Skip to content

Fix newMarker disappearing when deleting the comment that was marked unread. - #14032

Merged
thienlnam merged 18 commits into
mainfrom
tyler-fix-disappearing-newMarker
Jan 20, 2023
Merged

thienlnam merged 18 commits into
mainfrom
tyler-fix-disappearing-newMarker

Conversation

@tylerkaraszewski

@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski commented Jan 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/251047
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Create a conversation between two users. Send several messages from user 1 to user 2.
  2. As user 1 (the one who created the messages) mark one of your own messages unread (not the last one).
  3. You should see a "new" marker above the message marked as unread.
  4. Delete the message marked as unread.
  5. The "new" marker should remain in the same location, above the next newer message.
  6. Switch away from the chat. It should remain bolded as "unread" in the LHN. Note that you need to switch to an entirely different chat in the compact/mobile view, not simply switch the the list of chats.
  7. Switch back to the chat. It should no longer show as "unread" in the LHN, but the "new" marker should remain in the same location.
  8. Switch away from the chat again.
  9. Switch back to the chat again, the "new" marker should be gone.

For clarification, please watch one of the videos in the video/screenshot section.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

The same as above, except that the deleted comment should show as "greyed out" and stricken instead of disappearing. See the "offline" video in the "web" portion of the screenshots/videos section for an example.

QA Steps

Please repeat the "tests" section steps from above.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov

Offline:

screen_recording_web_offline.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
andriod-web.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
ios-web.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@tylerkaraszewski
tylerkaraszewski requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2023 20:00
@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski self-assigned this Jan 5, 2023
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from grgia and removed request for a team January 5, 2023 20:00
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@tylerkaraszewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Current state of this is it works, until onyx is updated, which makes the newMarker disappear. Navigating away and then back to the chat draws it again as intended.

@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski changed the title [WIP] Mostly fixes it except for it disappears and then returns for a sec. Fix newMarker disappearing when deleting the comment that was marked unread. Jan 5, 2023
@thienlnam
thienlnam self-requested a review January 5, 2023 23:17
@tylerkaraszewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I still have to run the android tests.

Comment on lines +136 to +140

if (this.newMarkerReportActionID !== '') {
this.setState({newMarkerReportActionID: ReportUtils.getNewMarkerReportActionID(nextProps.report, this.sortedAndFilteredReportActions)});
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updating state in shouldComponentUpdate is actually an anti-pattern, this is more intended to determine if the component should update at all. This should live in componentDidUpdate

@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where should I do it? componentDidUpdate doesn't run until after render happens. We want to update it before/during render.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see is that why you were running into the flickering? Another idea would be to check if when the action is deleted, if Report.subscribeToNewActionEvent is called - if so you could put it in there

@tylerkaraszewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@thienlnam - before I run through my complete test suite here, do you mind taking a look and seeing if you like this approach better?

@thienlnam thienlnam left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We keep newMarkerReportActionID in state because we want it to re-render every time it changes, but this approach just adds another variable to track the same thing.

I still think we should have this in the action event subscriber. Deleting a report comment should trigger that callback, which is where you can update the newMarkerReportActionID in state

@tylerkaraszewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@thienlnam - deleting a comment doesn't seem to trigger that callback. That doesn't actually seem to be called anywhere except from componentWillUnmount. That doesn't seem to align with the comment on the callback.

@tylerkaraszewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@grgia and @thienlnam This is updated and ready to go!

@thienlnam thienlnam left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code changes look good 👍 just need to run through testing screenshots

@thienlnam

thienlnam commented Jan 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-01-20.at.2.09.58.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-01-20.at.2.10.37.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-01-20.at.2.16.12.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-01-20.at.2.18.25.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-01-20.at.2.14.53.PM.mov
Android

android emulator broken

@thienlnam
thienlnam merged commit f9fe42b into main Jan 20, 2023
@thienlnam
thienlnam deleted the tyler-fix-disappearing-newMarker branch January 20, 2023 22:23
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.2.58-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.2.58-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants