Skip to content

ci: note why bundler needs an in-repo lockfile - #17

Merged
jdwyah merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
qfg-dependabot-bundler-note
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

jdwyah merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
qfg-dependabot-bundler-note

Conversation

@jdwyah

@jdwyah jdwyah commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a comment-only follow-up to #16. It records in dependabot.yml why the committed lockfile must not point at ../sdk-ruby. Changing this file also starts a fresh Dependabot run, which is how I check that the bundler job is green now. A dynamic Dependabot run can't be re-run from the API.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

SSDLC sanity check: PASS

No issues found.

Model: claude-sonnet-5-5 (effort medium), commit 7a5c5b2, prompt repo@553995d. Only BLOCK fails this check. To override a BLOCK after reading it, a human adds ssdlc-approved (sanity check only, this commit only) or, in an emergency, hotfix (all checks, needs a justification and follow-up bead).

@jdwyah
jdwyah merged commit 394d164 into main Nov 2, 2026
5 checks passed
@jdwyah
jdwyah deleted the qfg-dependabot-bundler-note branch November 2, 2026 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant