docs(work-items): require umbrella-side membership comment in fold sequence - #2492
docs(work-items): require umbrella-side membership comment in fold sequence#2492kyle-sexton wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9d50afccf2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
9d50afc to
e79da22
Compare
|
Warning Automated security review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict. Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."
The check is green on purpose, and it is not evidence. It certifies that a security pass ran, and this one did not complete — but the cause is outside this PR's control, so merging is deliberately left unblocked rather than locking every merge for the length of the outage. Nothing was reviewed at this head. Where this check is required, it is satisfied without that evidence; a human should review security-sensitive changes here before merging. Re-run the job to retry the review; a new push also retries it only if the caller's Re-running does NOT help for every class:
|
71d6a06 to
0621927
Compare
Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
0621927 to
d4ed863
Compare
|
Closing as duplicate: umbrella-side membership comment requirement is already on main (fold sequence docs landed via #2488 / related merges). Remaining diff is only a conflicting 0.35.9 changelog bump. |
|
Warning Automated review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict. Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."
Re-run the job to retry the review. A new push re-triggers this lane only if the caller's |
Closes #633
Documents the atomic fold sequence (item comment, umbrella comment, blocked-by edge, strip raw marker) in
issue-conventions.md.Related
None.