Repository navigation
refactor(mobile): group native chat message presentation - #34424
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
 |
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check |  |
The description explains the refactor and validation, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the required ELI5, What Changed, Why, Linked Issue, Visual Proof, AI Disclosure, Review, bo… | Rewrite the description using all required template headings. Add a linked issue, explain why the approach was selected, provide visual proof or state N/A with a reason, complete the Testing and Checklist sections, address AI Disclosure as … |
| Docstring Coverage |  |
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within survi… | Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold. |
-
Check name Status Explanation Title check The title clearly and concisely describes the primary change: grouping native chat message presentation files under the transcript owner. Linked Issues check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Out of Scope Changes check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The description explains the refactor and validation, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the required ELI5, What Changed, Why, Linked Issue, Visual Proof, AI Disclosure, Review, boundary, Notes, and Checklist sections.
Resolution
Rewrite the description using all required template headings. Add a linked issue, explain why the approach was selected, provide visual proof or state N/A with a reason, complete the Testing and Checklist sections, address AI Disclosure as applicable, and include the required review, boundary, and Notes information.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 1 functions across 50 files. (8 skipped: 2 unsupported, 6 over the file limit.)
Resolution
Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Finishing Touches: 💡 1
-
📝 Generate docstrings: 💡
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
Mobile native-chat message presentation is spread across the session directory. Group its 23 implementation and test files under the existing transcript owner, update callers and mocks, and import shared types from their concrete defining modules.
Preserve rendering, send timing, draft restoration, and native/web behavior. Move the seven existing reasoning-row cases into a focused sibling suite so the relocated test stays within the file-size limit. Update the existing send-test paths in reliability policy without changing counts or rules.
Validation: normal commit hooks; 301 mobile tests across 34 suites; mobile app and test typechecks; 32 mobile-web tests; flaky-test and reliability ratchets. Independent source audits, the complete changed-file checks, hosted CI, and merge preservation checks are required before merge.