chore: upgrade dependencies and add pnpm overrides#63
Open
klkch wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
@klkch is attempting to deploy a commit to the UWindsorCSS Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What are you trying to accomplish?
Upgrade Next.js 14.2.3 -> 16, which was affected by CVE-2025-55182. I figured I would upgrade React 18 -> 19 and Prisma 5 -> 6 as well
How are you accomplishing it?
Upgrading Next.js, React, Prisma, etc. Fixing breaking changes from the upgrade and migrating to ESLint 9.
Is there anything reviewers should know?
mise.toml is included for local dev setup, no effect on production.
Azure AD has been renamed to Microsoft Entra ID, so I changed the auth config as well. I haven't tested this with actual prod keys, but the schema was updated to include the new "issuer" instead of "tenantId".
Yes