Repository navigation
docs: expand Claim 3 with grammar-staleness timeline, log m4/batch under Claim 1 - #1562
Merged
squid-protocol merged 1 commit intoAug 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…der Claim 1 Two additions to why_gitgalaxy_beats_ast_here.md, both from a follow-up discussion after #1427/Claim 3 landed: - Claim 3's evidence now includes the actual tree-sitter-c-sharp bug-tracker trail for the ref/struct gap (issue #14 fixed 2022, issue #361 still open since Dec 2024 documenting the exact "one error corrupts the whole file" cascade in the maintainers' own words, PR #439 cataloging 8 more known gaps as of Aug 2026) -- answers "how long can tree-sitter be out of date" with sourced evidence instead of speculation, and a new subsection ("Why GitGalaxy doesn't hit this particular wall") generalizes the underlying reason: GitGalaxy's narrow four-signal contract (classes, functions, arguments, structural signatures -- never a full parse tree) exempts it from the specific constraints that cause this class of failure in a real grammar (canonical-tree-for-every-permutation, global coherence, full versioned grammar-surface tracking). - Logs m4 (confirmed, already implemented, same body-read idiom as bash/perl) and batch (same shape, but NOT yet implemented -- language_standards.py's batch entry has empty rules) as two more instances of Claim 1's shape, so batch doesn't get lost as a one-off observation before a future harden-language-extraction pass picks it up. No code change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
squid-protocol
deleted the
docs/beats-ast-tree-sitter-staleness-m4-batch
branch
August 14, 2026 04:34
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
gh api/WebFetch, not recalled): issue chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6 #14 (fixed 2022), issue Scope the Exfiltration Distance Check to real function boundaries (#102) #361 (still open since Dec 2024, the maintainers' own words confirm the exact "one error corrupts the whole file" cascade), PR docs: auto-update LLM architectural brief #439 (Aug 2026, documenting 8 more known gaps). Answers "how long can tree-sitter be out of date" with sourced evidence.language_standards.py's batch entry has empty rules) as two more Claim 1 instances, so batch's gap doesn't get lost as a one-off chat observation.Docs only, no code change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code