Skip to content

Codify orchestrated re-sync personas and full-replacement rule - #205

Merged
ptr727 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
orchestration-personas
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

Codify orchestrated re-sync personas and full-replacement rule#205
ptr727 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
orchestration-personas

Conversation

@ptr727

@ptr727 ptr727 commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Foundation for orchestrating template→downstream re-sync from one session. Because per-machine agent memory is lost on a machine switch, the reusable playbook must live in a committed file.

What

  • New AGENTS.md subsection "Orchestrated Re-Sync: Hub and Downstream Personas" (hub-only, under "Staying in Sync"): defines the hub/orchestrator persona (owns source of truth, drives consolidation, validates each downstream result for full-replacement + comment discipline + EOL/lint, fixes template gaps through the gate, never merges without maintainer OK) vs the downstream/derived persona (full-replace under direction, honor comment rules, report gaps upstream).
  • Strengthened the "Staying in Sync" rule: re-sync is full replacement of carried artifacts (replace whole file/section, never partial hand-merge), and is not an occasion to add or grow comments.

Why

Targets the two recurring downstream regressions observed across re-syncs: agents doing partial updates where carry means full replacement, and accreting comments that violate the Comments rules. The orchestrator now catches both by diffing every result against the template.

Docs-only; markdownlint clean; line endings preserved.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Re-syncing the downstream fleet from the hub needs a durable, committed
playbook (per-machine memory is lost on a machine switch). Add an
"Orchestrated Re-Sync: Hub and Downstream Personas" subsection defining
the hub/orchestrator vs downstream/derived separation of duties, and make
the full-replacement rule explicit in "Staying in Sync": carried
artifacts are replaced whole, never partially hand-merged, and re-syncing
is not an occasion to add or grow comments. Guards the two recurring
downstream regressions (partial carries, comment accretion); the
orchestrator validates each result by diffing against the template.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 24, 2026 05:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds additional guidance to AGENTS.md for template-to-downstream re-sync work by (1) explicitly requiring full replacement (not partial merges) when re-syncing carried artifacts and (2) introducing an orchestrated re-sync playbook that distinguishes hub/orchestrator vs downstream/derived responsibilities.

Changes:

  • Strengthen "Staying in Sync and Reporting Drift Upstream" to require full replacement of carried artifacts/sections.
  • Add a new "Orchestrated Re-Sync: Hub and Downstream Personas" subsection describing responsibilities and validation expectations.

Comment thread AGENTS.md Outdated

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@ptr727
ptr727 merged commit 20a9416 into develop Jun 25, 2026
10 checks passed
@ptr727
ptr727 deleted the orchestration-personas branch June 25, 2026 14:04
ptr727 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2026
…eadme, carry-whole-file (#207)

Phase-0 of the template-to-downstream convergence sweep: the template
absorbs everything downstream repos had reinvented, so derived repos can
take the carried artifacts verbatim with zero hand-rolling. Builds on
#205 (orchestration personas) and #206 (per-PR merge-bot concurrency),
which this branch incorporates. Held for end-gate review; not to be
merged midway.

## What this PR does

- **Absorbs downstream-led action pins** (template now leads per #204):
`dependabot/fetch-metadata` v2.5.0 -> v3.1.0 and
`softprops/action-gh-release` v2.6.2 -> v3.0.1, the SHAs the downstreams
already run.
- **Generalizes the release model + adds a loud guard.** Every release
is a tag on the built commit plus an auto source zip, README, and
LICENSE; targets amend it by uploading `release-asset-<branch>-*`
artifacts (binaries/packages) or pushing elsewhere (image/registry).
`github-release` collects assets by the `release-asset-<branch>-*`
pattern so the job is target-agnostic and carries verbatim.
- **Makes the Docker README + date badge main-only, caller-gated.**
Neither has per-branch context, so both move out of the publisher branch
matrix into single jobs gated on `main` being published.
`publish-docker-readme-task.yml` is rebuilt generic: a matrix over a
`repositories` input (or a manifest-derived list), a caller-passed
`ref`, and an optional transform step (e.g. m4) to render the README
before pushing.
- **Adopts the carry-whole-file rule.** Replaces "drop the sections you
don't ship": derived repos carry each shared file in full (an inert
`[*.cs]` block or unused-language `CODESTYLE.md` section costs nothing),
so every re-sync is a clean overwrite, not a partial merge.
`CODESTYLE.md` is genericized into a self-contained drop-in (no
demo-project names, no template-onboarding pointers) and carries both
the .NET and Python sections whole. Only per-language
`.vscode/tasks.json` task definitions still track the repo's language.

All carried files stay self-contained (no template/demo/cross-project
references except the sanctioned upstream-drift pointer). Workflow YAML
and Markdown remain CRLF per the line-ending governance. Validated with
actionlint and markdownlint-cli2 (clean).

## Documented adaptations (for review)

These are the genuine, intentional deviations the maintainer should
review at the end gate. Each is a sanctioned exception with its
rationale recorded inline in the artifact; nothing here is accidental
drift.

- **`fail_on_unmatched_files: true` on `github-release`** - a promised
`release-asset-*` that goes missing or is misnamed fails the release
loudly; a Docker-only / no-file-target repo is the one case that relaxes
it (no release asset to attach).
- **`merge-bot-pull-request.yml` concurrency: per-PR group,
`cancel-in-progress: false`** - under `pull_request_target` `github.ref`
is the base branch, which would serialize every bot PR against that
base, so the group keys on the PR number; cancellation would leave
auto-merge in an inconsistent state, so events queue and each runs to
completion.
- **`publish-release.yml` concurrency: global ref-independent group,
`cancel-in-progress: false`** - it publishes shared ref-independent
artifacts (both branches' Docker tags/caches and GitHub releases)
regardless of the triggering ref, so a ref-scoped group would let a
scheduled run and a manual dispatch double-push; cancelling mid-flight
can leave a partial tag set or half-created release.
- **`dotnet/nbgv` consumed via `@master` (no SHA pin)** - the upstream
tag stream lags `master` substantially and Dependabot's tag-tracking
would propose a downgrade; this is the one documented no-SHA-pin
exception.
- **Ruleset-bound job name kept verbatim (no "job" suffix)** - `Check
pull request workflow status` in `test-pull-request.yml` is referenced
as a required-status-check `context:` in the branch ruleset; renaming it
to fit the "every job name ends in job" convention would silently break
required-status-check enforcement.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ptr727 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2026
Promote the accumulated `develop` work to `main`. Twelve changes since
the last promotion:

- Add `WORKFLOW.md`: workflow style, architecture, behavioral contract,
test methodology (#223)
- Use NBGV `IGNORE_GITHUB_REF` instead of the ineffective `GITHUB_REF`
override (#222)
- Skip validate-release on smoke builds (#220)
- Gate asset delete on the release create/refresh condition (#218)
- Ship branch rulesets as versioned JSON in the re-sync / drift loop
(#212)
- Clean up transfer artifacts surgically at consumption, not
blanket-delete (#216)
- Version each publish leg against its own branch; validate at entry
(#215)
- Consolidate workspace configurations into a unified ProjectTemplate
workspace (#210)
- Template convergence barrier: absorb pins, generic release +
docker-readme, carry-whole-file (#207)
- Key merge-bot concurrency on PR number, not `github.ref` (#206)
- Codify orchestrated re-sync personas and full-replacement rule (#205)
- Lead action pins; affirm pattern-based artifact handoff (#204)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants