Fixed Doc Comment Typo in Linewritershim#157603
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @jhpratt (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
|
Can you actually change this to "if and only if"? I'm fairly certain the current spelling was deliberate (as a mathematical shorthand). You'll almost certainly need to format the code to ensure the line is wrapped properly. |
Changed the doc comment of the `flush_if_completed_line` function to use explicit 'if and only if' instead of it's shorthand 'iff'.
14b5b2a to
d412ac1
Compare
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #154543 (Fix deref field pattern suggestions and improve error messages) - #157476 (Adopt to LLVM 23 CfiFunctionIndex change) - #157542 (Reject `#[repr(packed)]` on `#[pin_v2]` types) - #157603 (Fixed Doc Comment Typo in Linewritershim) - #157624 (Move AttributeTemplate from rustc_feature to rustc_attr_parsing)
Rollup merge of #157603 - innin-jam:fix-doc-comment-typo-in-std, r=jhpratt Fixed Doc Comment Typo in Linewritershim The doc comment of the `flush_if_completed_line` function spelt 'if' as 'iff'.
The doc comment of the
flush_if_completed_linefunction spelt 'if' as 'iff'.