Repository navigation
det: a packed or binary item compared with a nonnumeric operand is refused, IBM rejects it (C13) (Part of #4702) - #5797
Merged
Conversation
…fused (C13) (Part of #4702) IBM's numeric / nonnumeric comparison table has no entry for a native numeric item, so IBM rejects the program; the port compared its digits like GnuCOBOL. Refused by name for alphanumeric, numeric-edited and group comparands. No burned estate moves (det_port check: 146/146 unchanged). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
squid-protocol
added
the
shepherd:merge
Owner
Author
|
No description provided. |
squid-protocol
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 20, 2026 23:44
Owner
Author
|
No description provided. |
squid-protocol
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 20, 2026 23:47
Contributor
8 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist: done [c:3d872fbb]
Part of #4702.
What
IBM's numeric / nonnumeric comparison table (Language Reference 6.4, "General relation conditions") has no entry for a packed, binary or COMP-5 item against an alphanumeric, edited or group operand, so IBM rejects the program. The det port compared the item's digits like GnuCOBOL.
Gen.digits_as_textnow refuses it by name (C13), either way round; EVALUATE / THRU / 88 forms go through the sameGen.cmppath. Floating point was already refused (C6).Burned-estate evidence (grep before refusing)
det_port.py checkagainst origin/main over all 146 cases of the six burned estates (CardDemo, CBSA, GenApp, zECS, DBB MortgageApplication, cicsdev async credit-card): 146/146 ports unchanged. No burned program compares a packed or binary item with a nonnumeric one, so no golden, ledger or evidence record moves.Class table (native item vs nonnumeric comparand)
Tests / gates
EDCMP/GRPCMPlost their packed / binary lines; both re-run against GnuCOBOL in Docker (EQUIVALENCE_E2E=1, 6 passed).register.py --check,test_cobolrt_rules.py,pr_gates --fast(7/7),pr_gates --ratchets(8 pass, 0 skipped).Cross-repo: none.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 noreply@anthropic.com
🤖 Generated with Claude Code