feat(mainnet): include all benchmarks

[al3mart]

Adds to mainnet runtime benchmarks for all pallets.

• Remove default weight configuration.
• Include pallets in define_benchmarks
• Script to easily run benchmarks across machines

Depends on:

• Inclusion of XCM benchmarks in mainnet runtime: feat(mainnet): include xcm benchmarks #479

---

On introducing the benchmarks, these are also refactored into pop_runtime_common, such that they can be used from any of the runtimes. This refactor is pushed in: da0aedf

---

Closes: #435

[sc-2757]

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 4.55779% with 3518 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.51%. Comparing base (a51ea5f) to head (c9aa96b).
⚠️ Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_revive.rs	8.41%	588 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_nfts.rs	0.00%	379 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_assets.rs	0.00%	315 Missing ⚠️
...n/src/weights/xcm/pallet_xcm_benchmarks_generic.rs	0.00%	265 Missing ⚠️
runtime/mainnet/src/config/xcm_weights.rs	0.00%	221 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_xcm.rs	0.00%	191 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_collective.rs	0.00%	171 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_scheduler.rs	0.00%	158 Missing ⚠️
runtime/common/src/weights/pallet_preimage.rs	0.00%	126 Missing ⚠️
...me/common/src/weights/pallet_collator_selection.rs	11.45%	116 Missing ⚠️
... and 20 more

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #478       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   74.69%   63.51%   -11.18%     
===========================================
  Files          98      125       +27     
  Lines       19424    23099     +3675     
  Branches    19424    23099     +3675     
===========================================
+ Hits        14508    14672      +164     
- Misses       4649     8160     +3511     
  Partials      267      267               

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
runtime/common/src/lib.rs	85.24% <ø> (ø)
runtime/common/src/weights/block_weights.rs	81.81% <ø> (ø)
runtime/common/src/weights/extrinsic_weights.rs	81.81% <ø> (ø)
runtime/common/src/weights/paritydb_weights.rs	73.33% <ø> (ø)
runtime/common/src/weights/rocksdb_weights.rs	73.33% <ø> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/config/assets.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/config/collation.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/config/governance.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/config/proxy.rs	92.30% <ø> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/config/revive.rs	94.50% <ø> (ø)
... and 34 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[peterwht]

Incredibly clean PR. I've got no concerns. Will wait to approve until after XCM is merged

[Daanvdplas]

The weight results are a little bit concerning to me as there are many differences when comparing it to asset hub or the other project that we work on. Also, have you thought about putting the weight functions we use for the runtimes in a common folder?

[al3mart]

I've re-excetued the benchmarks now and using a configuration with more steps and repetitions. I can see complexity parameters being included in the results now. cc @Daanvdplas

Although, I can still see some divergence between the #read/writes in these results and what we have seen in other places. I believe some related to balances are influenced by the existence of MaintenanceAccount.