Repository navigation
fix(runtime): bring terminal-send-method under the line limit - #34257
AmoabaKelvin wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
 |
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check |  |
The description explains the line-limit problem and the implementation change, but it omits most required template sections, including ELI5, explicit What Changed and Why sections, a linked issue in t… | Complete the required template sections. Add ELI5, What Changed, Why, and a valid linked issue reference. Add Visual Proof with N/A and a reason if there is no visual or interaction change. Document testing and platform coverage, complete t… |
| Docstring Coverage | |
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within survi… | Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold. |
-
Check name Status Explanation Title check The title clearly identifies the main change: reducing terminal-send-method.ts below the line limit. It is concise and specific. Linked Issues check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Out of Scope Changes check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The description explains the line-limit problem and the implementation change, but it omits most required template sections, including ELI5, explicit What Changed and Why sections, a linked issue in the required format, visual proof or N/A, testing details and checkboxes, review, boundary status, notes, and the checklist.
Resolution
Complete the required template sections. Add ELI5, What Changed, Why, and a valid linked issue reference. Add Visual Proof with N/A and a reason if there is no visual or interaction change. Document testing and platform coverage, complete the testing checkboxes, state AI disclosure when applicable, complete Review and Agent skill upstream boundary, address the Notes items, and complete the Checklist.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 1 functions across 2 files.
Resolution
Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Finishing Touches: 💡 1
-
📝 Generate docstrings: 💡
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
Superseded by #34256. |
#33957 and #33968 each added lines to
terminal-send-method.tsand passed on their own. Merged together, they took it to 301 lines against the 300 cap, so lint is red on main.The handler's first step, the size limits and the legacy AI Vault resume guard for the typed text and a resolved launch draft, moves into
terminal-send-text-admission.tsunchanged and in the same order. No behaviour change.