Skip to content

[Split #94595] Batch H - Remove useOnyx deps from Nav/Wallet/Travel/Debug - #96754

Merged
mountiny merged 7 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feature/onyx-deps-batch-h-recreate
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

mountiny merged 7 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feature/onyx-deps-batch-h-recreate

Conversation

@sosek108

@sosek108 sosek108 commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Part of the useOnyx dependencies-argument removal (#94595), Batch H of the split: Navigation, Wallet, Travel, Debug. Drops the deprecated 3rd useOnyx argument; selectors kept stable (inline/compiler-memoized, useCallback in the React-Compiler-bailout file CreateReportMenuItem). No intended behavior change. The main wrapper still accepts the arg, so this batch is independent.

Fixed Issues

$ #95581
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Inbox tab button

  1. Go to Inbox and select any report
  2. Go to Spend page
  3. Go back to Inbox and verify that last open report is presented

Create report flows
2. Create 2 workspaces, mark first as active
3. Go to inbox, and using FAB create empy report. Verify it’s created for active WS
4. Change active workspace
5. Go back to inbox, create empy report. Verify it’s created for active WS
6. Repeat the same for both FAB buttons

Debug report page

  1. Enable debug mode in Troubleshoot page
  2. Go to any report -> click on Header -> Debug
  3. Verify the view renders correctly and data is in tact with report’s state

Debug report actions

  1. Enable debug mode in Troubleshoot page
  2. Go to any report -> click on Header -> Debug
  3. Go to Actions
  4. Open E/App in another window and open the exact same report
    1. add some comment
  5. on Debug page verify if the new action is present
  6. select any action
  7. verify if action’s data renders correctly

Trip details page
I do not have access to Trip functionality so I wasn’t able to test this myself

  1. Create trip and open Trip details page
  2. Verify if traveler’s data is properly rendered

Expensify card page
I do not have access to cards functionality so I wasn’t able to test this myself

  1. As the card holder, freeze your own Expensify Card (Wallet → card → Freeze card).
  2. As a workspace admin (not the card holder) open that same card → verify Unfreeze button shows/works (covers isWorkspaceAdmin branch).
  3. As the card holder who froze it, verify you can unfreeze it yourself (covers frozenByAccountID === session?.accountID branch).

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
Nagranie.z.ekranu.2026-07-23.o.11.08.41.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Nagranie.z.ekranu.2026-07-23.o.11.04.50.mov

@sosek108

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 5718af82f0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nents/Navigation/QuickCreationActionsBar/index.tsx 85.54% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Debug/Report/DebugReportActions.tsx 89.36% <100.00%> (-0.84%) ⬇️
.../pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage/index.tsx 72.08% <100.00%> (-0.29%) ⬇️
...pages/Debug/ReportAction/DebugReportActionPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...BPopoverContent/menuItems/CreateReportMenuItem.tsx 5.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...nts/Navigation/NavigationTabBar/InboxTabButton.tsx 26.31% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Debug/Report/DebugReportPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Travel/TripDetailsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hoangzinh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from heyjennahay and removed request for a team July 23, 2026 09:13
Comment thread src/pages/Travel/TripDetailsPage.tsx Outdated
const travelerPersonalDetailsSelector = (personalDetails: OnyxEntry<PersonalDetailsList>) => pickTravelerPersonalDetails(personalDetails, reservation);

const [travelerPersonalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, {selector: travelerPersonalDetailsSelector}, [travelerPersonalDetailsSelector]);
const reservationDetails = useMemo(() => getReservationDetailsFromSequence(icons, tripReservations, Number(sequenceIndex)), [icons, tripReservations, sequenceIndex]);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CLEAN-REACT-PATTERNS-0 (docs)

This PR removes manual memoization everywhere else in the batch and relies on React Compiler, but here it introduces a new manual useMemo. The file previously had no manual memoization at all and was fully compiler-managed, so this wrapper is redundant — React Compiler already caches derived values based on their captured dependencies (icons, tripReservations, sequenceIndex). The manual useMemo adds noise (a hand-maintained dependency array) and can interfere with the compiler's own caching.

Remove the useMemo and compute the value inline; the compiler will memoize it automatically:

const {reservation, prevReservation, reservationType, reservationIcon, isCancelled} = getReservationDetailsFromSequence(icons, tripReservations, Number(sequenceIndex));
const travelerEmail = reservation?.travelerPersonalInfo?.email;
const [travelerPersonalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, {
    selector: (personalDetails: OnyxEntry<PersonalDetailsList>) => pickTravelerPersonalDetails(personalDetails, travelerEmail),
});

Reviewed at: c903b8e | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sosek108 do you agree with this feedback?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, addressed

@hoangzinh

hoangzinh commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-07-25.at.06.53.10.mov

lastReportRouteReportActionID,
]);
const [doesLastReportActionExist] = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${lastReportRouteReportID}`, {
selector: (reportActions: OnyxEntry<ReportActions>) => makeDoesLastReportActionExistSelector(lastReportRouteReportActionID)(reportActions),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
selector: (reportActions: OnyxEntry<ReportActions>) => makeDoesLastReportActionExistSelector(lastReportRouteReportActionID)(reportActions),
selector: makeDoesLastReportActionExistSelector(lastReportRouteReportActionID),

const isASAPSubmitBetaEnabled = isBetaEnabled(CONST.BETAS.ASAP_SUBMIT);
const hasViolations = hasViolationsReportUtils(undefined, transactionViolations, session?.accountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID, session?.email ?? '');
const chatEnabledPaidGroupPolicies = (policies: Parameters<typeof chatEnabledPaidGroupPoliciesSelector>[0]) => chatEnabledPaidGroupPoliciesSelector(policies, session?.email);
const chatEnabledPaidGroupPolicies = useCallback(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to wrap this selector in a useCallback?

Comment thread src/pages/Travel/TripDetailsPage.tsx Outdated
const travelerPersonalDetailsSelector = (personalDetails: OnyxEntry<PersonalDetailsList>) => pickTravelerPersonalDetails(personalDetails, reservation);

const [travelerPersonalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, {selector: travelerPersonalDetailsSelector}, [travelerPersonalDetailsSelector]);
const reservationDetails = useMemo(() => getReservationDetailsFromSequence(icons, tripReservations, Number(sequenceIndex)), [icons, tripReservations, sequenceIndex]);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sosek108 do you agree with this feedback?

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hoangzinh can you complete the checklist please

@hoangzinh hoangzinh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny July 24, 2026 23:59
@mountiny
mountiny merged commit c0a711b into Expensify:main Jul 25, 2026
35 of 36 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.45-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I reviewed the changes in this PR against the help site content under App/docs/articles.

No help site changes are required, so no draft PR was created.

This PR is Batch H of the useOnyx dependencies-argument removal (#94595). It only drops the deprecated 3rd useOnyx argument across Navigation, Wallet, Travel, and Debug files, with no intended behavior change. All 9 changed files are internal component/page code and an eslint config — none add, remove, or alter any user-facing feature, tab, setting, label, or flow that the help site documents.

Since there's nothing user-facing here, there's no behavior for a HelpDot article to reflect, so I did not open a docs PR.

@IuliiaHerets

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @sosek108. Coming from the "Debug report actions" test, step 5: After adding a comment, the new action doesn’t appear in the Debug page > Actions. Is this expected?

cc @mountiny @heyjennahay

Debug.report.actions.-.step.5.mp4

@hoangzinh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@IuliiaHerets, it won't work for a single expense report. Can you try on multi expense report or chat report?

Screen.Recording.2026-07-28.at.15.09.57.mov

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.4.45-14 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants