Dashboard and Host details page: Tweak copy

[noahtalerman]

• Copy tweak to use platform ("iOS/iPadOS") instead of device name to be consistent w/ "Android"

Tooltip copy before change:

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated MDM enrollment status tooltip to clarify device platform requirements for Managed Apple Account sign-in.

[claude]

Claude Code Review

This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review to trigger a review and subscribe this PR to future pushes, or @claude review once for a one-time review.

_{Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0cec383c-2dcf-4e55-9395-e25b49911207

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07697fa and 24f18e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• frontend/utilities/constants.tsx

---

Walkthrough

This PR updates the tooltip text in the MDM_STATUS_TOOLTIP constant to use more accurate platform terminology. The "On (personal)" enrollment status tooltip now references "iOS/iPadOS" instead of "iPhone/iPad" when describing Managed Apple Account sign-in on Apple devices.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Dashboard and Host details page: Tweak copy' is related to the changeset but is overly broad and lacks specificity about the actual copy change being made.	Consider a more specific title like 'Update MDM status tooltip to use iOS/iPadOS instead of iPhone/iPad' to clarify the exact change.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The description clearly explains the purpose (platform consistency with Android) and includes a visual reference, but does not follow the provided template's checklist structure.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch noahtalerman-patch-79

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.81%. Comparing base (a913a5e) to head (24f18e2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #45245   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.81%   66.81%           
=======================================
  Files        2724     2724           
  Lines      219027   219027           
  Branches    10627    10627           
=======================================
  Hits       146342   146342           
  Misses      59520    59520           
  Partials    13165    13165           

Flag	Coverage Δ
frontend	55.31% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[noahtalerman]

Hey @cdcme when you get the chance, can you please review this small copy tweak? Thanks!