fix: libraft-static output declares unused C compiler

[andrewwhitecdw]

This PR addresses the following issue in conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml: libraft-static output declares unused C compiler.

Changes

• conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml: libraft-static output declares unused C compiler.

Details

--- a/conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml
+++ b/conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml
@@ -1,16 +1,15 @@
-  - package:
-      name: libraft-static
-      version: ${{ version }}
-    build:
-      string: cuda${{ cuda_major }}_${{ datetime_string }}_${{ head_rev }}
-      dynamic_linking:
-        overlinking_behavior: "error"
-      script:
-        content: |
-          cmake --install cpp/build --component compiled-static
-    requirements:
-      build:
-        - cmake ${{ cmake_version }}
-        - ${{ compiler("c") }}
-      host:
-        - ${{ pin_subpackage("libraft-headers", exact=True) }}
+  - package:
+      name: libraft-static
+      version: ${{ version }}
+    build:
+      string: cuda${{ cuda_major }}_${{ datetime_string }}_${{ head_rev }}
+      dynamic_linking:
+        overlinking_behavior: "error"
+      script:
+        content: |
+          cmake --install cpp/build --component compiled-static
+    requirements:
+      build:
+        - cmake ${{ cmake_version }}
+      host:
+        - ${{ pin_subpackage("libraft-headers", exact=True) }}

Tests

Let me know if you want tests added for this fix or not.

[copy-pr-bot]

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 13a51895-1114-4f81-9549-a7f8eb27ebf3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2437c4 and 1032541.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Streamlined the static library package build configuration by removing an unnecessary build requirement.

Walkthrough

The libraft-static conda output no longer declares the C compiler in its build requirements. CMake remains declared.

Changes

libraft-static build requirements

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Remove redundant C compiler requirement conda/recipes/libraft/recipe.yaml	The libraft-static build requirements remove ${{ compiler("c") }} and retain CMake.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Mergeability Score: ⚪ Minimal · up to 10325

This localized recipe cleanup removes an unused build dependency and introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: msarahan

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the removal of the unused C compiler declaration from the libraft-static output.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains the removal of the unused C compiler declaration and shows the exact recipe change.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[msarahan]

same as #3114

[msarahan]

sorry, this may have been premature. Need confirmation, as in #3116

[andrewwhitecdw]

Closing per maintainer feedback in #3116 — these changes are being incorporated into #3116 so they can be validated together. See #3116 (comment).