Skip to content

docs: add the v2.0 rest order and the GI05 answer to PLAN - #1918

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen
Oct 26, 2026
Merged

mergify[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen

Conversation

@Cuarroc

@Cuarroc Cuarroc commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Dieser Entwurf ergänzt den Plan um die kurze Reihenfolge bis zur v2.0.0-Abnahme: Glass-Rest, technische Abnahme, Bilder, Klick-Checkliste, Release-Entwurf und die noch offene Endkarte für dich. Außerdem steht deine Antwort zu den 13 nicht angeschlossenen Bereichen im Plan (standardmäßig verbergen, per sichtbarem Schalter wieder zeigen), und der gemergte Stand von KR-08c-2b-LIVE ist berichtigt. Es ist nur Dokumentation: nichts wurde gebaut, installiert, im Programm geprüft oder freigegeben, und die Release-Sperre bleibt bestehen.

Plan-ID: V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN

Report

Package / tier: V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN, tier C (docs only), single file docs/PLAN.md. No-Test trailer: documentation of the accepted v2.0 rest order and recorded user decisions. Draft PR; first commit 36e868eb, correction round adds the merge/correction commit eb9e380d (see "Nachbesserung").

Model / admission: runtime init states claude-sonnet-5-5 (Claude subscription, not claude-api). Requested effort high; the runtime does not expose an actual effort field, so none is claimed. Dispatcher quota read 2026-10-26T01:06:42Z (Claude weekly 46%, session 5%, no error); admission file SHA-256 7fc40a17…94dfee verified at start 2026-10-26T01:10Z (inside 60 min). No extra agents, reviewers, QA or services started.

Base: origin/main = 5c15cddeccf6e0ab8333f2c72326cc94223c263e at start, before write and before push (git rev-parse origin/main), main CI at that SHA: ci, dev-build, test-insights = success. Worktree was clean. No exact duplicate: no PR was open at start; #1917 (FU-KR08C-LIVE-PLACEMENT, Codex, draft) appeared during the work and touches the same file docs/PLAN.md as this PR, in different agreed regions (its own KR/FU rows vs. the V2-REST section and the inbox). It has since merged (see "Nachbesserung").

What changed (docs/PLAN.md, +18/−3 raw lines)

  • New section "V2-REST" with rows: V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN (this row), V2-REST-GLASS (parent for the open KR 10.2 rows incl. RESTORE, split, D1 removal, exited-eligibility and GI05 inline, no GI05 leaf row), V2-ACC1b-NEW, V2-SHOT-BASE-PREP (light and dark, 1440×900, route list from Root), V2-UAT-1a-NEW (≤10 plain-German checkpoints, document only), V2-REL-PREP (draft outside the repo only, no version bump PR, no tag). Old IDs V2-ACC1b / V2-SHOT-BASE / V2-UAT-1a / V2-REL are untouched (new IDs carry a suffix; no duplicates).
  • Decision inbox: GI02/GI05 row keeps question and recommendation, status now "GI02 open; GI05 answered 26.10.2026". New open row V2-ENDKARTE (SHOT look, UAT-1b click, V2-DRILL, BETA-0 dev installer sufficient?, release-lock lift with D1-on/test(shell): record narrow v2 acceptance and keyboard coverage (V2-ACC1b) #1540 re-cut, fresh v2.0.0 yes). Unknown is never a release approval.
  • "Gültige Regeln und Antworten": GI05 entry quotes the user exactly: „Fragen von dir: ja du darfst die verirrten prozesse beenden 2. ja aber umschaltbar“ (Root msg msg-0mvoiks7e-9f5929ea, native 00:24:13.514Z, user ca. 00:23Z). Only the GI05 part (2.) is applied; process cleanup (1.) is recorded as Root history, not worker permission; the new-native-admission process-exception list stays empty.
  • KR-08c-2b-LIVE row: status corrected from "Nachbesserung … offen" to the evidenced merge (feat: launch profiles beside eligible live Glass terminal tabs #1915, 2026-10-25T17:09:55Z, 5c15cdde…, main CI success); "Root acceptance not evidenced". Meaning of the other cells unchanged.
  • "Für den Nutzer" bullet adjusted so it no longer calls GI05 open. Z1–Z4 rows, titles, deps and other status qualifiers are untouched. docs/plan/v2.0/plan.md was only read.

KR 10.2 live inventory (26.10.2026; full per-row file kept outside the repo, not committed)

Evidence (command → exit)

  • bash scripts/sync.sh start → 0; npm run dev:start-check -- --max-cargo 2 --min-free-gb 3.5 → 0 (13.5 GB free, 0 cargo builds; limit file/observe log not passed, reported as warning).
  • gh pr list --state all --search 'KR-' --limit 1000 --json … → 0 (25); gh pr list --state all --limit 3000 --json … → 0 (1913); gh pr view 1915|1914|1916 --json … → 0.
  • node scripts/plan-check.mjs --offline → 0 ("0 Befunde", incl. no unknown-dependency, no duplicate ID, no cycle). Online node scripts/plan-check.mjs --json baseline before edits → 1 with 19 pre-existing status-contradicts-github findings (e.g. KR-08c-1, Z4-M4B-*, DOC-9); after edits 20, the only new one is pr-without-plan-row for the unrelated draft fix: keep live terminal chooser inside viewport and clear of tabs #1917; none caused by this change.
  • Secret scan bash scripts/ci/secret-scan.sh → 0; pre-commit lane (crlf, eol, secrets, drift, plan-check, red-first with No-Test) → commit exit 0; diff scanned for personal paths/addresses: none.
  • bash scripts/ci/gates.sh lane prepush in this worktree → 0 (28 gates green; HEAD 36e868eb). git push -u origin claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen → 0; git ls-remote origin claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen → 36e868eb9701bb1d407048ca4a1127bdce60957f, equal to local HEAD.
  • Architecture drift: no finding, nothing allowlisted.

NICHT ABGEDECKT

  • No product code, native runtime, installed or effective state, Glass overall acceptance, user UAT or release was touched or proven; "applied", "merged", "installed", "effective", "native" and "UAT" stay distinct. The parent v2.0 rest is not complete.
  • Linux only: no #[cfg(windows)] test is touched by a docs change; the Windows lane runs in the merge queue.
  • Inventory rests on GitHub search plus a local filter and git log --grep; rows 13a–d and 17 are UNKNOWN. Other agents' reports (Codex job for fix: keep live terminal chooser inside viewport and clear of tabs #1917, Root messages) are cited as such and were not re-verified beyond the exact PR reads above.
  • Actual effort field of the runtime was not observable.
  • Pre-existing online plan-check findings (19) were not touched.

Review

Review: ausstehend (Stufe C, gates only). Author is Anthropic; Root's own Anthropic review does not count as independent. Root dispatches reviews, head CI, acceptance, ready, review-ok and Mergify; this worker started none.

Nachbesserung 26.10.2026 (Root order after the #1917 merge)

Heads / bases: old head 36e868eb9701bb1d407048ca4a1127bdce60957f; incoming main be8b70356ac888bfafdad6a7250a9155cdd77063 (#1917 merged 2026-10-26T02:18:06Z, main CI success); new head eb9e380d141ac64e3996793043e3871befab451c (merge commit, parents 36e868eb and be8b7035). git merge-base HEAD origin/main = be8b7035.

Conflict proof: gh pr view 1918 showed CONFLICTING plus label conflict after the #1917 merge; git merge origin/main reproduced a real content conflict in docs/PLAN.md (KR-08c-2b-LIVE vs. incoming FU-KR08C-LIVE-PLACEMENT row, the only hunk). Resolved by keeping both rows; no rebase, no force, no branch update button. After the push gh pr view shows MERGEABLE.

Corrections in docs/PLAN.md (only these, no new row, no GI05 leaf row):

Sizes: authored correction against the just-integrated tree: 6 PLAN rows/lines touched, about 11 raw added+deleted lines (<= 50). Final PR against fresh merge-base be8b7035: docs/PLAN.md +19/−4 = 23 raw (<= 300). Full 36e868eb..HEAD diff: 5 files, +248/−7, of which 4 files (+242/−2 runtime/test lines of #1917) are incoming main and not authored here; the P1-authored part is only docs/PLAN.md.

Source-qualified findings (IDs repeat across sources, so the source is part of the ID):

ID Source Severity Topic Disposition
R1918-Codex-P1 Codex feeder review-pr1918-codex.md (head 36e868eb) medium own row still "In Prüfung" fixed: Root's post-merge status wording
R1918-Codex-P2 Codex feeder medium "#1917 Entwurf-PR" obsolete fixed: observed merge SHA/date instead; no claim before the merge happened
R1918-Chief-P1 Chief (msg-0mvokxnq6-bdc9b2e1, ticket comment 04ccbac4) medium KR-07a parking missing in 07a→11c→11d fixed: parking and resume condition kept, order conditional only
R1918-Chief-P2 Chief medium #1915 "Root-Abnahme nicht belegt" fixed: replaced by the evidenced bounded acceptance with source link
R1918-Chief-P3 Chief medium GI05 answer vs. accepted conservative cut, child started fixed: separated; GI05 independent of RESTORE; nothing claimed delivered
Root addendum Root msg-0mvoln6u8-daec637d – FU-KR08C-LIVE-PLACEMENT row said reviews/Root pending fixed with actual merge/reviews/acceptance

Commands (raw exit codes): git merge origin/main → 1 (real conflict, expected); node scripts/plan-check.mjs --offline → 0 ("0 Befunde", no unresolved deps, no duplicate IDs); git commit (pre-commit lane incl. secret scan, red-first with No-Test) → 0; bash scripts/ci/gates.sh lane prepush in this worktree → 0 (also re-run by the push hook, push exit 0); git push -u origin claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen → 0; git ls-remote origin claude/v2-rest-plan-pflegen → eb9e380d141ac64e3996793043e3871befab451c = local HEAD. Old-head gates (36e868eb) are not reused as new-head evidence.

Model: author claude-sonnet-5-5 (Claude subscription), requested effort high; the runtime exposes no effort field, so none is claimed. Admission at 02:33:57Z (file SHA-256 bd798a62…26d877) was bound by the dispatcher.

NICHT ABGEDECKT (addendum): Windows #[cfg(windows)] tests and Windows clippy (merge queue). No product, native, installed/effective, Glass overall, UAT or release proof. Online plan-check --json was not re-run (its pre-existing findings are untouched). The #1915/#1917 acceptance statements are quoted from the PR comments, not independently re-derived. The state of the GI05 child (#1919) is only "draft PR open" as observed at update time.

Review: ausstehend (Stufe C, gates only; Root reads the delta; no further reviewer, no third round). Next owner: Root (ready, review-ok on the new head, Mergify queue).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Root disposition of the remaining Chief finding (head eb9e380d, 2026-10-26 03:20Z)

ID Source Finding Disposition
R1918-Chief-P3 (rest) Chief msg-0mvootiv7 / P1 comment 34de821b docs/PLAN.md:279 and :502 still say GI05 is "nichts davon geliefert, getestet" although #1919 exists accepted as a wording limit, no new push in this docs-only PR. Reading rule for these two lines: "geliefert" in PLAN means merged on main. As of this head GI05 is delivered only as draft PR #1919 (head dcc45032, author test and browser evidence in its report, Codex + Kimi K3.1 Pro reviews APPROVE, Root acceptance and merge still open). The status flips through #1919's own PLAN row at its merge; this PR does not pre-claim it. No extra reviewer or QA run.

Add the V2-REST section with rows for the Glass rest, V2-ACC1b-NEW,
V2-SHOT-BASE-PREP, V2-UAT-1a-NEW and V2-REL-PREP, the open endcard in
the decision inbox and the GI05 answer of 26.10.2026 (hide the 13
unconnected Glass areas by default, visible persistent switch). Correct
the KR-08c-2b-LIVE row to the evidenced merge (#1915, 5c15cdd).

Plan-ID: V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN
No-Test: docs-only plan rows and recorded user decision
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Cuarroc
Cuarroc marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2026 01:31
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-26T03:16:54.984981Z eb9e380 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 36e868eb97

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/PLAN.md Outdated

| ID | Ziel | Owner | Hängt ab von | Ort | Stufe | Status | Abnahme | Ticket |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN | Kurze kanonische Restreihenfolge mit Owner und Abhängigkeiten, GI05-Entscheid und Mergestatus von KR-08c-2b-LIVE nachführen | srv-v2-rest-plan-pflegen; Stabs delegiert, Root nimmt ab | KR-08c-2b-LIVE | Server | C | In Prüfung: Entwurf-PR, nur diese Datei | Reine Dokumentation (No-Test). Vollständige KR-Inventur im PR-Report, nicht im Repo. Keine Produkt-, native, installiert/wirksam- oder UAT-Abnahme und keine neue Freigabe | f13918cc-fc43-409e-90c6-7ef235fa7132 |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Den Status der eigenen Planzeile für den Merge formulieren

Die im Commit als Plan-ID benannte Zeile bleibt auf „In Prüfung: Entwurf-PR“ stehen. Nach dem Merge würde der kanonische Plan damit dieses bereits gelieferte Dokumentationspaket weiterhin als offenen Entwurf ausweisen; außerdem hängt V2-REST-GLASS ausdrücklich davon ab. Die verbindliche Review-Regel aus AGENTS.md verlangt über den eingebundenen Abschnitt „Reviews and advisors“, dass die eigene Planzeile den Zustand nach dem Merge beschreibt. Bitte den Status entsprechend bedingt formulieren, etwa „Erledigt mit Root-Abnahme und Merge dieses Dokumentenschnitts“, ohne damit Produkt- oder Nutzerabnahmen zu behaupten.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L74-L76

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Cuarroc Dieser PR hat einen Konflikt mit main und kann nicht in die Merge-Queue. Bitte main hineinmergen (kein Rebase, kein Force-Push) und den Konflikt loesen; das Label conflict verschwindet danach von selbst.

Merge origin/main (be8b703, #1917) to resolve the real PLAN.md conflict
at the KR-08c-2b-LIVE / FU-KR08C-LIVE-PLACEMENT rows; both rows are kept.

Correct the V2-REST rows: own status after merge, #1917 merged with its
actual SHA, RESTORE next on a fresh base, exited-tab eligibility as a
separate residual, KR-07a parking kept in the 07a-11c-11d chain, GI05
runs independently of RESTORE. Record the bounded Root acceptance of
#1915 and #1917 and the GI05 answer versus the accepted conservative cut.

Plan-ID: V2-REST-PLAN-PFLEGEN
No-Test: docs-only plan correction, no runtime or test change
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@mergify mergify Bot removed the conflict label Oct 26, 2026
@Cuarroc
Cuarroc marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2026 03:15
@Cuarroc Cuarroc added the review-ok Pipeline: review disposition complete, no open high finding label Oct 26, 2026
@Cuarroc

Cuarroc commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@Mergifyio queue

@Cuarroc

Cuarroc commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Integration note (Root, 2026-10-26T03:26:00Z): head eb9e380, Tier C (docs/PLAN.md only), checks green (linux_1, linux_2, gates (windows), red-first pass), review disposition in body. Label review-ok bound to eb9e380; queued via Mergify.

@mergify mergify Bot added the queued label Oct 26, 2026
@mergify mergify Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2026
30 of 46 tasks
@Cuarroc

Cuarroc commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Disposition correction (Root, 2026-10-26T03:30:01Z) after PM note: Chief finding P3 (PLAN:279/:502 wording 'nichts davon geliefert, getestet, abgenommen oder gemergt' about the GI05 draft) is NOT fixed in this head eb9e380. It is a remaining wording rest: follow-up for the PLAN owner (Stabschef) in the next PLAN-PFLEGEN package, to restate the GI05 state per stage (delivered/tested/reviewed/accepted/merged) once #1919 settles. No new push; Tier C docs; queue position unchanged.

@mergify
mergify Bot merged commit b69683d into main Oct 26, 2026
25 checks passed
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge Queue Status

This pull request spent 8 minutes 44 seconds in the queue, including 8 minutes 2 seconds running CI.

Required conditions to merge
  • check-success = gates (linux)
  • check-success = gates (windows)
  • check-success = red-first
  • github-review-approved [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]
  • label != do-not-merge
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/gates (linux)
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/gates (linux)
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/gates (linux)
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/gates (windows)
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/gates (windows)
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/gates (windows)
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/red-first
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/red-first
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/red-first
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-neutral = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-skipped = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-success = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

review-ok Pipeline: review disposition complete, no open high finding

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant