This issue comes out of the patch to fix a byte ordering bug:
It's easy for a developer to use IpEndpoint::port without thinking explicitly about whether they need network byte order or host byte order versions of the port. In the PR review meeting for #8406, it was suggested that we rename IpEndpoint::port to IpEndpoint:: network_order_port so it would make explicit that byte ordering must be considered.
This issue comes out of the patch to fix a byte ordering bug:
It's easy for a developer to use IpEndpoint::port without thinking explicitly about whether they need network byte order or host byte order versions of the port. In the PR review meeting for #8406, it was suggested that we rename IpEndpoint::port to IpEndpoint:: network_order_port so it would make explicit that byte ordering must be considered.