Skip to content

SPARK-7169: Metrics can be additionally configured from Spark configuration - #5788

Closed
jacek-lewandowski wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:branch-1.2from
jacek-lewandowski:SPARK-7169
Closed

jacek-lewandowski wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:branch-1.2from
jacek-lewandowski:SPARK-7169

Conversation

@jacek-lewandowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build started.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Apr 29, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #31320 has started for PR 5788 at commit 750927c.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Apr 29, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #31320 has finished for PR 5788 at commit 750927c.

  • This patch fails Scala style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31320/
Test FAILed.

@jacek-lewandowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

retest this please

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build started.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Apr 29, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #31324 has started for PR 5788 at commit 71993fe.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Apr 29, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #31324 has finished for PR 5788 at commit 71993fe.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31324/
Test PASSed.

@jerryshao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why did you submit PR against branch 1.2?

@jacek-lewandowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jerryshao because this is a very minor fix and I wanted to prepare a PR for the lowest version I think it it suitable. After successful review and agree to merge it to particular versions i'll create particular PRs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a little unsure about adding these metric-specific methods here. They're very particular to a specific scenario, while SparkConf is supposed to be a generic configuration class. I'd rather not add these (since I expect most people to set these via config files anyway).

@vanzin

vanzin commented May 15, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM aside from the SparkConf changes, which I think are unnecessary.

I also agree with @jerryshao's comment; any change, be it a bug fix or feature, should always be made on master first, and later backported if desired. The only exception is when the change is not needed on master.

@vanzin

vanzin commented May 20, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jacek-lewandowski do you plan to address the feedback here? Otherwise I can pick this up and post a PR against master.

@vanzin

vanzin commented May 27, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jacek-lewandowski ping?

@jacek-lewandowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@vanzin i'm really sorry - i must have missed the notification

@andrewor14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jacek-lewandowski the updated version of this is already merged at #6560. Would you mind closing this patch?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants