Nit: Remove unnecessary log over the k8s version informed for the AlphaDeprecatedAPIs - #157
Closed
camilamacedo86 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Nit: Remove unnecessary log over the k8s version informed for the AlphaDeprecatedAPIs#157camilamacedo86 wants to merge 1 commit into
camilamacedo86 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
2 tasks
camilamacedo86
changed the title
Member
|
/approve |
Member
|
/lgtm |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Nit: Remove unnecessary log over the k8s version informed for the AlphaDeprecatedAPIs
PS.: In the future, we can re-add it to info level if we address the issue: #158