docs: add release process topic shelf - #26
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 40 minutes and 7 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughAdds ChangesAGENTS.md Policy, Release-Process Topic Shelf, and xtask Evidence Expansion
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 93d1aec323
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Code Lawyer Activity Summary@codex second-opinion loop closed.
Self-audit result: no additional self-discovered issues beyond the PR thread. Verification:
Thread resolution:
|
Summary
Testing
|
Summary
AGENTS.mdguidance for topic shelf upkeep, git rules, Think usage, and local verification.docs/topics/release-process/as the current contract shelf for tag-triggered GitHub Release publication.v0.1.0-alpha.1publication.cargo xtask contract-checkto acceptxtasktests as executable evidence, not only crate tests.AGENTS.mdtopic-shelf language.RED / GREEN Evidence
RED:
cargo test -p xtask contract_graph_is_validfailed after adding the release-process shelf because release workflow evidence lives inxtask, while the checker only searchedcrates/tests.GREEN:
cargo test -p xtask release_workflow_publishes_only_main_reachable_tagscargo test -p xtask agents_topic_shelf_policy_is_presentcargo test -p xtask contract_graph_is_validnpx --yes markdownlint-cli2 AGENTS.md CHANGELOG.md docs/README.md docs/releases/v0.1.0-alpha.1.md docs/topics/README.md docs/topics/release-process/README.md docs/topics/release-process/test-plan.mdcargo xtask verifyTopic Shelf Impact