[derrik-fleming]

Summary

• updates the configuration example in the documentation, it was incomplete and missing an expected value, max_file_size.

Test plan

adding the value to my config allowed rtk to successfully parse it

• cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test
• Manual testing: rtk <command> output inspected

Important: All PRs must target the develop branch (not master).
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[pszymkowiak]

Verified this is a real bug, not just a cosmetic doc gap: copying the current docs example verbatim (with a [tee] section, no max_file_size) produces a hard TOML parse failure:

rtk: TOML parse error at line 17, column 1
   |
17 | [tee]
   | ^^^^^
missing field `max_file_size`

Root cause: TeeConfig::max_file_size (src/core/tee.rs) has no #[serde(default)], unlike the top-level tee field on RtkConfig which defaults only when the whole [tee] section is absent. So: no [tee] section → fine; [tee] section present but missing max_file_size → hard parse error, exactly what the previous docs example triggered.

With the PR's added line (max_file_size = 1048576, matching DEFAULT_MAX_FILE_SIZE in tee.rs), the same config parses cleanly. Minimal, accurate, one-line fix. Approving.