[don-petry]

The Maintainer raised the checks job's timeout from 15 to 25 minutes.

Why

On 2026-10-21, make verify on the runner (its simulators on 300 seeds) took 11 to 14.5 minutes in the runs that finished. Six runs were cancelled at 15:00 with the tests still running:

• Trial P-26 (fail): the CLI's sandbox limits connections, but a tool reads the parent's environment #301 (four times);
• adapters/acceptance;
• kernel/unidentified-run-alert.

The mutation shards run the same suite on 40 seeds and pass, so the cancelled runs are slow, not broken.

What changes

• .github/workflows/verify.yml: checks gets timeout-minutes: 25. The head comment gains one line with the measured times.
• examples/workflows/verify.yml and the first yaml block of docs/standards/workflows.md change the same way. They hold the workflow word for word, and tools/check_workflows.py and tools/check_context.py compare them.
• tests/test_tools.py: the tests that removed or changed timeout-minutes: 15 to make a drift or a fault now use 25. Each still fails loudly if its replacement stops matching.

Nothing else changes: no permission, trigger, secret, pin or step.

Gates

• PATH=/usr/bin:/bin SIM_SEEDS=40 make verify: 973 tests, OK.
• Claude review with a security pass: no blockers or majors. Its two wording nits are fixed in 0c5bf91.
• Argon (AGY, gemini-4-argon-high): no findings.
• Muse: not run (Maintainer, 2026-10-20: Kernel/hook only).
• No decision record, by the Maintainer's instruction.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	⚠️ Failed 2026-10-22T02:11:57.915749Z We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.	0c5bf91	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 25 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: combsmith/software-factory/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 33c4e797-bf5e-4e40-a256-ad612b82b89c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb4694f and 0c5bf91.

📒 Files selected for processing: 4

• .github/workflows/verify.yml
• docs/standards/workflows.md
• examples/workflows/verify.yml
• tests/test_tools.py

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud