Skip to content

uv.lock: bump black to 26.10.1 - #5839

Open
pylaterreur wants to merge 3 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
pylaterreur:uv-lock-black-26.10.1
Open

pylaterreur wants to merge 3 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
pylaterreur:uv-lock-black-26.10.1

Conversation

@pylaterreur

@pylaterreur pylaterreur commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

black 26.5.1 in uv.lock is affected by GHSA-cg8m-r9f2-5wm2 (black's GitHub Action, development lock only); 26.10.1 is the first patched release. uv lock --upgrade-package black, nothing else changes.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

See contributing.md for styleguide, changelog guidelines, and more.

  • I am a human and not a bot
  • I have run tox -e precommit
  • I have run the relevant tests and linting tox environments

Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5

black 26.5.1 is affected by GHSA-cg8m-r9f2-5wm2 (CVE-2026-114134,
"Black: GitHub Action installs unvalidated required-version from
pyproject.toml"); 26.10.1 is the first patched release. black is only in
the development lock, as a dependency of datamodel-code-generator, and
the advisory is about black's GitHub Action rather than the library,
but scanners that read uv.lock report it.

This is `uv lock --upgrade-package black`, so nothing else changes.
filelock 3.32.2 stays: its advisories are fixed in 4.2.1, which
requires Python 3.11, while uv.lock resolves for Python 3.10.

Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5
@pylaterreur
pylaterreur requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 01:57
@opentelemetry-pr-dashboard

opentelemetry-pr-dashboard Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull request dashboard status

Waiting on reviewers · refreshed 2026-10-29 01:25 UTC

Review the latest changes.

Status above doesn't look right?
  • Just replied or pushed? Anything around or after the refresh time above may not be picked up yet — give it a few minutes.
  • Anything look wrong? Report it with what you expected; it helps us improve the dashboard.

@herin049 herin049 added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Oct 29, 2026
@herin049
herin049 enabled auto-merge October 29, 2026 01:21

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants