You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Status:Not started — comment here before beginning work.
Family:families/boltz2/ Current declared task mode(s):structure_prediction Target semantic Task(s): Identify the existing semantic Task contract(s) that preserve every current capability; record the exact IDs in the PR.
Work
Inventory this family's primary and secondary behavior, including batch, streaming, raw outputs and stateful operations where supported. Record the current defaults, profiles, checkpoint cases, and reference criteria.
Implement and bind the matching semantic Task interface(s) in this family's runtime. Preserve its graph, preprocessing, inference, postprocessing, configuration and complete owned results.
Align family-owned support, build metadata and manifests with the primary Task. Advertise only interfaces implemented by the loaded bundle; document whether existing bundles need rebuilding.
Add family-owned CPU contracts and public C/C++ SDK consumers. Cover invalid inputs, configuration handling, result lifetime and every relevant lifecycle.
Run a selected real checkpoint E2E with the existing oracle and thresholds, then check the remaining declared capabilities and public CLI, example and benchmark paths. Preserve meaningful passing criteria.
PR evidence
Link the migration PR here. Report the tested revision, exact commands and results, selected checkpoint cases, original reference checks, current-head CI, and any untested configurations. Keep a normal migration within families/boltz2/**; raise a separate linked prerequisite issue if a shared contract is genuinely missing. Do not weaken an acceptance criterion to pass CI.
families/boltz2/ on current main already has Boltz2Pipeline implementing IStructurePrediction, and plugin.cpp, support.py and model.py all use structure_prediction. So I plan to do the following, modeled on the merged
migration in #1308:
Add the family's bind record / IModel binding, if it isn't already
covered. I'll confirm this against the current runtime first.
Add family-owned CPU tests for the Task contract: binding, request
validation, complete result ownership (samples, confidence, metadata) and
unsupported config.
Add public C11 and C++17 SDK consumers to the existing E2E. Both will read
the result after releasing the model and must agree on the structure output
and confidence values.
Align the manifest and support metadata with the Task, and add a family
README.
Run the existing real-checkpoint E2E on a single GPU with the current oracle
and thresholds. I'll report the exact revision, commands, results, and
anything I couldn't test.
I'll keep all changes inside families/boltz2/**. I'll open a separate
prerequisite issue if I find a shared contract is missing, and I won't weaken
any existing acceptance criterion. I'll link a single migration PR here.
families/boltz2/ on current main already has Boltz2Pipeline implementing IStructurePrediction, and plugin.cpp, support.py and model.py all use structure_prediction. So I plan to do the following, modeled on the merged migration in #1308:
Add the family's bind record / IModel binding, if it isn't already
covered. I'll confirm this against the current runtime first.
Add family-owned CPU tests for the Task contract: binding, request
validation, complete result ownership (samples, confidence, metadata) and
unsupported config.
Add public C11 and C++17 SDK consumers to the existing E2E. Both will read
the result after releasing the model and must agree on the structure output
and confidence values.
Align the manifest and support metadata with the Task, and add a family
README.
Run the existing real-checkpoint E2E on a single GPU with the current oracle
and thresholds. I'll report the exact revision, commands, results, and
anything I couldn't test.
I'll keep all changes inside families/boltz2/**. I'll open a separate prerequisite issue if I find a shared contract is missing, and I won't weaken any existing acceptance criterion. I'll link a single migration PR here.
Sounds good. Please go ahead and start a PR and link it to this issue!
Activity
roma5087 commentedon Sep 29, 2026
Hi, I'd like to take the
boltz2migration.families/boltz2/on currentmainalready hasBoltz2PipelineimplementingIStructurePrediction, andplugin.cpp,support.pyandmodel.pyall usestructure_prediction. So I plan to do the following, modeled on the mergedmigration in #1308:
bindrecord /IModelbinding, if it isn't alreadycovered. I'll confirm this against the current runtime first.
validation, complete result ownership (samples, confidence, metadata) and
unsupported config.
the result after releasing the model and must agree on the structure output
and confidence values.
README.
and thresholds. I'll report the exact revision, commands, results, and
anything I couldn't test.
I'll keep all changes inside
families/boltz2/**. I'll open a separateprerequisite issue if I find a shared contract is missing, and I won't weaken
any existing acceptance criterion. I'll link a single migration PR here.
yifeif-nv commentedon Sep 30, 2026
Sounds good. Please go ahead and start a PR and link it to this issue!