Repository navigation
Support mod.metafunc() call - #691
Merged
Merged
Conversation
8 of 21 tasks
antocuni
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2026
antocuni
left a comment
antocuni
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
Should we also do the same for @blue.generic functions?
paugier
force-pushed
the
mod-dot-meta_func
branch
from
September 23, 2026 07:46
739a561 to
c226e8d
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I added another failing test for generic functions called as module |
Contributor
Author
|
@antocuni it seems to me that it's mergeable. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SPy fails to call a metafunc like this
mymod.foo(5).Using
W_Func.op_METACALLin module.py fixes this issue.