bpo-41877 Check for asert, aseert, assrt in mocks#23165
Merged
gpshead merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom Nov 5, 2020
vabr-g:more-assert-typos-issue-41877
Merged
bpo-41877 Check for asert, aseert, assrt in mocks#23165gpshead merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom vabr-g:more-assert-typos-issue-41877
gpshead merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
vabr-g:more-assert-typos-issue-41877
Conversation
Currently, a Mock object which is not unsafe will raise an AttributeError if an attribute with the prefix assert or assret is accessed on it. This protects against misspellings of real assert method calls, which lead to tests passing silently even if the tested code does not satisfy the intended assertion. Recently a check was done in a large code base and three more frequent ways of misspelling assert were found causing harm: asert, aseert, assrt. These are now added to the existing check.
gpshead
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2020
Member
gpshead
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like this PR. The discussion on the bug is valid but this is practical for existing unittest.mock practices used around the world today and will help prevent issues while the longer term "where do we want test assertions to go in Python" conversations continue.
Member
|
Thanks! I agree that while larger discussions of how Python's unittest and unittest.mock system design allowed this to happen in the first place are good, lets not let perfect be the enemy of the good. This is still an improvement for real world issues in code today; the larger topic will continue to be discussed. |
shihai1991
added a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2020
* origin/master: bpo-42179: Doc/tutorial: Remove mention of __cause__ (pythonGH-23162) bpo-26389: Allow passing an exception object in the traceback module (pythonGH-22610) bpo-42260: PyConfig_Read() only parses argv once (pythonGH-23168) bpo-42260: Add _PyConfig_FromDict() (pythonGH-23167) bpo-41877 Check for asert, aseert, assrt in mocks (pythonGH-23165) [docs] fix wrongly named AsyncContextDecorator (pythonGH-23164) bpo-42262: Add Py_NewRef() and Py_XNewRef() (pythonGH-23152) bpo-42266: Handle monkey-patching descriptors in LOAD_ATTR cache (pythonGH-23157) bpo-40816 Add AsyncContextDecorator class (pythonGH-20516)
shihai1991
added a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
…lots1 * origin/master: (80 commits) bpo-42282: Fold constants inside named expressions (pythonGH-23190) bpo-41028: Doc: Move switchers to docsbuild-scripts. (pythonGH-20969) bpo-42133: update parts of the stdlib to fall back to `__spec__.loader` when `__loader__` is missing (python#22929) Remove outdated reference to pywin32 from platform module (pythonGH-22005) bpo-41832: PyType_FromModuleAndSpec() now accepts NULL tp_doc (pythonGH-23123) Minor grammar edits for the descriptor howto guide (GH-python#23175) bpo-42179: Doc/tutorial: Remove mention of __cause__ (pythonGH-23162) bpo-26389: Allow passing an exception object in the traceback module (pythonGH-22610) bpo-42260: PyConfig_Read() only parses argv once (pythonGH-23168) bpo-42260: Add _PyConfig_FromDict() (pythonGH-23167) bpo-41877 Check for asert, aseert, assrt in mocks (pythonGH-23165) [docs] fix wrongly named AsyncContextDecorator (pythonGH-23164) bpo-42262: Add Py_NewRef() and Py_XNewRef() (pythonGH-23152) bpo-42266: Handle monkey-patching descriptors in LOAD_ATTR cache (pythonGH-23157) bpo-40816 Add AsyncContextDecorator class (pythonGH-20516) bpo-42260: Add _PyInterpreterState_SetConfig() (pythonGH-23158) Disable peg generator tests when building with PGO (pythonGH-23141) bpo-1635741: _sqlite3 uses PyModule_AddObjectRef() (pythonGH-23148) bpo-1635741: Fix PyInit_pyexpat() error handling (pythonGH-22489) bpo-42260: Main init modify sys.flags in-place (pythonGH-23150) ...
adorilson
pushed a commit
to adorilson/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
Currently, a Mock object which is not unsafe will raise an AttributeError if an attribute with the prefix assert or assret is accessed on it. This protects against misspellings of real assert method calls, which lead to tests passing silently even if the tested code does not satisfy the intended assertion. Recently a check was done in a large code base (Google) and three more frequent ways of misspelling assert were found causing harm: asert, aseert, assrt. These are now added to the existing check.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, a Mock object which is not unsafe will raise an
AttributeError if an attribute with the prefix assert or assret is
accessed on it. This protects against misspellings of real assert
method calls, which lead to tests passing silently even if the tested
code does not satisfy the intended assertion.
Recently a check was done in a large code base and three more frequent
ways of misspelling assert were found causing harm: asert, aseert,
assrt. These are now added to the existing check.
https://bugs.python.org/issue41877