Skip to content

docs(docs-hygiene): process derivability route-to-sibling batch (0.14.7) - #2810

Closed
kyle-sexton wants to merge 1 commit into
cursor/2734-clean-tree-8f91from
cursor/2735-route-sibling-8f91
Closed

docs(docs-hygiene): process derivability route-to-sibling batch (0.14.7)#2810
kyle-sexton wants to merge 1 commit into
cursor/2734-clean-tree-8f91from
cursor/2735-route-sibling-8f91

Conversation

@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #2735

Summary

Replacement for #2798 (squash-merged into the wrong stack base when that branch was not main). Re-lands 0.14.7 on top of #2795.

Related

Close the 38 audit-noise routes after re-scan (one Sources relocation),
triage the 136 extract-ssot routes in-tree, and record false-keep sampling
as deferred without opening new issues.

Closes #2735

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@claude

claude Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 35s —— View job


Security Review

  • Gather context (PR diff, changed files)
  • Apply skip gate check
  • Review changed files for security-relevant surface
  • Post final findings

Skip gate applied — no review performed. This PR touches only documentation and metadata:

  • docs/conventions/commit-convention/README.md — prose edit relocating a design-topic reference into a new ## Sources section
  • plugins/docs-hygiene/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — version bump 0.14.60.14.7
  • plugins/docs-hygiene/CHANGELOG.md — changelog entry for the release
  • plugins/docs-hygiene/context/derivability-route-followups.md — new in-tree status board (markdown table/prose) tracking a prior audit-derivability sweep
  • plugins/docs-hygiene/skills/audit-derivability/SKILL.md — one-line doc addition linking to the new follow-ups file

No code, scripts, GitHub Actions workflows, permissions, or configuration with runtime effect are touched. There is no injection surface, no auth/access-control logic, no secret/token handling, and no trust-boundary change. Per the skip gate, "no security-relevant surface after reading the diff" — no findings to report.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Last security-reviewed head: 43776aee85c8ae5b5ae098db3f71ae2c38622052. On the next push, the relevance gate compares only the commits since this SHA; delete this comment to force a full re-review.

@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #2812 (re-landed on main after #2795). No new issue.

kyle-sexton added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2026
….7) (#2812)

Closes #2735

## Summary

Re-lands 0.14.7 on main after #2795. Replaces #2810/#2798 which were
closed or merged against a deleted stack base.

## Related

- Docs-hygiene stack after #2795; precedes 0.15.0 compress remediations.

Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
@claude

claude Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude encountered an error —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Automated review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

Re-run the job, or workflow_dispatch this workflow with the PR number, to retry the review. A new push re-triggers this lane only if the caller's pull_request triggers include synchronize (the canonical caller omits it).
An automatic retry may already have run — it is skipped when a partial review could duplicate comments, or when the failure class needs an operator (auth).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants