Skip to content

OCPBUGS-98642 OCPBUGS-90007: Fix CVE-2026-33814 and CVE-2026-39829 - #9529

Open
Atharva-Shinde wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.21from
Atharva-Shinde:4.21-cve-fix
Open

Atharva-Shinde wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.21from
Atharva-Shinde:4.21-cve-fix

Conversation

@Atharva-Shinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What this PR does / why we need it:

Bumps golang.org/x/net and golang.org/x/crypto

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes CVE-2026-33814 and CVE-2026-39829

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Sep 7, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 39123d44-10e2-43ec-8a28-2fb59a3cb4df

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Atharva-Shinde: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98642, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101951 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.22.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

Bumps golang.org/x/net and golang.org/x/crypto

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes CVE-2026-33814 and CVE-2026-39829

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from bryan-cox and devguyio September 7, 2026 11:59
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added area/api Indicates the PR includes changes for the API and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Sep 7, 2026
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vendor only changes for api.

/approve for api

@Atharva-Shinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@red-hat-konflux

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

All PipelineRuns for this commit have already succeeded. Use /retest <pipeline-name> to re-run a specific pipeline or /test to re-run all pipelines.

@Atharva-Shinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/test verify
/test images
/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator

@jparrill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test verify

@jparrill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey @Atharva-Shinde, the verify failure is because the PR adds vendor/ directories to contrib/aws-tag-lb-service-webhook/ and contrib/gomaxprocs-webhook/ — these don't exist on main and aren't needed. Both projects build with go mod download, not vendor mode.

Remove the contrib/*/vendor/ dirs from the PR and keep only the go.mod/go.sum changes there. The api/vendor/ changes are fine.

The e2e failures are caused by a known blocker on this branch, tracked in #9736 and #9600. Once those merge and you rebase, /retest should pass.

@Atharva-Shinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

on it @jparrill thanks!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the area/ci-tooling Indicates the PR includes changes for CI or tooling label Sep 23, 2026
@devguyio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/uncc @devguyio
I'm currently out of capacity to review this PR

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot removed the request for review from devguyio September 29, 2026 23:00
@jparrill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@jparrill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Atharva-Shinde, everettraven, jparrill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 30, 2026
@clebs

clebs commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

HI @Atharva-Shinde,
Overall LGTM, verify is failing due to not updated modules.txt. You need to run make verify locally to get those changes and push them.

Comment thread go.mod Outdated
github.com/IBM/vpc-go-sdk v0.68.0
github.com/armon/go-socks5 v0.0.0-20160902184237-e75332964ef5
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.55.7
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/transfermanager v0.4.3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Were these AWS dependencies added intentionally? for what purpose?

@clebs

clebs commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@clebs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98642, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101951 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.22.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jparrill

jparrill commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jparrill: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98642, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101951 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.22.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-merge-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98642, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101951 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101951 targets the "4.22.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90007 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.22.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Atharva-Shinde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@red-hat-konflux

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

All PipelineRuns for this commit have already succeeded. Use /retest <pipeline-name> to re-run a specific pipeline or /test to re-run all pipelines.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Atharva-Shinde: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/api Indicates the PR includes changes for the API area/ci-tooling Indicates the PR includes changes for CI or tooling jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants