gh-115011: Improve support of __index__() in setters of members with unsigned integer type#115029
Merged
serhiy-storchaka merged 2 commits intopython:mainfrom Feb 11, 2024
Merged
Conversation
… with unsigned integer type Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning.
serhiy-storchaka
added
needs backport to 3.11
Member
Author
|
Thanks @serhiy-storchaka for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12. |
|
Sorry, @serhiy-storchaka, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
Sorry, @serhiy-storchaka, I could not cleanly backport this to |
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
to serhiy-storchaka/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…members with unsigned integer type (pythonGH-115029) Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning. (cherry picked from commit d9d6909) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
|
GH-115294 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
to serhiy-storchaka/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…members with unsigned integer type (pythonGH-115029) Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning. (cherry picked from commit d9d6909) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
|
GH-115295 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…s with unsigned integer type (GH-115029) (GH-115294) Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning. (cherry picked from commit d9d6909)
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…s with unsigned integer type (GH-115029) (GH-115295) Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning. (cherry picked from commit d9d6909)
fsc-eriker
pushed a commit
to fsc-eriker/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2024
… with unsigned integer type (pythonGH-115029) Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a __index__() method as for int. Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a __index__() method larger than LONG_MAX. Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Setters for members with an unsigned integer type now support the same range of valid values for objects that has a
__index__()method as for int.Previously, Py_T_UINT, Py_T_ULONG and Py_T_ULLONG did not support objects that has a
__index__()method larger than LONG_MAX.Py_T_ULLONG did not support negative ints. Now it supports them and emits a RuntimeWarning.