[lidge-jun]

Summary

#6960 carried LilMGenius's LazyCodex role reasoning-effort series (#6907, #6908, #6909) but updated only the English guides/integrations.md. The seven translated guide sections from #6907 were dropped, so the fr, ja, ko, ru, tr, zh-cn and zh-tw guides said nothing about picking or clearing a role's effort.

This restores those sections, inserted before ## Kilo to match the English page order, and rewrites them to the behavior that actually landed on dev:

• The row option is named with each locale's GUI string for Inherit effort (integrations.lazycodexRoles.effortDefault); feat(gui): pick each LazyCodex role's reasoning effort next to its model #6907 used a shorter "Inherit" label that no longer exists.
• Changing an existing pin to Inherit effort sends "effort": null, which removes the root model_reasoning_effort line and its trailing comment plus [codex].agents.<role>.reasoning; a multiline or non-string value is refused with 409 unsupported_model_value; Codex then resolves effort as for any role without an override.
• Auto-assign proposes an effort for every sized role whose model has a non-empty ladder, and Apply / Apply all / --apply inserts or replaces it. An empty ladder gives proposedEffort: null, Apply omits effort, and a null proposal never clears a pin. (feat(gui): pick each LazyCodex role's reasoning effort next to its model #6907 described only the no-proposal case.)
• When the role file saves but the omo.jsonc write fails, Retry omo.jsonc resends the same choice, including a null clear, and a later effort-less Save or Auto-assign Apply carries it; an explicit effort takes its place.

The English guide gains one paragraph describing that retry, so no translation documents behavior the canonical English page leaves out. No code, GUI or test changes.

Co-authored-by: LilMGenius smsmeee@naver.com

Verification

• cd docs-site && bun install --frozen-lockfile && ASTRO_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 bun run build: exit 0, 569 pages, 79353 internal links checked. All seven locale pages render the new section.
• bun test tests/ci-workflows/docs-*.test.ts tests/ci-workflows/file-size-ratchet.test.ts tests/ci-workflows/repo-hygiene.test.ts tests/ci-workflows/structure-ssot.test.ts tests/ci-workflows/skill-ocx-workflows.test.ts tests/codex-integration/codex-inject-history-wording.test.ts: 419 pass, 0 fail (17 files).
• bun run structure:check, bun run privacy:scan, git diff --check origin/dev: exit 0.
• Docs-only change: bun run typecheck and the full bun run test were not run locally because no TypeScript, GUI or test file changed; required CI covers them.
• Every claim was checked against gui/src/pages/integrations/LazyCodexRoleModels.tsx, LazyCodexRoleAutoAssign.tsx, src/codex/agent-role-models.ts and src/codex/role-auto-assign.ts, and every bolded label against gui/src/i18n/{fr,ja,ko,ru,tr,zh,zh-TW}.ts. An independent cross-model review found no behavioral contradictions with the English page; its four wording findings (ru, ja, tr, fr) are folded in.

Checklist

• Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
• Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
• Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added multilingual guidance for configuring model reasoning effort per omo (Codex / LazyCodex) role through the interface or CLI.
  • Explained effort inheritance, automatic-assignment suggestions, and how mirror-write failures can be retried.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-12T06:59:37.157049Z	5caee35	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: lidge-jun/opencodex/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 528f222d-7016-4603-8839-2e53ce511e23

---

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8eb1fc3 and 5caee35.

---

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• docs-site/src/content/docs/fr/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/ja/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/ko/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/ru/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/tr/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/zh-cn/guides/integrations.md
• docs-site/src/content/docs/zh-tw/guides/integrations.md

---

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.

---

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The integration guides now document per-role reasoning effort settings for omo Codex and LazyCodex. They cover role-file updates, inheritance, optional omo.jsonc mirroring and retries, and automatic-assignment effort proposals.

Changes

Per-role reasoning effort

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Role effort settings and mirror behavior docs-site/src/content/docs/guides/integrations.md, docs-site/src/content/docs/{fr,ja,ko,ru,tr,zh-cn,zh-tw}/guides/integrations.md	The guides describe saving model and effort settings, clearing supported overrides through inheritance, and handling unsupported values. They also document optional omo.jsonc mirrors, retrying failed mirror writes, and automatic-assignment proposals.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

---

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 5caee

This restores translated documentation sections that match the implemented behavior. There is no code, runtime or data impact, so merging carries minimal risk.

Pre-merge checks | 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title accurately identifies the documentation scope and main change: restoring translated LazyCodex role-effort sections in the integration guides. It is concise and specific.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

[lidge-jun]

Maintainer integration into dev (MAINTAINERS.md dev-only path; actor @lidge-jun, admin), merged as 561c55b; head 5caee35d2a bound with --match-head-commit, no unresolved threads. Exact-head checks all passed (docs site build, privacy gate, enforce-target, hygiene). Author verification: docs-site build 0 (569 pages), docs ci-workflows tests 419/0, structure:check and privacy:scan 0; GPT-6.1-Sol translation review NEAR-PASS with wording findings folded. A union check with #6975 (same English guide) merges cleanly.