Ongoing changes in the representation of coordinate reference systems in the PROJ, external software used by sf, sp and other R packages, will impact R packages and workflows using these packages. In particular, the changes affect transformation between coordinate reference systems, as for example shown in this presentation at the OpenGeoHub Summer School 2019.
-
Invite users/developers to contribute cases
-
Add other examples and links, also from other geospatial software.
GDAL RFC 73: https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc73_proj6_wkt2_srsbarn.html
Notes from Spatialite
PROJ wiki proj.h adoption status
GRASS-dev thread and PR
PostGIS blog posting
cartography CRS issues
geojsonio geojsonio seems vulnerable to PROJ 6
MODIS getTile() sp subset or raster::crop issues with PROJ 6.1 and GDAL 3.0
MODIStsp PROJ 6 failures in MODIStsp
rangeMapper PROJ 6 failures in rangeMapper
rdefra PROJ 6 failures in rdefra
rnrfa PROJ 6 failures in rnfra
rshapemapper PROJ 6 problems?
Incomplete list of packages with CRAN issues after PROJ 6.2.0 installed on some test machines:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_foieGras.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_plotKML.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rangeMapper.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rnrfa.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_sf.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vapour.html
- Provide recommendations for checking/testing PROJ versions in use and expected transformation outcomes.
See also r-spatial/sf#1146 for sf and rgdal reprex with PROJ 4.9.3/GDAL 2.4.2 output from the same file contrasted with PROJ 6.2.0/GDAL 3.0.1.
This issue is based on https://github.com/rsbivand/geostat19_talk; https://rsbivand.github.io/geostat19_talk/Discuss_issue_drafts.html
Ongoing changes in the representation of coordinate reference systems in the PROJ, external software used by sf, sp and other R packages, will impact R packages and workflows using these packages. In particular, the changes affect transformation between coordinate reference systems, as for example shown in this presentation at the OpenGeoHub Summer School 2019.
Invite users/developers to contribute cases
Add other examples and links, also from other geospatial software.
GDAL RFC 73: https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc73_proj6_wkt2_srsbarn.html
Notes from Spatialite
PROJ wiki proj.h adoption status
GRASS-dev thread and PR
PostGIS blog posting
cartography CRS issues
geojsonio geojsonio seems vulnerable to PROJ 6
MODIS getTile() sp subset or raster::crop issues with PROJ 6.1 and GDAL 3.0
MODIStsp PROJ 6 failures in MODIStsp
rangeMapper PROJ 6 failures in rangeMapper
rdefra PROJ 6 failures in rdefra
rnrfa PROJ 6 failures in rnfra
rshapemapper PROJ 6 problems?
Incomplete list of packages with CRAN issues after PROJ 6.2.0 installed on some test machines:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_foieGras.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_plotKML.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rangeMapper.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rnrfa.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_sf.html
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vapour.html
See also r-spatial/sf#1146 for sf and rgdal reprex with PROJ 4.9.3/GDAL 2.4.2 output from the same file contrasted with PROJ 6.2.0/GDAL 3.0.1.
This issue is based on https://github.com/rsbivand/geostat19_talk; https://rsbivand.github.io/geostat19_talk/Discuss_issue_drafts.html