Skip to content

chore(release): prepare session-peer 0.6.0 - #177

Merged
abruption merged 14 commits into
mainfrom
release/0.6.0
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

abruption merged 14 commits into
mainfrom
release/0.6.0

Conversation

@abruption

@abruption abruption commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Release contents

Prepares session-peer@0.6.0 after #173/#174/#176: macOS Orca Claude profile discovery and explicit local authenticated receipts. Codex keeps generation-bound v1; Claude uses separate delegated-context v2 without claiming native generation/model identity/consumption/completion. No service, wake, automatic retry, reverse-SSH collector or new native qualification is added.

Updates package/compiled version, scoped four-language README/guide examples and the finite doctor matrix. Earlier rows and the documented immutable TS skill 0.2.1 pin remain unchanged; metadata acceptance does not establish new receipt feature coverage. #73 transcript/body probing is NO-GO. Test files run serially without weakening production probe bounds or effect assertions; failures retain actual fixture call diagnostics.

Validation

Reviewed head 0410d8f7fa88ef049b91540720430dcebad4c8c1 passed 12/12 checks and code review with no findings. Merged main 7d80eb901c63b0a260331779cca30eb2eccfa6ea has the same tree. Local full suite: 666 total, 654 pass, 0 fail, 11 skip, 1 existing TODO, with pinned Python comparison reference. Main CI 41578253524 passes on attempt 2; CodeQL 41578253236 passes. Initial macOS pre-effect owner-probe refusals remain of unconfirmed cause and are retained in the audit record; no runtime deadlines/assertions were weakened.

Independent static development/security reviews and root corrections are recorded in #176: actual Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon Medium, fresh noninteractive frozen inputs, no reviewer writes/tests. The adapter-masking and terminal timeout findings are corrected. GitHub security metadata naming older heads is not represented as current security completion. No live native/model/SSH ACK qualification is inferred from isolated tests.

Published result

Approved source 7d80eb901c63b0a260331779cca30eb2eccfa6ea was staged once by run 41580042849. Reviewed, Actions, staged, npm-public and GitHub-release raw archives match SHA-256 23a422252fb945c07f06184207b07c80ec280360cd29c97949c2c941398336f4. All 95 files, including 18 Markdown documents, match source. Registry integrity, npm signature/attestation audit, SLSA digest/source/workflow/run linkage and isolated install/remove pass. npm latest=0.6.0; preview=0.1.0-preview.1 is preserved.

GitHub v0.6.0 is public/Latest; its annotated tag peels to the same source. The release includes the reviewed tarball and source-bound manifest. The Trusted Publisher was freshly verified stage-only and the protected npm environment approval was observed. The user explicitly waived this release's separate web publish-MFA-policy read. The final stage became unavailable and public publication was observed after the user reported approval; the agent did not execute a stage-approval command. No user global/fleet installation was changed.

Refs #175

Align scoped current-version context, carry forward the four reviewed finite skill profiles, and retain the public 0.5.2 baseline and immutable skill pin. Feature integration and final artifact evidence remain separate preparation steps.

Refs #175
Add a manually operated private collector and receipt-only handler. Preserve original budgets through private IPC v2, generation-bound Codex v1, and a separate Claude delegated context without native identity or consumption claims.

Fence one native submission, preserve known facts on unknown receipt outcomes, and keep authority out of argv, environment, public output and sender/collector persistence.

Refs #132
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-03T04:22:54.446567Z 0410d8f Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-03T03:09:15.816212Z ef1ba36 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

Review current final preparation head d1569cc. The only follow-up to the reviewed release checkpoint records local validation and bounds test file concurrency; no publication is requested.

@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex security review

Review current final preparation head d1569cc. Earlier-head reviews are retained as historical evidence only.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: d1569cc176

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex security review

Code review has now completed at final head d1569cc. Please run security review alone on this head; metadata still points to the previous preparation checkpoint. No additional code-review request is pending from this session.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: d1569cc176

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@abruption
abruption changed the base branch from feat/receipt-bootstrap-132 to main November 3, 2026 04:10
@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

Please review main-target preparation head 152de81 after #176 was squash-merged at105b3c529d46df025dbb2c3136223ac482d76548. Integration tree is byte-identical to tested39eede0 (666tests,654pass,0fail,11skip,1TODO); current main-target CI and CodeQL must pass before normal protected merge. The diff is release version/docs/finite matrix and fixtures only.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: 152de81b02

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Current-head macOS Node24 hit the existing pre-effect owner-probe refusal in the unknown-after-native-write E2E. Original failed log is retained; source/assertions/runtime bounds are unchanged. One failed-job rerun is requested to distinguish a transient runner refusal. A passing rerun will not be described as proof that the unconfirmed root cause is fixed. Other generated checks and current code review pass; no protection bypass is used.

@abruption

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

Please review current preparation head0410d8f. This follow-up only serializes npm test file execution and includes actual fixture queue/native call logs when the existing post-write-loss assertion fails. Runtime guards,800/1000ms probe bounds and all required effect assertions are unchanged. The original failure and one failed rerun are retained; no root-cause fix is claimed without evidence. Normal current-head gates are rerunning.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 0410d8f7fa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@abruption
abruption merged commit 7d80eb9 into main Nov 3, 2026
12 checks passed
@abruption
abruption deleted the release/0.6.0 branch November 3, 2026 05:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant