Skip to content

Fix drm device probe ordering with strict fw_devlink - #34

Merged
minlexx merged 6 commits into
qcom-sdm660-6.10.yfrom
alexeymin/devlink-fixes
Aug 24, 2024
Merged

minlexx merged 6 commits into
qcom-sdm660-6.10.yfrom
alexeymin/devlink-fixes

Conversation

@minlexx

@minlexx minlexx commented Jul 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add fake panel node for simple-fbramebuffer to calculate DPI from. It only needs width & height specified. This allows us to break device link from simplefb to mdss (implicitly via panel->mdp->mdss) to fix drm device probe ordering.

Without this, mdss/adreno probes first, creates /dev/dri/card0, simpledrm would probe second after msm-drm, create /dev/dri/card1, resulting in two cards and confuse userspace with 2 GPUs (UIs fail to start). When there is no dependency on mdss for simpledrm, it probes first, creates card0. After that, mdss/adreno probes, takes over the framebuffer, removes card0 and adds it's own card1 🤔 At least what I think is happening.

Alternative workaround is to boot with kernel parameter fw_devlink=permissive, which also can break this dependency, but is worse, because it can hide other issues with device dependencies.

@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the alexeymin/devlink-fixes branch from 518e967 to 3c11dca Compare July 14, 2024 16:56
@minlexx minlexx changed the title fixup! arm64: dts: qcom: sdm660-xiaomi-lavender: Split by display lavender: Fix conflict between simpledrm and msm with strict fw_devlink Jul 14, 2024
@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the qcom-sdm660-6.9.y branch from 6d07b94 to d7a3a40 Compare July 14, 2024 23:44
@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the alexeymin/devlink-fixes branch 3 times, most recently from 8fd1008 to fde23b1 Compare July 15, 2024 05:24
@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the alexeymin/devlink-fixes branch 7 times, most recently from 51adbfb to c778ef6 Compare August 6, 2024 12:59
@minlexx
minlexx changed the base branch from qcom-sdm660-6.9.y to qcom-sdm660-6.10.y August 6, 2024 13:00
@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the qcom-sdm660-6.10.y branch 2 times, most recently from 6936bde to d5cde25 Compare August 7, 2024 04:55
@minlexx minlexx closed this Aug 7, 2024
@minlexx
minlexx force-pushed the alexeymin/devlink-fixes branch from c778ef6 to d5cde25 Compare August 7, 2024 04:56
Add fake panel node for simple-framebuffer to calculate DPI from.
It only needs width & height specified. We can't just reference
"real" panel node which is under mdss/mdp/dsi, because it will
cause simplefb to probe 2nd, after mdss and it will cause
multiple issues.

This fake node allows us to break device link
from simplefb to mdss (implicitly via panel->mdp->mdss) to fix drm
device probe ordering. Without this, simpledrm would probe second
after msm-drm, and confuse userspace with 2 GPUs in /dev/dri.
Alternative workaround is to boot with kernel parameter
`fw_devlink=permissive`, which is worse, because it can hide other
issues with device dependencies.
@minlexx minlexx reopened this Aug 7, 2024
@minlexx minlexx changed the title lavender: Fix conflict between simpledrm and msm with strict fw_devlink Fix drm device probe ordering with strict fw_devlink Aug 7, 2024
@minlexx

minlexx commented Aug 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I've tested this on lavender and clover-plus, so hopefully it should work fine also for x00td and tulip :)

@minlexx
minlexx merged commit c2ada12 into qcom-sdm660-6.10.y Aug 24, 2024
@minlexx
minlexx deleted the alexeymin/devlink-fixes branch August 24, 2024 19:51
minlexx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2024
[ Upstream commit 86a41ea ]

When l2tp tunnels use a socket provided by userspace, we can hit
lockdep splats like the below when data is transmitted through another
(unrelated) userspace socket which then gets routed over l2tp.

This issue was previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87sfialu2n.fsf@cloudflare.com/

The solution is to have lockdep treat socket locks of l2tp tunnel
sockets separately than those of standard INET sockets. To do so, use
a different lockdep subclass where lock nesting is possible.

  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  6.10.0+ #34 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  iperf3/771 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8881027601d8 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  10 locks held by iperf3/771:
   #0: ffff888102650258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x1a/0x40
   #1: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #2: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #3: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   #4: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0xf9/0x260
   #5: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10
   #6: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #7: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #8: ffffffff822ac1e0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0xcc/0x1450
   #9: ffff888101f33258 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock#2){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1450

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 771 Comm: iperf3 Not tainted 6.10.0+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0
   dump_stack+0xc/0x20
   __lock_acquire+0x135d/0x2600
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2a0
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   ? __skb_checksum+0xa3/0x540
   _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x35/0x50
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_eth_dev_xmit+0x3c/0xc0
   dev_hard_start_xmit+0x11e/0x420
   sch_direct_xmit+0xc3/0x640
   __dev_queue_xmit+0x61c/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   __tcp_send_ack+0x1b8/0x340
   tcp_send_ack+0x23/0x30
   __tcp_ack_snd_check+0xa8/0x530
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   tcp_rcv_established+0x412/0xd70
   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x299/0x420
   tcp_v4_rcv+0x1991/0x1e10
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x50/0x220
   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x158/0x260
   ip_local_deliver+0xc8/0xe0
   ip_rcv+0xe5/0x1d0
   ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xce/0xe0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   __netif_receive_skb+0x34/0xd0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   process_backlog+0x2cb/0x9f0
   __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x61/0x280
   net_rx_action+0x332/0x670
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   handle_softirqs+0xda/0x480
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0
   </IRQ>
   <TASK>
   __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xe0
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   __dev_queue_xmit+0xa48/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   tcp_write_xmit+0x766/0x2fb0
   ? __entry_text_end+0x102ba9/0x102bad
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __might_fault+0x74/0xc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x190
   tcp_push+0x117/0x310
   tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x14c1/0x1740
   tcp_sendmsg+0x28/0x40
   inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x90
   sock_write_iter+0x242/0x2b0
   vfs_write+0x68d/0x800
   ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10
   ksys_write+0xc8/0xf0
   __x64_sys_write+0x3d/0x50
   x64_sys_call+0xfaf/0x1f50
   do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4d143af992
  Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> e9 01 cc ff ff 41 54 b8 02 00 00 0
  RSP: 002b:00007ffd65032058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f4d143af992
  RDX: 0000000000000025 RSI: 00007f4d143f3bcc RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f4d143f2b28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4d143f3bcc
  R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd650323f0
   </TASK>

Fixes: 0b2c597 ("l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4
CC: gnault@redhat.com
CC: cong.wang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240806160626.1248317-1-jchapman@katalix.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
minlexx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
When simulating an nvme device on qemu with both logical_block_size and
physical_block_size set to 8 KiB, an error trace appears during
partition table reading at boot time. The issue is caused by
inode->i_blkbits being larger than PAGE_SHIFT, which leads to a left
shift of -1 and triggering a UBSAN warning.

[    2.697306] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    2.697309] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c:336:37
[    2.697311] shift exponent -1 is negative
[    2.697315] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 274 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.18.0-rc2+ #34 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[    2.697317] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[    2.697320] Call Trace:
[    2.697324]  <TASK>
[    2.697325]  dump_stack_lvl+0x76/0xa0
[    2.697340]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[    2.697342]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1e3/0x390
[    2.697351]  bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num.cold+0x12/0x94
[    2.697359]  fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx_bh+0x44/0x90
[    2.697365]  submit_bh_wbc+0xb6/0x190
[    2.697370]  block_read_full_folio+0x194/0x270
[    2.697371]  ? __pfx_blkdev_get_block+0x10/0x10
[    2.697375]  ? __pfx_blkdev_read_folio+0x10/0x10
[    2.697377]  blkdev_read_folio+0x18/0x30
[    2.697379]  filemap_read_folio+0x40/0xe0
[    2.697382]  filemap_get_pages+0x5ef/0x7a0
[    2.697385]  ? mmap_region+0x63/0xd0
[    2.697389]  filemap_read+0x11d/0x520
[    2.697392]  blkdev_read_iter+0x7c/0x180
[    2.697393]  vfs_read+0x261/0x390
[    2.697397]  ksys_read+0x71/0xf0
[    2.697398]  __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x30
[    2.697399]  x64_sys_call+0x1e88/0x26a0
[    2.697405]  do_syscall_64+0x80/0x670
[    2.697410]  ? __x64_sys_newfstat+0x15/0x20
[    2.697414]  ? x64_sys_call+0x204a/0x26a0
[    2.697415]  ? do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x670
[    2.697417]  ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x2e/0x2a0
[    2.697420]  ? irqentry_exit+0x43/0x50
[    2.697421]  ? exc_page_fault+0x90/0x1b0
[    2.697422]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[    2.697425] RIP: 0033:0x75054cba4a06
[    2.697426] Code: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <48> 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08
[    2.697427] RSP: 002b:00007fff973723a0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
[    2.697430] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005ea9a2c02760 RCX: 000075054cba4a06
[    2.697432] RDX: 0000000000002000 RSI: 000075054c190000 RDI: 000000000000001b
[    2.697433] RBP: 00007fff973723c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[    2.697434] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
[    2.697434] R13: 00005ea9a2c027c0 R14: 00005ea9a2be5608 R15: 00005ea9a2be55f0
[    2.697436]  </TASK>
[    2.697436] ---[ end trace ]---

This situation can happen for block devices because when
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is enabled, the maximum logical_block_size
is 64 KiB. set_init_blocksize() then sets the block device
inode->i_blkbits to 13, which is within this limit.

File I/O does not trigger this problem because for filesystems that do
not support the FS_LBS feature, sb_set_blocksize() prevents
sb->s_blocksize_bits from being larger than PAGE_SHIFT. During inode
allocation, alloc_inode()->inode_init_always() assigns inode->i_blkbits
from sb->s_blocksize_bits. Currently, only xfs_fs_type has the FS_LBS
flag, and since xfs I/O paths do not reach submit_bh_wbc(), it does not
hit the left-shift underflow issue.

Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Fixes: 47dd675 ("block/bdev: lift block size restrictions to 64k")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[EB: use folio_pos() and consolidate the two shifts by i_blkbits]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105003642.42796-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
setotau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2026
[ Upstream commit fa2408a ]

The logic at ghes_new() prevents allocating too large records, by
checking if they're bigger than GHES_ESTATUS_MAX_SIZE (currently, 64KB).
Yet, the allocation is done with the actual number of pages from the
CPER bios table location, which can be smaller.

Yet, a bad firmware could send data with a different size, which might
be bigger than the allocated memory, causing an OOPS:

    Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fff00000f9b40000
    Mem abort info:
      ESR = 0x0000000096000007
      EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
      SET = 0, FnV = 0
      EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
      FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault
    Data abort info:
      ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007, ISS2 = 0x00000000
      CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
      GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
    swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=000000008ba16000
    [fff00000f9b40000] pgd=180000013ffff403, p4d=180000013fffe403, pud=180000013f85b403, pmd=180000013f68d403, pte=0000000000000000
    Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000007 [#1]  SMP
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 303 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1-00002-gda407d200220 #34 PREEMPT
    Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022
    Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred
    pstate: 214020c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
    pc : hex_dump_to_buffer+0x30c/0x4a0
    lr : hex_dump_to_buffer+0x328/0x4a0
    sp : ffff800080e13880
    x29: ffff800080e13880 x28: ffffac9aba86f6a8 x27: 0000000000000083
    x26: fff00000f9b3fffc x25: 0000000000000004 x24: 0000000000000004
    x23: ffff800080e13905 x22: 0000000000000010 x21: 0000000000000083
    x20: 0000000000000001 x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000010
    x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 00000007c7f20fec x15: 0000000000000020
    x14: 0000000000000008 x13: 0000000000081020 x12: 0000000000000008
    x11: ffff800080e13905 x10: ffff800080e13988 x9 : 0000000000000000
    x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000020
    x5 : 0000000000000030 x4 : 00000000fffffffe x3 : 0000000000000000
    x2 : ffffac9aba78c1c8 x1 : ffffac9aba76d0a8 x0 : 0000000000000008
    Call trace:
     hex_dump_to_buffer+0x30c/0x4a0 (P)
     print_hex_dump+0xac/0x170
     cper_estatus_print_section+0x90c/0x968
     cper_estatus_print+0xf0/0x158
     __ghes_print_estatus+0xa0/0x148
     ghes_proc+0x1bc/0x220
     ghes_notify_hed+0x5c/0xb8
     notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x148
     blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x80
     acpi_hed_notify+0x28/0x40
     acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x50/0x80
     acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x24/0x48
     process_one_work+0x15c/0x3b0
     worker_thread+0x2d0/0x400
     kthread+0x148/0x228
     ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
    Code: 6b14033f 540001ad a94707e2 f100029f (b8747b44)
    ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Prevent that by taking the actual allocated are into account when
checking for CPER length.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
[ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4e70310a816577fabf37d94ed36cde4ad62b1e0a.1767871950.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
XiKoTaSu pushed a commit to XiKoTaSu/linux that referenced this pull request May 2, 2026
[ Upstream commit eedf3e3 ]

ACPICA commit 1c28da2242783579d59767617121035dafba18c3

This was originally done in NetBSD:
NetBSD/src@b69d1ac
and is the correct alternative to the smattering of `memcpy`s I
previously contributed to this repository.

This also sidesteps the newly strict checks added in UBSAN:
llvm/llvm-project@7926744

Before this change we see the following UBSAN stack trace in Fuchsia:

  #0    0x000021afcfdeca5e in acpi_rs_get_address_common(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsaddr.c:329 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6aca5e
  sdm660-mainline#1.2  0x000021982bc4af3c in ubsan_get_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:41 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c
  sdm660-mainline#1.1  0x000021982bc4af3c in maybe_print_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:51 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c
  sdm660-mainline#1    0x000021982bc4af3c in ~scoped_report() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:395 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c
  sdm660-mainline#2    0x000021982bc4bb6f in handletype_mismatch_impl() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:137 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x42b6f
  sdm660-mainline#3    0x000021982bc4b723 in __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1 compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:142 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x42723
  sdm660-mainline#4    0x000021afcfdeca5e in acpi_rs_get_address_common(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsaddr.c:329 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6aca5e
  sdm660-mainline#5    0x000021afcfdf2089 in acpi_rs_convert_aml_to_resource(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*, struct acpi_rsconvert_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsmisc.c:355 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b2089
  sdm660-mainline#6    0x000021afcfded169 in acpi_rs_convert_aml_to_resources(u8*, u32, u32, u8, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rslist.c:137 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6ad169
  sdm660-mainline#7    0x000021afcfe2d24a in acpi_ut_walk_aml_resources(struct acpi_walk_state*, u8*, acpi_size, acpi_walk_aml_callback, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/utilities/utresrc.c:237 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6ed24a
  sdm660-mainline#8    0x000021afcfde66b7 in acpi_rs_create_resource_list(union acpi_operand_object*, struct acpi_buffer*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rscreate.c:199 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6a66b7
  sdm660-mainline#9    0x000021afcfdf6979 in acpi_rs_get_method_data(acpi_handle, const char*, struct acpi_buffer*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsutils.c:770 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b6979
  sdm660-mainline#10   0x000021afcfdf708f in acpi_walk_resources(acpi_handle, char*, acpi_walk_resource_callback, void*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsxface.c:731 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b708f
  sdm660-mainline#11   0x000021afcfa95dcf in acpi::acpi_impl::walk_resources(acpi::acpi_impl*, acpi_handle, const char*, acpi::Acpi::resources_callable) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/acpi-impl.cc:41 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x355dcf
  sdm660-mainline#12   0x000021afcfaa8278 in acpi::device_builder::gather_resources(acpi::device_builder*, acpi::Acpi*, fidl::any_arena&, acpi::Manager*, acpi::device_builder::gather_resources_callback) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/device-builder.cc:84 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x368278
  sdm660-mainline#13   0x000021afcfbddb87 in acpi::Manager::configure_discovered_devices(acpi::Manager*) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/manager.cc:75 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x49db87
  sdm660-mainline#14   0x000021afcf99091d in publish_acpi_devices(acpi::Manager*, zx_device_t*, zx_device_t*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/acpi-nswalk.cc:95 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x25091d
  sdm660-mainline#15   0x000021afcf9c1d4e in x86::X86::do_init(x86::X86*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:60 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x281d4e
  sdm660-mainline#16   0x000021afcf9e33ad in λ(x86::X86::ddk_init::(anon class)*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:77 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a33ad
  sdm660-mainline#17   0x000021afcf9e313e in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:76:19), false, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void>::invoke(void*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:183 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a313e
  sdm660-mainline#18   0x000021afcfbab4c7 in fit::internal::function_base<16UL, false, void(), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<16UL, false, void (), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x46b4c7
  sdm660-mainline#19   0x000021afcfbab342 in fit::function_impl<16UL, false, void(), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(const fit::function_impl<16UL, false, void (), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:315 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x46b342
  sdm660-mainline#20   0x000021afcfcd98c3 in async::internal::retained_task::Handler(async_dispatcher_t*, async_task_t*, zx_status_t) ../../sdk/lib/async/task.cc:24 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x5998c3
  sdm660-mainline#21   0x00002290f9924616 in λ(const driver_runtime::Dispatcher::post_task::(anon class)*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, zx_status_t) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:789 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x10a616
  sdm660-mainline#22   0x00002290f9924323 in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:788:7), true, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int>::invoke(void*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:128 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x10a323
  sdm660-mainline#23   0x00002290f9904b76 in fit::internal::function_base<24UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<24UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xeab76
  sdm660-mainline#24   0x00002290f9904831 in fit::callback_impl<24UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(fit::callback_impl<24UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:471 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xea831
  sdm660-mainline#25   0x00002290f98d5adc in driver_runtime::callback_request::Call(driver_runtime::callback_request*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, zx_status_t) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/callback_request.h:74 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xbbadc
  sdm660-mainline#26   0x00002290f98e1e58 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::dispatch_callback(driver_runtime::Dispatcher*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1248 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xc7e58
  sdm660-mainline#27   0x00002290f98e4159 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::dispatch_callbacks(driver_runtime::Dispatcher*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1308 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xca159
  sdm660-mainline#28   0x00002290f9918414 in λ(const driver_runtime::Dispatcher::create_with_adder::(anon class)*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:353 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe414
  sdm660-mainline#29   0x00002290f991812d in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:351:7), true, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>>::invoke(void*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:128 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe12d
  sdm660-mainline#30   0x00002290f9906fc7 in fit::internal::function_base<8UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<8UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xecfc7
  sdm660-mainline#31   0x00002290f9906c66 in fit::function_impl<8UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(const fit::function_impl<8UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:315 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xecc66
  sdm660-mainline#32   0x00002290f98e73d9 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter::invoke_callback(driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.h:543 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xcd3d9
  sdm660-mainline#33   0x00002290f98e700d in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter::handle_event(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, async_dispatcher_t*, async::wait_base*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1442 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xcd00d
  sdm660-mainline#34   0x00002290f9918983 in async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>::handle_event(async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>*, async_dispatcher_t*, async::wait_base*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/async_loop_owned_event_handler.h:59 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe983
  sdm660-mainline#35   0x00002290f9918b9e in async::wait_method<async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>, &async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>::handle_event>::call_handler(async_dispatcher_t*, async_wait_t*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../sdk/lib/async/include/lib/async/cpp/wait.h:201 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfeb9e
  sdm660-mainline#36   0x00002290f99bf509 in async_loop_dispatch_wait(async_loop_t*, async_wait_t*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:394 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x1a5509
  sdm660-mainline#37   0x00002290f99b9958 in async_loop_run_once(async_loop_t*, zx_time_t) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:343 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x19f958
  sdm660-mainline#38   0x00002290f99b9247 in async_loop_run(async_loop_t*, zx_time_t, _Bool) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:301 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x19f247
  sdm660-mainline#39   0x00002290f99ba962 in async_loop_run_thread(void*) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:860 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x1a0962
  sdm660-mainline#40   0x000041afd176ef30 in start_c11(void*) ../../zircon/third_party/ulib/musl/pthread/pthread_create.c:63 <libc.so>+0x84f30
  sdm660-mainline#41   0x000041afd18a448d in thread_trampoline(uintptr_t, uintptr_t) ../../zircon/system/ulib/runtime/thread.cc:100 <libc.so>+0x1ba48d

Link: open-acpica/acpica@1c28da22
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4664267.LvFx2qVVIh@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
[ rjw: Pick up the tag from Tamir ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
XiKoTaSu pushed a commit to EEBBK-QMUR-Devs/linux-sdm660 that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026
The logic at ghes_new() prevents allocating too large records, by
checking if they're bigger than GHES_ESTATUS_MAX_SIZE (currently, 64KB).
Yet, the allocation is done with the actual number of pages from the
CPER bios table location, which can be smaller.

Yet, a bad firmware could send data with a different size, which might
be bigger than the allocated memory, causing an OOPS:

    Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fff00000f9b40000
    Mem abort info:
      ESR = 0x0000000096000007
      EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
      SET = 0, FnV = 0
      EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
      FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault
    Data abort info:
      ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007, ISS2 = 0x00000000
      CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
      GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
    swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=000000008ba16000
    [fff00000f9b40000] pgd=180000013ffff403, p4d=180000013fffe403, pud=180000013f85b403, pmd=180000013f68d403, pte=0000000000000000
    Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000007 [#1]  SMP
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 303 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1-00002-gda407d200220 sdm660-mainline#34 PREEMPT
    Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022
    Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred
    pstate: 214020c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
    pc : hex_dump_to_buffer+0x30c/0x4a0
    lr : hex_dump_to_buffer+0x328/0x4a0
    sp : ffff800080e13880
    x29: ffff800080e13880 x28: ffffac9aba86f6a8 x27: 0000000000000083
    x26: fff00000f9b3fffc x25: 0000000000000004 x24: 0000000000000004
    x23: ffff800080e13905 x22: 0000000000000010 x21: 0000000000000083
    x20: 0000000000000001 x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000010
    x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 00000007c7f20fec x15: 0000000000000020
    x14: 0000000000000008 x13: 0000000000081020 x12: 0000000000000008
    x11: ffff800080e13905 x10: ffff800080e13988 x9 : 0000000000000000
    x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000020
    x5 : 0000000000000030 x4 : 00000000fffffffe x3 : 0000000000000000
    x2 : ffffac9aba78c1c8 x1 : ffffac9aba76d0a8 x0 : 0000000000000008
    Call trace:
     hex_dump_to_buffer+0x30c/0x4a0 (P)
     print_hex_dump+0xac/0x170
     cper_estatus_print_section+0x90c/0x968
     cper_estatus_print+0xf0/0x158
     __ghes_print_estatus+0xa0/0x148
     ghes_proc+0x1bc/0x220
     ghes_notify_hed+0x5c/0xb8
     notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x148
     blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x80
     acpi_hed_notify+0x28/0x40
     acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x50/0x80
     acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x24/0x48
     process_one_work+0x15c/0x3b0
     worker_thread+0x2d0/0x400
     kthread+0x148/0x228
     ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
    Code: 6b14033f 540001ad a94707e2 f100029f (b8747b44)
    ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Prevent that by taking the actual allocated are into account when
checking for CPER length.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
[ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4e70310a816577fabf37d94ed36cde4ad62b1e0a.1767871950.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant