Skip to content

fix: nats checks were missing the configured auth - #3724

Merged
fschade merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-nats-checks
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

fschade merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-nats-checks

Conversation

@micbar

@micbar micbar commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

The nats readiness checks were not respecting the provided config for authentication.

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • test case 1:
  • test case 2:
  • ...

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation added

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity

Metric Results
Complexity 0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 0.00% diff coverage · -0.01% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation ✅ -0.01% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage ✅ 0.00% diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (af43e7d) 91768 23165 25.24%
Head commit (3662a94) 91787 (+19) 23160 (-5) 25.23% (-0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#3724) 40 0 0.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@dragonchaser dragonchaser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@fschade
fschade merged commit 4086fad into main Oct 15, 2026
61 of 62 checks passed
@fschade
fschade deleted the fix-nats-checks branch October 15, 2026 09:20
@fschade

fschade commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@micbar should we backport it?

@openclouders openclouders mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2026
@micbar

micbar commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@micbar should we backport it?

Good idea!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

nats health checks do not use the configured nats client options

4 participants