984 [ 778.359938] __irq_exit_rcu+0x137/0x1d0 [ 778.360865] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20 [ 778.361708] common_interrupt+0x80/0xa0 [ 778.362640] </IRQ> [ 778.363212] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 [ 778.364204] RIP: 0010:native_safe_halt+0xe/0x10 [ 778.365273] Code: 4f ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 50 3f 40 fe e9 dc fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 43 3f 40 fe eb 90 cc e9 07 00 00 00 0f 00 2d 74 05 62 00 fb f4 <c3> 90 e9 07 00 00 00 0f 00 2d 64 05 62 00 f4 c3 cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 [ 778.369355] RSP: 0018:ffffffff84407e48 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 778.370570] RAX: ffff88842de46a80 RBX: ffffffff84425840 RCX: ffffffff83418468 [ 778.372143] RDX: 000000000026f1da RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff8343af5e [ 778.373722] RBP: fffffbfff0884b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88842de46bcb [ 778.375292] R10: ffffed1085bc8d79 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 778.376860] R13: ffffffff851124a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 [ 778.378491] ? rcu_eqs_enter.constprop.0+0xb8/0xe0 [ 778.379606] ? default_idle_call+0x5e/0xe0 [ 778.380578] default_idle+0xa/0x10 [ 778.381406] default_idle_call+0x96/0xe0 [ 778.382350] do_idle+0x3d4/0x550 [ 778.383153] ? arch_cpu_idle_exit+0x40/0x40 [ 778.384143] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 778.385078] start_kernel+0x3c7/0x3e5 [ 778.385978] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb Fix the issue by providing new function tc_skb_ext_alloc() that allocates tc skb extension and initializes its memory to 0 before returning it to the caller. Change all existing users to use new API instead of calling skb_ext_add() directly. Fixes: 038ebb1 ("net/sched: act_ct: fix miss set mru for ovs after defrag in act_ct") Fixes: d29334c ("net/sched: act_api: fix miss set post_ct for ovs after do conntrack in act_ct") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…asid() commit 9bfecd0 upstream. While digesting the XSAVE-related horrors which got introduced with the supervisor/user split, the recent addition of ENQCMD-related functionality got on the radar and turned out to be similarly broken. update_pasid(), which is only required when X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD is available, is invoked from two places: 1) From switch_to() for the incoming task 2) Via a SMP function call from the IOMMU/SMV code #1 is half-ways correct as it hacks around the brokenness of get_xsave_addr() by enforcing the state to be 'present', but all the conditionals in that code are completely pointless for that. Also the invocation is just useless overhead because at that point it's guaranteed that TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set on the incoming task and all of this can be handled at return to user space. #2 is broken beyond repair. The comment in the code claims that it is safe to invoke this in an IPI, but that's just wishful thinking. FPU state of a running task is protected by fregs_lock() which is nothing else than a local_bh_disable(). As BH-disabled regions run usually with interrupts enabled the IPI can hit a code section which modifies FPU state and there is absolutely no guarantee that any of the assumptions which are made for the IPI case is true. Also the IPI is sent to all CPUs in mm_cpumask(mm), but the IPI is invoked with a NULL pointer argument, so it can hit a completely unrelated task and unconditionally force an update for nothing. Worse, it can hit a kernel thread which operates on a user space address space and set a random PASID for it. The offending commit does not cleanly revert, but it's sufficient to force disable X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD and to remove the broken update_pasid() code to make this dysfunctional all over the place. Anything more complex would require more surgery and none of the related functions outside of the x86 core code are blatantly wrong, so removing those would be overkill. As nothing enables the PASID bit in the IA32_XSS MSR yet, which is required to make this actually work, this cannot result in a regression except for related out of tree train-wrecks, but they are broken already today. Fixes: 20f0afd ("x86/mmu: Allocate/free a PASID") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mtsd6gr9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 510b80a upstream. When user space brings PKRU into init state, then the kernel handling is broken: T1 user space xsave(state) state.header.xfeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU; xrstor(state) T1 -> kernel schedule() XSAVE(S) -> T1->xsave.header.xfeatures[PKRU] == 0 T1->flags |= TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD; wrpkru(); schedule() ... pk = get_xsave_addr(&T1->fpu->state.xsave, XFEATURE_PKRU); if (pk) wrpkru(pk->pkru); else wrpkru(DEFAULT_PKRU); Because the xfeatures bit is 0 and therefore the value in the xsave storage is not valid, get_xsave_addr() returns NULL and switch_to() writes the default PKRU. -> FAIL #1! So that wrecks any copy_to/from_user() on the way back to user space which hits memory which is protected by the default PKRU value. Assumed that this does not fail (pure luck) then T1 goes back to user space and because TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set it ends up in switch_fpu_return() __fpregs_load_activate() if (!fpregs_state_valid()) { load_XSTATE_from_task(); } But if nothing touched the FPU between T1 scheduling out and back in, then the fpregs_state is still valid which means switch_fpu_return() does nothing and just clears TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD. Back to user space with DEFAULT_PKRU loaded. -> FAIL #2! The fix is simple: if get_xsave_addr() returns NULL then set the PKRU value to 0 instead of the restrictive default PKRU value in init_pkru_value. [ bp: Massage in minor nitpicks from folks. ] Fixes: 0cecca9 ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608144346.045616965@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit f9dfb5e upstream. The XSAVE init code initializes all enabled and supported components with XRSTOR(S) to init state. Then it XSAVEs the state of the components back into init_fpstate which is used in several places to fill in the init state of components. This works correctly with XSAVE, but not with XSAVEOPT and XSAVES because those use the init optimization and skip writing state of components which are in init state. So init_fpstate.xsave still contains all zeroes after this operation. There are two ways to solve that: 1) Use XSAVE unconditionally, but that requires to reshuffle the buffer when XSAVES is enabled because XSAVES uses compacted format. 2) Save the components which are known to have a non-zero init state by other means. Looking deeper, #2 is the right thing to do because all components the kernel supports have all-zeroes init state except the legacy features (FP, SSE). Those cannot be hard coded because the states are not identical on all CPUs, but they can be saved with FXSAVE which avoids all conditionals. Use FXSAVE to save the legacy FP/SSE components in init_fpstate along with a BUILD_BUG_ON() which reminds developers to validate that a newly added component has all zeroes init state. As a bonus remove the now unused copy_xregs_to_kernel_booting() crutch. The XSAVE and reshuffle method can still be implemented in the unlikely case that components are added which have a non-zero init state and no other means to save them. For now, FXSAVE is just simple and good enough. [ bp: Fix a typo or two in the text. ] Fixes: 6bad06b ("x86, xsave: Use xsaveopt in context-switch path when supported") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210618143444.587311343@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit f54b3ca upstream. This reverts commit 1815d9c. Unfortunately this inverts the locking hierarchy, so back to the drawing board. Full lockdep splat below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kms_frontbuffer/1087 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810dcd01a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x22e/0xca0 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x42/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&client->modeset_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x1c/0x180 drm_client_modeset_commit+0x1c/0x40 __drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x88/0xb0 drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x40 intel_fbdev_set_par+0x11/0x40 [i915] fbcon_init+0x270/0x4f0 visual_init+0xc6/0x130 do_bind_con_driver+0x1e5/0x2d0 do_take_over_console+0x10e/0x180 do_fbcon_takeover+0x53/0xb0 register_framebuffer+0x22d/0x310 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36c/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0 drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->master_mutex --> &client->modeset_mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&client->modeset_mutex); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&dev->master_mutex);

[ Upstream commit 85e8b03 ] syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh() is treated differently than rcu_read_lock() WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/addrconf.h:313 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/5: #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:617 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:644 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x871/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2247 #1: ffffc90000ca7da8 ((work_completion)(&port->wq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8a5/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2251 #2: ffffffff8bf795c0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1da/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4180 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events ipvlan_process_multicast Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:313 [inline] __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:311 [inline] neigh_reduce drivers/net/vxlan.c:2167 [inline] vxlan_xmit+0x34d5/0x4c30 drivers/net/vxlan.c:2919 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4944 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4958 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3654 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1eb/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3670 __dev_queue_xmit+0x2133/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4246 ipvlan_process_multicast+0xa99/0xd70 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:287 process_one_work+0x98d/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2276 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2422 kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:313 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 Fixes: f564f45 ("vxlan: add ipv6 proxy support") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit d676598 ] Patch was based on wrong presumption that be_poll can be called only from bh context. It reintroducing old regression (also reverted) and causing deadlock when we use netconsole with benet in bonding. Old revert: commit 072a9c4 ("netpoll: revert 6bdb7fe and fix be_poll() instead") [ 331.269715] bond0: (slave enp0s7f0): Releasing backup interface [ 331.270121] CPU: 4 PID: 1479 Comm: ifenslave Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7+ #2 [ 331.270122] Call Trace: [ 331.270122] [c00000001789f200] [c0000000008c505c] dump_stack+0x100/0x174 (unreliable) [ 331.270124] [c00000001789f240] [c008000001238b9c] be_poll+0x64/0xe90 [be2net] [ 331.270125] [c00000001789f330] [c000000000d1e6e4] netpoll_poll_dev+0x174/0x3d0 [ 331.270127] [c00000001789f400] [c008000001bc167c] bond_poll_controller+0xb4/0x130 [bonding] [ 331.270128] [c00000001789f450] [c000000000d1e624] netpoll_poll_dev+0xb4/0x3d0 [ 331.270129] [c00000001789f520] [c000000000d1ed88] netpoll_send_skb+0x448/0x470 [ 331.270130] [c00000001789f5d0] [c0080000011f14f8] write_msg+0x180/0x1b0 [netconsole] [ 331.270131] [c00000001789f640] [c000000000230c0c] console_unlock+0x54c/0x790 [ 331.270132] [c00000001789f7b0] [c000000000233098] vprintk_emit+0x2d8/0x450 [ 331.270133] [c00000001789f810] [c000000000234758] vprintk+0xc8/0x270 [ 331.270134] [c00000001789f850] [c000000000233c28] printk+0x40/0x54 [ 331.270135] [c00000001789f870] [c000000000ccf908] __netdev_printk+0x150/0x198 [ 331.270136] [c00000001789f910] [c000000000ccfdb4] netdev_info+0x68/0x94 [ 331.270137] [c00000001789f950] [c008000001bcbd70] __bond_release_one+0x188/0x6b0 [bonding] [ 331.270138] [c00000001789faa0] [c008000001bcc6f4] bond_do_ioctl+0x42c/0x490 [bonding] [ 331.270139] [c00000001789fb60] [c000000000d0d17c] dev_ifsioc+0x17c/0x400 [ 331.270140] [c00000001789fbc0] [c000000000d0db70] dev_ioctl+0x390/0x890 [ 331.270141] [c00000001789fc10] [c000000000c7c76c] sock_do_ioctl+0xac/0x1b0 [ 331.270142] [c00000001789fc90] [c000000000c7ffac] sock_ioctl+0x31c/0x6e0 [ 331.270143] [c00000001789fd60] [c0000000005b9728] sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x150 [ 331.270145] [c00000001789fdb0] [c0000000000336c0] system_call_exception+0x160/0x2f0 [ 331.270146] [c00000001789fe10] [c00000000000d35c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [ 331.270147] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7fffa6c6ec00 [ 331.270147] NIP: 00007fffa6c6ec00 LR: 0000000105c4185c CTR: 0000000000000000 [ 331.270148] REGS: c00000001789fe80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc7+) [ 331.270148] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000428 XER: 00000000 [ 331.270155] IRQMASK: 0 [ 331.270156] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffd494d5b0 00007fffa6d57100 0000000000000003 [ 331.270158] GPR04: 0000000000008991 00007fffd494d6d0 0000000000000008 00007fffd494f28c [ 331.270161] GPR08: 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270164] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fffa6dfa220 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270167] GPR16: 0000000105c44880 0000000000000000 0000000105c60088 0000000105c60318 [ 331.270170] GPR20: 0000000105c602c0 0000000105c44560 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270172] GPR24: 00007fffd494dc50 00007fffd494d6a8 0000000105c60008 00007fffd494d6d0 [ 331.270175] GPR28: 00007fffd494f27e 0000000105c6026c 00007fffd494f284 0000000000000000 [ 331.270178] NIP [00007fffa6c6ec00] 0x7fffa6c6ec00 [ 331.270178] LR [0000000105c4185c] 0x105c4185c [ 331.270179] --- interrupt: c00 This reverts commit d0d006a. Fixes: d0d006a ("be2net: disable bh with spin_lock in be_process_mcc") Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 5648c07 upstream. Add the following Telit FD980 composition 0x1056: Cfg #1: mass storage Cfg #2: rndis, tty, adb, tty, tty, tty, tty Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803194711.3036-1-dnlplm@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 67069a1 upstream. ASan reported a memory leak caused by info_linear not being deallocated. The info_linear was allocated during in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(). This patch adds the corresponding free() when bpf_prog_info_node is freed in perf_env__purge_bpf(). $ sudo ./perf