new lint null_pointer_optimization#10960
Conversation
|
r? @Alexendoo (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
778fcee to
55c3023
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #10951) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
55c3023 to
f4abdab
Compare
|
Sometimes you do need a |
|
IIUC, |
f4abdab to
cf628b1
Compare
|
So technically yeah you can move the |
|
We could probably add an additional check for Description should probably be updated (again!) to mention |
cf628b1 to
9dbcf93
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #11316) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Hey this is triage, I'm closing this due to inactivity. Currently, @Centri3 sadly doesn't have the time to continue this implementation. If anyone is interested in continuing this PR, you're more than welcome to create a new PR and push it over the finish line. :D Thank you to @Centri3 and the reviewers for the time, that you already put into this! @rustbot label +S-inactive-closed -S-waiting-on-author -S-waiting-on-review |
Although this doesn't close #9983, I think this is good enough and is more general than such a change to
large_enum_variant:)changelog: New lint [
null_pointer_optimization]