Conversation
…ld ready-for-dev on affected stories
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 10 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a "needs-input" gate for non-blocking open questions that target specific stories. It updates apply-plan.sh to parse affected_story_ids from open questions, label affected stories with planning:needs-input (withholding their ready-for-dev status), and flag the parent epic with initiative:needs-input. Additionally, the JSON schema and the Python validation script are updated to support and validate these new fields, and comprehensive integration tests are added to verify the behavior. I have no feedback to provide as there are no review comments.
Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (no-changes)Agent reasoning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7c7613ddc7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (applied)Changes committed and pushed. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: review-changes)PR: #733 |
|
Note @don-petry I reviewed this PR and no code changes were needed, but it still has blocking checks or reviews (failing or cancelled checks, or changes-requested reviews), so I cannot mark it done yet. I'll re-check automatically. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)Agent reasoning |
|
Closing as superseded. The open-questions gate already shipped via #682 → #707 (merged) as a hard Closing to avoid layering a second, conflicting gate on top of #707. If the finer per-story behavior is ever wanted, it should be a fresh story under epic #597 (see the note on #600). Generated by Claude Code |



Closes #600
Implemented by dev-lead agent. Please review.