record -- sleep 5 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.025 MB perf.data (8 samples) ] ================================================================= ==297735==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 7688 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f420f in malloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f420f) #1 0xc06a74 in bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear /home/user/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:11113:16 #2 0xb426fe in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:191:16 #3 0xb42008 in perf_event__synthesize_bpf_events /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:410:9 #4 0x594596 in record__synthesize /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1490:8 #5 0x58c9ac in __cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1798:8 ni#6 0x58990b in cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2901:8 ni#7 0x7b2a20 in run_builtin /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 ni#8 0x7b12ff in handle_internal_command /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 ni#9 0x7b2583 in run_argv /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 ni#10 0x7b0d79 in main /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 ni#11 0x7fa357ef6b74 in __libc_start_main /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.33-8.fc34.x86_64/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:332:16 Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210602224024.300485-1-rickyman7@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 41d5854 upstream. I got several memory leak reports from Asan with a simple command. It was because VDSO is not released due to the refcount. Like in __dsos_addnew_id(), it should put the refcount after adding to the list. $ perf record true [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.030 MB perf.data (10 samples) ] ================================================================= ==692599==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 439 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce4aa8ee in dso__new_id util/dso.c:1256 #2 0x559bce59245a in __machine__addnew_vdso util/vdso.c:132 #3 0x559bce59245a in machine__findnew_vdso util/vdso.c:347 #4 0x559bce50826c in map__new util/map.c:175 #5 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 ni#6 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 ni#7 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 ni#8 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#9 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#10 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 ni#11 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 ni#12 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 ni#13 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 ni#14 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 ni#15 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 ni#16 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 ni#17 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 ni#18 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 ni#19 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 ni#20 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Indirect leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce520907 in nsinfo__copy util/namespaces.c:169 #2 0x559bce50821b in map__new util/map.c:168 #3 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 #4 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 #5 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 ni#6 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#7 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#8 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 ni#9 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 ni#10 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 ni#11 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 ni#12 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 ni#13 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 ni#14 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 ni#15 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 ni#16 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 ni#17 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 ni#18 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 471 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210315045641.700430-1-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 23d2b94 upstream. I got below panic when doing fuzz test: Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 4056 Comm: syz-executor.3 Tainted: G B 5.14.0-rc1-00195-gcff5c4254439-dirty #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x7a/0x9b panic+0x2cd/0x5af end_report.cold+0x5a/0x5a kasan_report+0xec/0x110 ip_check_mc_rcu+0x556/0x5d0 __mkroute_output+0x895/0x1740 ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x2d0/0x1050 ip_route_output_key_hash+0x182/0x2e0 ip_route_output_flow+0x28/0x130 udp_sendmsg+0x165d/0x2280 udpv6_sendmsg+0x121e/0x24f0 inet6_sendmsg+0xf7/0x140 sock_sendmsg+0xe9/0x180 ____sys_sendmsg+0x2b8/0x7a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf0/0x160 __sys_sendmmsg+0x17e/0x3c0 __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9e/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x462eb9 Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f3df5af1c58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000073bf00 RCX: 0000000000462eb9 RDX: 0000000000000312 RSI: 0000000020001700 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3df5af26bc R13: 00000000004c372d R14: 0000000000700b10 R15: 00000000ffffffff It is one use-after-free in ip_check_mc_rcu. In ip_mc_del_src, the ip_sf_list of pmc has been freed under pmc->lock protection. But access to ip_sf_list in ip_check_mc_rcu is not protected by the lock. Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 21e3980 ] vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in a lockdep warning. Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it. The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply, while vctrl-regulator was not enabled. The lockdep warning is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) but task is already holding lock: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199) regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427) [...] -> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) [...] -> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire); lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030) #1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2)) #2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033) #3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285 include/linux/cpumask.h:405 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399) #4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) #5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161) show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113) print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Fixes: e915331 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-3-wenst@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b357d97 ] commit 3ba7f53 ("ice: don't remove netdev->dev_addr from uc sync list") introduced calls to netif_addr_lock_bh() and netif_addr_unlock_bh() in the driver's ndo_set_mac() callback. This is fine since the driver is updated the netdev's dev_addr, but since this is a spinlock, the driver cannot sleep when the lock is held. Unfortunately the functions to add/delete MAC filters depend on a mutex. This was causing a trace with the lock debug kernel config options enabled when changing the mac address via iproute. [ 203.273059] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:281 [ 203.273065] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 6698, name: ip [ 203.273068] Preemption disabled at: [ 203.273068] [<ffffffffc04aaeab>] ice_set_mac_address+0x8b/0x1c0 [ice] [ 203.273097] CPU: 31 PID: 6698 Comm: ip Tainted: G S W I 5.14.0-rc4 #2 [ 203.273100] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0010.010620200716 01/06/2020 [ 203.273102] Call Trace: [ 203.273107] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 203.273113] ? ice_set_mac_address+0x8b/0x1c0 [ice] [ 203.273124] ___might_sleep.cold.150+0xda/0xea [ 203.273131] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x40 [ 203.273136] ice_remove_mac+0xe3/0x180 [ice] [ 203.273155] ? ice_fltr_add_mac_list+0x20/0x20 [ice] [ 203.273175] ice_fltr_prepare_mac+0x43/0xa0 [ice] [ 203.273194] ice_set_mac_address+0xab/0x1c0 [ice] [ 203.273206] dev_set_mac_address+0xb8/0x120 [ 203.273210] dev_set_mac_address_user+0x2c/0x50 [ 203.273212] do_setlink+0x1dd/0x10e0 [ 203.273217] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x12d/0x1a0 [ 203.273221] __rtnl_newlink+0x530/0x910 [ 203.273224] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x17f/0x380 [ 203.273230] ? preempt_count_add+0x68/0xa0 [ 203.273236] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1f/0x30 [ 203.273241] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x4d/0x440 [ 203.273244] rtnl_newlink+0x43/0x60 [ 203.273245] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x13a/0x380 [ 203.273248] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.40+0x130/0x130 [ 203.273250] netlink_rcv_skb+0x4e/0x100 [ 203.273256] netlink_unicast+0x1a2/0x280 [ 203.273258] netlink_sendmsg+0x242/0x490 [ 203.273260] sock_sendmsg+0x58/0x60 [ 203.273263] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1ef/0x260 [ 203.273265] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 203.273268] ? ____sys_recvmsg+0xe6/0x170 [ 203.273270] ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xc0 [ 203.273272] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 203.273274] ? ___sys_recvmsg+0x89/0xc0 [ 203.273276] ? __netlink_sendskb+0x50/0x50 [ 203.273278] ? mod_objcg_state+0xee/0x310 [ 203.273282] ? __dentry_kill+0x114/0x170 [ 203.273286] ? get_max_files+0x10/0x10 [ 203.273288] __sys_sendmsg+0x57/0xa0 [ 203.273290] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 [ 203.273295] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 203.273296] RIP: 0033:0x7f8edf96e278 [ 203.273298] Code: 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b5 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 8d 05 25 63 2c 00 8b 00 85 c0 75 17 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 58 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 41 54 41 89 d4 55 [ 203.273300] RSP: 002b:00007ffcb8bdac08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e [ 203.273303] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000006115e0ae RCX: 00007f8edf96e278 [ 203.273304] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffcb8bdac70 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 203.273305] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffcb8bda5b0 [ 203.273306] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 203.273306] R13: 0000555e10092020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000005 Fix this by only locking when changing the netdev->dev_addr. Also, make sure to restore the old netdev->dev_addr on any failures. Fixes: 3ba7f53 ("ice: don't remove netdev->dev_addr from uc sync list") Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com> Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.15, take #2 - Properly refcount pages used as a concatenated stage-2 PGD - Fix missing unlock when detecting the use of MTE+VM_SHARED

gratian requested review from a team and bstreiff July 21, 2020 18:58

bstreiff approved these changes Jul 21, 2020

View reviewed changes

gratian merged commit 07aa6be into ni:nilrt/master/5.6 Jul 22, 2020

gratian deleted the nilrt/master/5.6 branch July 22, 2020 15:40

kimkhiam mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2022

buildnipkg: adding roboRIO 2.0 boot command #51

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

nati_x86_64_defconfig: enable full real-time preemption#2

nati_x86_64_defconfig: enable full real-time preemption#2
gratian merged 1 commit intoni:nilrt/master/5.6from
gratian:nilrt/master/5.6

gratian commented Jul 21, 2020

Uh oh!

bstreiff commented Jul 21, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

gratian commented Jul 21, 2020

Uh oh!

bstreiff commented Jul 21, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants