Repository navigation
Generate better error message for incompatible **kwargs #8874
Description
Activity
I believe there should be multiple error messages, to inform of all callable argument type mismatch.
Can I work on it??
Sure, I have not been able to continue work on it, feel free to do so. Take a look at the PR I made, let me know if you need help!
@rohitkg98 I was looking at your PR and I saw that it passed all the checks then why it was not merged?
I am new to open source. Can you please help and guide me on how to work on this issue & why was your code not merged?is this issue still open?
One idea for a note:
...: note: Consider using a TypedDict type or "Dict[str, Any]" for the ** argumentHi, I plan to work on this issue.
My take on this issue is that as discussed in #8772 this behavior is to be expected, and an error message should indeed be thrown.
But the message needs improvement. I will implement what has been proposed in PR #8960 by gvanrossum and modify existing tests accordingly in order to get it merged.As a new and inexperienced contributor I'm open to any suggestions or comments.
Hello,
I could really use someone's opinion on this case :def f(a: int = 42, b: str = "hello world"): ... d = dict(a=3, b="Bye") # is inferred as Dict[str, object] f(**d)
This code cannot be statically typed, and so we should indicate to the user a way of making it work.
My question is : which of the following solution is the best ? My personal opinion is that the first one should be preferred, because it seems safer.Solution 1
from typing import TypedDict class Params(TypedDict): a: int b: str d: Params = dict(a=3, b="hello") f(**d)
Solution 2
d: Dict[str, Any] = dict(a=3, b="hello") f(**d)
I think both have their place, the note Jukka suggests here #8874 (comment) seems like a good phrasing
Hi, I've been looking into this issue and would like to work on a fix. I've reviewed the prior attempt in #17186 and noticed it stalled after a review comment suggesting the note should reference **kwargs: Any annotation syntax rather than Dict[str, Any], since that's what a user would actually write in their function signature. I plan to address that feedback in a fresh implementation. I'll comment here before opening a PR if I have questions about the intended approach.
This output is from #8772:
The error messages are pretty confusing. We should special case this and produce a customized error message that explains the situation better.
Here's the code that triggers the errors:
Some ideas about what to do:
Dict[str, Any]or a TypedDict type for the**kwargsargument.