Kconfig and const cleanups#461
Merged
plbossart merged 3 commits intothesofproject:topic/sof-devfrom Dec 18, 2018
Merged
Conversation
Fix compilation issues reported by 0day-Kbuild with sparc64 w/ SOF. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Simplify selection of SND_SOC_SOF. It used to be selected following the module dependencies but since the module/buit-in selection is only done at the top-level it can be selected from the top-level. Also add dependency on SOC_SOC_ACPI This fixes compilation issues with sparc64 allyesconfig reported by 0day/kbuild Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
f91b468 ('ASoC: SOF: make ops constant') missed a couple of places when const can be used. Fix. Signed-off-by: Libin Yang <libin.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
plbossart
force-pushed
the
fix/sof-updates-20181217
branch
from
6f3a1ae to
2019fcc
Compare
|
@plbossart |
|
@plbossart |
bardliao
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2019
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821607 commit 1cec3f2 upstream. This fixes a longstanding lockdep warning triggered by fstests/btrfs/011. Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /btrfs $ btrfs scrub start -B /btrfs In fact we have fs_info::scrub_workers_refcnt to track if the init and destroy of the scrub workers are needed. So once we have incremented and decremented the fs_info::scrub_workers_refcnt value in the thread, its ok to drop the scrub_lock, and then actually do the btrfs_destroy_workqueue() part. So this patch drops the scrub_lock before calling btrfs_destroy_workqueue(). [359.258534] ====================================================== [359.260305] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [359.261938] 5.0.0-rc6-default #461 Not tainted [359.263135] ------------------------------------------------------ [359.264672] btrfs/20975 is trying to acquire lock: [359.265927] 00000000d4d32bea ((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.268416] [359.268416] but task is already holding lock: [359.270061] 0000000053ea26a6 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x322/0x590 [btrfs] [359.272418] [359.272418] which lock already depends on the new lock. [359.272418] [359.274692] [359.274692] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [359.276671] [359.276671] -> #3 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}: [359.278187] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9c0 [359.279086] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x31/0x100 [btrfs] [359.280421] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1e4/0x9e0 [btrfs] [359.281931] close_ctree+0x30b/0x350 [btrfs] [359.283208] generic_shutdown_super+0x64/0x100 [359.284516] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [359.285658] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0xa0 [btrfs] [359.286964] deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 [359.288242] cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70 [359.289310] task_work_run+0x98/0xc0 [359.290428] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x83/0x90 [359.291445] do_syscall_64+0x15b/0x180 [359.292598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.294011] [359.294011] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}: [359.295432] __sb_start_write+0x113/0x1d0 [359.296394] start_transaction+0x369/0x500 [btrfs] [359.297471] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2aa/0x7c0 [btrfs] [359.298629] normal_work_helper+0xcd/0x530 [btrfs] [359.299698] process_one_work+0x246/0x610 [359.300898] worker_thread+0x3c/0x390 [359.302020] kthread+0x116/0x130 [359.303053] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [359.304152] [359.304152] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}: [359.306100] process_one_work+0x21f/0x610 [359.307302] worker_thread+0x3c/0x390 [359.308465] kthread+0x116/0x130 [359.309357] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [359.310229] [359.310229] -> #0 ((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name){+.+.}: [359.311812] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [359.312929] flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x540 [359.313845] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.314761] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x240 [359.315754] btrfs_destroy_workqueue+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [359.317245] scrub_workers_put+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [359.318585] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x336/0x590 [btrfs] [359.319944] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.19+0x179/0x1bb [btrfs] [359.321622] btrfs_ioctl+0x28a4/0x2e40 [btrfs] [359.322908] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.324021] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [359.325066] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [359.326236] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x180 [359.327379] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.328772] [359.328772] other info that might help us debug this: [359.328772] [359.330990] Chain exists of: [359.330990] (wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->scrub_lock [359.330990] [359.334376] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [359.334376] [359.336020] CPU0 CPU1 [359.337070] ---- ---- [359.337821] lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); [359.338506] lock(sb_internal#2); [359.339506] lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); [359.341461] lock((wq_completion)"%s-%s""btrfs", name); [359.342437] [359.342437] *** DEADLOCK *** [359.342437] [359.343745] 1 lock held by btrfs/20975: [359.344788] #0: 0000000053ea26a6 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x322/0x590 [btrfs] [359.346778] [359.346778] stack backtrace: [359.347897] CPU: 0 PID: 20975 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-rc6-default #461 [359.348983] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626cc-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [359.350501] Call Trace: [359.350931] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [359.351676] print_circular_bug.isra.37.cold.56+0x15c/0x195 [359.353569] check_prev_add.constprop.44+0x4f9/0x750 [359.354849] ? check_prev_add.constprop.44+0x286/0x750 [359.356505] __lock_acquire+0xb84/0xf10 [359.357505] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [359.358271] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.359098] flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x540 [359.359912] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x540 [359.360740] ? drain_workqueue+0x1e/0x180 [359.361565] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.362391] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x180 [359.363193] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x240 [359.364539] btrfs_destroy_workqueue+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [359.365673] scrub_workers_put+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [359.366618] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x336/0x590 [btrfs] [359.367594] ? start_transaction+0xa1/0x500 [btrfs] [359.368679] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.19+0x179/0x1bb [btrfs] [359.369545] btrfs_ioctl+0x28a4/0x2e40 [btrfs] [359.370186] ? __lock_acquire+0x263/0xf10 [359.370777] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [359.371392] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [359.372248] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [359.372786] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xc0 [359.373662] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.374552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6d0 [359.375378] ? do_sigaction+0xff/0x250 [359.376233] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [359.376954] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [359.377772] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x180 [359.378841] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [359.380422] RIP: 0033:0x7f5429296a97 Backporting to older kernels: scrub_nocow_workers must be freed the same way as the others. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
update misses from last week