This package validates Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs) conforming to the Internet Engineering Task Force specification (see IETF Specification). The design intent is to validate that a string would be traditionally acceptable as a public Internet hostname to RFC-conforming software, which is a strict subset of the logic in modern web browsers like Mozilla Firefox and Chromium that determines whether to make a DNS lookup. Configuration options can relax constraints so that short hostnames without periods or others with underscores will be valid. These relaxations are closer to how modern web browsers work (see Notes).
>>> from fqdn import FQDN
>>> domain = 'bbc.co.uk'
>>> bbc_fqdn = FQDN(domain)
>>> bbc_fqdn.is_valid
True
>>> bbc_fqdn.absolute
'bbc.co.uk.'
>>> bbc_fqdn.relative
'bbc.co.uk'Equality checks are implemented case insensitive conforming to the IETF specification:
>>> FQDN('BBC.CO.UK.') == FQDN('BbC.Co.uK')
True
>>> hash(FQDN('BBC.CO.UK.')) == hash(FQDN('BbC.Co.uK'))
TrueKubernetes validates object names against DNS-1123 formats. K8sLabel,
K8sSubdomain, K8sLabelValue and K8sQualifiedName mirror the functions the
API server calls, so a name can be checked before it is submitted. Unlike
FQDN, the DNS-1123 labels are case-sensitive and reject uppercase.
>>> from fqdn import K8sLabel, K8sSubdomain
>>> K8sLabel('web-1').is_valid
True
>>> K8sLabel('Web-1').is_valid
False
>>> K8sSubdomain('svc.cluster.local').is_valid
TrueEach class matches a function in
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/validation,
the package the API server validates names with:
| Class | Kubernetes function | Example |
|---|---|---|
K8sLabel |
IsDNS1123Label |
Namespace and StatefulSet names |
K8sSubdomain |
IsDNS1123Subdomain |
Pod and Deployment names |
K8sLabelValue |
IsValidLabelValue |
metadata.labels values |
K8sQualifiedName |
IsQualifiedName |
label and annotation keys |
The rules come from the Kubernetes Object Names documentation and the labels syntax and character set, which cite RFC 1123 and RFC 1035. Two details are worth knowing:
IsDNS1123Labelaccepts a leading digit. The names documentation currently says RFC 1123 labels must start with an alphabetic character, but the implementation has always matched[a-z0-9];K8sLabelfollows the implementation.- Service names use the stricter RFC 1035 label form and are therefore out of
scope. The
RelaxedServiceNameValidationfeature gate switches newly created Services toIsDNS1123Label.
- Certificate authorities. Certificate authorities like Let's Encrypt run a
narrower set of string validation logic to determine validity for issuance.
This package is not intended to achieve functional parity with CA issuance,
because they may have proprietary or custom logic.
boulder's code is starkly different from Chromium's, as outlined in issue #14. - Browsers. See issue #14.
In the default configuration, this package adds only one additional constraint to the IETF specification, requiring a minimum of two labels, separated by periods. This extra restriction can be disabled. It is enabled by default to prevent breaking backwards compatibility. Review the tests for examples of the impact of this.
The IETF specification restricts domain names to alphanumeric ASCII characters and hyphens as described below.
RFC 1123: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and Support, October 1989
This RFC is an official specification for the Internet community. It incorporates by reference, amends, corrects, and supplements the primary protocol standards documents relating to hosts.
2.1 Host Names and Numbers
The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
[DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
syntax.
Host software MUST handle host names of up to 63 characters and
SHOULD handle host names of up to 255 characters.
Whenever a user inputs the identity of an Internet host, it SHOULD
be possible to enter either (1) a host domain name or (2) an IP
address in dotted-decimal ("#.#.#.#") form. The host SHOULD check
the string syntactically for a dotted-decimal number before
looking it up in the Domain Name System.
RFC 952: DoD Internet host table specification, October 1985
This RFC is the official specification of the format of the Internet Host Table.
<hname> ::= <name>*["."<name>]
<name> ::= <let>[*[<let-or-digit-or-hyphen>]<let-or-digit>]
RFC 1034: Domain Name Concepts and Facilities, November 1987
-
Section 3.5 specifies a "preferred name syntax", which is non-compulsory.
3.5. Preferred name syntax The DNS specifications attempt to be as general as possible in the rules for constructing domain names. The idea is that the name of any existing object can be expressed as a domain name with minimal changes. However, when assigning a domain name for an object, the prudent user will select a name which satisfies both the rules of the domain system and any existing rules for the object, whether these rules are published or implied by existing programs. For example, when naming a mail domain, the user should satisfy both the rules of this memo and those in RFC-822. When creating a new host name, the old rules for HOSTS.TXT should be followed. This avoids problems when old software is converted to use domain names.
RFC 1035: Domain Names - Implementation and Specification, November 1987
- Section 2.3.1 repeats the "preferred name syntax" proposal from RFC 1034.
RFC 2181: Clarification to the DNS Specification, July 1997
- Section 11 comments that RFC 1035 does not restrict domain names to the preferred name syntax set out in it. Instead Internet hostnames are restricted more or less by a combination of tradition and RFC 2181, where this package finds itself.
RFC 3696: Application Techniques for Checking and Transformation of Names, February 2004
- This memo provides fascinating commentary of the history of string validation for domain names.