fix(visionOS): Remove Interoperability mode for visionOS

[itaybre]

📜 Description

Removes swift's interoperability mode set to C++.

💡 Motivation and Context

If we have swift interoperability mode, each target depending on Sentry will need to enable this which is annoying.

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

You have to check all boxes before merging:

• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• I updated the wizard if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

Closes #6103

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.592%. Comparing base (8203ac0) to head (f4d8a1e).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              main     #6077       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage   86.602%   86.592%   -0.011%     
=============================================
  Files          432       433        +1     
  Lines        36956     36941       -15     
  Branches     17426     17416       -10     
=============================================
- Hits         32005     31988       -17     
  Misses        4907      4907               
- Partials        44        46        +2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ces/Swift/Helper/SentryMobileProvisionParser.swift	83.333% <100.000%> (-1.852%)	⬇️

... and 17 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8203ac0...f4d8a1e. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1220.40 ms	1250.61 ms	30.22 ms
Size	23.75 KiB	960.94 KiB	937.19 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
ef2c9b3	1222.12 ms	1253.96 ms	31.84 ms
c8dd5e4	1217.67 ms	1242.90 ms	25.23 ms
ab0ba7e	1216.08 ms	1242.40 ms	26.31 ms
354b020	1223.88 ms	1236.82 ms	12.94 ms
25f2d2c	1232.02 ms	1242.78 ms	10.76 ms
e446901	1233.32 ms	1252.32 ms	19.00 ms
27e7514	1229.47 ms	1245.60 ms	16.13 ms
7273bf4	1202.42 ms	1227.62 ms	25.21 ms
c03a8d8	1234.77 ms	1259.19 ms	24.42 ms
6cb4338	1238.47 ms	1256.96 ms	18.49 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
ef2c9b3	23.75 KiB	933.03 KiB	909.29 KiB
c8dd5e4	23.75 KiB	913.48 KiB	889.72 KiB
ab0ba7e	23.75 KiB	904.54 KiB	880.79 KiB
354b020	23.75 KiB	878.19 KiB	854.44 KiB
25f2d2c	23.75 KiB	866.69 KiB	842.94 KiB
e446901	23.75 KiB	933.33 KiB	909.58 KiB
27e7514	23.75 KiB	919.69 KiB	895.94 KiB
7273bf4	23.75 KiB	908.01 KiB	884.26 KiB
c03a8d8	23.75 KiB	928.15 KiB	904.40 KiB
6cb4338	23.75 KiB	913.63 KiB	889.88 KiB

Previous results on branch: itay/remove_iterop_mode_xrOS

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f08c6d9	1217.92 ms	1238.52 ms	20.60 ms
821c3ff	1205.94 ms	1245.33 ms	39.39 ms
e677158	1230.94 ms	1259.51 ms	28.57 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f08c6d9	23.75 KiB	947.54 KiB	923.79 KiB
821c3ff	23.75 KiB	959.44 KiB	935.69 KiB
e677158	23.75 KiB	946.69 KiB	922.94 KiB

[itaybre]

@philipphofmann this was enabled on this commit: 4569cc9
Do you have some insight why this was needed, it seems to build fine right now?

I will remove Package@swift5.9.swift on a later PR

[philipphofmann]

@philipphofmann this was enabled on this commit: 4569cc9 Do you have some insight why this was needed, it seems to build fine right now?

Nope, sorry, I have no idea. I have little knowledge of the interoperability mode. If you've done your research and don't think we need it, I can only ask how can we ensure we don't break anything and how can we test this?

Maybe a review from @noahsmartin would be useful cause his knowledge on such topics is way more extensive than mine.

[philprime]

4569cc9 points to #4462 which closed #3809, where quite a lot of people were asking for this to be enabled.

You should probably perform the same checks as done in this comment:
#3809 (comment)

[itaybre]

Thanks @philprime, I was able to reproduce with those comments.
Looks like the problem is Xcode not linking with libc++ automatically when using the static version, we can manually add it to a target and looks to be fixing the issue.

I will add an integration test to ensure this is working

[itaybre]

Proof of the fix and a verification job to are working: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-cocoa/actions/runs/17501347281/job/49715077730?pr=6092