translation(ru): fixed format of money in the article №5

[Fristail27]

Fixed the format of money, because current format is not clear and doesn't fit the main format in this article.

For example, main format looks like:

Простыми словами: Согласно правилам, минимальная доля выручки, выделяемая на призы в лотереях типа «лотто» и цифровых, составляет 50%, а в «Двойном шаре» — 51%. Это значит, что в среднем за долгий период каждый вложенный вами рубль принесёт лишь 0,51 рубля, а 49% вы теряете. В 2024 году по всей стране было продано лотерейных билетов на 6234,86 млрд рублей, из которых 1610,31 млрд рублей направились в фонд благотворительности и не стали призами для игроков. В общей сложности сумма, не пошедшая на выплату призов, составила 623486000000 рублей, а сумма, направленная в фонд благотворительности, — 161031000000 рублей.

And there were mistakes with 0.

And of course 亿元 means 100 millions yuan so 6234b rub and 1610b rub are wrong

[dlgrv]

Landed via #88 (polished yuan units + dropped the non-prize=full-sales clause). Thanks @Fristail27 for catching the 10x / currency bug.

[Fristail27]

@dlgrv Honestly, this is disappointing. The RU chapters were machine-translated and published with script checks only. The lottery item had rubles instead of yuan and figures off by 10x, which is an automatic fail under hard rule #1 of your own QUALITY.md. And instead of merging my PR or leaving a review comment, you re-committed my changes under your own name. A line in the description doesn't make me the author of the commit.

This isn't how open-source contributions are usually handled on GitHub. The accepted practice is to review the PR, push fixes to the contributor's branch, or at least keep the contributor as a co-author (Co-authored-by, which GitHub supports for exactly this case). Taking someone's changes and publishing them as your own commit goes against basic contribution etiquette.

I've found a few more serious errors in the RU chapters. I think I'll report them upstream in eternity4719/HowToLiveBetter instead, so the original authors know about the quality of this translation.

[dlgrv]

@Fristail27 You're right about the process, and I'm sorry.

PR #83 should have been reviewed and merged (or fixed on your branch with Co-authored-by). Instead the fix landed via #88 under my name. That was a mistake — agent-assisted workflow, I didn't catch the attribution miss in time. Credit for catching the 10× / currency bug is yours; a line in the PR description was not enough.

Going forward: if you open a PR or issue here, I'll make sure you're credited properly — merge your PR when it's green, or push follow-ups to your branch / keep Co-authored-by. I won't re-land your work as a solo commit again.

If you've found more RU errors, please file them on this repo (issue or PR). We'll review and merge under your authorship. A small corrective PR from you would also be the cleanest way to get the contribution on the record — happy to merge that.

Sorry again for the clumsy handling, and thanks for the careful read of ch05.

[Fristail27]

@dlgrv Thanks for acknowledging this. I found another error in RU chapter 09, item 24: yuan became rubles, Chinese law became “УК РФ,” and several figures were mistranslated. I’ve prepared a correction against the Chinese original and will submit a separate PR.

#145