You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[comment audit] Finish launcher and configuration comment review - #33513
Finish the comment audit for extensionless launchers and repository configuration files that the original file-extension inventory missed. Comments are shorter; launch commands and configuration rules stay byte-for-byte identical after comments and blank lines are removed.
What Changed
Shorten launcher explanations for symlink resolution, executable selection and the unpacked CLI entrypoint.
Remove configuration narration and shorten useful line-ending, hashing, generated-fixture and credential warnings.
Keep the audit inventory and all evidence outside the repository.
Why
A final coverage check after #33249 found these file formats missing from the original inventory. The expanded inventory now covers 37,559 source/configuration files. This completes that supplementary review without changing behavior.
N/A — comments only; no visual or interaction changes.
Testing
All nine affected checks pass: pnpm check:changed --base=7d6603aa1766eb4cac079f8d6d2f4e67f251574a --maxWorkers=2.
All 14 existing src/main/cli/packaged-cli-assets.test.ts tests pass, including macOS/Linux launcher argv, environment, symlink and signal contracts.
Exact noncomment-line comparison passes for all nine edited files; Bash syntax checks pass for all three launchers.
Normal commit hooks and whitespace checks pass. No new tests needed for comment-only edits.
Review
Reviewed each comment against its adjacent configuration or shell code. All executable lines, configuration patterns, file modes and shebangs are unchanged. No runtime, compatibility, performance or security impact across macOS/Linux/Windows, local/SSH/remote hosts, folder/worktree workspaces, mobile, agents or integrations. Verified locally on Linux using Node 24 with background launch enabled.
Agent skill upstream boundary
Not applicable: no upstream skill-installer content copied or translated.
Checklist
Small, focused comment-only change.
Self-reviewed for correctness, security, performance and compatibility.
Local validation complete before one non-draft publication; no routine follow-up pushes planned.
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
Recent review info
Run configuration
Source mode: Auto
Repository: Unavailable
Branch: Unavailable
File: No configuration file from this repository applied
Commit: Unavailable
Layers: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Advanced
Run ID: 2095bbe5-fa39-4225-be35-0ebd057f0f82
Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d6603a and 1caa1cf.
Files selected for processing: 9
.gitattributes
.github/CODEOWNERS
.gitignore
cloud/.gitignore
config/scripts/orca-dev
docs/site/.gitignore
resources/darwin/bin/orca
resources/linux/bin/orca-ide
tests/tools/relay-bench/.gitignore
Files with no reviewable changes: 2
docs/site/.gitignore
.github/CODEOWNERS
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.
Walkthrough
This pull request revises or removes explanatory comments in repository configuration, ignore files, ownership rules, and launcher scripts. The .gitattributes rules, ignore patterns, ownership entries, and executable statements remain unchanged.
Priority: Low
Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 1caa1
The PR introduces no executable, configuration, ownership, or ignore-rule behavior changes.
Pre-merge checks: 5
Check name
Status
Explanation
Title check
The title "[comment audit] Finish launcher and configuration comment review" matches the changeset, which shortens or removes comments in launcher scripts (resources/darwin/bin/orca, resources/linux/b…
Description check
The description follows the template structure: it has ELI5, What Changed, Why, Linked Issue, Visual Proof, Testing, Review, Agent skill upstream boundary, and Checklist sections. The Visual Proof sec…
Docstring Coverage
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check
Explanation
The title "[comment audit] Finish launcher and configuration comment review" matches the changeset, which shortens or removes comments in launcher scripts (resources/darwin/bin/orca, resources/linux/bin/orca-ide, config/scripts/orca-dev) and in .gitignore and .gitattributes files. It names the main change and the scope, and the bracketed prefix is a conventional tag that does not hide the meaning. The changes are comment-only, which the title does not state, but it does not need to cover every detail.
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description follows the template structure: it has ELI5, What Changed, Why, Linked Issue, Visual Proof, Testing, Review, Agent skill upstream boundary, and Checklist sections. The Visual Proof section correctly uses N/A with a reason for a comment-only change. The Linked Issue section links only a follow-up to #33249 with no 'Fixes #' issue reference, which the template says outside contributors must include. The AI Disclosure section is missing, but it applies only to outside contributors who used AI, so the gap is minor. The 'Notes' section from the template is also not repeated, which is minor too. The LoC table at the top is an auto-generated block and does not affect the assessment.
Resolution
Optional: state whether the author is a StablyAI org member, since the template asks outside contributors to link a real issue. Also consider filling in or removing the AI Disclosure section to match the template.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
Explanation
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (7 skipped: 7 unsupported.)
Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ELI5
Finish the comment audit for extensionless launchers and repository configuration files that the original file-extension inventory missed. Comments are shorter; launch commands and configuration rules stay byte-for-byte identical after comments and blank lines are removed.
What Changed
Why
A final coverage check after #33249 found these file formats missing from the original inventory. The expanded inventory now covers 37,559 source/configuration files. This completes that supplementary review without changing behavior.
Linked Issue
Follow-up to #33249.
Visual Proof
N/A — comments only; no visual or interaction changes.
Testing
pnpm check:changed --base=7d6603aa1766eb4cac079f8d6d2f4e67f251574a --maxWorkers=2.src/main/cli/packaged-cli-assets.test.tstests pass, including macOS/Linux launcher argv, environment, symlink and signal contracts.Review
Reviewed each comment against its adjacent configuration or shell code. All executable lines, configuration patterns, file modes and shebangs are unchanged. No runtime, compatibility, performance or security impact across macOS/Linux/Windows, local/SSH/remote hosts, folder/worktree workspaces, mobile, agents or integrations. Verified locally on Linux using Node 24 with background launch enabled.
Agent skill upstream boundary
Checklist