Skip to content

chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6#2

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-6
Closed

chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6#2
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-6

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps actions/checkout from 4 to 6.

Release notes

Sourced from actions/checkout's releases.

v6.0.0

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/checkout@v5.0.0...v6.0.0

v6-beta

What's Changed

Updated persist-credentials to store the credentials under $RUNNER_TEMP instead of directly in the local git config.

This requires a minimum Actions Runner version of v2.329.0 to access the persisted credentials for Docker container action scenarios.

v5.0.1

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/checkout@v5...v5.0.1

v5.0.0

What's Changed

⚠️ Minimum Compatible Runner Version

v2.327.1
Release Notes

Make sure your runner is updated to this version or newer to use this release.

Full Changelog: actions/checkout@v4...v5.0.0

v4.3.1

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/checkout@v4...v4.3.1

v4.3.0

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from actions/checkout's changelog.

Changelog

v6.0.2

v6.0.1

v6.0.0

v5.0.1

v5.0.0

v4.3.1

v4.3.0

v4.2.2

v4.2.1

v4.2.0

v4.1.7

v4.1.6

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 4 to 6.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](actions/checkout@v4...v6)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/checkout
  dependency-version: '6'
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Labels

The following labels could not be found: ci, dependencies. Please create them before Dependabot can add them to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for a dependency by adding an ignore condition with the desired update_types to your config file.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot
dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-6 branch May 18, 2026 13:19
galuis116 added a commit to galuis116/vouch that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2026
…check, fsck coverage

- lifecycle.supersede / contradict pre-validate both touched claims via
  _validate_claim_refs before the first disk write so a legacy dangling
  ref can't half-apply the operation (P2 vouchdev#3).
- proposals.check_approvable dry-runs the put_*-side ref guards via a
  new _payload_block_reason helper so the default `vouch approve a b`
  batch flow catches a dangling claim.entities ref BEFORE any write,
  preserving the all-or-nothing contract (P2 vouchdev#1).
- health.fsck reports claim.entities pointing at a missing entity as a
  new `dangling_claim_entity` error finding, giving operators a
  preflight repair path for legacy KBs (P2 vouchdev#2).
Tet-9 added a commit to Tet-9/vouch that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2026
…dev#428)

Adds ClaimType.LESSON and kb.mark_lesson_followed -- an append-only
observation of whether a surfaced lesson was actually followed in a given
turn. Never edits the claim; appends a lesson.followed audit event with
followed, optional context, and claim_type.

Registered across all four surfaces: CLI (mark-lesson-followed), MCP
(kb_mark_lesson_followed), JSONL (kb.mark_lesson_followed), and
capabilities.METHODS. Added to the _STANDARD MCP tool profile alongside
kb.confirm, its closest existing analogue.

Lessons resurface through the normal retrieval path with no special-casing
anywhere in context.py -- verified directly, not assumed. The propose-time
repeat guard (vouchdev#147) comes for free: propose_claim already runs
find_similar_on_propose for every claim type regardless, so no new code was
needed for that acceptance criterion.

Not restricted to ClaimType.LESSON: mark_lesson_followed accepts any claim
id, matching the issue's own proposed surface ("either a new ClaimType.LESSON
or a flag on workflow/warning claims").

Deliberately does not build the "effectiveness computation" system vouchdev#428
names as a downstream consumer (vouchdev#2) -- that reference resolves to an
unrelated PR and no such system exists anywhere in this codebase under any
name (verified via grep). These events are shaped for such a consumer to
exist later; inventing an unspecified analytics system was out of scope.

tests/test_lessons.py: 13 tests covering the claim type, retrieval
resurfacing, the observe-not-edit invariant, multiple observations, missing-
claim handling, the not-restricted-to-LESSON case, registration in
capabilities/JSONL/MCP, and the repeat-guard warning.
Tet-9 added a commit to Tet-9/vouch that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2026
…dev#428)

Adds ClaimType.LESSON and kb.mark_lesson_followed -- an append-only
observation of whether a surfaced lesson was actually followed in a given
turn. Never edits the claim; appends a lesson.followed audit event with
followed, optional context, and claim_type.

Registered across all four surfaces: CLI (mark-lesson-followed), MCP
(kb_mark_lesson_followed), JSONL (kb.mark_lesson_followed), and
capabilities.METHODS. Added to the _STANDARD MCP tool profile alongside
kb.confirm, its closest existing analogue.

Lessons resurface through the normal retrieval path with no special-casing
anywhere in context.py -- verified directly, not assumed. The propose-time
repeat guard (vouchdev#147) comes for free: propose_claim already runs
find_similar_on_propose for every claim type regardless, so no new code was
needed for that acceptance criterion.

Not restricted to ClaimType.LESSON: mark_lesson_followed accepts any claim
id, matching the issue's own proposed surface ("either a new ClaimType.LESSON
or a flag on workflow/warning claims").

Deliberately does not build the "effectiveness computation" system vouchdev#428
names as a downstream consumer (vouchdev#2) -- that reference resolves to an
unrelated PR and no such system exists anywhere in this codebase under any
name (verified via grep). These events are shaped for such a consumer to
exist later; inventing an unspecified analytics system was out of scope.

tests/test_lessons.py: 13 tests covering the claim type, retrieval
resurfacing, the observe-not-edit invariant, multiple observations, missing-
claim handling, the not-restricted-to-LESSON case, registration in
capabilities/JSONL/MCP, and the repeat-guard warning.
plind-junior added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
…eset

- extract verify + arm into a reusable pr-verify.yml shared by the label
  path and the new slash-command path (avoids github label-recursion).
- #2 environment gate: the verify job runs behind a pr-verify environment
  with a required-reviewer rule, so untrusted head code and the api key are
  gated on the owner per-run approval. the key is passed explicitly to the
  handler, not inherited.
- #3 comment-command.yml: the owner authorizes a pr by commenting
  /auto-merge or /verify (owner-gated), as an alternative to the label.
- #1 setup_repo_guards.sh replaces setup_branch_protection.sh: creates a
  branch ruleset (pr + code-owner review + ci/trust-gate checks, org-admin
  bypass) plus the pr-verify environment and the labels.
- deauthorize-on-push now runs on every synchronize (unconditional disarm).
Tet-9 added a commit to Tet-9/vouch that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
…dev#428)

Adds ClaimType.LESSON and kb.mark_lesson_followed -- an append-only
observation of whether a surfaced lesson was actually followed in a given
turn. Never edits the claim; appends a lesson.followed audit event with
followed, optional context, and claim_type.

Registered across all four surfaces: CLI (mark-lesson-followed), MCP
(kb_mark_lesson_followed), JSONL (kb.mark_lesson_followed), and
capabilities.METHODS. Added to the _STANDARD MCP tool profile alongside
kb.confirm, its closest existing analogue.

Lessons resurface through the normal retrieval path with no special-casing
anywhere in context.py -- verified directly, not assumed. The propose-time
repeat guard (vouchdev#147) comes for free: propose_claim already runs
find_similar_on_propose for every claim type regardless, so no new code was
needed for that acceptance criterion.

Not restricted to ClaimType.LESSON: mark_lesson_followed accepts any claim
id, matching the issue's own proposed surface ("either a new ClaimType.LESSON
or a flag on workflow/warning claims").

Deliberately does not build the "effectiveness computation" system vouchdev#428
names as a downstream consumer (vouchdev#2) -- that reference resolves to an
unrelated PR and no such system exists anywhere in this codebase under any
name (verified via grep). These events are shaped for such a consumer to
exist later; inventing an unspecified analytics system was out of scope.

tests/test_lessons.py: 13 tests covering the claim type, retrieval
resurfacing, the observe-not-edit invariant, multiple observations, missing-
claim handling, the not-restricted-to-LESSON case, registration in
capabilities/JSONL/MCP, and the repeat-guard warning.
Tet-9 added a commit to Tet-9/vouch that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2026
…dev#428)

Adds ClaimType.LESSON and kb.mark_lesson_followed -- an append-only
observation of whether a surfaced lesson was actually followed in a given
turn. Never edits the claim; appends a lesson.followed audit event with
followed, optional context, and claim_type.

Registered across all four surfaces: CLI (mark-lesson-followed), MCP
(kb_mark_lesson_followed), JSONL (kb.mark_lesson_followed), and
capabilities.METHODS. Added to the _STANDARD MCP tool profile alongside
kb.confirm, its closest existing analogue.

Lessons resurface through the normal retrieval path with no special-casing
anywhere in context.py -- verified directly, not assumed. The propose-time
repeat guard (vouchdev#147) comes for free: propose_claim already runs
find_similar_on_propose for every claim type regardless, so no new code was
needed for that acceptance criterion.

Not restricted to ClaimType.LESSON: mark_lesson_followed accepts any claim
id, matching the issue's own proposed surface ("either a new ClaimType.LESSON
or a flag on workflow/warning claims").

Deliberately does not build the "effectiveness computation" system vouchdev#428
names as a downstream consumer (vouchdev#2) -- that reference resolves to an
unrelated PR and no such system exists anywhere in this codebase under any
name (verified via grep). These events are shaped for such a consumer to
exist later; inventing an unspecified analytics system was out of scope.

tests/test_lessons.py: 13 tests covering the claim type, retrieval
resurfacing, the observe-not-edit invariant, multiple observations, missing-
claim handling, the not-restricted-to-LESSON case, registration in
capabilities/JSONL/MCP, and the repeat-guard warning.
Tet-9 added a commit to Tet-9/vouch that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2026
…dev#428)

Adds ClaimType.LESSON and kb.mark_lesson_followed -- an append-only
observation of whether a surfaced lesson was actually followed in a given
turn. Never edits the claim; appends a lesson.followed audit event with
followed, optional context, and claim_type.

Registered across all four surfaces: CLI (mark-lesson-followed), MCP
(kb_mark_lesson_followed), JSONL (kb.mark_lesson_followed), and
capabilities.METHODS. Added to the _STANDARD MCP tool profile alongside
kb.confirm, its closest existing analogue.

Lessons resurface through the normal retrieval path with no special-casing
anywhere in context.py -- verified directly, not assumed. The propose-time
repeat guard (vouchdev#147) comes for free: propose_claim already runs
find_similar_on_propose for every claim type regardless, so no new code was
needed for that acceptance criterion.

Not restricted to ClaimType.LESSON: mark_lesson_followed accepts any claim
id, matching the issue's own proposed surface ("either a new ClaimType.LESSON
or a flag on workflow/warning claims").

Deliberately does not build the "effectiveness computation" system vouchdev#428
names as a downstream consumer (vouchdev#2) -- that reference resolves to an
unrelated PR and no such system exists anywhere in this codebase under any
name (verified via grep). These events are shaped for such a consumer to
exist later; inventing an unspecified analytics system was out of scope.

tests/test_lessons.py: 13 tests covering the claim type, retrieval
resurfacing, the observe-not-edit invariant, multiple observations, missing-
claim handling, the not-restricted-to-LESSON case, registration in
capabilities/JSONL/MCP, and the repeat-guard warning.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant