futex: Add work-around for inconsistent pi_state by gratian · Pull Request #3 · ni/linux

gratian · 2020-08-05T19:58:53Z

Commit 73d786b ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q
state") removed a work-around in fixup_owner() that fixed an
inconsistent pi_state.

Part of the work-around was added back by commit 1352130 ("futex:
Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex"). However it left out, for
good reason (it might hide a race), the fix-up for the case where the
rt_mutex ends up w/o an owner.

This commit adds back the fix-up for the pi_state pi_mutex owner to
work around the race that is still present in the kernel. This allows
us to recover and continue if we find an rt_mutex w/o an owner. We
also throw a warning so we can continue the search for the race.

Signed-off-by: Gratian Crisan gratian.crisan@ni.com

Commit 73d786b ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state") removed a work-around in fixup_owner() that fixed an inconsistent pi_state. Part of the work-around was added back by commit 1352130 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex"). However it left out, for good reason (it might hide a race), the fix-up for the case where the rt_mutex ends up w/o an owner. This commit adds back the fix-up for the pi_state pi_mutex owner to work around the race that is still present in the kernel. This allows us to recover and continue if we find an rt_mutex w/o an owner. We also throw a warning so we can continue the search for the race. Signed-off-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>

gratian · 2020-08-06T18:59:18Z

Merged as commit 4fe2aca "futex: Add work-around for inconsistent pi_state"

With SO_RCVLOWAT, under memory pressure, it is possible to enter a state where: 1. We have not received enough bytes to satisfy SO_RCVLOWAT. 2. We have not entered buffer pressure (see tcp_rmem_pressure()). 3. But, we do not have enough buffer space to accept more packets. In this case, we advertise 0 rwnd (due to #3) but the application does not drain the receive queue (no wakeup because of #1 and #2) so the flow stalls. Modify the heuristic for SO_RCVLOWAT so that, if we are advertising rwnd<=rcv_mss, force a wakeup to prevent a stall. Without this patch, setting tcp_rmem to 6143 and disabling TCP autotune causes a stalled flow. With this patch, no stall occurs. This is with RPC-style traffic with large messages. Fixes: 03f45c8 ("tcp: avoid extra wakeups for SO_RCVLOWAT users") Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023184709.217614-1-arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 ni#6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee ni#7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b ni#8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 ni#9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 ni#10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 ni#11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat (with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs/24552: #0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0 #1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs] #2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs] #3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs] #4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue processing roots. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem patches on btrfs/104: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ ni#102 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520 process_one_work+0x238/0x540 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903: #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ ni#102 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read lock on the tree_root nodes. To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Various fixes This patch set contains various fixes for mlxsw. Patch #1 ensures that only link modes that are supported by both the device and the driver are advertised. When a link mode that is not supported by the driver is negotiated by the device, it will be presented as an unknown speed by ethtool, causing the bond driver to wrongly assume that the link is down. Patch #2 fixes a trivial memory leak upon module removal. Patch #3 fixes a use-after-free that syzkaller was able to trigger once on a slow emulator after a few months of fuzzing. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201024133733.2107509-1-idosch@idosch.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for v5.10, take #3 - Allow userspace to downgrade ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 - Inject UNDEF on SCXTNUM_ELx access

When afs_write_end() is called with copied == 0, it tries to set the dirty region, but there's no way to actually encode a 0-length region in the encoding in page->private. "0,0", for example, indicates a 1-byte region at offset 0. The maths miscalculates this and sets it incorrectly. Fix it to just do nothing but unlock and put the page in this case. We don't actually need to mark the page dirty as nothing presumably changed. Fixes: 65dd2d6 ("afs: Alter dirty range encoding in page->private") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This fix is for a failure that occurred in the DWARF unwind perf test. Stack unwinders may probe memory when looking for frames. Memory sanitizer will poison and track uninitialized memory on the stack, and on the heap if the value is copied to the heap. This can lead to false memory sanitizer failures for the use of an uninitialized value. Avoid this problem by removing the poison on the copied stack. The full msan failure with track origins looks like: ==2168==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x559ceb10755b in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 #1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceb106acf in __libdwfl_frame_reg_set elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:77:22 #1 0x559ceb106acf in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:627:13 #2 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #3 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #9 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #10 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #11 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #12 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #13 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #14 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #15 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #16 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #18 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #20 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #21 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #22 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #23 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #24 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceb106a54 in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:613:9 #1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559ceaff8800 in memory_read tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:156:10 #1 0x559ceb10f053 in expr_eval elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:501:13 #2 0x559ceb1060cc in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:603:18 #3 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4 #4 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7 #5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10 #6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17 #7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17 #8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14 #9 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10 #10 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8 #11 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8 #12 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #13 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #14 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #15 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #16 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #17 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #18 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #19 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #20 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #21 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #22 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #23 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #24 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #25 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was stored to memory at #0 0x559cea9027d9 in __msan_memcpy llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1558:3 #1 0x559cea9d2185 in sample_ustack tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:41:2 #2 0x559cea9d202c in test__arch_unwind_sample tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:72:9 #3 0x559ceabc9cbd in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:106:6 #4 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26 #5 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0) #6 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2 #7 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9 #8 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9 #9 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8 #10 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9 #11 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9 #12 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4 #13 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9 #14 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #15 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #16 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #17 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'bf' in the stack frame of function 'perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events' #0 0x559ceafc5f60 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c:445 SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 in handle_cfi Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@google.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201113182053.754625-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

Abaci Fuzz reported a shift-out-of-bounds BUG in io_uring_create(): [ 59.598207] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13 [ 59.599665] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' [ 59.601230] CPU: 0 PID: 963 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4+ #3 [ 59.602502] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 [ 59.603673] Call Trace: [ 59.604286] dump_stack+0x107/0x163 [ 59.605237] ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a [ 59.606094] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb2/0x20e [ 59.607335] ? lock_downgrade+0x6c0/0x6c0 [ 59.608182] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xaf/0xe0 [ 59.609166] io_uring_create.cold+0x99/0x149 [ 59.610114] io_uring_setup+0xd6/0x140 [ 59.610975] ? io_uring_create+0x2510/0x2510 [ 59.611945] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400 [ 59.613007] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80 [ 59.614038] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x180 [ 59.615056] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40 [ 59.615940] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 59.617007] RIP: 0033:0x7f2bb8a0b239 This is caused by roundup_pow_of_two() if the input entries larger enough, e.g. 2^32-1. For sq_entries, it will check first and we allow at most IORING_MAX_ENTRIES, so it is okay. But for cq_entries, we do round up first, that may overflow and truncate it to 0, which is not the expected behavior. So check the cq size first and then do round up. Fixes: 88ec321 ("io_uring: round-up cq size before comparing with rounded sq size") Reported-by: Abaci Fuzz <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

…nx/linux-xlnx into arm/fixes arm64: soc: ZynqMP SoC fixes for v5.10-rc6 - Fix SD dll reset issue by using proper macro - Fix PM feature checking for Xilinx Versal SoC * tag 'zynqmp-soc-fixes-for-v5.10-rc6' of https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx: (337 commits) firmware: xilinx: Use hash-table for api feature check firmware: xilinx: Fix SD DLL node reset issue Linux 5.10-rc4 kvm: mmu: fix is_tdp_mmu_check when the TDP MMU is not in use afs: Fix afs_write_end() when called with copied == 0 [ver #3] ocfs2: initialize ip_next_orphan panic: don't dump stack twice on warn hugetlbfs: fix anon huge page migration race mm: memcontrol: fix missing wakeup polling thread kernel/watchdog: fix watchdog_allowed_mask not used warning reboot: fix overflow parsing reboot cpu number Revert "kernel/reboot.c: convert simple_strtoul to kstrtoint" compiler.h: fix barrier_data() on clang mm/gup: use unpin_user_pages() in __gup_longterm_locked() mm/slub: fix panic in slab_alloc_node() mailmap: fix entry for Dmitry Baryshkov/Eremin-Solenikov mm/vmscan: fix NR_ISOLATED_FILE corruption on 64-bit mm/compaction: stop isolation if too many pages are isolated and we have pages to migrate mm/compaction: count pages and stop correctly during page isolation drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use atomic encoder callbacks everywhere ... Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fd5ab967-f3cf-95fb-7947-5477ff85f97e@monstr.eu Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 ni#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 ni#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 ni#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 ni#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 ni#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 ni#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 ni#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 ni#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b872d06 ] The vfio_pci_release call will free and clear the error and request eventfd ctx while these ctx could be in use at the same time in the function like vfio_pci_request, and it's expected to protect them under the vdev->igate mutex, which is missing in vfio_pci_release. This issue is introduced since commit 1518ac2 ("vfio/pci: fix memory leaks of eventfd ctx"),and since commit 5c5866c ("vfio/pci: Clear error and request eventfd ctx after releasing"), it's very easily to trigger the kernel panic like this: [ 9513.904346] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008 [ 9513.913091] Mem abort info: [ 9513.915871] ESR = 0x96000006 [ 9513.918912] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 9513.924198] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 9513.927238] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 9513.930364] Data abort info: [ 9513.933231] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 [ 9513.937048] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 9513.940003] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000007ec7d12000 [ 9513.946414] [0000000000000008] pgd=0000007ec7d13003, p4d=0000007ec7d13003, pud=0000007ec728c003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 9513.956975] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 9513.962521] Modules linked in: vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio hclge hns3 hnae3 [last unloaded: vfio_pci] [ 9513.972998] CPU: 4 PID: 1327 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.8.0-rc4+ #3 [ 9513.980443] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B270.01 05/08/2020 [ 9513.989274] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 9513.994827] pc : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88 [ 9513.999515] lr : eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0 [ 9514.003591] sp : ffff800038a0b960 [ 9514.006889] x29: ffff800038a0b960 x28: ffff007ef7f4da10 [ 9514.012175] x27: ffff207eefbbfc80 x26: ffffbb7903457000 [ 9514.017462] x25: ffffbb7912191000 x24: ffff007ef7f4d400 [ 9514.022747] x23: ffff20be6e0e4c00 x22: 0000000000000008 [ 9514.028033] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 9514.033321] x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 9514.038606] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffbb7910029328 [ 9514.043893] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000001 [ 9514.049179] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 9514.054466] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a00 [ 9514.059752] x9 : ffff800038a0b840 x8 : ffff007ef7f4de60 [ 9514.065038] x7 : ffff007fffc96690 x6 : fffffe01faffb748 [ 9514.070324] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 9514.075609] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001 [ 9514.080895] x1 : ffff007ef7f4d400 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 9514.086181] Call trace: [ 9514.088618] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88 [ 9514.092954] eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0 [ 9514.096691] vfio_pci_request+0x84/0xd0 [vfio_pci] [ 9514.101464] vfio_del_group_dev+0x150/0x290 [vfio] [ 9514.106234] vfio_pci_remove+0x30/0x128 [vfio_pci] [ 9514.111007] pci_device_remove+0x48/0x108 [ 9514.115001] device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1b8 [ 9514.120200] device_release_driver+0x28/0x38 [ 9514.124452] pci_stop_bus_device+0x68/0xa8 [ 9514.128528] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x20/0x38 [ 9514.133557] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xb4/0x128 [ 9514.137893] sriov_disable+0x3c/0x108 [ 9514.141538] pci_disable_sriov+0x28/0x38 [ 9514.145445] hns3_pci_sriov_configure+0x48/0xb8 [hns3] [ 9514.150558] sriov_numvfs_store+0x110/0x198 [ 9514.154724] dev_attr_store+0x44/0x60 [ 9514.158373] sysfs_kf_write+0x5c/0x78 [ 9514.162018] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x210 [ 9514.166010] __vfs_write+0x48/0x90 [ 9514.169395] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1c0 [ 9514.172694] ksys_write+0x74/0x100 [ 9514.176079] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30 [ 9514.179987] el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0x110/0x200 [ 9514.184842] do_el0_svc+0x34/0x98 [ 9514.188144] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 9514.191185] el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0x2d0 [ 9514.195088] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 9514.198389] Code: b9001020 d2800000 52800022 f9800271 (885ffe61) [ 9514.204455] ---[ end trace 648de00c8406465f ]--- [ 9514.212308] note: bash[1327] exited with preempt_count 1 Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Fixes: 1518ac2 ("vfio/pci: fix memory leaks of eventfd ctx") Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

@offset

commit 64b7f67 upstream. On setxattr() syscall path due to an apprent typo the size of a dynamically allocated memory chunk for storing struct smb2_file_full_ea_info object is computed incorrectly, to be more precise the first addend is the size of a pointer instead of the wanted object size. Coincidentally it makes no difference on 64-bit platforms, however on 32-bit targets the following memcpy() writes 4 bytes of data outside of the dynamically allocated memory. ============================================================================= BUG kmalloc-16 (Not tainted): Redzone overwritten ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint INFO: 0x79e69a6f-0x9e5cdecf @offset=368. First byte 0x73 instead of 0xcc INFO: Slab 0xd36d2454 objects=85 used=51 fp=0xf7d0fc7a flags=0x35000201 INFO: Object 0x6f171df3 @offset=352 fp=0x00000000 Redzone 5d4ff02d: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ Object 6f171df3: 00 00 00 00 00 05 06 00 73 6e 72 75 62 00 66 69 ........snrub.fi Redzone 79e69a6f: 73 68 32 0a sh2. Padding 56254d8: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZ CPU: 0 PID: 8196 Comm: attr Tainted: G B 5.9.0-rc8+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x54/0x6e print_trailer+0x12c/0x134 check_bytes_and_report.cold+0x3e/0x69 check_object+0x18c/0x250 free_debug_processing+0xfe/0x230 __slab_free+0x1c0/0x300 kfree+0x1d3/0x220 smb2_set_ea+0x27d/0x540 cifs_xattr_set+0x57f/0x620 __vfs_setxattr+0x4e/0x60 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x4e/0x100 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0xae/0xd0 vfs_setxattr+0x4e/0xe0 setxattr+0x12c/0x1a0 path_setxattr+0xa4/0xc0 __ia32_sys_lsetxattr+0x1d/0x20 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x40/0x70 do_fast_syscall_32+0x29/0x60 do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20 entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2 Fixes: 5517554 ("cifs: Add support for writing attributes on SMB2+") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir@tuxera.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ca10845 ] While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

When built with PROVE_LOCKING, NO_HZ_FULL, and CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE will WARN() at boot time that interrupts are enabled when we call context_tracking_user_enter(), despite the DAIF flags indicating that IRQs are masked. The problem is that we're not tracking IRQ flag changes accurately, and so lockdep believes interrupts are enabled when they are not (and vice-versa). We can shuffle things so to make this more accurate. For kernel->user transitions there are a number of constraints we need to consider: 1) When we call __context_tracking_user_enter() HW IRQs must be disabled and lockdep must be up-to-date with this. 2) Userspace should be treated as having IRQs enabled from the PoV of both lockdep and tracing. 3) As context_tracking_user_enter() stops RCU from watching, we cannot use RCU after calling it. 4) IRQ flag tracing and lockdep have state that must be manipulated before RCU is disabled. ... with similar constraints applying for user->kernel transitions, with the ordering reversed. The generic entry code has enter_from_user_mode() and exit_to_user_mode() helpers to handle this. We can't use those directly, so we add arm64 copies for now (without the instrumentation markers which aren't used on arm64). These replace the existing user_exit() and user_exit_irqoff() calls spread throughout handlers, and the exception unmasking is left as-is. Note that: * The accounting for debug exceptions from userspace now happens in el0_dbg() and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from debug_exception_enter() and debug_exception_exit(). As user_exit_irqoff() wakes RCU, the userspace-specific check is removed. * The accounting for syscalls now happens in el0_svc(), el0_svc_compat(), and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from el0_svc_common(). This does not adversely affect the workaround for erratum 1463225, as this does not depend on any of the state tracking. * In ret_to_user() we mask interrupts with local_daif_mask(), and so we need to inform lockdep and tracing. Here a trace_hardirqs_off() is sufficient and safe as we have not yet exited kernel context and RCU is usable. * As PROVE_LOCKING selects TRACE_IRQFLAGS, the ifdeferry in entry.S only needs to check for the latter. * EL0 SError handling will be dealt with in a subsequent patch, as this needs to be treated as an NMI. Prior to this patch, booting an appropriately-configured kernel would result in spats as below: | DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) | WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | Modules linked in: | CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3 #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 804003c5 (Nzcv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) | pc : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | lr : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | sp : ffff80001003bd80 | x29: ffff80001003bd80 x28: ffff66ce801e0000 | x27: 00000000ffffffff x26: 00000000000003c0 | x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffc31842527258 | x23: ffffc31842491368 x22: ffffc3184282d000 | x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000001 | x19: ffffc318432ce000 x18: 0080000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffc31840f18a78 | x15: 0000000000000001 x14: ffffc3184285c810 | x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000 | x11: ffffc318415857a0 x10: ffffc318406614c0 | x9 : ffffc318415857a0 x8 : ffffc31841f1d000 | x7 : 647261685f706564 x6 : ffffc3183ff7c66c | x5 : ffff66ce801e0000 x4 : 0000000000000000 | x3 : ffffc3183fe00000 x2 : ffffc31841500000 | x1 : e956dc24146b3500 x0 : 0000000000000000 | Call trace: | check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | lock_is_held_type+0x10c/0x188 | rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x70/0x98 | __context_tracking_enter+0x310/0x350 | context_tracking_enter.part.3+0x5c/0xc8 | context_tracking_user_enter+0x6c/0x80 | finish_ret_to_user+0x2c/0x13cr Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130115950.22492-8-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Prarit reported that depending on the affinity setting the ' irq $N: Affinity broken due to vector space exhaustion.' message is showing up in dmesg, but the vector space on the CPUs in the affinity mask is definitely not exhausted. Shung-Hsi provided traces and analysis which pinpoints the problem: The ordering of trying to assign an interrupt vector in assign_irq_vector_any_locked() is simply wrong if the interrupt data has a valid node assigned. It does: 1) Try the intersection of affinity mask and node mask 2) Try the node mask 3) Try the full affinity mask 4) Try the full online mask Obviously #2 and #3 are in the wrong order as the requested affinity mask has to take precedence. In the observed cases #1 failed because the affinity mask did not contain CPUs from node 0. That made it allocate a vector from node 0, thereby breaking affinity and emitting the misleading message. Revert the order of #2 and #3 so the full affinity mask without the node intersection is tried before actually affinity is broken. If no node is assigned then only the full affinity mask and if that fails the full online mask is tried. Fixes: d6ffc6a ("x86/vector: Respect affinity mask in irq descriptor") Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ft4djtyp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de

[ Upstream commit b1b8eb1 ] The previous fix left another warning in randconfig builds: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_QDSP6 Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_QCOM [=y] && QCOM_APR [=y] && COMMON_CLK [=n] Selected by [y]: - SND_SOC_MSM8996 [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_QCOM [=y] && QCOM_APR [=y] Add one more dependency for this one. Fixes: 2bc8831 ("ASoC: qcom: fix SDM845 & QDSP6 dependencies more") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203231443.1483763-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 4a9d81c ] If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration process will fall into an endless loop. kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137] PID: 17137 TASK: ffff8818d93c0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "nfsd" [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76] RIP: ffffffffc00e817c RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff881dc0c38298 RBX: ffffffff81b03580 RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50 RDX: ffff881e3fce8500 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81b03580 RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0 R8: 0000000000000020 R9: ffff8818d3aefd40 R10: ffff88017fc03800 R11: ffff8818e83933c0 R12: ffff8818d3aefd40 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8818e8391068 R15: ffff8818fa6e4000 CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace] #1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd] #2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd] #3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd] #4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd] #5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc] #6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc] #7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd] #8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607 The troublemake elem: crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298 struct lock_manager { list = { next = 0xffff881dc0c38298, prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298 }, block_opens = false } Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit d9e4498 ] Like other tunneling interfaces, the bareudp doesn't need TXLOCK. So, It is good to set the NETIF_F_LLTX flag to improve performance and to avoid lockdep's false-positive warning. Test commands: ip netns add A ip netns add B ip link add veth0 netns A type veth peer name veth1 netns B ip netns exec A ip link set veth0 up ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev veth0 ip netns exec B ip link set veth1 up ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev veth1 for i in {2..1} do let A=$i-1 ip netns exec A ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \ dstport $i ethertype ip ip netns exec A ip link set bareudp$i up ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.$i.1/24 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec A ip r a 10.0.$i.2 encap ip src 10.0.$A.1 \ dst 10.0.$A.2 via 10.0.$i.2 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec B ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \ dstport $i ethertype ip ip netns exec B ip link set bareudp$i up ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.$i.2/24 dev bareudp$i ip netns exec B ip r a 10.0.$i.1 encap ip src 10.0.$A.2 \ dst 10.0.$A.1 via 10.0.$i.1 dev bareudp$i done ip netns exec A ping 10.0.2.2 Splat looks like: [ 96.992803][ T822] ============================================ [ 96.993954][ T822] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 96.995102][ T822] 5.10.0+ #819 Not tainted [ 96.995927][ T822] -------------------------------------------- [ 96.997091][ T822] ping/822 is trying to acquire lock: [ 96.998083][ T822] ffff88810f753898 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 96.999813][ T822] [ 96.999813][ T822] but task is already holding lock: [ 97.001192][ T822] ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.002908][ T822] [ 97.002908][ T822] other info that might help us debug this: [ 97.004401][ T822] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 97.004401][ T822] [ 97.005784][ T822] CPU0 [ 97.006407][ T822] ---- [ 97.007010][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2); [ 97.007779][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2); [ 97.008550][ T822] [ 97.008550][ T822] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 97.008550][ T822] [ 97.010057][ T822] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 97.010057][ T822] [ 97.011594][ T822] 7 locks held by ping/822: [ 97.012426][ T822] #0: ffff888109a144f0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0x12f7/0x2b00 [ 97.014191][ T822] #1: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020 [ 97.016045][ T822] #2: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960 [ 97.017897][ T822] #3: ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.019684][ T822] #4: ffffffffbce2f600 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bareudp_xmit+0x31b/0x3690 [bareudp] [ 97.021573][ T822] #5: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020 [ 97.023424][ T822] #6: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960 [ 97.025259][ T822] [ 97.025259][ T822] stack backtrace: [ 97.026349][ T822] CPU: 3 PID: 822 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0+ #819 [ 97.027609][ T822] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 97.029407][ T822] Call Trace: [ 97.030015][ T822] dump_stack+0x99/0xcb [ 97.030783][ T822] __lock_acquire.cold.77+0x149/0x3a9 [ 97.031773][ T822] ? stack_trace_save+0x81/0xa0 [ 97.032661][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910 [ 97.033673][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910 [ 97.034679][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 [ 97.035697][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 97.036690][ T822] lock_acquire+0x1b2/0x730 [ 97.037515][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.038466][ T822] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50 [ 97.039277][ T822] ? netif_skb_features+0x296/0x9c0 [ 97.040226][ T822] ? validate_xmit_skb+0x29/0xb10 [ 97.041151][ T822] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [ 97.041977][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.042927][ T822] __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960 [ 97.043852][ T822] ? netdev_core_pick_tx+0x290/0x290 [ 97.044824][ T822] ? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120 [ 97.045712][ T822] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0 [ 97.046824][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 [ 97.047771][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.048710][ T822] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x41/0x120 [ 97.049626][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.050556][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 [ 97.051509][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0 [ 97.052443][ T822] ? check_chain_key+0x244/0x5f0 [ 97.053352][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x56/0xa0 [ 97.054317][ T822] ? ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020 [ 97.055263][ T822] ? pneigh_lookup+0x410/0x410 [ 97.056135][ T822] ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020 [ ... ] Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Fixes: 571912c ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228152136.24215-1-ap420073@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 3a21777 upstream. We had kernel panic, it is caused by unload module and last close confirmation. call trace: [1196029.743127] free_sess+0x15/0x50 [rtrs_client] [1196029.743128] rtrs_clt_close+0x4c/0x70 [rtrs_client] [1196029.743129] ? rnbd_clt_unmap_device+0x1b0/0x1b0 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743130] close_rtrs+0x25/0x50 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743131] rnbd_client_exit+0x93/0xb99 [rnbd_client] [1196029.743132] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x190/0x260 And in the crashdump confirmation kworker is also running. PID: 6943 TASK: ffff9e2ac8098000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "kworker/4:2" #0 [ffffb206cf337c30] __schedule at ffffffff9f93f891 #1 [ffffb206cf337cc8] schedule at ffffffff9f93fe98 #2 [ffffb206cf337cd0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9f943938 #3 [ffffb206cf337d50] wait_for_completion at ffffffff9f9410a7 #4 [ffffb206cf337da0] __flush_work at ffffffff9f08ce0e #5 [ffffb206cf337e20] rtrs_clt_close_conns at ffffffffc0d5f668 [rtrs_client] #6 [ffffb206cf337e48] rtrs_clt_close at ffffffffc0d5f801 [rtrs_client] #7 [ffffb206cf337e68] close_rtrs at ffffffffc0d26255 [rnbd_client] #8 [ffffb206cf337e78] free_sess at ffffffffc0d262ad [rnbd_client] #9 [ffffb206cf337e88] rnbd_clt_put_dev at ffffffffc0d266a7 [rnbd_client] The problem is both code path try to close same session, which lead to panic. To fix it, just skip the sess if the refcount already drop to 0. Fixes: f7a7a5c ("block/rnbd: client: main functionality") Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 41d5854 upstream. I got several memory leak reports from Asan with a simple command. It was because VDSO is not released due to the refcount. Like in __dsos_addnew_id(), it should put the refcount after adding to the list. $ perf record true [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.030 MB perf.data (10 samples) ] ================================================================= ==692599==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 439 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce4aa8ee in dso__new_id util/dso.c:1256 #2 0x559bce59245a in __machine__addnew_vdso util/vdso.c:132 #3 0x559bce59245a in machine__findnew_vdso util/vdso.c:347 #4 0x559bce50826c in map__new util/map.c:175 #5 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 ni#6 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 ni#7 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 ni#8 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#9 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#10 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 ni#11 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 ni#12 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 ni#13 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 ni#14 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 ni#15 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 ni#16 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 ni#17 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 ni#18 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 ni#19 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 ni#20 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Indirect leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce520907 in nsinfo__copy util/namespaces.c:169 #2 0x559bce50821b in map__new util/map.c:168 #3 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 #4 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 #5 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 ni#6 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#7 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#8 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 ni#9 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 ni#10 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 ni#11 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 ni#12 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 ni#13 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 ni#14 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 ni#15 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 ni#16 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 ni#17 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 ni#18 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 471 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210315045641.700430-1-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 21e3980 ] vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in a lockdep warning. Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it. The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply, while vctrl-regulator was not enabled. The lockdep warning is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) but task is already holding lock: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199) regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427) [...] -> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) [...] -> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire); lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030) #1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2)) #2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033) #3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285 include/linux/cpumask.h:405 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399) #4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) #5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161) show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113) print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Fixes: e915331 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-3-wenst@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 6fa54bc ] If em28xx_ir_init fails, it would decrease the refcount of dev. However, in the em28xx_ir_fini, when ir is NULL, it goes to ref_put and decrease the refcount of dev. This will lead to a refcount bug. Fix this bug by removing the kref_put in the error handling code of em28xx_ir_init. refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.13.0 #3 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28 Call Trace: kref_put.constprop.0+0x60/0x85 include/linux/kref.h:69 em28xx_usb_disconnect.cold+0xd7/0xdc drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c:4150 usb_unbind_interface+0xbf/0x3a0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458 __device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1201 [inline] device_release_driver_internal+0x22a/0x230 drivers/base/dd.c:1232 bus_remove_device+0x108/0x160 drivers/base/bus.c:529 device_del+0x1fe/0x510 drivers/base/core.c:3540 usb_disable_device+0xd1/0x1d0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:1419 usb_disconnect+0x109/0x330 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2221 hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5151 [inline] hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5440 [inline] port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5586 [inline] hub_event+0xf81/0x1d40 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5668 process_one_work+0x2c9/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2276 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2338 [inline] worker_thread+0x333/0x5b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2424 kthread+0x188/0x1d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 Reported-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Fixes: ac56886 ("media: em28xx: Fix possible memory leak of em28xx struct") Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…rbage value Currently, when the rule related to IDLETIMER is added, idletimer_tg timer structure is initialized by kmalloc on executing idletimer_tg_create function. However, in this process timer->timer_type is not defined to a specific value. Thus, timer->timer_type has garbage value and it occurs kernel panic. So, this commit fixes the panic by initializing timer->timer_type using kzalloc instead of kmalloc. Test commands: # iptables -A OUTPUT -j IDLETIMER --timeout 1 --label test $ cat /sys/class/xt_idletimer/timers/test Killed Splat looks like: BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 Read of size 8 at addr 0000002e8c7bc4c8 by task cat/917 CPU: 12 PID: 917 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.14.0+ #3 79940a339f71eb14fc81aee1757a20d5bf13eb0e Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0x9c kasan_report.cold+0x112/0x117 ? alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 __asan_load8+0x86/0xb0 alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 idletimer_tg_show+0xe5/0x19b [xt_IDLETIMER 11219304af9316a21bee5ba9d58f76a6b9bccc6d] dev_attr_show+0x3c/0x60 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x11d/0x1f0 ? device_remove_bin_file+0x20/0x20 kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xb0 seq_read_iter+0x29c/0x750 kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x25a/0x2c0 ? __fsnotify_parent+0x3d1/0x570 ? iov_iter_init+0x70/0x90 new_sync_read+0x2a7/0x3d0 ? __x64_sys_llseek+0x230/0x230 ? rw_verify_area+0x81/0x150 vfs_read+0x17b/0x240 ksys_read+0xd9/0x180 ? vfs_write+0x460/0x460 ? do_syscall_64+0x16/0xc0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x120 __x64_sys_read+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0cdc819142 Code: c0 e9 c2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d 3a ca 0a 00 e8 f5 19 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 RSP: 002b:00007fff28eee5b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007f0cdc819142 RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007f0cdc032000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f0cdc032000 R08: 00007f0cdc031010 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005607e9ee31f0 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 Fixes: 68983a3 ("netfilter: xtables: Add snapshot of hardidletimer target") Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

On the preemption path when updating a Xen guest's runstate times, this lock is taken inside the scheduler rq->lock, which is a raw spinlock. This was shown in a lockdep warning: [ 89.138354] ============================= [ 89.138356] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 89.138358] 5.15.0-rc5+ #834 Tainted: G S I E [ 89.138360] ----------------------------- [ 89.138361] xen_shinfo_test/2575 is trying to lock: [ 89.138363] ffffa34a0364efd8 (&kvm->arch.pvclock_gtod_sync_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: get_kvmclock_ns+0x1f/0x130 [kvm] [ 89.138442] other info that might help us debug this: [ 89.138444] context-{5:5} [ 89.138445] 4 locks held by xen_shinfo_test/2575: [ 89.138447] #0: ffff972bdc3b8108 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x77/0x6f0 [kvm] [ 89.138483] #1: ffffa34a03662e90 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xdc/0x8b0 [kvm] [ 89.138526] #2: ffff97331fdbac98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0xff/0xbd0 [ 89.138534] #3: ffffa34a03662e90 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x26/0x170 [kvm] ... [ 89.138695] get_kvmclock_ns+0x1f/0x130 [kvm] [ 89.138734] kvm_xen_update_runstate+0x14/0x90 [kvm] [ 89.138783] kvm_xen_update_runstate_guest+0x15/0xd0 [kvm] [ 89.138830] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0xe6/0x170 [kvm] [ 89.138870] kvm_sched_out+0x2f/0x40 [kvm] [ 89.138900] __schedule+0x5de/0xbd0 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+b282b65c2c68492df769@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 30b5c85 ("KVM: x86/xen: Add support for vCPU runstate information") Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Message-Id: <1b02a06421c17993df337493a68ba923f3bd5c0f.camel@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ni#1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ni#2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 ni#3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 ni#4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 ni#5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 ni#6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 ni#7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 ni#8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 ni#9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 ni#10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 ni#11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 ni#12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 ni#13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 ni#14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 ni#15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 ni#16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 ni#17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ni#18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame ni#2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 98e2e40 upstream. When the refcount is decreased to 0, the resource reclamation branch is entered. Before CPU0 reaches the race point (1), CPU1 may obtain the spinlock and traverse the rbtree to find 'root', see nilfs_lookup_root(). Although CPU1 will call refcount_inc() to increase the refcount, it is obviously too late. CPU0 will release 'root' directly, CPU1 then accesses 'root' and triggers UAF. Use refcount_dec_and_lock() to ensure that both the operations of decrease refcount to 0 and link deletion are lock protected eliminates this risk. CPU0 CPU1 nilfs_put_root(): <-------- (1) spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); rb_erase(&root->rb_node, &nilfs->ns_cptree); spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); kfree(root); <-------- use-after-free refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 at lib/refcount.c:28 \ refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.45-rc1+ ni#3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 ... ... Call Trace: __refcount_sub_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline] __refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline] refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline] nilfs_put_root+0xc1/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:795 nilfs_segctor_destroy fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2749 [inline] nilfs_detach_log_writer+0x3fa/0x570 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2812 nilfs_put_super+0x2f/0xf0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:467 generic_shutdown_super+0xcd/0x1f0 fs/super.c:464 kill_block_super+0x4a/0x90 fs/super.c:1446 deactivate_locked_super+0x6a/0xb0 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0x85/0x90 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x277/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:1118 __cleanup_mnt+0x15/0x20 fs/namespace.c:1125 task_work_run+0x8e/0x110 kernel/task_work.c:151 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:164 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13c/0x170 kernel/entry/common.c:191 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x30 kernel/entry/common.c:266 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:56 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 There is no reproduction program, and the above is only theoretical analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1629859428-5906-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Fixes: ba65ae4 ("nilfs2: add checkpoint tree to nilfs object") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210723012317.4146-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ] We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ni#4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> ni#1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 8253a34 upstream. When passing 'phys' in the devicetree to describe the USB PHY phandle (which is the recommended way according to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt) the following NULL pointer dereference is observed on i.MX7 and i.MX8MM: [ 1.489344] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000098 [ 1.498170] Mem abort info: [ 1.500966] ESR = 0x96000044 [ 1.504030] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1.509356] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1.512416] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1.515569] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 1.520458] Data abort info: [ 1.523349] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000044 [ 1.527196] CM = 0, WnR = 1 [ 1.530176] [0000000000000098] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 1.536544] Internal error: Oops: 96000044 [ni#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 1.542125] Modules linked in: [ 1.545190] CPU: 3 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 5.14.0-dirty ni#3 [ 1.551901] Hardware name: Kontron i.MX8MM N801X S (DT) [ 1.557133] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 1.562984] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) [ 1.568998] pc : imx7d_charger_detection+0x3f0/0x510 [ 1.573973] lr : imx7d_charger_detection+0x22c/0x510 This happens because the charger functions check for the phy presence inside the imx_usbmisc_data structure (data->usb_phy), but the chipidea core populates the usb_phy passed via 'phys' inside 'struct ci_hdrc' (ci->usb_phy) instead. This causes the NULL pointer dereference inside imx7d_charger_detection(). Fix it by also searching for 'phys' in case 'fsl,usbphy' is not found. Tested on a imx7s-warp board. Fixes: 746f316 ("usb: chipidea: introduce imx7d USB charger detection") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com> Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> Acked-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921113754.767631-1-festevam@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…rbage value [ Upstream commit 902c0b1 ] Currently, when the rule related to IDLETIMER is added, idletimer_tg timer structure is initialized by kmalloc on executing idletimer_tg_create function. However, in this process timer->timer_type is not defined to a specific value. Thus, timer->timer_type has garbage value and it occurs kernel panic. So, this commit fixes the panic by initializing timer->timer_type using kzalloc instead of kmalloc. Test commands: # iptables -A OUTPUT -j IDLETIMER --timeout 1 --label test $ cat /sys/class/xt_idletimer/timers/test Killed Splat looks like: BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 Read of size 8 at addr 0000002e8c7bc4c8 by task cat/917 CPU: 12 PID: 917 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.14.0+ ni#3 79940a339f71eb14fc81aee1757a20d5bf13eb0e Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0x9c kasan_report.cold+0x112/0x117 ? alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 __asan_load8+0x86/0xb0 alarm_expires_remaining+0x49/0x70 idletimer_tg_show+0xe5/0x19b [xt_IDLETIMER 11219304af9316a21bee5ba9d58f76a6b9bccc6d] dev_attr_show+0x3c/0x60 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x11d/0x1f0 ? device_remove_bin_file+0x20/0x20 kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xb0 seq_read_iter+0x29c/0x750 kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x25a/0x2c0 ? __fsnotify_parent+0x3d1/0x570 ? iov_iter_init+0x70/0x90 new_sync_read+0x2a7/0x3d0 ? __x64_sys_llseek+0x230/0x230 ? rw_verify_area+0x81/0x150 vfs_read+0x17b/0x240 ksys_read+0xd9/0x180 ? vfs_write+0x460/0x460 ? do_syscall_64+0x16/0xc0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x120 __x64_sys_read+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0cdc819142 Code: c0 e9 c2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d 3a ca 0a 00 e8 f5 19 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 RSP: 002b:00007fff28eee5b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007f0cdc819142 RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007f0cdc032000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f0cdc032000 R08: 00007f0cdc031010 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005607e9ee31f0 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 Fixes: 68983a3 ("netfilter: xtables: Add snapshot of hardidletimer target") Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ni#5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> ni#2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> ni#1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit bc39a69 ] Limit when FPU is enabled to only functions that does FPU operations for dcn20_resource_construct, which gets called during driver initialization. Enabling FPU operation disables preemption. Sleeping functions(mutex (un)lock, memory allocation using GFP_KERNEL, etc.) should not be called when preemption is disabled. Fixes the following case caught by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP in kernel config [ 1.338434] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:281 [ 1.347395] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 197, name: systemd-udevd [ 1.356356] CPU: 7 PID: 197 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.13.0+ ni#3 [ 1.356358] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X570-PRO, BIOS 3405 02/01/2021 [ 1.356360] Call Trace: [ 1.356361] dump_stack+0x6b/0x86 [ 1.356366] ___might_sleep.cold+0x87/0x98 [ 1.356370] __might_sleep+0x4b/0x80 [ 1.356372] mutex_lock+0x21/0x50 [ 1.356376] smu_get_uclk_dpm_states+0x3f/0x80 [amdgpu] [ 1.356538] pp_nv_get_uclk_dpm_states+0x35/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 1.356711] init_soc_bounding_box+0xf9/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 1.356892] ? create_object+0x20d/0x340 [ 1.356897] ? dcn20_resource_construct+0x46f/0xd30 [amdgpu] [ 1.357077] dcn20_resource_construct+0x4b1/0xd30 [amdgpu] ... Tested on: 5700XT (NAVI10 0x1002:0x731F 0x1DA2:0xE410 0xC1) Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Acked-by: Agustin Gutierrez <agustin.gutierrez@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…eam state [ Upstream commit b7b1d02 ] The internal stream state sets the timeout to 120 seconds 2 seconds after the creation of the flow, attach this internal stream state to the IPS_ASSURED flag for consistent event reporting. Before this patch: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Note IPS_ASSURED for the flow not yet in the internal stream state. after this update: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 120 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Before this patch, short-lived UDP flows never entered IPS_ASSURED, so they were already candidate flow to be deleted by early_drop under stress. Before this patch, IPS_ASSURED is set on regardless the internal stream state, attach this internal stream state to IPS_ASSURED. packet ni#1 (original direction) enters NEW state packet ni#2 (reply direction) enters ESTABLISHED state, sets on IPS_SEEN_REPLY paclet ni#3 (any direction) sets on IPS_ASSURED (if 2 seconds since the creation has passed by). Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 6d0d1b5 ] If the device used as a serial console gets detached/attached at runtime, register_console() will try to call imx_uart_setup_console(), but this is not possible since it is marked as __init. For instance # cat /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/active tty1 ttymxc0 # echo -n N > /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/subsystem/ttymxc0/console # echo -n Y > /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/subsystem/ttymxc0/console [ 73.166649] 8<--- cut here --- [ 73.167005] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c154d928 [ 73.167601] pgd = 55433e84 [ 73.167875] [c154d928] *pgd=8141941e(bad) [ 73.168304] Internal error: Oops: 8000000d [ni#1] SMP ARM [ 73.168429] Modules linked in: [ 73.168522] CPU: 0 PID: 536 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6-00056-g3968ddcf05fb ni#3 [ 73.168675] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Ultralite (Device Tree) [ 73.168791] PC is at imx_uart_console_setup+0x0/0x238 [ 73.168927] LR is at try_enable_new_console+0x98/0x124 [ 73.169056] pc : [<c154d928>] lr : [<c0196f44>] psr: a0000013 [ 73.169178] sp : c2ef5e70 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000 [ 73.169281] r10: 00000000 r9 : c02cf970 r8 : 00000000 [ 73.169389] r7 : 00000001 r6 : 00000001 r5 : c1760164 r4 : c1e0fb08 [ 73.169512] r3 : c154d928 r2 : 00000000 r1 : efffcbd r0 : c1760164 [ 73.169641] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 73.169782] Control: 10c5387d Table: 8345406a DAC: 00000051 [ 73.169895] Register r0 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170032] Register r1 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170158] Register r2 information: NULL pointer [ 73.170273] Register r3 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170397] Register r4 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170521] Register r5 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170647] Register r6 information: non-paged memory [ 73.170771] Register r7 information: non-paged memory [ 73.170892] Register r8 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171009] Register r9 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.171142] Register r10 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171259] Register r11 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171375] Register r12 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171494] Process sh (pid: 536, stack limit = 0xcd1ba82f) [ 73.171621] Stack: (0xc2ef5e70 to 0xc2ef6000) [ 73.171731] 5e60: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.171899] 5e80: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172059] 5ea0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172217] 5ec0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172377] 5ee0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172537] 5f00: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172698] 5f20: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172856] 5f40: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173016] 5f60: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173177] 5f80: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173336] 5fa0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173496] 5fc0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173654] 5fe0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173826] [<c0196f44>] (try_enable_new_console) from [<c01984a8>] (register_console+0x10c/0x2ec) [ 73.174053] [<c01984a8>] (register_console) from [<c06e2c90>] (console_store+0x14c/0x168) [ 73.174262] [<c06e2c90>] (console_store) from [<c0383718>] (kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x110/0x1cc) [ 73.174470] [<c0383718>] (kernfs_fop_write_iter) from [<c02cf5f4>] (vfs_write+0x31c/0x548) [ 73.174679] [<c02cf5f4>] (vfs_write) from [<c02cf970>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xec) [ 73.174863] [<c02cf970>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c) [ 73.175052] Exception stack(0xc2ef5fa8 to 0xc2ef5ff0) [ 73.175167] 5fa0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175327] 5fc0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175486] 5fe0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175608] Code: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (00000000) [ 73.175744] ---[ end trace 9b75121265109bf1 ]--- A similar issue could be triggered by unbinding/binding the serial console device [*]. Drop __init so that imx_uart_setup_console() can be safely called at runtime. [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20181114174940.7865-3-stefan@agner.ch/ Fixes: a3cb39d ("serial: core: Allow detach and attach serial device for console") Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211020192643.476895-2-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 54659ca ] when turning off a connection, lockdep complains with the following warning (a modprobe has been done but the same happens with a disconnection from NetworkManager, it's enough to trigger a cfg80211_disconnect call): [ 682.855867] ====================================================== [ 682.855877] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 682.855887] 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 Tainted: G C OE [ 682.855898] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 682.855906] modprobe/1770 is trying to acquire lock: [ 682.855916] ffffb6d000332b00 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856073] but task is already holding lock: [ 682.856081] ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856207] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 682.856215] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 682.856223] -> ni#1 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.856247] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.856265] rtw_get_stainfo+0x9a/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856389] rtw_xmit_classifier+0x27/0x130 [r8723bs] [ 682.856515] rtw_xmitframe_enqueue+0xa/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 682.856642] rtl8723bs_hal_xmit+0x3b/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856752] rtw_xmit+0x4ef/0x890 [r8723bs] [ 682.856879] _rtw_xmit_entry+0xba/0x350 [r8723bs] [ 682.856981] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xee/0x320 [ 682.856999] sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x330 [ 682.857014] __dev_queue_xmit+0xba5/0xf00 [ 682.857030] packet_sendmsg+0x981/0x1b80 [ 682.857047] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 [ 682.857060] __sys_sendto+0xf1/0x160 [ 682.857073] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 682.857087] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.857102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.857117] -> #0 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.857142] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.857158] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.857172] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.857185] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.857308] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.857415] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.857522] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.857759] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.857961] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.858163] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.858180] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.858195] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.858209] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.858225] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.858240] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.858255] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.858360] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.858463] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.858532] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.858550] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.858564] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.858579] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.858685] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.858699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.858715] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.858729] other info that might help us debug this: [ 682.858737] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 682.858744] CPU0 CPU1 [ 682.858751] ---- ---- [ 682.858758] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858772] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858786] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858799] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858812] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 682.858820] 5 locks held by modprobe/1770: [ 682.858831] #0: ffff8d870697d980 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x1a/0x1d0 [ 682.858869] ni#1: ffffffffbdbbf1c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: unregister_netdev+0xe/0x20 [ 682.858906] ni#2: ffff8d87054ee5e8 (&rdev->wiphy.mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x9e/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.859131] ni#3: ffff8d870f2bc8f0 (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_leave+0x20/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.859354] ni#4: ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.859482] stack backtrace: [ 682.859491] CPU: 1 PID: 1770 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G C OE 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 [ 682.859507] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW 08/20/2015 [ 682.859517] Call Trace: [ 682.859531] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 682.859551] check_noncircular+0xdb/0xf0 [ 682.859579] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.859606] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.859623] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859752] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x70 [ 682.859769] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x4a/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859898] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.859914] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860039] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860171] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.860286] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.860397] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.860629] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.860836] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.861048] ? __lock_acquire+0x4dc/0x1b50 [ 682.861070] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861089] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861104] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861120] ? packet_notifier+0x173/0x300 [ 682.861141] ? lock_release+0xb3/0x250 [ 682.861160] ? packet_notifier+0x192/0x300 [ 682.861184] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.861205] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.861224] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.861245] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.861264] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861284] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.861306] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.861325] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.861434] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.861542] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.861615] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.861637] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.861656] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.861674] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.861782] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.861801] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xf3/0x170 [ 682.861817] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 [ 682.861836] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.861855] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.861873] RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbe85400b [ 682.861890] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 6d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 682.861906] RSP: 002b:00007ffe7a82f538 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 682.861923] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a64693bd20 RCX: 00007f6dbe85400b [ 682.861935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861946] RBP: 000055a64693bd20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.861957] R10: 00007f6dbe8c7ac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861967] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a64693bd88 R15: 00007ffe7a831848 This happens because when we enqueue a frame for transmission we do it under xmit_priv lock, then calling rtw_get_stainfo (needed for enqueuing) takes sta_hash_lock and this leads to the following lock dependency: xmit_priv->lock -> sta_hash_lock Turning off a connection will bring to call rtw_free_assoc_resources which will set up the inverse dependency: sta_hash_lock -> xmit_priv_lock This could lead to a deadlock as lockdep complains. Fix it by removing the xmit_priv->lock around rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call inside rtl8723bs_hal_xmit and put it in a smaller critical section inside rtw_xmit_classifier, the only place where xmit_priv data are actually accessed. Replace spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(pxmitpriv->lock) in other tx paths leading to rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call with spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(psta->sleep_q.lock) - it's not clear why accessing a sleep_q was protected by a spinlock on xmitpriv->lock. This way is avoided the same faulty lock nesting order. Extra changes in v2 by Hans de Goede: -Lift the taking of the struct __queue.lock spinlock out of rtw_free_xmitframe_queue() into the callers this allows also protecting a bunch of related state in rtw_free_stainfo(): -Protect psta->sleepq_len on rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&psta->sleep_q); -Protect struct tx_servq.tx_pending and tx_servq.qcnt when calling rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&tx_servq.sta_pending) -This also allows moving the spin_lock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock); to below the sleep_q free-ing code, avoiding another ABBA locking issue CC: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Co-developed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-on: Lenovo Ideapad MiiX 300-10IBY Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ ni#34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit bc39a69 ] Limit when FPU is enabled to only functions that does FPU operations for dcn20_resource_construct, which gets called during driver initialization. Enabling FPU operation disables preemption. Sleeping functions(mutex (un)lock, memory allocation using GFP_KERNEL, etc.) should not be called when preemption is disabled. Fixes the following case caught by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP in kernel config [ 1.338434] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:281 [ 1.347395] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 197, name: systemd-udevd [ 1.356356] CPU: 7 PID: 197 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.13.0+ #3 [ 1.356358] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X570-PRO, BIOS 3405 02/01/2021 [ 1.356360] Call Trace: [ 1.356361] dump_stack+0x6b/0x86 [ 1.356366] ___might_sleep.cold+0x87/0x98 [ 1.356370] __might_sleep+0x4b/0x80 [ 1.356372] mutex_lock+0x21/0x50 [ 1.356376] smu_get_uclk_dpm_states+0x3f/0x80 [amdgpu] [ 1.356538] pp_nv_get_uclk_dpm_states+0x35/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 1.356711] init_soc_bounding_box+0xf9/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 1.356892] ? create_object+0x20d/0x340 [ 1.356897] ? dcn20_resource_construct+0x46f/0xd30 [amdgpu] [ 1.357077] dcn20_resource_construct+0x4b1/0xd30 [amdgpu] ... Tested on: 5700XT (NAVI10 0x1002:0x731F 0x1DA2:0xE410 0xC1) Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Acked-by: Agustin Gutierrez <agustin.gutierrez@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…eam state [ Upstream commit b7b1d02 ] The internal stream state sets the timeout to 120 seconds 2 seconds after the creation of the flow, attach this internal stream state to the IPS_ASSURED flag for consistent event reporting. Before this patch: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Note IPS_ASSURED for the flow not yet in the internal stream state. after this update: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 120 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Before this patch, short-lived UDP flows never entered IPS_ASSURED, so they were already candidate flow to be deleted by early_drop under stress. Before this patch, IPS_ASSURED is set on regardless the internal stream state, attach this internal stream state to IPS_ASSURED. packet #1 (original direction) enters NEW state packet #2 (reply direction) enters ESTABLISHED state, sets on IPS_SEEN_REPLY paclet #3 (any direction) sets on IPS_ASSURED (if 2 seconds since the creation has passed by). Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 6d0d1b5 ] If the device used as a serial console gets detached/attached at runtime, register_console() will try to call imx_uart_setup_console(), but this is not possible since it is marked as __init. For instance # cat /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/active tty1 ttymxc0 # echo -n N > /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/subsystem/ttymxc0/console # echo -n Y > /sys/devices/virtual/tty/console/subsystem/ttymxc0/console [ 73.166649] 8<--- cut here --- [ 73.167005] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c154d928 [ 73.167601] pgd = 55433e84 [ 73.167875] [c154d928] *pgd=8141941e(bad) [ 73.168304] Internal error: Oops: 8000000d [#1] SMP ARM [ 73.168429] Modules linked in: [ 73.168522] CPU: 0 PID: 536 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6-00056-g3968ddcf05fb #3 [ 73.168675] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Ultralite (Device Tree) [ 73.168791] PC is at imx_uart_console_setup+0x0/0x238 [ 73.168927] LR is at try_enable_new_console+0x98/0x124 [ 73.169056] pc : [<c154d928>] lr : [<c0196f44>] psr: a0000013 [ 73.169178] sp : c2ef5e70 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000 [ 73.169281] r10: 00000000 r9 : c02cf970 r8 : 00000000 [ 73.169389] r7 : 00000001 r6 : 00000001 r5 : c1760164 r4 : c1e0fb08 [ 73.169512] r3 : c154d928 r2 : 00000000 r1 : efffcbd r0 : c1760164 [ 73.169641] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 73.169782] Control: 10c5387d Table: 8345406a DAC: 00000051 [ 73.169895] Register r0 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170032] Register r1 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170158] Register r2 information: NULL pointer [ 73.170273] Register r3 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170397] Register r4 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170521] Register r5 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.170647] Register r6 information: non-paged memory [ 73.170771] Register r7 information: non-paged memory [ 73.170892] Register r8 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171009] Register r9 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 73.171142] Register r10 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171259] Register r11 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171375] Register r12 information: NULL pointer [ 73.171494] Process sh (pid: 536, stack limit = 0xcd1ba82f) [ 73.171621] Stack: (0xc2ef5e70 to 0xc2ef6000) [ 73.171731] 5e60: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.171899] 5e80: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172059] 5ea0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172217] 5ec0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172377] 5ee0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172537] 5f00: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172698] 5f20: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.172856] 5f40: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173016] 5f60: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173177] 5f80: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173336] 5fa0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173496] 5fc0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173654] 5fe0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.173826] [<c0196f44>] (try_enable_new_console) from [<c01984a8>] (register_console+0x10c/0x2ec) [ 73.174053] [<c01984a8>] (register_console) from [<c06e2c90>] (console_store+0x14c/0x168) [ 73.174262] [<c06e2c90>] (console_store) from [<c0383718>] (kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x110/0x1cc) [ 73.174470] [<c0383718>] (kernfs_fop_write_iter) from [<c02cf5f4>] (vfs_write+0x31c/0x548) [ 73.174679] [<c02cf5f4>] (vfs_write) from [<c02cf970>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xec) [ 73.174863] [<c02cf970>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c) [ 73.175052] Exception stack(0xc2ef5fa8 to 0xc2ef5ff0) [ 73.175167] 5fa0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175327] 5fc0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175486] 5fe0: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? [ 73.175608] Code: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (00000000) [ 73.175744] ---[ end trace 9b75121265109bf1 ]--- A similar issue could be triggered by unbinding/binding the serial console device [*]. Drop __init so that imx_uart_setup_console() can be safely called at runtime. [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20181114174940.7865-3-stefan@agner.ch/ Fixes: a3cb39d ("serial: core: Allow detach and attach serial device for console") Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211020192643.476895-2-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5ec0a6f ] Host crashes when pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for VFs with virtual buses. The virtual buses added to SR-IOV have bus->self set to NULL and host crashes due to this. PID: 4481 TASK: ffff89c6941b0000 CPU: 53 COMMAND: "bash" ... #3 [ffff9a9481713808] oops_end at ffffffffb9025cd6 #4 [ffff9a9481713828] page_fault_oops at ffffffffb906e417 #5 [ffff9a9481713888] exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9a0ad14 ni#6 [ffff9a94817138b0] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9c00ace [exception RIP: pcie_capability_read_dword+28] RIP: ffffffffb952fd5c RSP: ffff9a9481713960 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff89c6b1096000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff9a9481713990 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000080 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: ffff89c64341a2f8 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89c648bab000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff89c648bab0c8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 ni#7 [ffff9a9481713988] pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root at ffffffffb95359a6 ni#8 [ffff9a94817139c0] bnxt_qplib_determine_atomics at ffffffffc08c1a33 [bnxt_re] ni#9 [ffff9a94817139d0] bnxt_re_dev_init at ffffffffc08ba2d1 [bnxt_re] Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, the AtomicOp Requester Enable bit in Device Control 2 is reserved for VFs. The PF value applies to all associated VFs. Return -EINVAL if pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for a VF. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1631354585-16597-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com Fixes: 35f5ace ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Enable global atomic ops if platform supports") Fixes: 430a236 ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()") Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 2aa3660 upstream. It is generally unsafe to call put_device() with dpm_list_mtx held, because the given device's release routine may carry out an action depending on that lock which then may deadlock, so modify the system-wide suspend and resume of devices to always drop dpm_list_mtx before calling put_device() (and adjust white space somewhat while at it). For instance, this prevents the following splat from showing up in the kernel log after a system resume in certain configurations: [ 3290.969514] ====================================================== [ 3290.969517] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3290.969519] 5.15.0+ #2420 Tainted: G S [ 3290.969523] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3290.969525] systemd-sleep/4553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3290.969529] ffff888117ab1138 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.969554] but task is already holding lock: [ 3290.969556] ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.969571] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3290.969573] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3290.969575] -> #3 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969583] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969591] device_pm_add+0x2e/0xe0 [ 3290.969597] device_add+0x4d5/0x8f0 [ 3290.969605] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0xb0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969689] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.71+0x124/0x750 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969747] hci_event_packet+0xd6c/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969798] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969842] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969851] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969859] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969865] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.969872] -> #2 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969881] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969887] hci_event_packet+0xba/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969935] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969978] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969985] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969993] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969999] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970004] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970013] process_one_work+0x27d/0x650 [ 3290.970020] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.970028] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.970033] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970038] -> #0 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970047] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970054] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970059] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970066] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970073] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970081] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970130] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970195] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970201] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970211] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970215] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970220] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970229] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970236] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970243] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970251] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970257] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970263] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970269] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970276] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970284] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3290.970285] Chain exists of: (wq_completion)hci0#2 --> &hdev->lock --> dpm_list_mtx [ 3290.970297] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3290.970299] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3290.970300] ---- ---- [ 3290.970302] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970306] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 3290.970310] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970314] lock((wq_completion)hci0#2); [ 3290.970319] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3290.970321] 7 locks held by systemd-sleep/4553: [ 3290.970325] #0: ffff888103bcd448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970341] #1: ffff888115a14488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x103/0x1b0 [ 3290.970355] #2: ffff888100f719e0 (kn->active#233){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1b0 [ 3290.970369] #3: ffffffff82661048 (autosleep_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: state_store+0x12/0x90 [ 3290.970384] #4: ffffffff82658ac8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x9f/0x310 [ 3290.970399] #5: ffffffff827f2a48 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x4c/0x80 [ 3290.970416] ni#6: ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.970428] stack backtrace: [ 3290.970431] CPU: 3 PID: 4553 Comm: systemd-sleep Tainted: G S 5.15.0+ #2420 [ 3290.970438] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9380/0RYJWW, BIOS 1.5.0 06/03/2019 [ 3290.970441] Call Trace: [ 3290.970446] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 [ 3290.970454] check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 [ 3290.970468] ? __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970474] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970487] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970493] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970503] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x3b/0x60 [ 3290.970510] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x58/0x240 [ 3290.970519] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970526] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970544] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970552] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970561] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970572] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970624] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970687] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970695] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970705] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970710] ? dpm_resume_early+0x251/0x3b0 [ 3290.970718] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970723] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970737] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970746] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970755] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970764] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970777] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970785] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970794] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970811] RIP: 0033:0x7f41b1328164 [ 3290.970819] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 4a d2 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [ 3290.970824] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6ae21b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 3290.970831] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f41b1328164 [ 3290.970836] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 000055965e651070 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970839] RBP: 000055965e651070 R08: 000055965e64f390 R09: 00007f41b1e3d1c0 [ 3290.970843] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970846] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055965e64f2b0 R15: 0000000000000004 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 54659ca ] when turning off a connection, lockdep complains with the following warning (a modprobe has been done but the same happens with a disconnection from NetworkManager, it's enough to trigger a cfg80211_disconnect call): [ 682.855867] ====================================================== [ 682.855877] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 682.855887] 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 Tainted: G C OE [ 682.855898] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 682.855906] modprobe/1770 is trying to acquire lock: [ 682.855916] ffffb6d000332b00 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856073] but task is already holding lock: [ 682.856081] ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856207] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 682.856215] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 682.856223] -> #1 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.856247] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.856265] rtw_get_stainfo+0x9a/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856389] rtw_xmit_classifier+0x27/0x130 [r8723bs] [ 682.856515] rtw_xmitframe_enqueue+0xa/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 682.856642] rtl8723bs_hal_xmit+0x3b/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856752] rtw_xmit+0x4ef/0x890 [r8723bs] [ 682.856879] _rtw_xmit_entry+0xba/0x350 [r8723bs] [ 682.856981] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xee/0x320 [ 682.856999] sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x330 [ 682.857014] __dev_queue_xmit+0xba5/0xf00 [ 682.857030] packet_sendmsg+0x981/0x1b80 [ 682.857047] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 [ 682.857060] __sys_sendto+0xf1/0x160 [ 682.857073] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 682.857087] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.857102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.857117] -> #0 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.857142] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.857158] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.857172] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.857185] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.857308] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.857415] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.857522] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.857759] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.857961] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.858163] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.858180] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.858195] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.858209] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.858225] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.858240] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.858255] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.858360] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.858463] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.858532] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.858550] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.858564] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.858579] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.858685] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.858699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.858715] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.858729] other info that might help us debug this: [ 682.858737] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 682.858744] CPU0 CPU1 [ 682.858751] ---- ---- [ 682.858758] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858772] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858786] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858799] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858812] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 682.858820] 5 locks held by modprobe/1770: [ 682.858831] #0: ffff8d870697d980 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x1a/0x1d0 [ 682.858869] #1: ffffffffbdbbf1c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: unregister_netdev+0xe/0x20 [ 682.858906] #2: ffff8d87054ee5e8 (&rdev->wiphy.mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x9e/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.859131] #3: ffff8d870f2bc8f0 (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_leave+0x20/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.859354] #4: ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.859482] stack backtrace: [ 682.859491] CPU: 1 PID: 1770 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G C OE 5.14.0-rc6+ ni#16 [ 682.859507] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW 08/20/2015 [ 682.859517] Call Trace: [ 682.859531] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 682.859551] check_noncircular+0xdb/0xf0 [ 682.859579] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.859606] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.859623] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859752] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x70 [ 682.859769] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x4a/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859898] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.859914] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860039] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860171] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.860286] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.860397] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.860629] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.860836] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.861048] ? __lock_acquire+0x4dc/0x1b50 [ 682.861070] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861089] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861104] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861120] ? packet_notifier+0x173/0x300 [ 682.861141] ? lock_release+0xb3/0x250 [ 682.861160] ? packet_notifier+0x192/0x300 [ 682.861184] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.861205] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.861224] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.861245] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.861264] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861284] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.861306] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.861325] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.861434] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.861542] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.861615] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.861637] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.861656] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.861674] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.861782] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.861801] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xf3/0x170 [ 682.861817] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 [ 682.861836] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.861855] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.861873] RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbe85400b [ 682.861890] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 6d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 682.861906] RSP: 002b:00007ffe7a82f538 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 682.861923] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a64693bd20 RCX: 00007f6dbe85400b [ 682.861935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861946] RBP: 000055a64693bd20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.861957] R10: 00007f6dbe8c7ac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861967] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a64693bd88 R15: 00007ffe7a831848 This happens because when we enqueue a frame for transmission we do it under xmit_priv lock, then calling rtw_get_stainfo (needed for enqueuing) takes sta_hash_lock and this leads to the following lock dependency: xmit_priv->lock -> sta_hash_lock Turning off a connection will bring to call rtw_free_assoc_resources which will set up the inverse dependency: sta_hash_lock -> xmit_priv_lock This could lead to a deadlock as lockdep complains. Fix it by removing the xmit_priv->lock around rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call inside rtl8723bs_hal_xmit and put it in a smaller critical section inside rtw_xmit_classifier, the only place where xmit_priv data are actually accessed. Replace spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(pxmitpriv->lock) in other tx paths leading to rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call with spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(psta->sleep_q.lock) - it's not clear why accessing a sleep_q was protected by a spinlock on xmitpriv->lock. This way is avoided the same faulty lock nesting order. Extra changes in v2 by Hans de Goede: -Lift the taking of the struct __queue.lock spinlock out of rtw_free_xmitframe_queue() into the callers this allows also protecting a bunch of related state in rtw_free_stainfo(): -Protect psta->sleepq_len on rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&psta->sleep_q); -Protect struct tx_servq.tx_pending and tx_servq.qcnt when calling rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&tx_servq.sta_pending) -This also allows moving the spin_lock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock); to below the sleep_q free-ing code, avoiding another ABBA locking issue CC: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Co-developed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-on: Lenovo Ideapad MiiX 300-10IBY Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 35b6b28 upstream. When branch target identifiers are in use, code reachable via an indirect branch requires a BTI landing pad at the branch target site. When building FTRACE_WITH_REGS atop patchable-function-entry, we miss BTIs at the start start of the `ftrace_caller` and `ftrace_regs_caller` trampolines, and when these are called from a module via a PLT (which will use a `BR X16`), we will encounter a BTI failure, e.g. | # insmod lkdtm.ko | lkdtm: No crash points registered, enable through debugfs | # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer | # cat /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT | Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x34000001 -- BTI | CPU: 0 PID: 174 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-dirty #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 60400405 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=jc) | pc : ftrace_caller+0x0/0x3c | lr : lkdtm_debugfs_open+0xc/0x20 [lkdtm] | sp : ffff800012e43b00 | x29: ffff800012e43b00 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800012e43c88 | x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff0000c171f200 | x23: ffff0000c27b1e00 x22: ffff0000c2265240 x21: ffff0000c23c8c30 | x20: ffff8000090ba380 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80001002bb4c x15: 0000000000000000 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000900ff0 | x11: ffff0000c4166310 x10: ffff800012e43b00 x9 : ffff8000104f2384 | x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000003f | x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : ffff800012e43af0 x3 : 0000000000000001 | x2 : ffff8000090b0000 x1 : ffff0000c171f200 x0 : ffff0000c23c8c30 | Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception | CPU: 0 PID: 174 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-dirty #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a4 | show_stack+0x24/0x30 | dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 | dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 | panic+0x168/0x360 | arm64_exit_nmi.isra.0+0x0/0x80 | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xd4 | el1h_64_sync+0x78/0x7c | ftrace_caller+0x0/0x3c | do_dentry_open+0x134/0x3b0 | vfs_open+0x38/0x44 | path_openat+0x89c/0xe40 | do_filp_open+0x8c/0x13c | do_sys_openat2+0xbc/0x174 | __arm64_sys_openat+0x6c/0xbc | invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 | el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xdc/0x100 | do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0 | el0_svc+0x28/0x80 | el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa8/0x130 | el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 | SMP: stopping secondary CPUs | Kernel Offset: disabled | CPU features: 0x0,00000f42,da660c5f | Memory Limit: none | ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception ]--- Fix this by adding the required `BTI C`, as we only require these to be reachable via BL for direct calls or BR X16/X17 for PLTs. For now, these are open-coded in the function prologue, matching the style of the `__hwasan_tag_mismatch` trampoline. In future we may wish to consider adding a new SYM_CODE_START_*() variant which has an implicit BTI. When ftrace is built atop mcount, the trampolines are marked with SYM_FUNC_START(), and so get an implicit BTI. We may need to change these over to SYM_CODE_START() in future for RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, in case we need to apply special care aroud the return address being rewritten. Fixes: 97fed77 ("arm64: bti: Provide Kconfig for kernel mode BTI") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129135709.2274019-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b50db70 upstream. There are cases that the TSC clocksource is wrongly judged as unstable by the clocksource watchdog mechanism which tries to validate the TSC against HPET, PM_TIMER or jiffies. While there is hardly a general reliable way to check the validity of a watchdog, Thomas Gleixner proposed [1]: "I'm inclined to lift that requirement when the CPU has: 1) X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC 2) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC 3) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 4) X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST 5) At max. 4 sockets After two decades of horrors we're finally at a point where TSC seems to be halfway reliable and less abused by BIOS tinkerers. TSC_ADJUST was really key as we can now detect even small modifications reliably and the important point is that we can cure them as well (not pretty but better than all other options)." As feature #3 X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 only exists on several generations of Atom processorz, and is always coupled with X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC and X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, skip checking it, and also be more defensive to use maximal 2 sockets. The check is done inside tsc_init() before registering 'tsc-early' and 'tsc' clocksources, as there were cases that both of them had been wrongly judged as unreliable. For more background of tsc/watchdog, there is a good summary in [2] [tglx} Update vs. jiffies: On systems where the only remaining clocksource aside of TSC is jiffies there is no way to make this work because that creates a circular dependency. Jiffies accuracy depends on not missing a periodic timer interrupt, which is not guaranteed. That could be detected by TSC, but as TSC is not trusted this cannot be compensated. The consequence is a circulus vitiosus which results in shutting down TSC and falling back to the jiffies clocksource which is even more unreliable. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87eekfk8bd.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87a6pimt1f.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ [ tglx: Refine comment and amend changelog ] Fixes: 6e3cd95 ("x86/hpet: Use another crystalball to evaluate HPET usability") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211117023751.24190-2-feng.tang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 2fa7d94 upstream. The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error, arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts from the verifier, for example (pseudocode): // 1. Passes the verifier: if (data + 8 > data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass): if (data + 7 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code starts failing in the verifier: // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1. if (data + 8 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however, they should be accepted. This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the one that should actually fail. Fixes: fb2a311 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns") Fixes: b37242c ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit f35838a upstream. Line 1169 (#3) allocates a memory chunk for victim_name by kmalloc(), but when the function returns in line 1184 (#4) victim_name allocated by line 1169 (#3) is not freed, which will lead to a memory leak. There is a similar snippet of code in this function as allocating a memory chunk for victim_name in line 1104 (#1) as well as releasing the memory in line 1116 (#2). We should kfree() victim_name when the return value of backref_in_log() is less than zero and before the function returns in line 1184 (#4). 1057 static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 1058 struct btrfs_root *root, 1059 struct btrfs_path *path, 1060 struct btrfs_root *log_root, 1061 struct btrfs_inode *dir, 1062 struct btrfs_inode *inode, 1063 u64 inode_objectid, u64 parent_objectid, 1064 u64 ref_index, char *name, int namelen, 1065 int *search_done) 1066 { 1104 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #1: kmalloc (victim_name-1) 1105 if (!victim_name) 1106 return -ENOMEM; 1112 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1113 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1114 victim_name_len); 1115 if (ret < 0) { 1116 kfree(victim_name); // #2: kfree (victim_name-1) 1117 return ret; 1118 } else if (!ret) { 1169 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #3: kmalloc (victim_name-2) 1170 if (!victim_name) 1171 return -ENOMEM; 1180 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1181 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1182 victim_name_len); 1183 if (ret < 0) { 1184 return ret; // #4: missing kfree (victim_name-2) 1185 } else if (!ret) { 1241 return 0; 1242 } Fixes: d3316c8 ("btrfs: Properly handle backref_in_log retval") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 4d9380e ] Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 35b6b28 upstream. When branch target identifiers are in use, code reachable via an indirect branch requires a BTI landing pad at the branch target site. When building FTRACE_WITH_REGS atop patchable-function-entry, we miss BTIs at the start start of the `ftrace_caller` and `ftrace_regs_caller` trampolines, and when these are called from a module via a PLT (which will use a `BR X16`), we will encounter a BTI failure, e.g. | # insmod lkdtm.ko | lkdtm: No crash points registered, enable through debugfs | # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer | # cat /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT | Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x34000001 -- BTI | CPU: 0 PID: 174 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-dirty #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 60400405 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=jc) | pc : ftrace_caller+0x0/0x3c | lr : lkdtm_debugfs_open+0xc/0x20 [lkdtm] | sp : ffff800012e43b00 | x29: ffff800012e43b00 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800012e43c88 | x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff0000c171f200 | x23: ffff0000c27b1e00 x22: ffff0000c2265240 x21: ffff0000c23c8c30 | x20: ffff8000090ba380 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80001002bb4c x15: 0000000000000000 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000900ff0 | x11: ffff0000c4166310 x10: ffff800012e43b00 x9 : ffff8000104f2384 | x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000003f | x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : ffff800012e43af0 x3 : 0000000000000001 | x2 : ffff8000090b0000 x1 : ffff0000c171f200 x0 : ffff0000c23c8c30 | Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception | CPU: 0 PID: 174 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-dirty #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a4 | show_stack+0x24/0x30 | dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 | dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 | panic+0x168/0x360 | arm64_exit_nmi.isra.0+0x0/0x80 | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xd4 | el1h_64_sync+0x78/0x7c | ftrace_caller+0x0/0x3c | do_dentry_open+0x134/0x3b0 | vfs_open+0x38/0x44 | path_openat+0x89c/0xe40 | do_filp_open+0x8c/0x13c | do_sys_openat2+0xbc/0x174 | __arm64_sys_openat+0x6c/0xbc | invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 | el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xdc/0x100 | do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0 | el0_svc+0x28/0x80 | el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa8/0x130 | el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 | SMP: stopping secondary CPUs | Kernel Offset: disabled | CPU features: 0x0,00000f42,da660c5f | Memory Limit: none | ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception ]--- Fix this by adding the required `BTI C`, as we only require these to be reachable via BL for direct calls or BR X16/X17 for PLTs. For now, these are open-coded in the function prologue, matching the style of the `__hwasan_tag_mismatch` trampoline. In future we may wish to consider adding a new SYM_CODE_START_*() variant which has an implicit BTI. When ftrace is built atop mcount, the trampolines are marked with SYM_FUNC_START(), and so get an implicit BTI. We may need to change these over to SYM_CODE_START() in future for RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, in case we need to apply special care aroud the return address being rewritten. Fixes: 97fed77 ("arm64: bti: Provide Kconfig for kernel mode BTI") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129135709.2274019-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b50db70 upstream. There are cases that the TSC clocksource is wrongly judged as unstable by the clocksource watchdog mechanism which tries to validate the TSC against HPET, PM_TIMER or jiffies. While there is hardly a general reliable way to check the validity of a watchdog, Thomas Gleixner proposed [1]: "I'm inclined to lift that requirement when the CPU has: 1) X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC 2) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC 3) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 4) X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST 5) At max. 4 sockets After two decades of horrors we're finally at a point where TSC seems to be halfway reliable and less abused by BIOS tinkerers. TSC_ADJUST was really key as we can now detect even small modifications reliably and the important point is that we can cure them as well (not pretty but better than all other options)." As feature #3 X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 only exists on several generations of Atom processorz, and is always coupled with X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC and X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, skip checking it, and also be more defensive to use maximal 2 sockets. The check is done inside tsc_init() before registering 'tsc-early' and 'tsc' clocksources, as there were cases that both of them had been wrongly judged as unreliable. For more background of tsc/watchdog, there is a good summary in [2] [tglx} Update vs. jiffies: On systems where the only remaining clocksource aside of TSC is jiffies there is no way to make this work because that creates a circular dependency. Jiffies accuracy depends on not missing a periodic timer interrupt, which is not guaranteed. That could be detected by TSC, but as TSC is not trusted this cannot be compensated. The consequence is a circulus vitiosus which results in shutting down TSC and falling back to the jiffies clocksource which is even more unreliable. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87eekfk8bd.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87a6pimt1f.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ [ tglx: Refine comment and amend changelog ] Fixes: 6e3cd95 ("x86/hpet: Use another crystalball to evaluate HPET usability") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211117023751.24190-2-feng.tang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 2fa7d94 upstream. The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error, arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts from the verifier, for example (pseudocode): // 1. Passes the verifier: if (data + 8 > data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass): if (data + 7 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code starts failing in the verifier: // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1. if (data + 8 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however, they should be accepted. This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the one that should actually fail. Fixes: fb2a311 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns") Fixes: b37242c ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

gratian requested review from bstreiff and jeminor August 5, 2020 19:58

bstreiff approved these changes Aug 6, 2020

View reviewed changes

gratian closed this Aug 6, 2020

gratian deleted the nilrt/master/4.14-futex-workaround branch August 6, 2020 18:59

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

futex: Add work-around for inconsistent pi_state#3

futex: Add work-around for inconsistent pi_state#3
gratian wants to merge 1 commit intoni:nilrt/master/4.14from
gratian:nilrt/master/4.14-futex-workaround

gratian commented Aug 5, 2020

Uh oh!

gratian commented Aug 6, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

gratian commented Aug 5, 2020

Uh oh!

gratian commented Aug 6, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants