Skip to content

[world-vercel] Retry throttled stream WebSocket writes - #4381

Merged
alangenfeld merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/ws-stream-client-retry-429
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

alangenfeld merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/ws-stream-client-retry-429

Conversation

@alangenfeld

@alangenfeld alangenfeld commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary & Motivation

A correlated 429 on workflow-stream-ws/v1 means the write never applied, so the session now waits out the server's Retry-After and resends on the same socket (or its post-drain replacement), matching what the HTTP writer already does. Past the shared 30s throttle budget, or if the connection ends during the wait, the write moves to HTTP rather than failing the writer; a close that fails with a 5xx likewise retries over HTTP, since close is idempotent.

Two behavior changes ride along: an HTTP write that fails after the session has settled on HTTP now fails the writer (its outcome is unknown, so no queued write may apply ahead of it), and a throttle wait is cancelled on dispose or poison instead of stalling until its timer fires.

Test Plan

Tests added.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 6:19pm UTC

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a50ad75

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit a50ad75 · Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:43:20 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 401 (-45%) 💚 2571 🔴 (+135%) 🔻 2938 🔴 (+164%) 🔻 2953 🔴 (+145%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 428 (+95%) 🔻 2415 🔴 (+130%) 🔻 2548 🔴 (+132%) 🔻 3046 🔴 (+113%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1136 (+30%) 🔻 3360 🔴 (+153%) 🔻 3421 🔴 (+144%) 🔻 3598 🔴 (+130%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 589 (-32%) 💚 902 (-47%) 💚 2955 (+66%) 🔻 2992 (+60%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 3625 (+58%) 🔻 6019 (+66%) 🔻 6670 (+77%) 🔻 7806 (+8.1%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 143 (+43%) 🔻 215 (+65%) 🔻 253 (+64%) 🔻 398 (+96%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 207418 (+57%) 🔻 207418 (+57%) 🔻 207418 (+57%) 🔻 207418 (+57%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 72 (±0%) 118 (-17%) 💚 129 (-39%) 💚 206 (-42%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 101 (+2%) 163 (-15%) 234 (-23%) 447 (-9%) 194 (-14%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 104 (±0%) 185 (-18%) 284 (-20%) 576 (-9%) 183 (-13%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 113 (-18%) 156 (-18%) 199 (-38%) 867 (+51%) 234 (-46%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 111 (+6%) 159 (-19%) 200 (-35%) 371 (-33%) 344 (-24%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 99 (-30%) 247 (-24%) 3032 (+523%) 4773 (+408%) 943 (+101%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 131526ms → this run 207020ms (Δ +75494ms, +57%)

100-150 ms  ┃███████████████████████  main 899  this   3  -896
150-200 ms  ███░░░░░░░░░░░░┃          main 108  this 610  +502
200-250 ms  █░░░░░░┃                  main   8  this 302  +294
250-300 ms  █┃                        main   2  this  64   +62
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this  19   +19
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   1  this  11   +10
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   2    +1
450-500 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   6    +6
550-600 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
600-650 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50           p90           p99     n
control  ······▂█▂····    140 (-11%)   128 (-7%)    234 (-23%)     447 (-9%)  3000
sweep    ······▂█▂▁···  147.9 (-16%)  134 (-14%)    284 (-20%)     576 (-9%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁▃█▁▁···  138.1 (-13%)  123 (-10%)    199 (-38%)    867 (+51%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁▃█▁▁···  136.1 (-16%)   125 (-7%)    200 (-35%)    371 (-33%)  5186
eve 2x   ······▂█▃▁▁▁·  354.1 (+53%)  158 (-27%)  3032 (+523%)  4773 (+408%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▆▄▅▅▅▁▄▃▇█  114–163ms
sweep    ▆▂▂▆▅▁▅▁▃█  125–179ms
gw 1x    ▃█▂▁▂▁▁▂▁▁  120–223ms
eve 1x   ▃▂▂▁▂▂█▄▁▂  120–191ms
eve 2x   ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▇  133–1203ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▃██▇▇▅▁  145–150ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▂▂▃▄▂▁▆▂█▄  38–55ms
sweep    ▁▃█▇▄▃▃▄▅▄  51–74ms
gw 1x    ▆█▄▁▆▃▄▃▄▃  32–51ms
eve 1x   ▅▄▁▁▄▅█▄▁▆  22–34ms
eve 2x   ▃▂▁▁▂▁▂▁█▃  19–68ms
📜 Previous results (2)

6c02f0e

Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:21:52 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 2190 (+240%) 🔻 2334 🔴 (-6.8%) 2389 🔴 (-6.4%) 2516 🔴 (-6.5%) 30
TTFS stream 215 (-89%) 💚 2267 🔴 (+14%) 2317 🔴 (+15%) 🔻 2632 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 774 (+1.0%) 2760 🔴 (+18%) 🔻 2785 🔴 (+15%) 🔻 2949 🔴 (+6.2%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 533 (-0.6%) 904 (+4.4%) 915 (-3.9%) 2927 (-2.7%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2429 (+54%) 🔻 3680 (+13%) 3811 (+8.8%) 10942 (+80%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 166 (+0.6%) 196 (-14%) 214 (-16%) 💚 261 (-30%) 💚 1019
WO 1020 steps 195258 (-14%) 195258 (-14%) 195258 (-14%) 195258 (-14%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 85 (+15%) 148 (-2.6%) 186 (-25%) 💚 3512 (+1150%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 113 (+1%) 199 (+13%) 245 (-9%) 389 (+3%) 170 (+25%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 130 (+9%) 253 (+38%) 480 (+83%) 3485 (+724%) 168 (-21%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 121 (-20%) 206 (+19%) 253 (+18%) 465 (+15%) 291 (-2%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 163 (+5%) 212 (+21%) 252 (+11%) 369 (-90%) 258 (-87%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 112 (-26%) 260 (+8%) 325 (±0%) 550 (+1%) 317 (+6%) 3

8249f2a

Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:24:32 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 2230 (+206%) 🔻 2379 🔴 (+118%) 🔻 2418 🔴 (+117%) 🔻 2567 🔴 (+113%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 206 (-6.4%) 2367 🔴 (+125%) 🔻 2398 🔴 (+119%) 🔻 2530 🔴 (+77%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 2540 (+190%) 🔻 2705 🔴 (+104%) 🔻 2773 🔴 (+98%) 🔻 3109 🔴 (+99%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 537 (-38%) 💚 839 (-51%) 💚 3218 (+80%) 🔻 3378 (+80%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2076 (-9.5%) 3413 (-6.0%) 8520 (+126%) 🔻 12445 (+72%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 128 (+28%) 🔻 165 (+27%) 🔻 182 (+18%) 🔻 232 (+14%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 164369 (+25%) 🔻 164369 (+25%) 🔻 164369 (+25%) 🔻 164369 (+25%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 79 (+9.7%) 127 (-11%) 216 (+1.9%) 3231 (+810%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 117 (+18%) 178 (-7%) 342 (+13%) 3196 (+550%) 118 (-48%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 110 (+6%) 167 (-26%) 227 (-36%) 417 (-34%) 156 (-26%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 107 (-22%) 148 (-22%) 177 (-45%) 282 (-51%) 213 (-51%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 148 (+41%) 168 (-15%) 210 (-31%) 273 (-50%) 234 (-49%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 209 (+47%) 199 (-39%) 253 (-48%) 547 (-42%) 285 (-39%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • a run can take over its own earlier hook (nest · local-prod / local / quickjs / stable)
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running (nextjs-webpack · local-dev / local / node / canary)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • run-pickup-stall · runs app-generated source against a registered step (tanstack-start) · at 18:19:26Z · abandoned wrun_01M3SRNFTA4VSZPMPBGWQS7VB9
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 18:19:28Z · abandoned wrun_01M3SRNFT30SG950ZBG5FYHXQM
  • run-pickup-stall · hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack) · at 18:24:53Z · abandoned wrun_01M3SRZFFQJW5NG0JW0HJN1CSD
  • run-pickup-stall · ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class (nextjs-webpack) · at 18:26:18Z · abandoned wrun_01M3SS21MDHBR3XA890J58VAF5

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3904 0 875 4779
✅ 💻 Local Development 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 📦 Local Production 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 🪟 Windows 342 0 12 354
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 84 152
✅ dynamic-runs 0 0 0 0
✅ vercel-http-transport 879 0 183 1062
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 595 0 113 708
Total 19033 0 2917 21950
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 142 0 35
✅ astro-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ example-node 142 0 35
✅ example-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ express-node 142 0 35
✅ express-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ fastify-node 142 0 35
✅ fastify-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ hono-node 142 0 35
✅ hono-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nest-node 142 0 35
✅ nest-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 169 0 8
✅ nitro-node 142 0 35
✅ nitro-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nuxt-node 142 0 35
✅ nuxt-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ python-node 66 0 111
✅ sveltekit-node 161 0 16
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 161 0 16
✅ tanstack-start-node 142 0 35
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ vite-node 142 0 35
✅ vite-quickjs 142 0 35

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 171 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 171 0 6

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 84

✅ dynamic-runs

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-vercel 0 0 0
✅ example-vercel 0 0 0
✅ express-vercel 0 0 0
✅ fastify-vercel 0 0 0
✅ hono-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nest-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nitro-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nuxt-vercel 0 0 0
✅ sveltekit-vercel 0 0 0
✅ tanstack-start-vercel 0 0 0
✅ vite-vercel 0 0 0

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 142 0 35
✅ express 142 0 35
✅ hono 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack 169 0 8
✅ nitro 142 0 35
✅ vite 142 0 35

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 142 0 35
✅ express 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack 169 0 8
✅ vite 142 0 35

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 42 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ step-vs-timer-early-settlement completed 8 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 265.9 KiB (±0) 97.2 KiB (±0) 1.98 MiB (+1.4 KiB)
nextjs-turbopack 273.3 KiB (±0) 426 B (±0) 979.6 KiB (+581 B)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

a50ad75 · run

@shalabhc shalabhc left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general do we have a policy on when we fall back to HTTP? Do we see long term always maintaining the HTTP fallback path?

Behavior changes flagged by agent below, with my comments below.

  1. Declined writers now stop after one HTTP failure: this changes existing behavior (ws-stream-session.ts:303-305, :354-363).
    Repro: upgrade declined, first writeHttp rejects with a 503.
    On main: write fails, next write succeeds, close() succeeds (closeHttp called once).
    On this PR: write fails, next write fails, close() fails, and closeHttp is never called.

    Is this intentional? Can we add a test?

  2. A drain that arrives during a throttle wait drops the writer to HTTP for good (:500/:740-745, :846).

    Repro: 429 with retryAfter: '1', then drain{max_duration}.
    The resend throws NotSent because the mode is draining. fallbackToHttpBeforeSend then closes the socket from the client side with 1000, and every later write goes over HTTP.
    Result: 1 socket, both writes over HTTP, closed: [[1000,'HTTP fallback before send']].
    It's safe, but this is the normal drain-and-reconnect case, now losing the socket for good.
    Suggested fix: when mode === 'draining' after the wait, await transportDecision and try again, instead of treating the resend as not sent.

    Seems like we shouldn't fallback to http here?

  3. A TCP reset after a 429 fails the writer instead of falling back (:662-668).

    Repro: 429, then error(ECONNRESET) and close 1006. The write rejects with ECONNRESET, and writeHttp is never called.
    At that moment nothing is outstanding and the throttled request did not apply, so HTTP would be safe.
    The 'error' handler after open calls failUnknown without checking throttledSocket. handleSocketClose is the only place that checks it.
    The old-server contract is a clean close after the error. But an abrupt reset (for example, a proxy tearing down under load, which is exactly what 429s coincide with) takes the fatal path.
    Suggested fix: in the post-open 'error' handler, when !this.pending && socket === this.throttledSocket, switch to HTTP.

  4. When the budget runs out after the socket has closed, the writer fails rather than trying HTTP (:1027-1040).

    Repro: 429 with retryAfter: '60', then close. The write fails in about 1 ms without trying HTTP.

    Maybe ok, but unsure if http has a separate retry allowance in which case an http retry may be fine?

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
…l throttle waits on dispose

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
…ins; hand them to HTTP on reset or budget exhaustion

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>

@shalabhc shalabhc left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving but curious about your thoughts on this. Could be documented in the protocol spec.

In general do we have a policy on when we fall back to HTTP? Do we see long term always maintaining the HTTP fallback path?

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review: no blocking issues

* whose socket closed meanwhile, or one past the budget, throws
* StreamWsRequestNotSentError, which callers turn into an HTTP fallback.
*/
private async requestRetryingThrottle(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Note

This conflicts with #4510, which adds a maxMessageBytes argument to request() and passes it from the write() loop. Git flags the import and protocol-comment hunks, but there is also a conflict it won't flag: after resolving those, write() passes a 5th argument to requestRetryingThrottle, which doesn't accept it. Whichever PR lands second has to add the parameter here and forward it to request().

I merged the two locally, forwarded the arg, and ran a few combined cases (not committed). All passed:

  • a 429 on the second byte-split request resends only that request, with chunkSeq advanced past the first (acked) request and the same body
  • a retryAfter over the budget on the second request sends only the unapplied tail to HTTP (not the acked first request), and later writes stay on HTTP without a reconnect
  • a throttle resend followed by a single chunk too large for one message sends that chunk over HTTP

So the two features compose once the argument is threaded through.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ignore

* likewise never replayed. The whole WebSocket-message ceiling is deliberately
* closes from executing and poisons the writer. The exception is a correlated
* 429, which did not apply: a client with no other request outstanding may
* resend it after `retryAfter`. An unknown client outcome is never replayed. The whole WebSocket-message ceiling is deliberately

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Nit

This comment line wasn't re-wrapped after the insertion (about 130 columns).

"@workflow/world-vercel": patch
---

Retry throttled (429) stream WebSocket writes and closes after `Retry-After`, moving to HTTP when the socket closes or the wait budget runs out, and retry a close 5xx over HTTP instead of failing the writer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Nit

This ends up in the end-user changelog. Something like "Retry throttled stream WebSocket writes and closes" is enough. The HTTP handoff and close-5xx details belong in the docs, which already cover them.

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fine as is I think

@alangenfeld
alangenfeld merged commit 0648d16 into main Sep 30, 2026
320 of 325 checks passed
@alangenfeld
alangenfeld deleted the alangenfeld/ws-stream-client-retry-429 branch September 30, 2026 19:45
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 0648d16 (AI decision).

The change builds entirely on the experimental workflow-stream-ws/v1 transport, which does not exist on stable — git ls-tree origin/stable shows no packages/world-vercel/src/ws-stream-session.ts, no stream-ws-protocol-v1.ts, and no docs/content/worlds/ tree. The only touched file present on stable is event-retry.ts, and its edit (generalizing createThrottleWaiter and adding abort support to sleep) is refactoring to serve the main-only WebSocket caller, not a fix for any defect on the maintenance line.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

0648d1684cbc86482c8c43de60b975cffc745185

This branch was successfully deployed

18 active (17 outdated) deployments
Preview – workflow-docs — a50ad752 Deployed Sep 30, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-swc-playground — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-tanstack-start-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nestjs-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-vite-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-astro-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-express-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-tarballs — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-hono-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-web — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-python-workflow — 8249f2a0 Deployed Sep 24, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants