OCPBUGS-56278: extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10 by jbtrystram · Pull Request #1817 · openshift/os

jbtrystram · 2025-05-12T11:59:44Z

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-05-12T12:11:01Z

@jbtrystram: This pull request references COS-3075 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target either version "4.20." or "openshift-4.20.", but it targets "4.19" instead.

Details

In response to this:

Closes #1680

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jbtrystram · 2025-05-12T12:12:16Z

/jira-refresh

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-12T12:23:59Z

Does the crun-wasm extension get built without failing now?

travier

/lgtm
/hold
(until we've confirmed this fixes the issue :))

jbtrystram · 2025-05-12T13:02:57Z

Yeah some llvm libs are still missing :(

Importing rpm-md...done
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-baseos'; generated: 2025-04-16T23:25:48Z solvables: 1173
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-appstream'; generated: 2025-04-16T23:25:27Z solvables: 6262
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-fast-datapath'; generated: 2025-04-17T00:12:31Z solvables: 1201
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-nfv'; generated: 2025-04-16T23:26:27Z solvables: 21
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-highavailability'; generated: 2025-04-16T23:26:23Z solvables: 44
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19'; generated: 2025-05-12T10:24:26Z solvables: 526
rpm-md repo 'rhel-9.6-early-kernel'; generated: 2025-05-12T10:24:26Z solvables: 526
Resolving dependencies...done
error: Could not depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - package crun-wasm-1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19 requires crun = 1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package crun-wasm-1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel requires crun = 1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both crun-1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19 and crun-1.19.1-1.el9.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both crun-1.21-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel and crun-1.19.1-1.el9.x86_64 from @System
  - package crun-wasm-1.8.5-4.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19 requires wasm-library, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package crun-wasm-1.8.5-5.rhaos4.14.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19 requires wasm-library, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package crun-wasm-1.8.5-4.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel requires wasm-library, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package crun-wasm-1.8.5-5.rhaos4.14.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel requires wasm-library, but none of the providers can be installed
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so(LLVM_17)(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides liblldCommon.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides liblldELF.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so(LLVM_17)(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides liblldCommon.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides liblldELF.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-server-ose-4.19
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so(LLVM_17)(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides liblldCommon.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides liblldELF.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides libLLVM-17.so(LLVM_17)(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides liblldCommon.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel
  - nothing provides liblldELF.so.17()(64bit) needed by wasmedge-rt-0.14.0-2.rhaos4.19.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9.6-early-kernel

jbtrystram · 2025-05-12T13:05:30Z

Does the crun-wasm extension get built without failing now?

no it does not. I thought the missing package was llvm and was asked by ART why we were pulling an old version while a newer exist.
I misunderstood the underlying issue.

dustymabe · 2025-05-12T13:59:38Z

also related to this: #1680 (comment)

travier · 2025-05-12T14:28:43Z

/lgtm cancel

joelcapitao · 2025-05-12T15:08:57Z

/lgtm cancel

jlebon · 2025-05-12T16:50:29Z

I think the LLVM errors there are a red herring and this is really just #1680 (comment).

jbtrystram · 2025-05-14T12:25:00Z

/retest

jbtrystram · 2025-05-14T14:14:37Z

I had this passing fine in the pipeline so this has to do with how the repos are mirrored in PROW. let's see how it goes after openshift/release#64914 merges

jbtrystram · 2025-05-14T16:59:55Z

/retest

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T04:15:06Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2025-05-15T10:35:57Z

@jbtrystram: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test images

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test e2e-aws

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

/test okd-scos-images

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-os-master-e2e-aws

pull-ci-openshift-os-master-images

pull-ci-openshift-os-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Details

In response to this:

/retest images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T10:36:23Z

/retest

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T11:51:26Z

/retest

Closes openshift#1680

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T18:02:28Z

/retest

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T20:11:41Z

/retest

jbtrystram · 2025-05-15T20:26:31Z

/unhold

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-15T20:39:41Z

/label backport-risk-assessed
/label cherry-pick-approved

jlebon · 2025-05-15T20:44:14Z

Side note: openshift/release#64590 landed after branching I think but it'd make sense to apply the changes to ci-operator/config/openshift/os/openshift-os-master.yaml in that PR also to the 4.19 version so that these jobs stop running on this branch.

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-15T20:59:02Z

/retitle OCPBUGS-56278: extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-05-15T20:59:18Z

@jbtrystram: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56278, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Closes #1680

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-15T20:59:23Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-05-15T20:59:28Z

@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56278, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-15T21:00:11Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-05-15T21:00:18Z

@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56278, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56277 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56277 targets the "4.20.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mike-nguyen

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci · 2025-05-15T22:40:46Z

@jbtrystram: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws	`ab142c9`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws`
ci/prow/images	`ab142c9`	link	true	`/test images`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

mike-nguyen · 2025-05-16T11:04:38Z

/retest

jlebon · 2025-05-16T14:21:16Z

Nice!

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2025-05-16T14:22:10Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jbtrystram, jlebon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [jbtrystram,jlebon]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-05-16T14:25:27Z

@jbtrystram: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56278: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/os#1817

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56278 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Closes #1680

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci Bot requested review from gursewak1997 and joelcapitao May 12, 2025 12:00

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 12, 2025

joelcapitao approved these changes May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

jbtrystram changed the title ~~extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10~~ COS-3075: extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10 May 12, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 12, 2025

travier approved these changes May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 12, 2025

openshift-ci Bot assigned travier May 12, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 12, 2025

openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 12, 2025

openshift-ci Bot assigned joelcapitao May 12, 2025

mike-nguyen mentioned this pull request May 14, 2025

NO-JIRA: bump verison to 4.20 #1804

Merged

jbtrystram changed the base branch from master to release-4.19 May 15, 2025 17:23

extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10

da76f64

Closes openshift#1680

jbtrystram force-pushed the llvm-9.6 branch from 586422d to da76f64 Compare May 15, 2025 18:02

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 15, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels May 15, 2025

openshift-ci Bot changed the title ~~COS-3075: extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10~~ OCPBUGS-56278: extensions: llvm now available in rhel 9.6 and 10 May 15, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 15, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 15, 2025

openshift-ci Bot requested a review from mike-nguyen May 15, 2025 21:00

openshift-ci Bot assigned jlebon May 16, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2025

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 2acbcb0 into openshift:release-4.19 May 16, 2025

Conversation

jbtrystram commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 12, 2025 • edited by openshift-ci Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

travier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

travier commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

joelcapitao commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

jlebon commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 14, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 14, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 14, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jbtrystram commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jlebon commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

mike-nguyen commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

jlebon commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 12, 2025 •

edited by openshift-ci Bot

Loading

jbtrystram commented May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

jbtrystram commented May 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading