Repository navigation
CICS file control: tokenless update hold INVREQ RESP2 30 / 31 / 28 on both runtimes (Part of #5092) - #5103
Merged
Conversation
… both runtimes (Part of #5092) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
squid-protocol
added
the
shepherd:merge
Owner
Author
|
No description provided. |
squid-protocol
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 14, 2026 11:08
squid-protocol
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 14, 2026 11:08
Owner
Author
|
No description provided. |
Contributor
squid-protocol
added
shepherd:retrying
This was referenced Oct 15, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #5092. Models the tokenless file-control INVREQ RESP2 values on both CICS runtimes (stub
ggcics.c, JavaCicsTask) and the spec, as #5090 did for 47.IBM CICS TS 6.x, EXEC CICS REWRITE / DELETE / READ (register X52):
Tests:
tests/cics_crucible/test_update_hold_resp2_5092.py, one 23-step scenario run on the stub and CicsTask (no hold, spent hold, SYNCPOINT, NOTFND, plain READ, other file, token hold vs tokenless hold) plus GTEQ UPDATE;test_update_token_runtimes_5078.pyexpectation 0 -> 30. Spec outcomes infiles.py; X52 updated.Cross-repo: none. Overlaps open #5095 (UNLOCK without TOKEN: same files); this PR touches only the INVREQ paths, so expect a trivial merge either way.
Gates:
pr_gates --fast6/6,--ratchets7/7 (0 skipped); cics_crucible + equivalence_cics tests pass (Docker/Maven cells skipped locally).🤖 Generated with Claude Code