Skip to content

Dev - #598

Merged
yungwine merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
dev
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

Dev#598
yungwine merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
dev

Conversation

@yungwine

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-14T11:02:50.390911Z b692a30 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b692a306fc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread mytoncore/mytoncore.py
Comment on lines +2578 to +2579
if self.is_pool_v2_ready_to_stake(pool):
return pool

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Skip v2 pools unusable by this validator

When poolsDir contains multiple active, open v2 pools, this returns the first one without checking whether the configured validator has a proxy or any stakeable balance there. ElectionEntry then fails in GetStake or get_validator_proxy_v2, so a later usable pool is never examined and the validator can miss the election. Include validator-specific eligibility in the readiness check or continue to the next pool when those checks fail.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@yungwine
yungwine merged commit 9666dbb into master Sep 14, 2026
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant