Repository navigation
refactor(lockfile): Make diffing/printing more reusable - #13564
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
rustbot
added
Command-generate-lockfile
S-waiting-on-review
weihanglo
reviewed
Mar 11, 2024
weihanglo
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
Member
|
Thanks. Looks good. @bors r+ |
Contributor
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Contributor
|
👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Changes must be made through a pull request. |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
Update cargo 9 commits in a4c63fe5388beaa09e5f91196c86addab0a03580..7065f0ef4aa267a7455e1c478b5ccacb7baea59c 2024-03-06 22:15:17 +0000 to 2024-03-12 13:25:15 +0000 - chore: remove repetitive word (rust-lang/cargo#13575) - refactor(lockfile): Make diffing/printing more reusable (rust-lang/cargo#13564) - test: Add tests for using worktrees and sparse checkouts (rust-lang/cargo#13567) - util/network/http: Use `cargo/1.2.3` user-agent header (rust-lang/cargo#13548) - fix: Consistently compare MSRVs (rust-lang/cargo#13537) - refactor(shell): Use alternate to close links (rust-lang/cargo#13562) - fix(doc): Collapse down Generated statuses without --verbose (rust-lang/cargo#13557) - doc: Add doc for -Zpublic-dependency (rust-lang/cargo#13556) - docs: add link to the exported_private_dependencies lint (rust-lang/cargo#13547) r? ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
This is prep for #13561 so we can tailor the printing of lockfile changes to each use without a bunch of flags.
How should we test and review this PR?
Additional information